
Any charity that solicits more than $25,000 a year from the public must obtain this registration before raising money and submit to annual audits to assure that no money is used to benefit the officers through self-dealing. Schneiderman could move to enjoin the charity and even force the return of past money raised by Trump. What is known is that the Trump Foundation took in at least $1.67 million through Trump’s website. Trump has reportedly given at least $5.4 million between 1987 and 2006.
In Trump’s defense, two points should be raised. First, there is still a considerable amount of money given to charity from this foundation, even if you consider the couple of controversies that we discussed earlier. Second, for much of its history, Trump was the only donor. That would allow him to claim the minimal level of reporting and certification under Estates, Powers and Trusts Law. His attorneys did in fact file annual reports during that period in compliance with the law and there was likely no required independent audit.
The key period will be the last decade when the Foundation began to solicit donations from third parties. The gradual change may have blindsided Trump’s attorneys but it should not have. At some point, the charity had change to a major solicitor of charitable funds.
This is a serious matter because courts treat these requirements as straightforward and unrelenting standards. There is little room for interpretation. That would place the New York attorney general in a commanding position unless the certification and auditing allegations are proven false.
