Site icon JONATHAN TURLEY

University of Tampa Fires Professor For Using Hurricane Harvey To Attack GOP

We have been discussing the disciplining of professors for their statements on social media and the erosion of free speech protections for teachers outside of their schools.  As many of you know, I take a robust view of free speech rights and have been critical of the monitoring and punishment of teachers for expressing their political and social views outside of campus. The latest such controversy comes the University of Tampa where visiting assistant professor Kenneth Storey was sacked for tweeting, “I dont believe in instant karma but this kinda feels like it for Texas. Hopefully this will help them realize the GOP doesnt care about them.” Few would defend Storey’s comments which were insensitive and unthinking, but that does not alter the question of where the line is drawn for teachers in speaking publicly about politics or society. (He later apologized.)

Storey deleted the comment and (apologized) but the university still felt that he should be terminated for expressing his political opinion in this fashion. The  university’s stated:

On Sunday, Aug. 27, visiting assistant professor of sociology Kenneth Storey made comments on a private Twitter account that do not reflect UT’s community views or values. We condemn the comments and the sentiment behind them, and understand the pain this irresponsible act has caused.

Storey has been relieved of his duties at UT, and his classes will be covered by other sociology faculty.

As Floridians, we are well aware of the destruction and suffering associated with tropical weather. Our thoughts and prayers are with all impacted by Hurricane Harvey.

Of course, as a private institution, the University of Tampa is not subject to the protections of the first amendment, which bar governmental abridgment of free speech.  However, that does not relieve the university of its responsibility to maintain the free speech rights and academic freedom of its faculty.  The university does not explain when it will punish faculty for public comments or social media statements. This uncertainly creates an obvious chilling effect for faculty members who will not want to risk retaliation for controversial statements. The result will be the curtailment of free speech for academics who will not want to risk their positions.  I believe the university was wrong in taking this action rather than simply conveying its deep condemnation for the posting.

What do you think?

Exit mobile version