Site icon JONATHAN TURLEY

Honorable Civil Disobedience

By Darren Smith, Weekend Contributor

Having seen over the years protesters engaged in voicing their grievances in fashions ranging from the peaceful to the violent, I believe it is incumbent to provide guidelines in the hope of furthering a cause without the distractions that spill over into not only silencing important messages but preventing consequences that hurt others.

I propose the idea of Honorable Civil Disobedience.

(This article was published here nearly four years ago and I offer an updated version for today. Given current news events, I believe some of the readership might find it applicable.)

I must first state that these guidelines do not constitute legal advice or the need to foster discord. Such actions might result in arrest or civil implications. And while I do not encourage law breaking, for those who choose to engage in this strategy there are ways to go about such acts to minimize negative effects. Every individual should gauge the cost/benefit of their own actions and the wider costs that can lead to others behaving badly. One should also be realistic about what to expect from politicians, government or police in the country in which they live since many authoritarian nations have little if any tolerance for dissent and punish protesters severely.

What is noteworthy is that history shows more often than not that those who refuse to engage in violence or property damage better succeed in establishing a legacy that associates their names with social movements having a positive change. Well known figures such as Dr. King, Rosa Parks, Thoreau, and Gandhi are some of the most memorable and effective. Those who choose to engage in civil disobedience should at least follow an honor code to be effective in conveying the intended message.  What I mean by civil disobedience for the purpose of discussion is engaging in visible but minor violations to attract attention to a grievance or cause that ordinary public discourse or authorities fail to address.

I belive it is incumbent on those seeking change to attempt using minimal measures that are effective, to avoid demonstrations if possible and utilize proper channels to facilitate positive change. Use one’s own free thinking to decide a course of action and be especially skeptical and suspicious of opportunists, politicians, or influencers who might use you to do their bidding while insulating them from the consequences. But if you do so decide to protest or engage in civil disobedience try to understand the “big picture” and be prepared to be responsible for your own actions, especially in dealing with law enforcement and others.

It is important to recognize that the police on duty at the time are not the enemy of the cause. They are merely civil servants and generally do not make policy. The police who are assigned to the area of a demonstration are there to secure the peace and most always simply want to do their jobs and go home. They should be given a measure of respect, else if greatly pressured they are more likely to react unfavorably.

There are those who in the furtherance of the visibility of their grievance choose to be arrested, typically for minor offenses such as trespassing. This not only draws the attention of the media but conveys that their grievance is of such importance to them, they are willing to sacrifice a degree of freedom as a gesture in conveying their resolve.

The sit-in is a classic example of this. The sit-in is designed to result in a minor disruption of the target of the protest. Police will declare a protest to be unlawful and issue a warning of impending arrest to those who do not vacate.

Active resistance to the police in a sit-in is not honorable: that is, resisting arrest and engaging in tumultuous behavior. Again, the local police do not set policy and are not the enemy. It is better if one chooses a course of action that will lead to an arrest to not fight the police or members of the public. Instead some suggestions I propose to foster Honorable Civil Disobedience are as follows:

I found in the below videos there is much to be said in how to properly and honorably engage in civil disobedience. The actors held true to their message, arranged for reporters to hear grievances, and acted with dignity. They were met with great praise from observers and were very effective in drawing attention to their cause. They are a credit to what they hold dear.

~+~

~+~

And now for the fruits of Mr. Clooney and others’ Honorable Civil Disobedience. In playing the below video, there will be a link to view the video externally on YouTube. Click the link to view.

~+~

As you can see, the demonstrators accomplished national attention drawn to their cause. They were also successful in that the media then brought into their program images of the suffering residents of The Sudan, along with the imperative need to resolve the problems facing that nation. Consequently the demonstrators received a token fine of a hundred dollars and an immediate release from jail. Mr. Clooney left no doubt as to his resolve to sacrifice his freedom for an oppressed people. Yet in actuality, he paid a rather small price–all things considered–for the world-wide attention he earned.

Let us now contrast Honorable Civil Disobedience with dishonorable and disruptive behavior riotous actors show in practice: fighting; looting; attacking ordinary people and police. In the past few years in parts of the United States, and elsewhere certainly, we’ve all had to suffer the annoyances of rioters’ onslaughts. What have they earned for their criminal behavior; certainly contempt and often labels ranging from being thugs to useful idiots?

You have to wonder sometimes what actually is the message riotous demonstrators attempt to convey. Do they even know? Look at the usual result: Armed police in riot gear and counter demonstrators fighting against them. Ordinary citizens simply want the protesters run out of town and few had any sympathy for the demonstrators, much less their cause.

Nearly everything violent protesters do here serves to work against their cause and garners only contempt for them as individuals and their movement collectively.

If a particular group continues with reprehensible actions each time they organize a protest, eventually every time this protest group shows up in a city to demonstrate, they will be regarded as pariahs unworthy of respect. The message they actually conveyed focused on their actions, not their grievance. And nothing good results from their efforts.

Generally it is much better to not break the law and act with honor in all things. Don’t hurt others, leave people alone, and don’t become the evil you are advocating against. Take these tenets to heart and change the world for the better.

By Darren Smith

Video Sources: News2Share; Enough Project; and The Telegraph

The views expressed in this posting are the author’s alone and not those of the blog, the host, or other weekend bloggers. As an open forum, weekend bloggers post independently without pre-approval or review. Content and any displays or art are solely their decision and responsibility.

Exit mobile version