The public will not hear the details of the rape by the five men, their testimony, or evidence of how officials responded to the rape. Of all of the cases to be heard in India, this is the case that demands public scrutiny. Yet, Judge Yogesh Khanna turned down requests by journalists for a simple briefing on the proceedings in a harsh blackout on information.
The judge will also rule on the fate of one defendant who claims that he was 17 at the time of the crime. If treated as a juvenile, he would only be subject to three years in a reform facility if convicted as a juvenile for the brutal rape and torture of the woman and beating of her male friend.
The decision of the judge to bar the public and media as well as gag the lawyers should trigger a review of how these cases are handled in India.
Source: Daily Mail
