The contract stated that these people are now legally required to perform 1000 hours of community service, including, but not limited to, cleaning toilets at festivals, scraping chewing gum off the streets and “manually relieving sewer blockages.” It was a funny gag but one with a serious point. The “community service clause” was meant by the company “to illustrate the lack of consumer awareness of what they are signing up to when they access free wifi.”
In 2014, cybersecurity firm F-Secure did the same thing and actually got people in London to agree to give up their first born under a “Herod Clause” for WiFi.
Despite the humor in such gags, it is a disgrace that there has not been greater effort to combat these knowingly complex and convoluted contracts.
Of course, the more chilling question is who many would knowingly balance great WiFi against their eldest child.
