Adi spent his years working against human rights and denying gross violations of international law, including the gassing of civilian populations. He performed this role for 16 years in speaking for one of the most brutal dictatorships on the Earth. At the same time, he accused Israel of burning people alive and selling the organs of children.
Yet Rutgers insists that he is precisely the man that it wants teaching students with “his expertise in international law and diplomacy, and other fields.”
I fail to see how 16 years of being an apologist for a genocidal regime makes one a “diplomat” or, more importantly, an expert on international law. Adi is about as expert on international law as a Harvey Weinstein is an expert on sexual harassment.
