He was sold the fox as an all-white Pomeranian dog for £60 a year ago. He first noticed that it would not bark.
His account confirms the tort doctrine that animals are considered wild and subject to strict liability for if they lack animus revertendi, the habit of return. No matter how many times you shampoo a fox, it smells and remains a fox. The interesting question would have been if he was sued for a bite to someone else. Lack of knowledge or mistake is generally not a defense. It is the possession of a wild animal that triggers strict liability rather than negligence.
For the full story, click here.
