
Duick says that she received e-mails for five days from Bowler who said that he knew her and where she lived, and was coming to her home to hide from the police. Bowler even had a fictitious MySpace page.
This was a takeoff of the MTV Show Punk’d where celebrities are set up by their friends for elaborate pranks. Toyota’s marketers used the Internet punk people who were picked by their friends. One of Duick’s friends sent in her name.
Toyota Spokesman Chad Harp insists that Duick voluntarily participated in the alleged prank and that “[t]he person who made this claim specifically opted in, granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota.”
If that is true, Duick should be subject to Rule 11 damages for a frivolous lawsuit. However, if it is untrue, this will be a costly campaign for Toyota.
Her lawyer insists that the consent form was ambiguous and she was not told what exactly she was signing up for. I am astonished that any lawyer reviewed this campaign and approved it. Even with a signed form, such waivers are routinely challenged for their clarity and specific disclosures.
For the full story, click here.
