
We have been following (here and here and here and and and here and and here and here) the worsening situation in England concerning free speech. As noted in a recent column, free speech appears to be dying in the West with the increasing criminalization of speech under discrimination, hate, and blasphemy laws.
While I understand the anger, I remain stuck on the denial of free speech and association. Comedy is often a form of political speech and a vehicle of association. M’Bala has a right to speak his mind against different groups and the use of the quenelle is not unlawful and should not be unlawful as a form of speech. For those of us who find his humor offensive, free speech offers an ample vehicle to respond. Instead his critics are using the power of the state to punish him for speaking his mind, even in the form of jokes.
According to reports, Dieudonne was going to visit his friend French footballer, Nicolas Anelka. It was an interesting reason since Anelka was sanctioned for using the “quenelle” during a goal celebration in December. The men insist that the salute is not fascistic but anti-government. For many free speech advocates, it does not matter what the message of the salute may be. It is a form of speech that should be protected as a basic civil liberties.
England is not alone in such denials. Indeed, this country has engaged in such questionable practices. However, both France and England have plunged headlong into the uncertain waters of government speech regulations and prosecutions. It is only likely to get worse as different groups demanding actions on their own black listed individuals. Then the joke will be on us as the West guts free speech in the name of tolerance.
