Site icon JONATHAN TURLEY

Stanford Debates Free Speech After Flyers Supporting Law Enforcement Are Torn Down As Hate Speech

According to Stanford University students, one of these flyers is a public service and one is hate speech.  There is a controversy at Stanford University reported by College Fix over the distribution of the flyer on the right — a satirical jab at posters encouraging students and faculty to report any ICE activity.  It is clearly satirical and political, but some Stanford students declared it to be hate speech and filed complaints with the university that they now felt unsafe and threatened on campus. The flyers were removed by residential staff. 

 

In a column for the Stanford Review, student Isaac Kipust  discusses the incident.  To the credit of Stanford, it belatedly saw the free speech implications of its actions.  Lead Residence Dean Lisa De La Cruz-Caldera eventually concluded that such posting are expressions of political viewpoints and should not have been taken down. However, the university has not announced any discipline for those who destroyed the posters.We have discussed the courageous stand of the University of Chicago in favor of free speech (a position followed by schools like Purdue).  Nevertheless, free speech is being rapidly diminished on our campuses as an ever-widening scope of speech has been declared hate speech or part of the ill-defined “microaggression.”
 

This is an example of how students today believe that they have a right to be protected from opposing views and values — declaring any opposing statements to be “hate speech” or threatening conduct.  There is a growing number of schools that reinforce and even encourage such objections — often targeting conservative students and faculty.

In my view, both posters are free speech and express political and associational rights.

 

One concern is that anti-free speech activities are rarely punished when faculty or students target conservatives. We have been discussing how faculty around the country are supporting the abandonment of free speech principles to bar speakers and speech with which they disagree. The most extreme form of this rejection of classical liberal values is the antifa movement.  We have seen faculty physically attack speakers or destroy messages that they oppose.  We have also seen faculty physically attacked and intimidated.  In some of these incidents, other faculty have supported students in shutting down speakers or fellow academics (here and here).

Cruz-Caldera has promised to look into a new policy to address such vandalism (though clearly will not punish the vandals).  Of course, there was a preexisting “policy” that once defined our schools. It was called free speech.

Exit mobile version