The Senate appears ready to again yield to the President on the surveillance bill after democrats promised voters to fight on such issues. The Senate bill is reportedly even more generous for the White House than the House version, including an immunity provision. It also includes a retroactive immunity for telecommunications utilities that participated in the unlawful warrantless program ordered by the president. It is only the latest disconnect between democratic leaders and the voters. Democrats are simply claiming insufficient votes, but refuse to filibuster the bill or taken other actions to defend civil liberties. Lobbyists for the telecommunications industry have been working Senators on the need to give the corporations immunity from lawsuits from citizens who were harmed by the program. For the full story, click here

Turley Tweets
Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.
SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)
Categories
Top Posts
- Lying For Jesus: The Abortion/Breast Cancer Link
- Florida Boy Attacked, Stripped Naked in Public, and Videotaped By Three Girls -- Resulting In No Charges
- Contraception and Separation
- Gov. Walker "Walks" All Over the Proposed Foreclosure Settlement
- Traffic Citation or Terrorist Threat? A Curious Tale of Priorities In Washington
- Durham County District Attorney Tracey Cline Faces Removal Hearing
- Is The Tea Party Over?
- The National Women's Law Center Takes a Position on Contraceptive Coverage & "Extreme" Legislation
- Employment Division v. Smith
- Mr. [Legal] Manners Responds To Parents Of Legal Bubble Boy
Recent Posts
- English Student Arrested For Frying Roommate’s Pet Hamster
- Mr. [Legal] Manners Responds To Parents Of Legal Bubble Boy
- Traffic Citation or Terrorist Threat? A Curious Tale of Priorities In Washington
- Texas Judge Resigns After Being Filmed Sleeping During Critical Hearing
- Durham County District Attorney Tracey Cline Faces Removal Hearing
Recent Comments
| Monsieur Madeleine on OMG ADIH: Top Saudi Clerics Ca… | |
| Bron on OMG ADIH: Top Saudi Clerics Ca… | |
| Gene H. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Monsieur Madeleine on OMG ADIH: Top Saudi Clerics Ca… | |
| Elaine M. on The National Women’s Law… | |
| Bob,Esq. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Bob,Esq. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Gene H. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| idealist707 on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Bob,Esq. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| idealist707 on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Dredd on Durham County District Attorne… | |
| Gene H. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Gene H. on Contraception and Separat… | |
| Otteray Scribe on Contraception and Separat… |
Archives
- February 2012 (68)
- January 2012 (158)
- December 2011 (153)
- November 2011 (150)
- October 2011 (152)
- September 2011 (151)
- August 2011 (152)
- July 2011 (152)
- June 2011 (161)
- May 2011 (167)
- April 2011 (164)
- March 2011 (166)
- February 2011 (152)
- January 2011 (172)
- December 2010 (178)
- November 2010 (168)
- October 2010 (122)
- September 2010 (116)
- August 2010 (149)
- July 2010 (146)
- June 2010 (165)
- May 2010 (175)
- April 2010 (187)
- March 2010 (189)
- February 2010 (178)
- January 2010 (186)
- December 2009 (197)
- November 2009 (197)
- October 2009 (205)
- September 2009 (186)
- August 2009 (176)
- July 2009 (181)
- June 2009 (169)
- May 2009 (190)
- April 2009 (187)
- March 2009 (184)
- February 2009 (192)
- January 2009 (193)
- December 2008 (165)
- November 2008 (177)
- October 2008 (149)
- September 2008 (121)
- August 2008 (157)
- July 2008 (182)
- June 2008 (139)
- May 2008 (154)
- April 2008 (146)
- March 2008 (166)
- February 2008 (124)
- January 2008 (108)
- December 2007 (168)
- November 2007 (162)
- October 2007 (130)
- September 2007 (109)
- August 2007 (194)



I always see your article something everyday.i want you always make new articles like this. I hope you will read my this comment.the President on the surveillance bill after democrats promised voters to fight on such issues. The Senate bill is reportedly even more generous for the White House than the House version, including an immunity provision.Lobbyists for the telecommunications industry have been working Senators on the need to give the corporations immunity from lawsuits from citizens who were harmed by the program. For the full story,
===========================
Daniel01