White House Issues Defense of Suppression of Testimony

The White House is defending its suppression of the results of health threats caused by global warming. It insists that it cut out all but four pages of the 14 page testimony because Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ventured into areas covered by other agencies. The problem with this post-rationalization is three-fold. First, if you look at testimony of the Defense Secretary or other witnesses, they routinely address issues shared with or largely controlled by other agencies. Second, Gerberding was specifically called to testify on these threats and she was testifying on the results of the CDC study of the problem. Third, if the White House was truly worried about other agencies, it could have required a disclaimer at the outset to that end. For the Administration’s response, click here

0 Responses to “White House Issues Defense of Suppression of Testimony”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 595 other followers