A Flame in Zero Gravity

Space_FireI find this fascinating. This is a flame in zero gravity.

This also means that blowing out candles in space is four times easier than on Earth — a finding that more than justifies the Shuttle flights.

Here is the explanation from some smart people:

[A] candle can burn in zero gravity. However, the flame is quite a bit different. Fire behaves differently in space and microgravity than on Earth.

A microgravity flame forms a sphere surrounding the wick. Diffusion feeds the flame with oxygen and allows carbon dioxide to move away from the point of combustion, so the rate of burning is slowed. The flame of a candle burned in microgravity is an almost invisible blue color (video cameras on Mir could not detect the blue color). Experiments on Skylab and Mir indicate the temperature of the flame is too low for the yellow color seen on Earth.

7 Responses to “A Flame in Zero Gravity”


  1. 1 Dredd 1, October 7, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Wow, cool.

    I hope the witch burners never get into space. They may conclude that they are turning the witches into angels.

  2. 2 Former Federal LEO 1, October 7, 2009 at 9:18 am

    But, what about the flame of love in space? Is it spaced-out or does it flame-out?

  3. 3 Anonymously Yours 1, October 7, 2009 at 10:09 am

    WOW!!!!

  4. 4 Buddha Is Laughing 1, October 7, 2009 at 10:25 am

    This. The planet that rains rock. And Saturn has a newly discovered ring (it’s really big).

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8291905.stm

    It has been a busy week in science news.

  5. 5 maverratick 1, October 7, 2009 at 10:33 am

    It looks cool but it snuffs itself out. I’d like to see what a flame does in a high gravity environment like the surface of the sun which is above 20g.

  6. 6 lottakatz 1, October 7, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    AY: WOW

    I second that- just beautiful isn’t it.

    From linked article:
    “Smoke and soot production is different for candles and other forms of fire in space or zero gravity compared to candles on earth. Unless air flow is available, the slower gas exchange from diffusion can produce a soot-free flame. … Soot and smoke production depends on the fuel flow rate. …

    It isn’t true that candles burn for a shorter length of time in space. Dr. Shannon Lucid (Mir), found that candles that burn for 10 minutes or less on Earth produced a flame for up to 45 minutes.”

    That’s kind of a ‘WOW’ also. I wonder if that has application for clean energy. Could we burn dirty coal in a near vacuum and do it more cheaply than attempting (or actually holding out false hope for a red-herring like carbon sequestration) other coal burning methods?

  7. 7 billy 1, October 7, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Thanks for the Astronomy tip buddha, always nice to get updated in cosmology. I’m going to enjoy the article.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 595 other followers