Below is my column in The Hill on the release of the filing by Special Counsel Jack Smith just weeks before the election. Even Judge Tanya Chutkan described the move as “irregular,” but still ordered the release. While the usual voices heralded the move, others, including the CNN senior legal analyst, denounced the release as a raw political act by the court and the Special Counsel. The problem is that it was not in the least bit surprising.
Here is the column:
“The most stupendous and atrocious fraud.” Those words from federal prosecutors could have been ripped from the filing this week of Special Counsel Jack Smith defending his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
Yet they were actually from a Justice Department filing 184 years ago, just days from the 1840 presidential election. Democratic President Martin Van Buren was struggling for reelection against Whig William Henry Harrison, and his Justice Department waited until just before voters went to the polls to allege that Whig Party officials had paid Pennsylvanians to travel to New York to vote for Whig candidates two years earlier.
It was considered by many to be the first “October Surprise,” the last-minute pre-election scandal or major event intended to sway voters.
To avoid such allegations of political manipulation of cases, the Justice Department has long followed a policy against making potentially influential filings within 60 or 90 days of an election. One section of the Justice Department manual states “Federal prosecutors… may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election.”
Jack Smith, however, has long dismissed such considerations. For years, Smith has been unrelenting in his demands for a trial before the election. He has even demanded that Donald Trump be barred from standard appellate options in order to expedite his trial.
Smith never fully explained the necessity of holding a trial before the election beyond suggesting that voters should see the trial and the results — assaulting the very premise of the Justice Department’s rule against such actions just before elections.
After the Supreme Court rendered parts of his indictment against Trump presumptively unconstitutional, Smith made clear that he was prepared to prosecute Trump up to the very day of his inauguration.
True to his reputation and record, Smith refused to drop the main allegations against Trump to avoid official decisions or acts that the court found to be protected in Trump v. United States. Instead, he stripped out some prior evidence linked to Trump’s presidency, including witnesses serving in the White House. Yet the same underlying allegations remain. Smith just repeatedly uses references to Trump as acting as “a private citizen.”
It is like a customer complaining that he did not order a Coke and the waiter pouring it into a Mountain Dew bottle and saying, “Done!”
Smith even refused to drop the obstruction of official proceedings, despite another recent Supreme Court decision (Fischer v. United States) rendering that charge presumptively invalid.
Smith is making his case not to Judge Tanya Chutkan, but to America’s voters. Chutkan has consistently ruled with Smith to help him expedite the case. She permitted his hastened “rocket docket” despite declaring that she would not consider the election schedule as a factor in the pace of filings or even of the trial itself.
For critics, Judge Chutkan has proven far too motivated in the case. Indeed, many thought that she should have recused herself given her statement from a sentencing hearing of a Jan. 6 rioter in 2022. Chutkan said that the rioters “were there in fealty, in loyalty, to one man — not to the Constitution.” She added then “[i]t’s a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.” That “one person” was then brought to her courtroom for trial by Smith.
In their latest move, Chutkan and Smith used the Supreme Court decision to file a type of preemptive defense — an excuse to lay out the allegations against Trump in a 165-page filing filled with damaging accounts and testimonials against Trump, just weeks ahead of the election.
Even Chutkin herself acknowledged that Smith’s request was “procedurally irregular,” but she still allowed it. This was a premature exercise that would ordinarily occur months later, after defense filings. She could have scheduled such filings just a few weeks from now. She could have easily kept the filing under seal to avoid the appearance of political machinations. But the political effect appears to be the point. Chutkin again selected the most politically impactful option, at Smith’s urging.
This was so “irregular” that ordinarily anti-Trump legal analysts, such as CNN’s senior legal analyst Elie Honig, denounced Smith’s filing as “an unprincipled, norm-breaking practice.” He added that “Smith has essentially abandoned any pretense; he’ll bend any rule, switch up on any practice — so long as he gets to chip away at Trump’s electoral prospects.”
Others, as expected, applauded the filing as not just well-directed but well-timed. Smith was making his closing election argument to voters because he knows that the 2024 election will be the largest jury verdict in history.
If voters reelect Trump, then neither Chutkin nor Smith will likely see a jury in the case. This is why they must convict Trump now in the public eye, or else admit to an effective acquittal by plebiscite.
Their timing could well backfire. The weaponization of the legal system is central to this election, including the role of the Justice Department in pushing the debunked Russia-collusion allegations from the 2016 race. For many, the content of Smith’s filing is not nearly as important as the time stamp over the case caption. Titled a “Motion for Immunity Determination,” it seems more like a “Motion for an Election Determination.”
Smith’s raw political calculation should be troubling for anyone who values the rule of law. None of this excuses anything in these allegations against Trump. But the most disturbing part of Smith’s October Surprise was that it was not in the least bit surprising.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
The pigs on the way to slaughter are demonstrating their usual stupidity. Maybe this pig will be banned from this address like he was banned previously.
S. Meyer didn’t write this cr-p, nor did Upstate write what is below.
At least it provided me with a nice laugh at how desperate this troll is.
Honestly, I would be more surprised if a modern democrat could open their mouths and speak something that didn’t serve their own elitist interests or project a very obviously pulled-from-a-globalist-memo-narrative (this is impossible at this point. They are a regime); this is like asking the Prince of Wales to think of the serfs.
They are insufferable and absolutely ridiculous at the level of clowns; that they do not see this points to levels of obliviousness that in 2024 also makes them delusional to the point of being clinical; someone (us) needs to remind them that the aristocracy was defeated centuries ago, and we will never accept their ridiculous narcissism ever again. We aren’t going to swallow it now anymore than they did then. It would be sadly tragic that these people are so confused and bewildered were it not for the fact that they could potentially control our government – that’s the kicker, and on that point they can go directly to h*ll. Let us relegate them back to the dustbin, they may be rich, but they are pragmatically useless in toto.
The modern DNC can eff right off, we are done with them. Hope Nancy or Chelsea enjoy their ice cream and hair treatments when they and their kin are a footnote that no one alive recalls kindly, and we won’t.
Then you can say “We are punishing you not for what you expressed, or how you expressed it, but because of your bad character.”
Nancy Pelosi taking responsibility for Jan 6. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dtHUYpyi5-Y&pp=ygUsTmFuY3kgUGVsb3NpIGFkbWl0cyByZXNwb25zaWJpbGl0eSBmb3IgSmFuIDY%3D.
I can remember when the left hated FBI director Comey because he reopened the Hillary Clinton investigation just before the election. They called it election interference then but now these same people are cheering on the election interference by Smith. You can’t dance around the fact that these are just not good people. What part of Pelosi saying it was her responsibility do you not understand?
@Thinkitthrough
There is no question, particularly after Hillary’s recent comments, that they simply think they are the authority and we should just fall in line. This was the mentality of royalty; then colonialists on royalty’s behalf (there would be no Spanish in North America, which is a continent, not a country, were it not for Queen Isabella); and then fascists. The modern DNC are all three. Vote for them at your peril. The modern DNC represents the worst of history in a rather spectacular and combined fashion. I do not want to personally experience whatever the heck comes after ‘fascists’, and I don’t believe anyone else would, either. We need to collectively wake the h*ll up, and right quick.
It is an attempt to begin a new world order and the destruction of history. In the new history the United States will never have had slavery releasing the children from that stigma. IT’S RIGHT IN YOUR FACE. They of course have instituted weed and lgbtq culture as two must haves and they will ultimately fail.
Blah blah
Jonathan: For you and DJT Judge Chutkan is complicit in putting Jack Smith’s 165-page filing on the public docket. It’s all about “election interference”. For a variety of reasons, set forth below, that claim is false. In a previous comment (10/4/24@5:32) I cited the complete the complete Minute Order by Judge Chutkan. As I stated in my comment: “Judge Chutkan’s orders are not driven by the election calendar”. That’s because filing dates for DJT’s reply to Smith’s filing, Smith’s sur-reply and DJT’s final replay are scheduled AFTER the election. That can’t be called “election interference”. And Smith’s filing was not a violation of “the rule of law” nor a “Motion for an Election Determination” as you claim. Here’s why:
1. After SCOTUS issued its “immunity” ruling on July 1, the case was referred back to Judge Chutkan to determine what of DJT’s acts surrounding J. 6 were entitled to absolute immunity and which were not. Chutkan allowed Smith to file first to allow him to lay out his entire case .That will permit the judge and both parties to sort through Smith’s allegations and his evidence to make the determinations commanded by the SC–through a series of hearings AFTER the election. That’s also not “election interference”.
2. As to the timing of Chutkan’s Order, DJT’s lawyers had the opportunity to ask Chutkan for an emergency order to keep Smith’s filing under seal. They didn’t do that. They did nothing–for reasons not yet explained. So you and DJT can’t complain. Unlike some countries court proceedings here are not conducted in secret. Filings by parties in litigation are put on the public docket so the public can see and assess whether courts are being fair and impartial. That’s not “irregular” in our system of criminal justice.
You also falsely claim Smith violated a DOJ policy of not bringing any investigation or criminal prosecution within 60 days of an election. That policy doesn’t apply in this case. Why? In August of last year filed his indictment of DJT. After DJT’s arraignment the case was assigned to Judge Chutkan. After Chutkan dismissed DJT claim of presidential immunity he appealed that decision to the DC Court of Appeals. When he lost the appeal he then appealed to the SC. It wasn’t until the last days of the term that the SC finally issued its “immunity” decision on July 1. Any delays were due solely to DJT’s appeals. So an indictment and court proceedings that are ongoing are not a violation of DOJ policy.
For the above reasons Judge Chutkan orders are all consistent with both the “Speedy Trial Act” and the Constitution. Every criminal defendant, including DJT, is entitled to a prompt determination of guilt or innocence. The fact that all this is happening just before the election is immaterial. If DJT loses the election Judge Chutkan will proceed with a number of hearings to determine whether any of DJT’s acts fall outside the SC’s “immunity” decision. If she does Judge Chutkan will set a trial date sometime next year. That’s also not “election interference” because the election will have been over.
So what happens if DJT’s wins the election? He will tell his newly appointed AG to shut down Judge Chutkan’s case immediately. Why? Because DJT knows that Jack Smith’s filing is choked full of compelling evidence that DJT and his co-conspirators were engaged in a conspiracy to deprive voters of their right to select the president of their choice!
Trump told the people to protest peacefully, he tried to get the military to keep things under control but the ultra-woke Communist-China asset Mark Milley disobeyed a valid order from his commander in chief; Trump tried to get the national guard to keep order, but Nancy Pelosi said no, and yet the deranged Trump-haters still cling to the lie that he’s an “insurrectionist.”
They are truly mentally ill. Their own party engineered a coup d’état by kicking out the primary winner and installing as their presidential nominee a cackling-hyena-word-salad-shit-for-brains that nobody voted for, and yet the TDS lunatics have no problem with that. Instead they cling to the lie about the so-called “insurrection” while repeating any number of other lies such as the one about Charlottesville and “fine people on both sides” – which has been debunked even by left-wing Snopes. They lie by saying he endorses Project 2025 when he has purposely not even read it and he says over and over he does not endorse it, they lie when they say he wants a national abortion ban when he is on record many times saying he does not want it and in fact would veto it because he believes the issue is for the states, not the feds; and they lie when they say he would block IVF when he is on record many times saying he would fund it so that more people can have children. What a pathetic, deranged lot they are!
OldManFromKS,
Great comment!
Despite all the evidence to the contrary to their lies, they keep doubling down on their lies.
Upstate – Just one look at their many deranged comments today proves it.
@Upstate
Doubling? More like tripling or quadrupling, and often for things that are very easily refutable, even in the age of ChatGPT.
It. is. Madness.
The modern MSM are a kind of cloak or blanket (i.e. Pravda) that really needs to be lit on fire once and for all. The situation with the hurricane has pushed absurd to its very limits. How can one not be speechless at this point? How can one continue to vote dem? I mean, really? Are our cohort that still believe in ‘liberalism’ really this not just, reticent, but this stupid?
@Upstate
PS – I know you have said your sister has had tiny cracklings of awareness – my brother is still happily swimming in the Kool-Aid, basking, yelping, ‘Go Kamala!’ when one of her ads comes on the TV, and he will vote accordingly. I do not know what it will take. I really, really don’t. We are dealing with the braindead.
Folks, the trolls have been lying like a rug on this comment board. FEMA IS short on funds and it IS because of migrant funding:
https://www.bostonherald.com/2024/10/07/editorial-fema-funds-are-for-emergencies-not-bad-policy/
Vote Democrats out. They lie with malice.
Diogenes,
This is another reason why our leftist friends are in a panic. The Biden/Harris admin re-routed funds for their illegals and now FEMA is broke. More bad and failed Biden/Harris policies.
Vote EVERYONE out.
Diogenes,
And it just got worse for Biden/Harris, hurricane Milton just strengthened to cat five status. Democrats are desperate to deflect from their illegal immigrants, FEMA scandal and now with Milton heading for Florida, not good optics for them. For the good people of Florida, I hope this storm weakens significantly. Meanwhile, Florida governor DeSantis could further display how poorly Biden/Harris have handled and responded to Helene, and what real leadership looks like.
Upstate, get ready for headlines: “Milton wrecks Tampa after Trump moves to Florida. Trump campaign refuses accountability.”
Diogenes, please cite the Constitution for any power of Congress to tax for or fund FEMA, and please cite the Constitution for any ability of the legislative or executive branch to regulate emergencies or impose so-called “emergency powers” nationally, other than the power of Congress to suspend habeas corpus during rebellion or invasion per Article 1 (i.e. legislative powers), understanding that states may respond to emergencies according to their individual state constitutions while not denying superior federal constitutional rights and freedoms, and understanding that private, non-governmental, and charitable organizations may respond.
Diogenes, please cite the Constitution for any power of Congress to tax for or fund FEMA
George can’t provide the answer to his own question by quoting to us from that European aristocrat’s book “Law Of Nations” that he reads as his bible?
Dear Mr. Turley, Ordinary folks have seen through this lawfare sham against Mr. Trump from the get-go. From the false FISA court filings to this latest move by Mr. Smith and the Judge. All of these cases been built upon by lies and more lies. With the left-wing media fanning the flame, Mr. Trump’s opponents keep tripping over themselves by repeating the same lies hoping, if repeated often enough, they will become truth. In order to encourage Republicans who may read this comment, things are looking good here in Wisconsin. Even the senatorial candidate is making strides in the right direction. Democrats are correct about democracy being in danger.. it will be over for all of us if they win the White House.
Van Buren, forever to be remembered as “Van Ruin.”
Jack Smith, forever to be remembered as “Jack Inhoff.”
It’s times like these that tell you how low some people can go. The Left’s methods have all the trappings of war, save for the bullets and bayonets. I have a feeling if it weren’t for our bullets and bayonets, their war would be real.
The Democrats have to be voted out of power. Their gaslighting aside, they are the biggest threat to democracy in my lifetime–maybe since the War of 1812. We are sliding into oligarchism, and oligarchs always lose out to tyrants.
More like Jack “Shitt”
Why can’t it be both? 🙂
OK!!
Jack Inhoff? More like Jack Off.
It’s a Jackaroo court.
“82nd Lil Bow Wow,” what were your MOS, Awards, Campaign, and Theater, or did copycat “Tampon Tim” and steal that valor?
Why do people believe the lying piece of feces trump. Here is words from a. person actually in the Helene devastation telling it like it is. Unlike trumps lying piece of crap.
https://x.com/maddenifico/status/1842781460316537279?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1842781460316537279%7Ctwgr%5Ee9b31f3e647c6680027fc3249775db83c5f0dc76%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcrooksandliars.com%2F2024%2F10%2Fdrop-her-trump-posts-deranged-lie-filled
Very articulate. Is that you Obama?
* TIK TOK post- chicom phone invasion post
Why do people believe the lying piece of feces trump.
Is that you, lying piece of feces Biden – truck driver extraordinaire, two degrees at the top of your class, turned down a scholarship to the Naval College to play football beside Roger Staubach. And never, EVER knew any of your Communist Chinese or Putin customers while Vice President?
Or just another lying Anonymous Democrat piece of shyte?
Politics is an enduring filthy business ladened with conspiracies and rife with subterfuge. Not until Donald Trump came along, however, has the Department of Justice been so much a part of the deviousness. As one significant and essential bureaucracy set apart from the rest of the Administrative State, the DOJ has been expected to uphold the principle of “equality before the law” and widely distance itself from the chicanery of politics. With the DOJ having become little more than a partisan arm of the greater administrative state in lending itself to advancing the ideology of particular groups, that is no longer the case.
Derided for his boldness and combativeness Trump is public enemy number one for the Administrative State. He breached the line setting himself apart from the deeply entrenched powers that preside over the nation. The formidable forces waged against him have been relentless, but not nearly as much as Trump’s resolve has been even more resilient and unflagging. Regardless of what happens in the election, I hope for the man’s gameness to endure in others who will follow.
As I always begin a comment, I am no fan of Orange Jesus. There are no so many instances of weaponization of government from the FTC to the FEC to attacks on Elon Musk, we can now be considered a Banana Republic. This raw quest to dominate an shove down our throats the Left’s dictates is exactly what the Left does. This will lead to paybacks if Trump is elected. It will spiral out of control over the years as administrations change. We are in trouble.
He mentioned Elie Honig? Seriously? His column complaining about the timing of the filing has been disproven by several people who are actually following the case. This indicates that Turley is just spreading misinformation to provoke his readers and promote a misleading narrative.
George is racing to the defense of his fellow totalitarian Jack Smith. No surprise there.
Also no surprise that George is once again channeling his spreading of disinformation onto Professor Turley.
George sobs that the timing of his birth deprived him of being able to work for earlier totalitarians like Stalin and Lavarentiy Beria that Jack Smith has been emulating since 2012.
You remind me of an article I wrote for NPR a few years ago. I had to post my bona fides by stating my hatred for Trump, as my underhanded way to insure publication. To this day, I wonder if it was that or my actual article that got me published. It is a sad place we are in.
* you began with an apology?
Accountability is not a payback, and a payback is not an accountability.
In law and in scripture, one is held accountable for the commission of their crimes/sins. If, and or upon conviction of seeking forgiveness, one may be given a reduction in criminal sentence by mercy of the court, or receive forgiveness of sin as promised in scripture. Otherwise there will be a consequence of accountability one way or the other. The accountability as may be received under the laws of man, is far and away better than the second option.
Choose wisely.
“Screaming Lil Bow Wow,” what were your MOS, Awards, Campaign, and Theater, or is yours stolen valor “Tampon Tim” style?
You going to list YOURS first? You have any of your own to base your insinuations on?
Or did you just learn those words sleeping with some navy guy who never set foot on a battleground?
Our leftists friends seem very desperate today. Could it be it is their narrative is failing? Trump’s rally in Butler PA had a crowd estimated at 100,000 people attending? Could it be the raid in San Antonio, TX arrested over 150 Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang members Biden/Harris let in? The Biden/Harris/FEMA failed response in NC to hurricane Helene? Democrats lawfare against Trump is failing? That Kerry and Clinton have come out and said they were the fascists we have always said they were? The smell of their desperation is thick in the air toady.
How marvelous!!
“The smell of their desperation is thick in the air toady.
Upstate, that is an excellent observation. I am wondering if we will see a shift from the media, even if slight. They made some reasonable comments about Vance’s part in the debate.
S. Meyer,
Their TDS has them frothing at the mouth.
As the election gets closer, I expect to see the MSM say some pretty wild things, more so than they already have.
Maybe Pfizer can conjure up a vaccine for that.
I said, “As the election gets closer, I expect to see the MSM say some pretty wild things, more so than they already have.”
True to form, on MSNBC, Michael Cohen declared, “When he turns around and says the head of this network or other people who are critics, that he intends to use SEAL Team Six or the military to round up his critics or his opponents, he intends to do it.”
Of course former WH press secretary Jen Psaki did not press him for evidence of Trump saying this.
Upstate, I hope that with all the proof of the MSM’s many lies, people will look more carefully and start using other sources. I get much of my MSM news from the blog, but I also see better or raw data, which told me long ago that the MSM shouldn’t be read.
If a person reads the NYTimes or Washington Post for political information in a serious manner, it makes those people dumber.
Ah! I think I may have found it!
There is a new book out, “The Achievements of Kamala Harris” by Jason Dudash. It is a number one seller on Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/Achievements-Kamala-Harris-Jason-Dudash/dp/B0DJDHQHDX/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_bdcrb_top?ie=UTF8
I love the smell of desperation in the morning… Smells like victory!
Our leftist friends desperation has taken them to a new low, pretending to be S. Meyer and myself. Makes them look like something a ten year old would try to do.
Our leftists friends desperation new low, pretending to be other regular commenters here on the good professor’s blog continue as they pretend to be OldManFromKS, and then even go lower by responding to their own fake comments as if they were someone else. That is what desperation looks like. That is what failure looks like. That is what loosing looks like.
How marvelous!!!
It’s fourth and long, so the Chutkan/Smith Team is working overtime this month. Felonious mopery is back on the table along with unpaid movies from Blockbuster Video.
“This was so “irregular” that ordinarily anti-Trump legal analysts, such as CNN’s senior legal analyst Elie Honig, denounced Smith’s filing as “an unprincipled, norm-breaking practice.” He added that “Smith has essentially abandoned any pretense; he’ll bend any rule, switch up on any practice — so long as he gets to chip away at Trump’s electoral prospects.””. This only cements the idea that the prog/left dems do not respect the rule of law, the constitution or the cultural norms of this nation. All they truly care about is power concentrated in the government of their choosing and will justify any means to that end. We know they are despicable, craven ideologues so when are we going to disinfect our People’s House?
Let’s just say that Jack Smith is making a valiant effort to keep this country from completely ignoring clear election fraud and treason before the next presidential election. The fact it’s a futile effort doesn’t make it less shameful ultimately for the U.S. is kind of beyond his control.
Have fun — I guess — in your ongoing effort to sell out your country, Jon.
Let’s just say that Jack Smith is making a valiant effort to keep this country from completely ignoring clear election fraud
Let’s just say Commie Zombies want Jack Smith to do anything to take out the GOP opponent most likely to defeat a Democrat president’s reelection hopes. Just as he did for Obama/Biden in 2012.
The Commie Zombies hope that Harris can manage to win Obama’s Fourth Term and continue selling America out to Iran, the ChiComs, the Russians, and of course Mexican drug cartels.
Well done, Commie Zombie.
Thing is, Turls, there are no real ‘rules’ about how to deal with a criminal ex president. The DOJ peaced out on Nixon and trump makes Nixon look like a crosswalk guard. Apologies for insulting crosswalk guards..
The OLC guidelines about not introducing new charges or information within 60 days of an election doesn’t apply here because trump was indicted in this case many months ago and the only reason the case hasn’t been adjudicated is due to trump’s delay tactics and a fascinatingly corrupt SCOTUS decision meant to put a thumb on the scale for trump….
Not to mention the OLC guideline is just a guideline and not a rule. Jon, you had no problem with Comey releasing dirt on HRC right before the ’16 election after all…
And those allegations weren’t only ‘new’, they were false…
What Smith did was just to obey the dictum of the SCOTUS and revisit the ongoing case at the district Court level. To disobey would actually be him NOT doing his job.
Lot of cool stuff though in Smith’s brief that fill in any cracks in the case against the gimp!!! Add to that, it’s just another example in this case of Smith wildly outsmarting you surrogate trump lawyers. It’s a beautiful thing. Party on!!
Nice case of TDS you got anon. Better see a dr.
Hey, I sympathize. You can’t address facts so, to you, a baseless personal attack is all you available to you…
And perhaps one day there will be maybe one magat on the planet that realizes that saying “TDS ” like you’re a spinning head Linda Blair in the EXORCIST somehow makes sense rather than just being evidence that you don’t understand TDS is literally an impossibility since the worst expectations of trump have all been realized save for one…
That, of course, being a spiteful temper tantrum attempt to fire nuclear weapons at Russia in reaction to a sudden realization of how iguana f#$ked in the arse trump is by Putin.
Thing is, Turls, there are no real ‘rules’ about how to deal with a criminal ex president.
Thing is, Commie Zombie, your rules for a criminal former Senator, then former Vice President and now criminal president is to first throw out banks filing reports of accepting bribes and selling influence out of the VP’s office is to hide it while telling Americans “please don’t believe your lying eyes”.
Followed by having a DoJ cover for that criminal VP turned criminal President by hiding crimes for years.
But hey, when the best you have trying to sell Harris (and Biden before the insurrection that took him out) is BBBBUTTTTTT….MUH TRUMP!!!!!
Yeah, party on inside the Democrat Borg for Commie Zombies.
Let’s talk when there actual charges to back up your delusions, cap. Til then, keep beating the kid and drinking piss warm beer, heckler cletus.
Tough shit. The voters deserve as much information as possible about Trump’s attempted coup. Trump could have had a trial, with a judge, a jury, rules of evidence. But instead he insisted that his actions be adjudicated through the political process. So this is what he gets, his crimes aired publicly and in detail.
But it does not matter. Everyone voting for Trump does not care what crimes he commits.
Still spreading the coup lie? Bombshell transcripts: Trump urged use of troops to protect Capitol on Jan. 6 , but was rebuffed
https://justthenews.com/accountability/watchdogs/bombshell-transcripts-trump-urged-use-troops-protect-capitol-jan-6-was?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home
Everyone knows all the evidence has been fabricated. They changed laws in attempts to “Get Trump!” and all have failed
You citing justthenews as a source with a straight face is roughly equal to your walking around with a dirty diaper strapped to your head.
You citing justthenews as a source with a straight face is roughly equal to your walking around with a dirty diaper strapped to your head.
You’re attacking Just The News after mainlining CNN/Washington Post/NYT/etc straight into your brain for years? Years that they told you Biden’s Laptop Of Crime was just “Russian election disinformation” and “the Russia Dossier is verified intelligence agency evidence Trump is a Russian stooge”?
It smells like your words come out of a mouth covered by one of Biden’s shyte filled Depends as a guarantee against Wuhan Flu infection.
How stupid. It’s a lie cuz you don’t like it. You have zero evidence the 71 people who testified to the Grand jury, people who worked closely with Trump, that Trump broke the law are wrong. It’s low class people like you that make me hope it hurts like hell when MAGA is defeated and Trump goes to prison.
The desperation becomes more obvious.
Your assessment was correct.
What crime? No one has been convicted. How’s your TDS going?
James Kenmore, stop proving what a moron you are by asking what crime.
Sammy speaks… The voters deserve as much information as possible about Trump’s attempted coup.
Can Sammy say: “that laptop isn’t Hunter Biden’s – it’s just Russian election disinformation”? Sammy certainly said that a lot four years ago.
Sammy demands the DoJ keep hiding Biden criminality, continue allowing the statute of limitations to lapse, offer world record Get Out Of Jail cards to Biden, etc.
Because Sammy demands that American voters can’t be allowed all the information. Sammy demands that Jack Smith be allowed to do in 2016 a carbon copy of what he did for Obama/Biden in 2012.
Sammy wants more Biden/Harris deserting Americans to die, starting more wars in the Middle East, 400K+ Americans dead of Open Borders Fentanyl, more inflation, more Islamic terrorism…
Sammy hates America. Sammy wants the accomplishment of Obama’s goal of fundamentally changing America to Soviet Amerika.
* His crimes may consist of payola to union bosses and politicians to do any work in NY. NY is an entrenched criminal organization. Jack Smith is a lackey of the corrupt politicians .