The intense struggle between the Trump Administration and federal judges continued this week with another court ordering a halt to a nationwide program. In Massachusetts, District Judge Indira Talwani is preventing President Donald Trump from canceling a Biden program granting parole and the right to work to immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV). Judge Talwani’s order would require individual hearings for the half of a million individuals allowed into the country under this program by President Joe Biden.
Under the announcement published in the Federal Register, the Department of Homeland Security officially moved to terminate the CHNV Program.
The announcement followed an Executive Order, signed on Trump’s first day in office, entitled “Securing Our Borders,” directing the DHS to end the CHNV program.
Under the notice, DHS said that the parole status would expire in 30 days “unless the Secretary makes an individual determination to the contrary.” It further mandated that parolees who had not obtained a legal basis to be in the United States, such as a green card or other visa, must depart the United States before their parole expires.
In the prior hearing, Judge Talwani indicated that she would not allow that to happen, stating that the Administration’s interpretation of the law was “incorrect” and that “[t]he nub of the problem here is that [Homeland Security Secretary Krisit Noem], in cutting short the parole period afforded to these individuals, has to have a reasoned decision.”
In her opinion, Judge Talwani wrote:
“If their parole status is allowed to lapse, plaintiffs will be faced with two unfavorable options: continue following the law and leave the country on their own, or await removal proceedings. If plaintiffs leave the country on their own, they will face dangers in their native countries, as set forth in their affidavits.”
The court also noted that leaving would cause family separation and jeopardize their ability to seek a remedy based on the Administrative Procedure Act.
The Administration argued that it did have a “reasoned decision” to end the CHNV program and weighed the cost to the parolees. It noted that the parolees were always going to face family separation and costs since this was just a temporary, two-year program. It asserted that it did weigh alternative periods for winding down the program. While the court may disagree with its conclusions, it asserts that it has the same discretion used by President Biden in creating the program.
There was another pressing reason for the change. If the parolees were allowed to run the course of the full period, those who did not obtain legal status could force formal removal proceedings rather than the expedited removal under the program.
The Justice Department maintained:
“DHS’s decision to terminate the CHNV program and existing grants of parole under that program is within this statutory authority and comports with the notice requirements of the statute and regulations,” they wrote. “Additionally, given the temporary nature of CHNV parole and CHNV parolees’ pre-existing inability to seek re-parole under the program, their harms are outweighed by the harms to the public if the Secretary is not permitted to discontinue a program she has determined does not serve the public interest.”
All of this presents another novel legal question. Parole is not a legal status under immigration laws. It is a status created by executive action and is now being curtailed under that same authority. However, these individuals came to the country under the promise of a two-year period. The question is whether a temporary program created by executive fiat can be treated as creating a type of vested right.
If Judge Talwani prevails, individual determinations of half a million cases would be an overwhelming burden on the Administration and easily run out the time granted under the program for these individuals. Indeed, for many of the individuals, the appellate process could exceed that period.
The court is not weighing the harshness of the decision but the president’s discretion in making such a decision. Judge Talwani suggests that, once created by President Biden, the program cannot be curtailed or shortened by President Trump. That question could very well find itself on the Supreme Court’s ever-lengthening docket.
“Under the announcement published in the Federal Register . . .” (JT)
That announcement provides a very comprehensive explanation of Biden’s CHNV program, the Biden administration’s reasons for creating it, the Trump administration’s reasons for canceling it, and the authority used by *both* DHS Secretaries.
There are two separate issues here:
1) The creation and canceling of an immigration parole program. Under certain conditions, a DHS Secretary has the authority to both create and to cancel such programs. (They are *not* created by fiat or by EO.) Biden’s Secretary used that authority to create; Trump’s to cancel. That should be the end of that issue.
2) Noem’s decision to cut short the two-year window for any particular migrant who entered the country under the Biden parole program. That, in my opinion, is a mistake. Those migrants, and only those migrants, entered the country legally, and had a reasonable expectation of staying here legally for a full two years. They should be afforded that expectation.
Whatever. Congress has the option of taking this up and creating a statutory window. Not rocket science.
If they followed immigration laws why would they need EO protection?
Sam posted: Those migrants, and only those migrants, entered the country legally, and had a reasonable expectation of staying here legally for a full two years. They should be afforded that expectation.
They did not enter the country legally under the requirements established by existing immigration law. They entered under the terms of a side hustle Biden set up while he was violating his oath of office and refusing to enforce those existing immigration laws.
They expected that the president who started by inviting them here as Biden Migrants, and then used an EO to create a never before seen parole program would ALSO be in power, maintaining that parole, for the full two years of that parole?
With such a deep desire for nothing more than life to be American citizens, they had so little knowledge of our country that they thought Biden got to remain in the White House for the entire time of their parole, elections or not?
“They entered under the terms of a side hustle Biden set up while he was violating his oath of office and refusing to enforce those existing immigration laws.”
Side hustle? ROFL!. Come on. Biden set up the program using the same authority Trump wields now. They still entered legally. Existing immigration law gives the president the authority to determine who gets in, right? Just like Trump gets to decide who gets their visa revoked or not.
Biden authorized their immigration to the US as refugees and it was well within his power to do so. If Trump and rule by EO so could Biden.
“They did not enter the country legally . . .”
You are mistaken.
“. . . a never before seen parole program . . .”
And now you’re just ignorant.
Immigration law permits the creation of parole programs. And the creation of such programs go back to at least the Eisenhower administration.
The difference is that biden willfully allowed criminal thugs to enter unvetted – now that is where the problem starts – just like his so-called border policy – the end result was to flood the nation with would-be democrat voters willing to vote that way for free stuff from the taxpayer. It was a scam and a grift from the beginning under obama and the sentient adults in the nation understand that. it is a shame that most lefties are not sentient, but act more like Pavlov’s dogs.
“a side hustle Biden set up” The perfect description of this and most of biden’s criminal past. I just wish prog/left tools had better reading comprehension rather than their sheeple willingness to swallow leftist bilge.
“They should be afforded that expectation.”
You can say that if you wish, but such expectations do not create law. Everyone has expectations that are not fulfilled so the argument is silly.
DIdn’t the same thing happen with DACA? O’Bama created the program by executive order. Trump tried to rescind it the same way. A federal judge found that trump failed to follow the Administrative Procedures Act, but ignored the fact that the program was never created under the APA.
Seems a pattern is developing
The APA, while sounding reasonable, has evolved into something that destroys effective government. Biden’s policy was to allow, nay invite, people to jump across the border by the tens of thousands per day. Only Democrats can argue that such is “legal” immigration. Then, eventhough something like 1.4 million of the border jumper now have deportation orders, judges mandate that each and every one of these people deserves much more due process courtesy of the APA.
This is just a cloward-piven sort of strategy — make the nation ungovernable by a selective and partisan view of the law and procedures.
DACA and DAPA, where “P” stands for parents. I bet you never heard that before? It is right in SCOTUS’ own opinion. MSM conveniently went silent on that part. In any case, the Supremes ruled that O’Bama had no authority to create laws in the first place. Duh.
Now, another activist judge issues blanket injunction without even trying establishing a standing. Just trust us, our affidavits are true. Eventually, sanity will prevail. Those factory owners in Springfield OH (who double as slumlords) will have to change business model.
The “intense struggle between the Trump Administration and federal judges,” as Turley phrases it, is more than that; it’s an effort to restore the proper roles of the POTUS and the judiciary. As much as Chief John Roberts denies it, federal judges are political creatures whose personal ideologies often manifest themselves in their decisions and opinions. Under the Constitution, only one branch of the government has the power to make laws, and it isn’t the Executive or Judicial branches. Over the past several decades, each branch has at times exceeded its constitutional authority and infringed upon the powers of another branch. Unlike the lower courts that frequently consider merit over process, the Supreme Court must justify its decisions on the constitutional interpretation of the statute(s) and/or actions in question. Trump knows he can and must win these battles at the Supreme Court level, where political infringements may be less dispositive.
Under the Constitution, only one branch of the government has the power to make laws, and it isn’t the Executive or Judicial branches.
Well, we do have both statutory and case law….
Obeying Judges orders ithe bedrock of our country. To do otherwise is to tear the Conbstitution apart. Marbury v Madison set the stage for how the three branches of government work in a democracy. To no tear that out is the end of our country. Think about it. Will the next election be honored by those in power if they lose? And if the current occpant of the WH loses, under the current administrations reasoning, they would have every right to throw trump into a helicopter and sebd him and his supporters anywhere int he world, get them out.
Stop this nonsense noow, Obey Judges orders until a higher judge issues otherwise. And when the SC speaks, do it. To do otherwise is the end of our Constitutional Republic.
Judges obeying political operatives’ orders, however, is not the bedrock of the country. In fact, these universal judicial orders are a new phenomenon that seems to have a disparate impact on the recent republic administration.
Giving authority the finger and doing what is right despite it is the actual foundation of the Country.
Not a new phenomenon. Read some of the history regarding decisions during the first Adams administration. Federalist judges were hammering Republicans
Marbury vs. Madison?….so one branch of government can arrogate to itself “superior powers” to decide law not authorized to it by The People when ratifying the Constitution? Powers authorized directly by the Constitution always superceded self-claimed powers via Marbury. Congress can therefore overturn a Constitutional interpretation put forth in a SCOTUS case decision by passing new law.
So, you are saying the three branches are not equal, that checks and balances don’t exist merely because you don’t like what the current Executive is doing? What’s to stop Talwani or Boasberg from ordering troops deployed to Ukraine, then? Since, as you surmise, the judges hold every power in the government? Why do we have a Legislative branch if the district judges can just order anything across the whole country?
Baby: The “bedrock,” if there is such a thing, of our country is the Constitution. Let’s agree on that. To the extent needed, the lower or “inferior” courts must be created by Congress, the Legislative Branch. Only the Supreme Court has constitutional origin as a co-equal branch of our government. Article III of the Constitution was written in part to ensure that the inferior courts do not usurp the authority of the other branches, including the Supreme Court. The inferior courts are the product of the legislature, one of the two political branches of our government (along with the presidency). Their work, admittedly admirable at times, should not be viewed on an equal basis with that of the Supreme Court or, for that matter, the other two branches of the government that are elected to obey the will of the people. All members of the three branches are sworn to uphold, defend, and protect the Constitution, with the Supreme Court, the only “unelected” branch, being the final arbiter.
Just ignore her, she does not have the authority
Do you realize that by doing this it would me revolution? If you detest bloodshed, love our Constitution, please reconsider.
If it means we are rid of you, then …. Rep Jasmine “taken down” Crockett sends her dim regards
So? It is just about that time. The Neo-Bolsheviks have had their day and it is now our duty as Americans to destroy them and their rot. The left is gonna need a few million more luigis and karmelos…tic toc tic toc.
You won’t be able to put the toothpaste back into the tube.
Who are you going to kill? Name some names. Will you kill your neighbor down the street? Him and his wife? The kids? Who will you kill?
Kill? Hopefully that is not necessary, but if so, then so be it. FAFO. Neo-Bolsheviks, other central authoritarians, anyone that feeds off government graft and the lowest common denominators, and warmongers (ironic, eh?).
Thank you for your honesty. You decide what a patriot is. Fascist much? So for all your talk about law and order, the constitution, being a patriot, you’re really an A hole that wants it your way, to hell with Democracy and the rule of law. I do hope most MAGA is not as big an A hole as you but I guess we will find out.
I do want it my way. That is my birthright. And for anyone to profess to not want that or to profess to take that from me is the authoritarian Ahole of your mind, not me. My way is for you to have it your way, too, as long as it doesn’t infringe on my way – but you can’t live with that because you are a loser teat-suckler. The central authoritarians can never be Patriots and must be excised. I am not a Fascist, you are more the fascist.
Collectivists can rot, in fact they will absent force – that is what truly terrifies you, coward.
I forget to add. Are you going to tell your neighbors to support your way or you will kill them?
See, you, being a neo-Bolshevik, think that killing everyone not like yourself or anyone you cannot force into compliance is the only alternative. that is why YOU must be eliminated, others that live and let people live are fine without you even if they disagree with me or me them.
Your false choices and default to central authoritarianism to cure them is what makes you worthless and expendable.
“Trust us, it is all true”. Crooked judges never try to verify affidavits.
Officially, the Executive only has to listen to one Judicial court, the Supreme Court. All other courts are established under Legislative powers.
And indeed the SC spoke and told trump to get the guy back from El Salvador. In a 9-0 decision. Will trump do what the SC says or defy it? And if he defies it, then what? Defy another order? Where does this lead?
Dishonest opinionating, as always. they said to “facilitate”, not “force another nation to give up their prisoner (who is a deadly gang member).” We can’t control a nation’s behavior towards their citizens, unless you’re in the CIA
So you’re admitting trump is a weakling? You don’t think trump could say hey, give us the guy back?
Indeed, trump is showing exactly how weak he is.
How are those tariffs working out?
I see Russia has ended the Ukraine war as trump promised. NOT
Did you know China has responded to trump’s tariff BS by preventing all Rare Earths from leaving china? How is that going to work out for our needs.
Yep, if he yells winning long enough all his MAGA idiots believe him.
Libturd idiot ^^^^
YOU FORGOT TO TURN ON ALL CAPS.
All one n3eeds to know about Judge Talwani is that she is liberal Democrat indoctrinated at Boalt Hall law school and appointed to her position by Barack Obama. Interesting that they seemingly don’t focus on the Constitution’s separation of powers at Boalt Hall.
Their ‘26 platform is gonna be a hoot: The Democrat’s top four heroes in America are now:
1. A murderer named Luigi (gun)
2. A murderer named Karmelo (butcher knife)
3. An MS-13 illegal gang member
4. A Palestinian Hamas supporter
Add to this: Castration of children; men in women’s sports and spaces, millions of illegals, and now Mother Jones has decreed dogs are bad for the environment.
“Mother Jones has decreed dogs are bad for the environment.”
If the woke mofos or their idiot disciples try to come after our dogs next, they will find out the meaning of FAFO in great detail. If that happens, there *will* be an impact on some environmental variables, but it will be from the cessation of their respiration. My dog does not have a trigger finger, but I do.
Why is this a problem? Biden’s E.O. was not an option under immigration law. The District Judge is either ruling on law that does not exist or is making law. Both are unconstitutional actions by the Judge.
If Justice Robert’s must use the Constitutional authority of the Supreme Court to rein in the inferior court’s judicial insurrection. If Justice Roberts fails to do so he risks losing our Republic.
The Supreme Court through the years has obviously failed to comply with the Constitutional mandates of Constitution as required by Article VI. What the majority of the people sees is the Judicial Branch obstructing the people’s will and the Constitutional authority of the President to enforce the laws as directed by Article II. This has the potential to destroy our Constitutional Republic.
I thought “parole” was defined in law as an exception to be applied on a case by case basis to admit otherwise illegal migrants in circumstances where humanitarian grounds justified doing so. It was not to be the basis of a program waving through hundreds of thousands from designated countries.
If that is correct, then the court is saying the President is not free to reverse legal violations by his predecessor.
They are not illegal immigrants. They are refugees and asylees. They came here legally. Their status as legal aliens is based on the previous administration designating them as protected due to their status as refugees or aslyum seekers. Every MAGA moron assumes they are all illegal or came here illegally.
Speaking of morons . . . .
“Parole” is not the same as asylum.
Not if the former President violated immigration law in creating mass parole, ignoring the “case by case” constraint on his powers.
I agree with you. Biden violated the law by granting parole on a mass basis.
So the question is whether the President can undo the consequences of this violation and deport all those admitted or whether each now is entitled to an individual assessment.
Biden can grant parole on a mass basis. The power of pardons includes parole. Weirdly enough maybe he should have granted them a pardon instead.
The president cannot violate the law. Trump’s Supreme Court made that rule. But I guess here only Trump is afforded that luxury. Or did the effect of the ruling making whatever POTUS does legal no matter how illegal it is start Jan. 20 in the minds of the MAGA mASSES.
They are not illegal immigrants. They are refugees and asylees.
Please Believe Us, Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes™
Every communist Democrat Useful Idiot who comes here from the Democrat Borg keeps hoping normal Americans believe these criminals are actually refugees and asylum seekers.
Refugees we are told that are so terrified for their lives that they risked those lives transiting through countries that the UN has deemed safe for such people.
The majority of them men terrified of their lives – but left their parents, wives, children, etc behind to be subject to the horrors they tell us they had to save themselves from.
Justices, if you want Caeser for a President, just give him the right enemies. Stop these renegade judges now.
Let the legal process of deciding the limits of these lower judges begin and settle this constant ankle bitting by progressives who seem, ironically, concerned more about the civil rights (if they are, in fact, eligible for consideration of such rights) of illegals who obtained entrance to our nation through a questionably legal instrument, over the legal civil rights of American citizens to live in peace and safety.
A constant drum beat, illustrating the apparent lack of concern for real Americans in favor of illegal criminals by the democrats (and their agenda-driven, hand-picked lower judges) should be pounded by conservatives until most Americans realize the treachery of the democrats, who seem willing to ignore public safety in order to bedevil Trump because of rampant TDS still festering among the horde of losers.
TDS: tRUMP is a dumb sh!t.
Facts, not opinions. You illustrate your prog/left brainwashed cult status to perfection but bring nothing to the debate but vitriol – of corse, nothing more could be expected from a tortured TDS infected noggin.
So equal a response from an illiterate tool, bravo for showing you sad little black soul.
Wally had to stop sucking his thumb to put that cerebral reply together.
But then, speaking of levels of dumb, Wally kept voting for and STILL supports The Oval Office House Plant, President Autopen.
“Let the legal process of deciding the limits of these lower judges begin and settle this constant ankle bitting by progressives who seem, ironically, concerned more about the civil rights (if they are, in fact, eligible for consideration of such rights) of illegals who obtained entrance to our nation through a questionably legal instrument, over the legal civil rights of American citizens to live in peace and safety.”
Of course they are concerned about civil rights. Those immigrants came here legally as refugees. The automatic assumption that they came her illegaly is the problem. They ARE eligible to be here if they came here as refugees. They entered the country legally. They are currently here legally. That legal insrument is called legal immigration as refugees.
Americans have been living in peace and safety among them for a few years now.
“A constant drum beat, illustrating the apparent lack of concern for real Americans in favor of illegal criminals by the democrats (and their agenda-driven, hand-picked lower judges) should be pounded by conservatives until most Americans realize the treachery of the democrats, who seem willing to ignore public safety in order to bedevil Trump because of rampant TDS still festering among the horde of losers.”
What are “Real Americans”? Are Republicans the only “real” Americans? who gets to decide that? You? Trump has been rotting your brain for a while now and it clearly shows.
Prove that illegal criminals, not under the jurisdiction of the US, merit civil rights.
Wow. All people deserve civil rights, not just citizens. Under your reasoning, Germany under Hitler exterminated 6 million people. Is that where you want this to go? Exterminate unwanted people?
I’m all for exterminating the Neo-Bolsheviks and other central-authoritarian rot in this country and abroad. The “asylum seekers and refugees” are free to leave, should not be exterminated (obviously, but those that brought them here should be). FAFO.
What an illiterate and mis educated *ss you prove yourself to be each an every day. Jews were citizens of Germany, they were NOT illegal criminals vandalizing, terrorizing thugs who were given taxpayer’s money by indoctrinated communists (otherwise known as democrats).
The difference between Jews in Germany and illegal criminals entering our nation (or illegally invited here by a deranged gang of prog/thugs running the white house with an autopen) is blatantly clear to the properly educated, but a mystery. it appears, to those products of our current media/education industry.
Why you use inaccurate hyperbole and think this group of well educated people will not see through your obfuscations is a remarkable example of your ignorance.
Whimsicalmama, I wish the moderator would put BabyTrump in a garbage bag and throw him out.
@BabyTrump: You disgust me. You exploit the memory of Jews murdered by the Nazis to serve your hypocritical politics. They were German citizens, productive and loyal. You desecrate their legacy to score cheap points. No one, left or right, should share a stage with you.
You cheered when Biden bypassed Congress on immigration. Now you scream about executive power? You’re not just a hypocrite; you’re a vile opportunist with no shame and no honor.
You are too stupid to recognize how horrible a person you are.
Every criminal within our borders is subject to the jurisdiction of the Constitution and civil rights. Every one. You didn’t know that? Criminals are all innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. That’s a right. All of them are entitled to challenge their accusers and that means the government. Right?
And, YES, it appears that conservatives are the only true Americans at this point. Siding with the enemies of our nation has been the lode star of the left since the left’s attack on Tail Gunner Joe’s plea to uncover the communists among you.
Community organizing hordes of illiterates and indoctrinated tools against the safety and moral core of this nation has been your duly noted calling card for nearly a century or more.
Your penchant to obfuscate the truth for agenda, largesse, and power has been exposed and rejected..
Deal with that rejection, loser.
You’ve answered the question. Yes, the United States will act just like 1939 Hitler under trump
Given the false choice of Hitler 1939 or Russia 1917, which is where the left is leading us, I’d take Germany all day long.
But the real choice is USA pre-1963 or Russia 1917, so the former is the easy choice. Funny how the perpetrators of 1917 are sorta the same folks terrified of 1939.
You should stop embarrassing your mother by illustrating you lack of cognitive ability. Perhaps you should limit your rantings to the inside of a mental institution for the disturbed TDS sufferer that you are. Now go away and play with the other mental deficients in the prog/left arena of losers
“. . . illegals [sic] who obtained entrance to our nation through a *questionably* legal instrument . . .” (emphasis added)
That “legal instrument” is called an immigration parole program. That program has been part of immigration law for some 60 years. Those parole programs have been created by numerous administrations (both R and D).
Seriously, people. Gain knowledge *first*. Then comment.
And stop letting your xenophobia get the better of you.
“Seriously, people. Gain knowledge *first*. Then comment.”
Did you consider the manner in which Biden used the parole program and compare it with how it was used in the 56 earlier years? I guess not. Gain knowledge *first*. Then comment.
“It asserted that it did weigh alternative periods for winding down the program.”
Right, because Trump’s administration has been very good at making honest assertions. Of course they haven’t. They are just arbitrarily ending these programs because Biden implemented them. That’s the only reason. It’s Trump’s vindictive nature and that of his closest advisors like Stephen Miller who are constantly lying and pushing to ignore the law.
This administration is not going to last with the level of incompence and stupidity especiallly with regard to the economy.
Biden arbitrarily created them vs enforcing existing laws.
You illustrate, perfectly, the egregious fault of your prog/left adulterated sack of misfiring synapses; you focus on your advanced TDS to the detriment of the safety of true Americans. This stance of advocating for illegal criminals has shown the sane adults among us just how pernicious and immoral is the left.
Why don’t you look in the mirror and see the horses *ss staring back at you?
Another Radical Left unqualifies DEM Judge trying to dictate policy. Another Appeal and a run to the Supreme Court. Trump Admin is right, and the Judge cannot override President Trump EO since it was Biden EO. President Trump can override it. These radical Left judges are unqualified and giving the US legal system a bad name. Supreme Court needs to outline to the Courts to stop these challenges.
will trump obey the SC? That seems in question because in a 9-0 decision they said bring the guy back from El Salvador. trump appears to be violating the SC
is that the country you want? Remember, the next President gets to do the same. Or are you counting on trump in perpatuity?
Pretty sure that is not what they said. Do you have a link to a decision/order I missed? Or are you referring to this?
“The high court’s unsigned and brief decision left US District Judge Paula Xinis’ order in place but drew a distinction between “facilitating” Abrego Garcia’s return and “effectuating” it. The lower court properly required the government to “facilitate” his return, the justices made clear. ”
Can we just honestly report what the Court said?
Using the logic by the Trump administration the next democratic president could upend everything Trump did by fiat on day one and reverse everything regardless of what congress thinks. It is after all the whole idea of the unitary executive which is what Trump is operating under.
What would be the point of being able to institute a program with a promised timeline if the next preson to take office can simpley obliterate it with impunity? It sows distrust of the government. Why bother with contracts if another government office holder won’t honor it because it doesnt’ want to? Turley makes a good point, but he isn’t offering any analysis. Fascists do those kinds things. Trump being a fascist is turning out to be the newest theme in this administraion.
Yeah, I should be able to institute a policy for eternity minus a day and if the future doesn’t like it, tough.
Face it, the left has been building a strong executive for decades, those chickens are coming home to roost and just wait until the judiciary chickens come home…I know I can’t hardly wait.
Two years gives them plenty of time to get their affairs in order or determine the status of their home countries and determine if an extension is warranted. It’s the sensible approach. Trump just wants to get rid of them because it wants to not because of any sensibility or consideration. They are seen as parasites taking precious few resources that poor americans need. Right?
10 minutes is also enough time. Everyone EVERYONE knows this is a scam.
Presidents have done that constantly since EOs became an in thing, on both sides. Every time a new president comes up, they slash old EOs by the sheaf. This is nothing new; not that I’d expect low-IQ, short-attention span liberals to understand. The party of low-testosterone men and high-calorie women, indeed.
Seems that throwing around the term “Fascist” is the current practice of those who lack historical knowledge.
Seems that all the current admin needs to do is undermine a few of the bogus ‘dangers upon return’ in the affidavits that were likely written by Biden admin lackeys. It would seem all the evidence necessary is to show that the people remaining in those sending nations are no worse off than those in Baltimore or Oakland.
That this judge is supporting this immigration ruse on the citizens of the US, and the west, is more evidence of the judicial coup that is following the obama/biden executive coup that must be halted before the nation is torn apart. But frankly, I grow tired of ‘holding the nation together’ simply for it to be used by the left as a source of money and power for which to destroy it.
The left destroys, never builds, simply look everywhere they have had power for a period of time. Time to excise the cancer of central authority via central authority as the left would undermine individual liberty via individual liberty as in this case. The left needs to end, soon.
Moreover, if the ‘dangers upon return’ have some merit, Trump should simply invade those nations and remove those dangers then send the “refugees” home.
“The left destroys, never builds, simply look everywhere they have had power for a period of time.”
What has the right built? Currently it’s the right who is destroying things. USAID, SS, Education department, Immigtration, etc.
What has the right built?
So you’re okay with $37 trillion debt and $2 trillion deficits for the last 5 years and no end in sight! What’s your plan to get to a balanced budget? SS and Medicare are broken and government spending is out of control but let’s just keep doing the same thing and hope things get better
Well…Trump’s tax cuts will not bring down the debt. It will add $4 trillion more. Republicans don’t care about deficits and debt. Trump just proposed a trillion dollar defense budget. He’s looking to take away your medicare and SS to pay for all of that. Good luck.
“He’s looking to take away your medicare and SS to pay for all of that”. LOL…He’s gonna decouple you from a corrupt government, how ever will you survive? lol. BRING IT!
“What has the right built?” It built Every major city in the US that the left has destroyed in the last 70 years. Democrat-city refugees build the new cities in the south and west that CA, et al leftists are moving into to ruin.
To think any sane person can try to defend USAID, SS, DoEd, Immigration is laughable – these are corrupted and ineffectual – infested by the administrative state rot and must be excised. Destroying those things and others is required for a healthy future. Time to take your medicine. Sorry, not sorry.
The inherent assymetry in the illegal migration attack on this country is infuriating. An edict by POTATUS Biden allows 500k to waltz in via an app but each must be carefully examined for removal? There is something seriously wrong with this picture. SCOTUS looks ineffectual. Congress? Don’t make me laugh. Congress should rein in the lower court judges but won’t. They’re too busy worrying about optics, election cycles, insider trading, sex parties, and blackmailers. So how do we fix this because it has been festering for far too long?
if they didn’t have a problem with illegals coming in…then the JUDGES committed TREASON!
They weren’t illegal. They came in as refugees legally. They remain legal as long as they are part of the program. Trump is looking to boost his deportation numbers because he’s falling short of his goals fast. This is nothing but a numbers game.
Please show me the UN charter on refugees and how they can skip every nation en route to the richest ones in the world, then never leave. You do not understand refugees.
PS: They aren’t ever real refugees, they are fleeing BS claims.
PPS: this is why the left now calls them asylum seekers. More BS, but easier to fake.
Imagine that…
Another judge who determines the dubiously legal executive action of a previous (Democratic) president is the equivalent of Holy Writ that cannot be undone by a successor (Republican) president.
Was DACA before, it’s parole now.
Funny how both involve giving improper “legal” status to illegal aliens.
“Another judge who determines the dubiously legal executive action of a previous (Democratic) president is the equivalent of Holy Writ that cannot be undone by a successor (Republican) president.”
I would strongly favor a Constitutional Amendment that expires every Executives Order at the end of the term of the President who issued it. It would probably be prudent to allow the incoming President a month after Inauguration Day to reissue the order if he or she desires to do that. Possibly an exception could be made for a President elected to a second consecutive term so that EOs he or she issued remain in force. The Amendment should specify that ALL historical EOs have a one-time expiry as of a specific date to create the opportunity for a fresh start. There undoubtedly would be some downside to this (isn’t that true of nearly everything?) but I think the benefits would be tremendous and far outweigh any negatives.
Lawyer employment program for this rent seeking profession. There is no evidence of any benefit of this judge’s decision. She should be investigated for honest services fraud, and removed from any more cases until the investigation is complete.
Good