Sean Charles Dunn, 37, appears to have arranged for the ultimate take-out order. After spotting CBP agents outside of a Subway shop, Dunn proceeded to abuse them verbally. That is protected speech. What is not is taking your sandwich and heaving it at an officer. Dunn is now facing a charge of felony assault on an officer. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro now wants to throw the book at him. Just in case anyone is interested in the intersection of culinary and criminal matters, I pulled up the relevant statute.
Daina Henry, a transit police detective, gave the details of the incident in a criminal complaint. Dunn at first walks away before returning and continuing a profane diatribe against the officers, who remain calm. It shows Dunn raving, “F**k you! You f**king fascists! Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city!” Dunn then throws his sandwich at officers and runs away with officers in close pursuit.
Dunn appeared to shrug off the incident, saying “I did it. I threw a sandwich.”
It is a little more than that.
I assume that the charge is brought under 18 U.S. Code § 111 – Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees:
(a)In General.—Whoever—
(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or
(2) forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person’s term of service,
shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(b)Enhanced Penalty.—
Whoever, in the commission of any acts described in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
I am assuming that a sub sandwich is not “deadly or dangerous weapon” (It is more of a deli weapon). Moreover, there was no infliction of bodily injury in the case to justify an enhanced penalty.
However, Dunn is still looking at a maximum sentence of eight years, though that is highly unlikely. His actions certainly appear to satisfy the element of a simple assault.
His counsel could hope for jury nullification in Washington, D.C., but absent a favorable judge or jury, the language of the statute leaves little room for a defense. That could leave defense counsel pushing for a plea to a lesser offense, but U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro is clearly not in the mood for negotiations, posting “He thought it was funny. Well he doesn’t think it’s funny today because we charged him with a felony: Assault on a police officer. “So there, stick your Subway sandwich somewhere else!”
Making this all the more bizarre is that Dunn was a Justice Department employee with the Office of International Affairs within the criminal division. He was promptly fired. (Update: there are now reports that Dunn is an actual attorney. However, other reports say that he held a position similar to a paralegal and his name does not appear on the D.C. bar. If he is a lawyer, he could not be subject to a bar action for his alleged assault on law enforcement.)
Dunn created this incident and wanted the notoriety. He succeeded. I expect that there will be a GoFundMe effort to cover his legal costs and he will enjoy a certain celebrity status. However, while this is not a significant assault, it is an assault on an officer. While he may have been a protester, neither he nor his sandwich qualifies as a hero.
That is why he may have to forget about any light plea bargain.
Now Pirro is likely to say you can stick a fork in yourself because you’re Dunn.
Looks like Trump’s prosecutors failed to indict the sandwich thrower.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/us/politics/trump-sandwich-assault-indictment-justice-department.html
This shows how completely out of touch Turley is, but I doubt he will ever admit it.
Very embarrassing.
This would be the very same Trump who said that January 6th was a “day of love” and that the 140 law enforcement officers who were assaulted and suffered concussions, fractures, burns, and other significant harm were “very minor incidents”?
Yes, throwing a sandwich is funny, but the hypocrisy here is no laughing matter.
“This would be the very same Trump who said that January 6th was a “day of love” and that the 140 law enforcement officers who were assaulted and suffered concussions, fractures, burns, and other significant harm were “very minor incidents”?
Yes, throwing a sandwich is funny, but the hypocrisy here is no laughing matter.”
Cry harder. Nobody cares about J6 anymore. The voters saw through your crap narrative and re-elected Trump. Does that sting? I hope it stings.
Nobody mentioned Trump but you. And do you know what the word hypocrisy means? Seems not.
Tough words from someone who probably called the 2020 BLM riots a “summer of love” which resulted in 19 confirmed deaths, over 2000 law enforcement officers injured, and over $1 billion in property damage.
Yes, throwing a sandwich is funny, but your hypocrisy is no laughing matter.
Since when has “But HE did it too” been a defense?
On the other hand, Dunn is unemployed. Dunn is done. And I smiled.
The most expensive sandwich that Subway has ever sold. The raving idiot 12 incher. Only comes in baloney.
The guy was willing to pay at least a couple of months salary for his ten minutes of fame. A large price to pay.
Is there a small chance that when the direct deposit of his paycheck to his bank doesn’t happen that he might think what the hell was I doing? No way, he’s too far gone on the road to Fantasy Island. De plane! De plane!