“Anathema in the University Mission”: Bari Weiss Canceled at UCLA

This week, CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss was supposed to give the UCLA Burkle Center’s annual Daniel Pearl Memorial guest lecture on “The Future of Journalism.” It was a wonderful opportunity for students to hear from one of the impactful voices in the media. However, they will not be able to do so after a successful cancel campaign supported by faculty members.
The College Fix reports that roughly 11,000 people signed a petition demanding the university cancel the event, and a leader at the center hosting her talk threatened to resign if the journalist spoke.
One of the most outspoken critics was Margaret Peters, associate director of the Burkle Center, who suggested that she would resign even if Weiss were allowed to speak virtually, according to The Daily Bruin.The LA Times reported that UCLA was turning to the common excuse of security concerns to effectively yield to the heckler’s veto.Peters told The Daily Bruin:

“that she believes Weiss has used the guise of free speech to attack people on the left whose opinions she does not agree with – and having her speak at a signatory lecture would legitimize these actions….To invite somebody who is working against that mission in highly powerful places just seems like anathema in the university mission.”

This statement is an example of the culture that is inculcated into students who become intolerant in college. It explains why students feel righteous in shouting down or interrupting speakers.

What is “anathema” to the academic mission is the viewpoint intolerance and orthodoxy shown by Peters and the faculty and students at UCLA. In accusing Weiss of attacking those with “opinions she does not agree with,” Peters demanded that Weiss be silenced as someone with opinions that she does not agree with.

The lack of self-awareness is a common element among many in higher education who claim to support free speech and intellectual diversity while purging universities of conservative or libertarian faculty or speakers.

The fact that UCLA would pick Peters to lead this Center speaks volumes about the culture in higher education. Peters felt complete license to speak as the Associate Director for the canceling of speakers with opposing views.  Her overt intolerance was likely an advantage with other faculty members.

After years of surveys showing the purging of faculty ranks, there is no evidence that faculty members are willing to allow a diversity of opinions.

After years of viewpoint intolerance, schools like Yale have finally reached the point where there is not a single faculty member left who donates to the Republican Party or candidates.

In 2018, a faculty member who called for greater viewpoint diversity at Sarah Lawrence was the subject of threats and vandalism.

Samuel J. Abrams, a professor at Sarah Lawrence College, wrote about the problem almost ten years ago. His research showed that, while the faculty was overwhelmingly liberal, the administrators were even more so. In his survey of 900 college administrators, he found that liberal staff members outnumber conservative staff members by a 12-to-1 ratio: “A fairly liberal student body is being taught by a very liberal professoriate — and socialized by an incredibly liberal group of administrators.”

That was almost a decade ago.

This does not happen overnight or by accident. It is the result of faculty and administrators replicating their own views while effectively purging their ranks of conservatives or moderates.

Today, even liberal columnists like Ezra Klein have been subject to disruptive protests. It is rare for libertarian or conservative figures to be invited on campuses and these faculty members have succeeded in deterring others.

It is important for speakers to continue to appear on campuses despite these threats. We cannot yield to the mob.

Indeed, today I will be speaking at the University of Southern California from 12:00 pm to 1:30 pm PST at the USC Davidson Conference Center (3409 South Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA 90007). I look forward to speaking about my book Rage and the Republic.” I will then be speaking in the evening at the California Club.

 

174 thoughts on ““Anathema in the University Mission”: Bari Weiss Canceled at UCLA”

  1. I remember a game called Propaganda where you won points if you could recognize the specific fallacy in an argument (e.g. appeal to authority, ad hominem, etc.). It wasn’t such a fun game, but it was educational and memorable (from 50+ years ago). In that English & writing courses are to teach reasoned thought and expression; this seems like a great time to bring back this idea. It would not be hard to do. You could do this as a Bingo card in the comments section here, as one example!

  2. We know how she got her job, and that she has no ethics, journalistic or otherwise. Only connections to the Zio imperialist gangsters got her the gig, and she’s simply boring, weird, and incompetent. We’re not buying news from well-funded liars.

  3. Reading the comments, there seems to be some question over how the speech cancellation came to pass.
    Obviously, some UCLA students, 11K out of 48K (23%) wanted the speech cancelled, and signed a petition.

    The Bari Weiss security team and UCLA Admin could not reach agreement about security arrangements.
    The Weiss team, failing to obtain assurances of adequate event security, backed out of the event.

    Is this a factual rundown? (for those of us more interested in facts than taking sides)

    1. pbinca,
      Actually I believe you have a concise summary of what has transpired that we know of.
      You bring up a very good point: What were the security measures/assurances they could not agree upon?

Leave a Reply