Bio

JONATHAN TURLEY
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

unnamed-1Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, the University of Chicago, and other schools. He is a New York Times best-selling author of The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage (available here) and “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution” (#2 on NY Times Bestseller List).

After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In 2024, a G.W. alum endowed a fellowship after him, “The Professor Jonathan Turley Public Interest and Public Service Summer Fellowship.

In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients. He is also one of the few attorneys to successfully challenge both a federal and a state law — leading to courts striking down the federal Elizabeth Morgan law as well as the state criminalization of cohabitation.

In 2010, Professor Turley represented Judge G. Thomas Porteous in his impeachment trial. After a trial before the Senate, Professor Turley (on December 7, 2010) argued both the motions and gave the final argument to all 100 U.S. Senators from the well of the Senate floor — only the 14th time in history of the country that such a trial of a judge has reached the Senate floor. Judge Porteous was convicted of four articles of impeachments, including the acceptance of $2000 from an attorney and using a false name on a bankruptcy filing.

In 2011, Professor Turley filed a challenge to the Libyan War on behalf of ten members of Congress, including Representatives Roscoe Bartlett (R., Md); Dan Burton (R., Ind.); Mike Capuano (D., Mass.); Howard Coble (R., N.C.); John Conyers (D., Mich.); John J. Duncan (R., Tenn.); Tim Johnson (R., Ill.); Walter Jones (R., N.C.); Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio); and Ron Paul (R., Tx). The lawsuit was before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Turley-600x287In November 2014, Turley agreed to serve as lead counsel to the United States House of Representatives in its constitutional challenge to changes ordered by President Obama to the Affordable Care Act. The litigation was approved by the House of Representatives to seek judicial review of the claims under the separation of powers. On May 12, 2016, the federal court handed down a historic victory for the House and ruled that the Obama Administration violated the separation of powers in ordering billions to be paid to insurance companies without an appropriation of Congress.

Other cases include his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. In the Foretich case, Turley succeeded recently in reversing a trial court and striking down a federal statute through a rare “bill of attainder” challenge. Professor Turley has also served as counsel in a variety of national security cases, including espionage cases like that of Jim Nicholson, the highest ranking CIA officer ever accused of espionage. Turley also served as lead defense counsel in the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia. Turley also served as defense counsel in the case of Dr. Tom Butler, who is faced criminal charges dealing with the importation and handling of thirty vials of plague in Texas. He also served as counsel to Larry Hanauer, the House Intelligence Committee staffer accused of leaking a classified Presidential National Intelligence Estimate to the New York Times. (Hanauer was cleared of all allegations).

05282015_6695Among his current cases, Professor Turley represents Dr. Ali Al-Timimi, who was convicted in Virginia in 2005 of violent speech against the United States. (He was ultimately cleared of all charges in 2026). In 2020, the federal court found that there was merit in the challenges raised by Professor Turley and his co-counsel Tom Huff. Accordingly, the judge ordered his release to protect him from Covit-19 while the Court prepared a decision on the challenges. Pursuant to a court order, Dr. Al-Timimi was released from the Supermax in Colorado and the two drove across the country so that he could be placed into home confinement.  He also represented Dr. Sami Al-Arian, who was accused of being the American leader of a terrorist organization while he was a university professor in Florida. Turley represented Dr. Al-Arian for eight years, much of which was in a determined defense against an indictment for criminal contempt. The case centered on the alleged violation of a plea bargain by the Justice Department after Dr. Al-Arian was largely exonerated of terrorism charges in Tampa, Florida. On June 27, 2014, all charges were dropped against Dr. Al-Arian. He also represented pilots approaching or over the age of 60 in their challenge to the mandatory retirement age of the FAA. He also represented David Murphee Faulk, the whistleblower who disclosed abuses in the surveillance operations at NSA’s Fort Gordon facility in Georgia.

Professor Turley also served as an expert defense witness in the extradition proceedings of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in London. Turley was asked to testify on the likely pre-trial, trial, and appellate issues facing Mr. Assange as well as the prison conditions that he could expect upon extradition to Northern Virginia for trial.

Professor Turley also agreed to serve as lead counsel representing the Brown family from the TLC program “Sister Wives, a reality show on plural marriage or polygamy. On December 13, 2013, the federal court in Utah struck down the criminalization of polygamy — the first such decision in history — on free exercise and due process grounds. On September 26, 2014, the court also ruled in favor of the Browns under Section 1983 — giving them a clean sweep on all of the statutory and constitutional claims.  In April 2015, a panel reversed the decision on standing grounds and that decision is now on appeal.

Professor Turley was also lead counsel in the World Bank protest case stemming from the mass arrest of people in 2002 by the federal and district governments during demonstrations of the IMF and World Bank.  Turley and his co-lead counsel Dan Schwartz (and the law firm of Bryan Cave) were the first to file and represented student journalists arrested without probable cause.  In April 2015, after 13 years of intense litigation, the case was settled for $2.8 million, including $115,000 for each arrestee — a record damage award in a case of this kind and over twice the amount of prior damages for individual protesters.  The case also exposed government destruction and withholding of evidence as well as the admitted mass arrest of hundreds of people without probable cause.

Professor Turley also served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British Columbia (Canada) Supreme Court. In the latter case, he argued for the decriminalization of plural union and conjugal unions. In 2012, Turley also represented the makers of “Five Wives Vodka” (Ogden’s Own Distillery) in challenging an effective ban on the product in Idaho after officials declared the product to be offensive to Mormons. After opposing the ban on free speech and other grounds, the state of Idaho issued a letter apologizing for public statements made by officials and lifting the ban on sale for “Five Wives Vodka.”

Turley has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, including with the Florida House of Representatives. He also served as the consultant to the Puerto Rico House of Representatives on the impeachment of Gov. Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.

05282015_6655Professor Turley is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. He has testified over 100 times in the House and the Senate. That testimony includes the confirmation hearings of Attorney General nominees Loretta Lynch and William Barr as well as Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.  Professor Turley is also a nationally recognized legal commentator. Professor Turley was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited “public intellectuals” in the recent study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was also found to be the second most cited law professor in the country. He has been ranked in the top five most popular law professors on Twitter and has been repeatedly ranked in the nation’s top 500 lawyers in annual surveys (including in the latest rankings by LawDragon) – one of only a handful of academics. In prior years, he was ranked as one of the nation’s top ten lawyers in military law cases as well as one of the top 40 lawyers under 40. He was also selected in the last five years as one of the 100 top Irish lawyers in the world.  In 2016, he was ranked as one of the 100 most famous (past and present) law professors.

694940094001_6113691487001_6113685625001-vsProfessor Turley is one of only two academics to testify at both the Clinton and Trump impeachment hearings. In December 2019, Professor Turley was called as the one Republican witness in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings.  He appeared with three Democratic witnesses.  Professor Turley disagreed with his fellow witnesses in opposing the proposed articles of impeachments on bribery, extortion, campaign finance violations or obstruction of justice. He argued that these alleged impeachable acts were at odds with controlling definitions of those crimes and that Congress has historically looked to the criminal code and cases for guidance on such allegations.  The committee ultimately rejected those articles and adopted the only two articles that Professor Turley said could be legitimately advanced: abuse of power, obstruction of Congress. Chairman Jerrold Nadler even ended the hearing by quoting his position on abuse of power. However, Turley  opposed impeachment on this record as incomplete and insufficient for submission to the Senate. He argued for the House to wait and complete the record by seeking to compel key witnesses like former National Security Adviser John Bolton.  His testimony was later relied upon in the impeachment floor debate by various House members and he was cited by both the White House and House managers in their arguments before the United States Senate in the Trump impeachment trial, including videotaped remarks played at the trial.

download-2Professor Turley’s articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications with hundreds of articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is a columnist for USA Today and writes regularly for the Washington Post. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on civil liberties by The Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC News, CBS News, BBC and Fox News.  Professor Turley has been a repeated guest on Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday. Professor Turley has taught courses on constitutional law, constitutional criminal law, environmental law, litigation, and torts. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS). His work with older prisoners has been honored in various states, including his selection as the 2011 recipient of the Dr. Mary Ann Quaranta Elder Justice Award at Fordham University.

In 2024, the Washingtonian recognized Turley as one of the most influential persons in shaping policy. His award-winning blog is routinely ranked as one of the most popular legal blogs by AVVO. His blog was selected as the top News/Analysis site in 2013, the top Legal Opinion Blog in 2011 as well as prior selections as the top Law Professor Blog and Legal Theory Blog. It was also ranked in the top 20 constitutional law blog in 2018.  It has been regularly ranked by the ABA Journal in the top 100 blogs in the world. In 2012, Turley was selected as one of the top 20 legal experts on Twitter by Business Insider. In 2013, the ABA Journal inducted the Turley Blog into its Hall of Fame. In addition to teaching a course on the Supreme Court and the Constitution, he is on the board of the Supreme Court Historical Society.

Professor Turley received his B.A. at the University of Chicago and his J.D. at Northwestern. In 2008, he was given an honorary Doctorate of Law from John Marshall Law School for his contributions to civil liberties and the public interest.

Twitter: @jonathanturley

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.” and “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”

 

Icon made by DinosoftLabs from Flaticon

1,630 thoughts on “Bio”

  1. Dear Mr Turley, I’m a homeless person living in LA. I offended some people back min 1998 with connections to the fire dept, fed ex and the Bergen county sheriifs office. A smear campaign was initiated against me. I was illegally injected with microchips during a consumer product study in July 2004 in Fairfield, NJ. For the past 12 years I’ve been systematically stalked like an animal by large groups of people. I’ve been ignored by virtually anyone who can make a difference. Personally gave a letter to Chris Christie in Dec 2008 at Bergen Community college, had filed a complaint with his office in 2003. Being ignored by all people in LA who can do something. I feel like I’m the enemy and I’m just a civilian. So I walk around with foreign objects in my body so people at the police/fire dept. can get their jollies. Our country is in far worse shape than anyone previously thought. If no cares that I don’t have civil rights anymore, who’s next? and why will anyone care? Can you tell me where I can go for surgery. I’m getting the perpetual runaround here.

  2. Your list of ten reasons why we may no longer be a free nation should be committed to memory and we should be tested on them periodically..

  3. I thought Professor Turley would like to comment on this astounding action by a judge who skipped class when the Fifth Amendment was covered. It’s mind boggling and horrifying. And bravo to the rookie defense attorney.

  4. Dear Professor Turley

    I have recently published a novel, Luke2, which hypothesizes how a Christian fundamentalist might alter the face of U.S. politics. I think you’d like it. May I mail you a copy or send you the Kindle file?

  5. Gene H.

    Thank you for that. seems they have removed the post and me from the thread.

    Not surprised. Real law is not friendly to the crooks.

    If anyone wants to know the truth, google lawful detroit and see why i say.

  6. Law DeSchilde/DonS,

    If your posts have more than two links, WordPress automatically sends them to moderation. Neither the Professor nor any of the Guest Bloggers clear the moderation queue and it is effectively limbo. No conspiracy required.

  7. Just wondering whether some later comments on the gigantic thread

    ” Final Curtain: Obama Signs Indefinite Detention of Citizens Into Law As Final Act of 2011
    Published 1, January 2, 201″

    were lost, dropped out or intentionally removed? Some are definitely gone.

    Don’t want to get conspiratorial here. Yet.

  8. I am new to the blog and enjoy reading the articles. I spent 38 years practicing law and a lot of my best time was for civil rights clients. I have found here something that centers on my civil liberties interests. When I chime in with comments it may be jocularly. But this is serious stuff.

    When Gingrich came out with the call to arms to arrest activist judges on the Ninth Circuit and elsewhere with the Capitol Police (sp) and the U.S. Marshals, he stepped over the line into war crimes. It would be appropriate in this blog to discuss the Judges Trial at Nuremberg prosecuted by the United States alone right after the International Tribunials. Folks can Google Josef Alstoetter and find the articles. Here is a description from wikipedia:
    The Judges’ Trial (or the Justice Trial, or, officially, The United States of America vs. Josef Altstötter, et al.) was the third of the 12 trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the “Subsequent Nuremberg Trials” or, more formally, as the “Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals” (NMT).
    The defendants in this case were 16 German jurists and lawyers. Nine had been officials of the Reich Ministry of Justice, the others were prosecutors and judges of the Special Courts and People’s Courts of Nazi Germany. They were — amongst other charges — held responsible for implementing and furthering the Nazi “racial purity” program through the eugenic and racial laws.

  9. Mr Turley, I watched a wonderful interview you did on privacy and the erosion of same, including the erosion/amendments to the constitution, and arrest and confinement at the will/whim of the government without due process .
    I don’t know a-lot about the American voting system other than when it comes to Americans on the day of voting they have options of A or B, as you say Blue or Red. Perhaps a end result is voting for the one you least despise.
    Would it not be possible especially in today’s climate of such (largely ignored) civil dissatisfaction and unrest that a motion be promoted that instead of voting A or B that the people write through the middle of the vote NEITHER OF THE ABOVE, actively vote for NEITHER OF THE ABOVE!
    Surly it would have some impact if only in letting the American people see that they do have a choice by actively voting against. It may help dissipate some of the downtrodden lethargy and helplessness experienced by many or most of America today!

  10. In theory are here loopholes in the Constitution that will allow a President to circumvent Congress to utilize his excutive order powers to constitutionally protect and stimulate the economy?

  11. Mr. Turley———do you think polygamy should be legal?? Do you think we should have legalized gay marriage 100 years ago?? Why is President Obama and Hillary and Al Gore and John Kerry against gay marriage?? Maybe because they fear God. Do we have too many law schools in our blessed country?? I for one think we should just keep society simple and have faith, prayer, fasting, pay tithing, community support, strong families, traditional marriage and be honest with ourselves and say it is breaking God’s commandments that breaks down the family and that in turn breaks down society. (Bible is more important than law school and constitution) It is that simple. It is not complex. It is not legal theory. Sin is sin—–Paul and Peter said so; all are free to agree or disagree—-but nobody can change the commandments and the need for prophets both anciently and today (yes I’m Mormon)—- to say what we read in 1 Corinthians (chapters 1-3) that the wisdom of this world is foolishness—the wisdom in law school is foolishness. Being moral and honest and of faith in sacred texts —works!!!!!! And if one has faith, there is never a need to worry about free speech—-God will protect us—-if you have no faith—you are on your own in life. Intellectuals run around saying “Be afraid of this” “Be afraid of that”——people will take this away from you—-or that——-no, God is in control and you can not force me to live by fear. Book of Mormon is near 150 million printings and you are fighting an uphill battle against simple faith, prayer and keeping God’s commandments. You are kicking against the pricks as Paul was told in Acts.

  12. Prof. Turley,
    I appreciated your comments on C-SPAN but invocations of George Orwell are a convenient but maybe not ultimately helpful way to understand the Jones case. I’m at a loss to understand the difference between a tracking device (not ok) versus traditional (and far more extensive) surveillance.

Comments are closed.