Supreme Court of Canada Defends Fair Comment and Free Speech

In the last year, we have seen some alarming examples of how Canada has rolled back on free speech, particularly in cases of alleged discrimination (here and here). However, the Supreme Court of Canada has handed down a unanimous decision that offers great hope that free speech is not dead in the North. The Court ruled 9-0 in favor of controversial Vancouver radio broadcaster Rafe Mair in his libel case.

Mair was accused of defaming Kari Simpson, a Christian advocate, who he tied to book burning.

Mr. Mair, a former cabinet minister, used a radio show to criticize Mair for her support of a Surrey school board decision to ban three books depicting same-sex parents. Comparing the policy to Nazi Germany, Mair said “[f]or Kari’s ‘homosexual,’ one could easily substitute ‘Jew.’ I could see Governor Wallace – in my mind’s eye I could see Governor Wallace of Alabama standing on the steps of a schoolhouse shouting to the crowds that no Negroes would get into Alabama schools as long as he was governor. It could have been blacks last Thursday night just as easily as gays.”

In a refreshing moment of clairty, Mr. Justice Ian Binnie said that “We live in a free country, where people have as much right to express outrageous and ridiculous opinions as moderate ones.”

It is a decision that Canadians should be rightfully proud of and a relief to those of us who have been watching our neighbors with increasing alarm.

For a copy of the opinion, click here.

For the full story, click here.

3 Responses to “Supreme Court of Canada Defends Fair Comment and Free Speech”


  1. 1 Bob, Esq. 1, June 30, 2008 at 4:22 pm

    Wasn’t there a portion of the NAFTA treaty that provided for Canada & The U.S. to merge under the new name: “Mexico Sucks?”

  2. 2 whooliebacon 1, June 30, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    Bob, esq.

    Check out Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America…US, Canada, and Mexico…at SPP.gov, wikipedia, and Council on Foreign Relations.

    This stuff is amazing. Only thing I can figure is that it is a legal way of ripping off the natural resources of Canada while cutting out American workers.

    Bypasses both Congress and US citizens. It is a government unto itself with international trade laws that supercede the sovereignty of any of these nations.

    And, of course, denies existence of a proposed NAFTA 6 lane highway from Mexico into Canada. Texas Department of transportation with funding from private interest in Spain appears to be the initial point.

    So much for the US Constitution’s investment of sovereignty in its people.

    Even with globalization faltering, the SPP moves on.

  3. 3 zakimar 1, July 24, 2008 at 3:31 am

    It’s only free speech when a Jew is arguing for it. When a German resident denied the holocaust he was charged with spreading hate and deported. Canada has the same problem as the US and much of Europe. It makes me sometimes look fondly at Iran.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 781 other followers