Michigan Court Narrows Definition of Sex Offender to Exclude Bestiality

The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that the definition of sex offender does not include people convicted of bestiality. That means that Jeffrey Scott Haynes, 45, will not have to register after serving time for have sex with sheep.

Haynes has a long history of crimes that stretch across the criminal code from forgery to home invasion to bad checks. He added trespass and bestiality when a ranch owner caught him on his ranch in January 2005 and reported that her sleep were injures. DNA evidence proved the crime and Haynes pleaded no contest. (DNA tests appear increasingly used in such cases, here).

Calhoun County Circuit Court ordered him to register as a sex offender after he completed his sentence. He is still serving time.

The three judge panel rules that “victims” of sexual assault only include humans.

For the full story, click here.

2 Responses to “Michigan Court Narrows Definition of Sex Offender to Exclude Bestiality”


  1. 1 3L 1, September 26, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    I agree with the panel. Maybe this guy could have an “emergency rule” amputation like our friend in Kentucky.

  2. 2 david 1, September 29, 2008 at 11:02 pm

    Ewe! Umm, I mean “Eww!”

    Do you suppose he thought he would avoid publicity if he didn’t have to register? Not be in the public eye? Oops. Be careful what you wish for, I guess.

    In a few years, he’ll be in the second round of a job interview and the boss will say, ‘well, you passed the background check, but, wait a minute… you look familiar…”

    Seriously, the animal rights people will be all over this. I found this ouonce when wrote a letter to the editor in which I pointed out that a Menard’s ad which showed a golden retriever penned in a 6 by 6 kennel showed a violation of Omaha’s “cruelty to animals” ordinance. The law forbid providing a dog over 40 lbs. with less than 40 square feet of space, so anyone imitating the ad, I observed, risked a conviction for “cruelty” which would be hard to explain away. I assumed people would be upset about this intrusion on liberty but overwhelmingly the replies focused on the need to protect animals.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 595 other followers