In Whitehead, Indiana, Michelle Owen, 24, was allegedly so focused on incriminating her ex-boyfriend for downloading child pornography that she forgot about picture showing her engaged in sex acts with a dog.
Police report that Owen called them to invite then to review her computer to see her ex-boyfriend’s downloads of child pornography. Instead, they found two video files that allegedly showed Owen in the acts of bestiality.
She has reportedly insisted that she was drunk at the time, though few people reach for the household pets when the overindulge.
She now faces two felony counts of bestiality. It is not clear what the status of the ex-boyfriend is — beyond being an ex-boyfriend.
For the full story, click here.
What a bitch.
A guy walks into a convenience store and asks the clerk what’s the cheapest brand of beer they have.
“we’ve got Schaefer Light for $3.99 a twelve pack”, the clerk responds, so the customer buys a twelve pack and leaves the store.
A week later, the same customer comes in and buys a six pack of Moosehead. The clerk reminds him that they still have the Schaefer Light on sale.
“No way. I drank that twelve pack and wound up blowing chunks all night long”, said the customer.
Disgusted, the clerk says, “Well, maybe if you didn’t drink the whole twelve pack, you wouldn’t throw up”.
The man looks at the clerk and says, “I didn’t throw up, I blew chunks. chunks is my pet rottweiler”.
The ability of any human to act stupidly should never be underestimated.
“allegedly so intent on incriminating her ex-boyfriend”
This implies she was trying to set him up. The article doesn’t say that though the custody dispute referenced in the report opens up that she might have done that.
The report is interesting reading. First, the ex aided one of the acts — is there an aiding and abetting offense? Second, ok, is this what the statute should be used for? She had the dog lick her (in one case the guy applied something on the “location” to help) a couple times. And, both were not extended.
If a dog licks your feet, no crime. If it licks a certain other part of your anatomy … felony? Or, is it different for feet fetishes? If she did something to the dog, I can see it. But, having the dog lick her when she’s drunk. Come on.
Off Topic, but very funny . . .
Ladies and Gentlemen, may I present the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5018294/Pub-evacuated-after-Monty-Python-prop-mistaken-for-grenade.html
Buddha,
I love Monty Python. This genius from Indiana is a real sweetheart. I think her dog has more intelligence than her and her boyfriend combined.
I feel for the dog.
Mespo,
You are correct. She may be liable for cruelty to animals.
“Cruelty to animals”? Really?
What she did was definitely gross and illegal. But cruel? She put some food on a certain region of her anatomy and the dog licked it off. How is that cruel to the dog? Dogs’ll lick food off anything.
I love the part in the police report where it said the dog quickly lost interest and walked away. isn’t that just like a guy…uhhh…most guys.
All women are perverts. If they are not prostitutes, they are exhibitionists working at nude bars, flashing their genitals at strangers. Or they are female child molesters working in our schools victimizing young boys. I think there are far, far more female sex offenders in our society than male ones, which would make sense because the selective pressure has been much more intense on males during evolution. I think the only reason females don’t outnumber men on sex offender lists is because we have been conditioned to accept their sex crimes. We must begin prosecuting, arresting and registering all females who have any kind of weird sexual behavior, especially prostitutes, who are perverts.