President Bush’s nominee for the Fourth Circuit is in trouble. E. Duncan Getchell, Jr. is being sued for defamation stemming from an appeal dismissed for malpractice.
According to the lawsuit, Getchell was in charge of an appeal when the failure to file the trial transcript resulted in its dismissal. The lawsuit was brought by Christopher C. Spencer who says that Getchell conspired with his law partner, William R. Allcott to blame Spencer for the failure when the nomination ran into trouble. He insists that Getchell took complete control of the appeal after the trial and that the White House helped put out the false story that Spencer was the culprit — noting that he was the one who was sued. It is a form of common law defamation to attack the professional standing or conduct of another individual. Truth however remains a defense. Getchell could argue that he had was merely expressing an opinion, but this is routinely rejected as a defense when it clearly indicates a basis in undisclosed facts. The Virginia Supreme Court noted this in Williams v. Garraghty in 1995:
pure expressions of opinion cannot form the basis of a defamation action, but … “factual statements made to support or justify an opinion, however, can form the basis of an action for defamation.” See Swengler v. ITT Corp., 993 F.2d 1063, 1071 (4th Cir.1993) (construing Virginia law). It is for a court, not a jury, to determine, as a matter of law, whether an alleged defamatory statement is one of fact or of opinion.
The rule under the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 566 tracks the same general rule that a statement made as an opinion is still actionable “if it implies the allegation of undisclosed defamatory facts as the basis for the opinion.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 566. “[I]f the recipient draws the reasonable conclusion that the derogatory opinion expressed in the comment must have been based on undisclosed defamatory facts, the defendant is subject to liability.” Getchell will be called to account for whether he told people false statements about Spencer, a line of inquiry that could get into White House communications, raising issues of privilege. In the end, it may not matter. Getchell’s nomination was already controversial and now there is a lawsuit pending alleged false statements. For the full story, click here
One thought on “Bush Nominee for the Fourth Circuit — Duncan Getchell, Jr. — Sued for Defamation”
once upon a time the approval of a state’s two senators was considered politically important in such a nomination.
from the statement of Senators Warner and Webb:
““At the end of this process, Senator Warner and I submitted five outstanding candidates to the President. These five candidates possessed exceptional legal qualifications and received the highest ratings from the legal organizations and Bar Associations. Virginia has a long tradition of outstanding federal jurists. The names that Senator Warner and I offered were consistent with that tradition.
“Today, despite our good faith, bipartisan effort to accommodate the President, the recommendations that Senator Warner and I made have been ignored. The White House talks about the spirit of bipartisanship, lamenting congressional obstructionism. The White House cannot expect to complain about the confirmation of federal judges when they proceed to act in this manner.”
Neither home-state senatorial endorsement, ABA approval, professional competence, nor peer esteem, seem sine qua nons for this Administration’s bench nominations.
What in fact is the ruling desiderata?
Well, having a F S tie doesn’t hurt.
Comments are closed.