Controversial U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose Removed From Minnesota Post — Promoted in the Wake of Alleged Incompetence and Abuses

In a vintage moment for the Bush Administration, controversial U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose was promoted to a position in Washington in the wake of widespread allegations of abuse and incompetence.  The move is expected to assist GOP Sen. Norm Coleman who was behind the nomination of Paulose despite her lack of experience.  

Paulose was given the plum Minnesota job due to her connections in the Gonzales Justice Department — at the age of 33.  She was a personification of the lack of professional standards in the Bush Administration as people like Monica Goodling (who lacked any outstanding qualification for her own high position) worked on the firing of experienced prosecutors.  In their wake, Bush loyalists like Paulose were appointed.  Likewise, Bush officials put an inexperienced lawyers in as U.S. Attorney whose only outstanding qualification was his work as Karl Rove’s aide.

In January 2006, Paulose, then 32, began work at Justice in Washington under Acting Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and as a special assistant to Gonzales. Only one month later, she was named interim U.S. Attorney for Minnesota.  The Bush Administration used the new interim appointment  power that Democrats and Republicans voted for as part of the Patriot Act.  She was later unanimously confirmed for the permanent job by the Senate in December 2006, despite the absence of qualifications.  Once again, Democrats were absent without leave on the nomination.

Paulose quickly made an ungodly mess of the office.  She was immediately controversial for an official celebration for her installment that seemed weirdly regal, including a color guard and choir.  She was accused of reading Bible verses to her staff, berating them on their performance, using a racial slur against an employee, and retaliating against another co-worker. In April, three top supervisors stepped down from their management  positions rater than continue with her in those capacities.

What is most striking is that Paulose’s ruinous tenure results in a technical promotion to Washington. The Bush Administration simply threw out other U.S. Attorneys who were respected and experienced. However, with Paulose, her nationally ridiculed performance demanded a promotion for political reasons. 

For the full story, click here

9 thoughts on “Controversial U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose Removed From Minnesota Post — Promoted in the Wake of Alleged Incompetence and Abuses”

  1. Silk Lehenga choli is considered to be the beautiful version of old traditional attire, as it used to be in Mughal era.

    “New York City Restaurant Survey Supports Smoking Ban. The revelation provided closure for the previously unexplained tragedies.

  2. I quite like reading through a post that will make men and women think.

    Also, thanks for permitting me to comment!

  3. Hi all everyone1, just became a member of . Ive spent five hrs browsing in the internet, till i’ve found this community! I feel, I shall be here for a long time. kool forum.

  4. Good evening. Have you ever observed that we pay much more attention to a wise passage when it is quoted than when we read it in the original author? Help me! Please help find sites for: Table pads jax fla. I found only this – massage table warming pad. Table pads, not because you have always instructed any seam typically, return commonly sexually begin that you cannot. Table pads, this violation is name pressed military on one purpose and weight on the new. Thanks :o. Laraine from Portugal.

  5. It defies common sense, doesn’t it?

    Monica Goodling, Rachel Paulose’s ‘bff’, admits to “crossing the line”, politically, when evaluating lawyers for hire.

    Not only was it criminal to discriminate on that basis, but the whole idea of employing people dedicated to public service ie conducting the People’s business, is that they not only be competent, but that they be the best available.

    The line wasn’t just crossed, it was completely obliterated.

  6. It is a policy position on the Assistant Attorney General level, I believe. It is a typical “up and out” position. She will be able to assume a senior policy position reporting to the Attorney General, but kept from any actual litigation duties where true harm could result. I simply find it maddening that we will continue to pay her salary after the Bush Administration simply fired more experienced and more talented and more respected prosecutors.

  7. And close-to-insider info you can share with us about her new DC position?

    Such as just who she’ll be working for? And on what she’ll be working?

    I suggested humorously on another blog that her transfer to DC made a kind of a Bush Administration logical sense.

    That she would be the best person to takeover the investigation of herself, since she knows the most about it. *g*

    Lastly, looking forward to more of your blogging!

Comments are closed.