Will County Judge Joseph C. Polito in Illinois has become the latest case of disciplinary action for watching pornography on a work computer. Polito’s use of the courthouse computer was detected on a regular check of the computer system and, to his credit, Polito admitted the misuse. The question has now become the appropriate punishment for two counts under the Illinois judicial code.

There is no indication that child porn was involved and Polito has admitted that “I used pornography as a crutch to deal with my feelings of inadequacy.” He added that “[f]or 60 years this was an inner conflict–I was ashamed, I didn’t feel good about it and tried to stop. The only way I knew to address it was in a confession with a priest.”

Polito admits the first charge of bringing his “judicial office into disrepute” but denies that he failed to conduct himself in a way that “promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.” The latter denial appears based on his view that this was not public and did not affect his decisions.

Polito is seeking professional help for a compulsive sexual disorder and attends a Sexuality Anonymous support group twice a week.

Putting aside that denial, he did admit to the use and has been subject to what he legitimately describes as “a shameful and humbling experience.” Given that, should a reprimand be enough?

This is a violation that routinely occurs in offices around the country, including government offices. There is discussion of termination for Polito but I find that a bit harsh given his admission and treatment. If he is otherwise a judge in good standing and this is just a case of viewing porn online, I would think that a reprimand and conditions like monitoring would be sufficient. What do you think?

Source: NBC