The United States Attorney for Manhattan, Preet Bharara, appears to believe that he is working for a different branch of government. After Attorney General Jeff Sessions asked for the resignations of all U.S. Attorneys, a standard change of political appointees in a new Administration, Bharara reportedly indicated that President Donald Trump would have to fire him. Just as with the bizarre conduct of Sally Yates as Acting Attorney General, Bharara has shown a curious understanding of this position and his obligations as a federal officer. If these media reports are true, President Trump should immediately accommodate him and Bharara will have to explain to future employers how he justifies such an unfounded stance. [Update: Bharara has been fired]
I sincerely hope that the reports are not true or that Bharara quickly reconsiders and gets his letter of resignation in today. This is not the way to close a successful career as U.S. Attorney. In the end, I am not sure what the basis for refusing a letter of resignation is. Bharara seems a rebel without a cause.
New Administrations (particularly with a change of party) often demand such resignations — though many political appointees do not wait to be asked. Of the 93 U.S. attorneys, 46 were appointed by President Obama. There are career deputies who take over during the interim in these offices. The decision to ask for resignations depends on the president. Bill Clinton did so (including asking Jeff Sessions to resign) while George W. Bush gradually replaced U.S. Attorneys.
Ironically, presidents will sometimes ask for global resignations from political appointees only to decline to accept some on an individual basis. Bharara’s action guaranteed that he would not be one of them. US Attorneys Dana Boente and Rod Rosenstein did submit their letters and appear to have to told that the president has decline to accept their resignations. We will never know of Bharar might have been on that short list because he placed himself on an even shorter list in refusing to resign.
Bharara reportedly felt blindsided by the move and earlier spoke to Trump at Trump Tower. He said that Trump directed Bharara to go out to the cameras and tell them, “I asked you to stay.” Ok, even that is true, what professional standard is Bharara relying on for this obstructive position? Bharara has no claim to this political position or right to demand to remain in the position. According to news reports, Bharara indicated that Sen. Chuck Schumer wanted him to continue and the President agreed. Again, that does not change the fact that he serves at the pleasure of the president.
The Washington Post reported that Bharara first asked for clarification if the demand for resignations applied to him. However, other media outlets like Jake Tapper at CNN are reporting that he refused to submit the letter.
If true, the demand to be fired would be astonishingly unprofessional and frankly juvenile for a high-ranking prosecutor. Bharara has assembled an impressive record as U.S. Attorney and he would tarnish both that record and his office with this position. He should be fired without delay if indeed he has refused and I would hope that such a position would weigh heavily in any future consideration for public office or appointment.
Reblogged this on pundit from another planet.
Even Sessions had asked him to stay on:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/preet-bharara-us-attorney-refuses-resign-jeff-sessions
Kakistocracy in action!
For a time. So what? He asked for his resignation.
There is a candidate for the job named Katy Bardedoor. She is against migrants from terrorist territories. I hope Trump appoints her.
Here is a neutral account:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39243529
I suspect he’ll do well out of refusing to resign after being asked to stay on. Turley is wrong once again.
Given that The Donald belongs in Bedlam, not the White House, this action is commendable.
How old is this Preet guy, anyway? Could he be a senior member of the snowflake generation? Yes, maybe he loves the power of being a U.S. Attorney, but when it’s time to go, it’s time to go. And Trump won’t think twice about telling him “you’re fired,” if that’s what he thinks should be done. Trump expects a man to actually act like a man. Snowflakes might not understand that, but the rest of us do.
Gee. “Stand up” to the Trumpet and …. in a flash! you are Jeanne d’Arc on the battlefield.
It’s laughable.
Again, quoting Laurence Tribe:
“Bahara “is a hero. His firing was no ordinary turnover,” tweeted Harvard constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe. “It was a cowardly about-face by #conmantrump fearing Bharara’s investigations.””
Preet Bharara will do just fine.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/11/across-aisle-uproar-over-preet-bhararas-firing/99066268/
When the decision came down on Saturday, Schumer commended Bharara, saying his “relentless drive to root out public corruption, lock up terrorists, take on Wall Street, and stand up for what is right should serve as a model for all U.S. attorneys across the country. He will be sorely missed.”
The senator’s criticisms were echoed more harshly by other politicians.
“So much for wanting to drain the swamp. (Bharara) served with distinction and didn’t care about party … what a shame,” wrote Democratic N.Y. state Sen. Todd Kaminsky.
“Trump just fired prosecutor renowned for public corruption cases. So much for the rule of law. Sad!” tweeted Rep. Hakeen Jeffries, D-N.Y.
Republicans, too, released statements condemning the respected prosecutor’s firing.
“Definitely not a wise move at all if (Bharara) was asked to resign. This should immediately be reconsidered by AG Sessions. Big mistake,” wrote NY Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin on Twitter Friday. He had also issued a direct plea to Sessions to spare the prosecutor. “We need him here in NY to #Draintheswamp,” McLaughlin wrote.
GOP New York State Assembly leader Brian Kolb also threw support to Bharara for refusing to step down, prior to his firing. “Good for Preet, he is doing the job he was appointed to do!” Kolb tweeted early Saturday.
Bahara “is a hero. His firing was no ordinary turnover,” tweeted Harvard constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe. “It was a cowardly about-face by #conmantrump fearing Bharara’s investigations.”
“You have been a great and fearless public servant and those are in very short supply. You will be called upon again,” wrote former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean.
“Trump just fired prosecutor renowned for public corruption cases. So much for the rule of law. Sad!” tweeted Rep. Hakeen Jeffries, D-N.Y.
Huh??? What public corruption cases? Did this due put any of the WS bankers in jail? I didn’t think so.
“We need him here in NY to #Draintheswamp,” McLaughlin (R) wrote. That’s code for, “Psst. he’s a player.”
Did this
due-> dude put any of the WS bankers…http://nypost.com/2015/10/05/supreme-court-rejects-insider-trading-case-in-setback-for-bharara/ “Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara’s six-year battle against Wall Street got derailed on Monday when the Supreme Court refused to hear the government’s appeal of a key insider-trading case.
Bharara, who has charged 96 people during his long-running probe, wanted the High Court to consider overturning an appeals court decision that made it tougher to prosecute some Wall Street traders.” Hard to put these guys in jail but he had some successes.
Pure nonsense. These guys waited out the statute of limitations on many of high level crimes which they had plenty of evidence to convict with. Even Ronald Regan put over 1000 bankers in jail during hte S&L banking crisis, Dem score under Obama? Shameless, absolutely shameless.
I should have said, “Out of the zero (0) bankers put in jail for the banking crisis of 2007-8, how many of those put in jail (to remind the gentle reader, that total number – if you can hold it in your head, was smaller than one and greater than minus one) were put in the slammer due to the efforts of Bharara?” I’ll give you a hint. It can’t be greater than the total number of bankers put in prison which, last time, was zero; otherwise known with the symbol, (0). Spoiler Alert on the answer: not many.
Trump seems to be doing a great job of catching up, particularly if you look at the health care fiasco he’s endorsing that puts the mandate money directly in the pockets of the insurers (again, shameless). But he’s still got a ways to go.
BB,
No, he sure didn’t! The bankers walked. Surprise!
Karen S.
I agree. He’ll be a darling but for no reason. The US has had people of conscious who resisted a president and resigned rather than carry out what they believed to be unlawful/unjust orders. This didn’t happen here. It appears to be a case of large ego disorder. Nevertheless, many will think him a hero (of what?).
He’s making much ado about nothing. It’s usual and customary to clear out US Attorneys and appoint your own. They serve at the pleasure of the President. Resigning when asked in this position is part of the job, to be handled with dignity.
I’m disappointed in yet another fight. This wasn’t the classy way to handle things. Why not chain himself to his desk and go on a hunger strike? Get protesters in the hallway? He’ll be a darling in some circles and have embarrassed himself in others.
With Trump’s hedge fund and gangster buds
WhatEVER.
Well put, Karen. That about sums it up. An odd waste.
Another leftist defender of the faith throwing himself on his sword. His actions make perfect sense if you read Shelby Steele’s piece in the WSJ.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-exhaustion-of-american-liberalism-1488751826
If the reason he was to stay was because Chuckie Schumer wanted, I would send in the firing squad from Better Off Ted. He wouldn’t make past the first coffee break.
An endorsement from Comrade Schumer is the political kiss of death. He got released for incompatibility as part of the general layoffs.
Michael Aarethun – I understand he finally got the firing he asked for. 🙂
Go back to India!
It would seem that the most important image to project when one is engaged in the judicial system, is one of complete separation from politics. You keep your party allegiances to yourself, from yourself. However, this time there seems to be another ingredient, DDT apparently inferred or even stated-however being such a prolific liar anything DDT says cannot be taken with any seriousness-that this guy would stay. Even so, the most appropriate approach to this from this guy would have been to simply follow protocol and resign.
Jack
You illustrate what is wrong with this country very clearly. Keep it up for only confronted with the disease can one heal ones self. And, this country is festering. You do have a purpose after all.
Is this guy from India? Afghanistan? Does he have a visa? Was he born here?
Racism, bigotry, whatever you want to call it is nothing more than an expression of self loathing. One is so at odds with how one turned out, one seeks others to put down, in order to be,’comparatively’ superior. Caught in this revealed state, a fella will weasel and explain to maintain that perverse sense of credibility. But, in the end, when it all comes down to it, that fella is simply a racist and/or a bigot. Weasel on. This guy from India is worth a million home grown Americans or your ilk.
You will soon read in the mainstream how he has been hired by some lefty organization, watch and see.
Blah, blah. By refusing to resign, he gets to put “Fired by Donald J. Trump” on his resume and becomes a leftist martyr. After touring CNN, MSNBC and the broadcasts, he’ll get a named partnership in LA or SF.
What do you call the dismissal of 46 U.S. Attorneys from the U.S. Justice Department? A good start. But not nearly enough.
If Trump doesn’t clean house and eradicate the numerous traitorous moles within the U.S. Govenment, especially the CIA and the FBI, where they are burrowed deep, then the sabotage will not only continue, but will INCREASE. And the damage to America will continue UNABATED.
A good place to start and to have an immediate impact would be to identify the individuals responsible for concealing or destroying the CIA’s and the FBI’s records of its involvement in the 9/11 crimes and the John F. Kennedy assassination. These crimes are the Rosetta Stones of the criminal CIA/FBI syndicate operations.
Trump should FIRE everyone directly and indirectly involved, including their subordinates. A post-termination investigation should also be conducted to expose their traitorous activities. Such an act would be a DEATH KNELL to the Deep State. But Trump has to take action and do it fast. He should not wait or merely threaten like JFK did when he said that he wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces.”
We all know what happened the JFK. And after his murder, the Deep State installed former CIA Director Allen Dulles–whom JFK had fired about a year before his death–to preside over the phony “investigation” of JFK’s assassination to ensure that their crime would be covered up. And make no mistake about it. Although they called the committee that “investigated” JFK’s murder the “Warren” Commission, Chief Justice Earl Warren was just a front man, a stooge, a pawn–under the thumb and control of the Deep State’s REAL power player, Allen Dulles.
So, Trump’s actions should be decisive, swift, and merciless. When you’re dealing with the lowest form of skum in the U.S. Government, that is the only appropriate way to deal with them.
We all know what happened the JFK. And after his murder, the Deep State installed former CIA Director Allen Dulles–whom JFK had fired about a year before his death–to preside over the phony “investigation” of JFK’s assassination to ensure that their crime would be covered up. And make no mistake about it. Although they called the committee that “investigated” JFK’s murder the “Warren” Commission, Chief Justice Earl Warren was just a front man, a stooge, a pawn–under the thumb and control of the Deep State’s REAL power player, Allen Dulles.
No,we don’t know that, because it’s a fantasy.
desperatelyseekingleftism, you’ve never studied anything regarding the JFK assassination and know nothing about it whatsoever. Dulles was in charge of the Warrenm Commission, not Earl Warren. The CIA has been deeply involved in the coverup of the crime from the start.
To get just a little insight into the truth, see Dan Hardway’s declaration below:
http://aarclibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Doc.-156-1.-Dan-L.-Hardway-Declaration.pdf
But I doubt that you will do ANY reading or studying about ANYTHING regarding the mountains of evidence proving that JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy and that the conspiracy and coverup involved the U.S Government. You’ll just deny, deny, deny, like any dupe, dolt, or dope would do.
desperatelyseekingleftism, you’ve never studied anything regarding the JFK assassination and know nothing about it whatsoever. Dulles was in charge of the Warrenm Commission, not Earl Warren. The CIA has been deeply involved in the coverup of the crime from the start.
No, I’ve not bothered much with the worthless crank literature you fancy is ‘informative’. The chairman of the Warren Commission was …. Earl Warren. The staff director was Lee Rankin. That it pleases you to think otherwise, is your problem, not anyone else’s.
No, your failure to understand basic facts is your problem. Today 61% of Americans udnerstand that JFK was murdered as a result of a conspiracy and that the U.S. Government is involved, at a minimum, in the coverup of the conspiracy. That means that even a significant portion of leftist dupes, dolts, and dopes, much like yourself, also understand that the U.S. Government has been lying to the public about the assassination for nearly 54 years. As I’ve said many times, ignorance can be educated and crazy can be medicated but there’s no cure for stupid. Enjoy it. It’s all you’ve got.
No, your failure to understand basic facts is your problem.
Basic facts are what you have an allergy to. Fictions spun by fools is what you’re addicted to.
the U.S. Government has been lying to the public about the assassination for nearly 54 years.
No, for 54 years, fantasists like Jim Garrison and David LIfton have failed to assemble via inductive reasoning a history that’s to their liking. So we get travesties like the Clay Shaw trial. They cannot assemble a history to their liking because a history to their liking is a fiction.
The actual history was that an employee of the Texas School Book Depository – a man who had been addled by a hopelessly inflated self-assessment for at least 10 of his 24 years – showed up for work with a rifle (concealed in a package which he told his car pool mate held ‘curtain rods’), assembled a sniper’s nest on one of the upper floors, and took three shots at a passing limousine with six people in it, wounding one, killing another, and splattering the rest of the occupants with brains. He then left the scene armed with a pistol and was later collared on foot near his residence by a Dallas police officer. He shoots the police officer dead and ducks in a nearby theatre, where he’s arrested a half hour later.
Lee Harvey Oswald was adept at one thing: getting fired from his job, something he accomplished again and again and again. He was far to erratic and obnoxious to be of much use to anyone and had little or no history of executing collaborative projects with anyone.
Congratulations, desperatelyseekingleftism, you’ve got the basics of the official lie down. But that says nothing, as I’ve already made the case that you;re a programmed automaton, incapable of reading, comprehending, or understanding anything in connection with the truth behind the JFK conspiracy. As I’ve said many times, ignorance can be educated and crazy can be medicated but there’s no cure for stupid. Enjoy it. It’s all you’ve got.
You again. Let’s hear the ‘truth’. What is this year’s version? French Quarter queers? The Ngo family? Castro? Santos Trafficante? Conspirators hacking away at the president’s cranium and brain on Air Force One? The Grassy Knoll assassin that no one ever sees, who misses the president and the presidential limousine? Or is it some internatoinal harmonic convergence of cashiered CIA director, Jack Ruby’s mob buddies, and Ruth Paine?
DSS…
None of the above.
JFK survived the assassination attempt, and will be 100 in May.
This theory rivals those of Oliver Stone, and is explained in the underrated movie Bubba Ho Tepp.
And since you enjoy being an ultrasubcretin, I’ll leave you with a thought to ponder.
ALL of the surgeons, physicians, nurses, and others that attended to JFK at Parkland Hospital and observed his wounds noted that his throat wound was an ENTRY wound and that the fatal shot to his head blew out the occipital parietal region of his skull, which could ONLY have resulted from a shot from the right front of JFK. Among those doctors were Perry, McClelland, Carrico, Crenshaw, Baxter, Clark, Jenkins, and more.
Obviously, under those circumstances, the U.S. Government conspirators could NOT permit the autopsy to take place in Dallas in accordance with the law. Consequently, the U.S. Secret Service–which stood down from their duties to protect the president when he was alive in the motorcade–violated the law, stole JFK’s body, and shipped it to Bethesda. The autopsy HAD to be conducted ONLY by the military, as ONLY the military could be trusted to follow orders and to maintain absolute secrecy.
And who were the people in charge of the autopsy? Two pathologists were selected named Humes and Boswell.
Now, while ALL of the physicians and surgeons at the emergency room at Parkland were VERY experienced in gunshot wounds, as was Earl Rose, the coroner at Dallas who SHOULD have performed the autopsy under LAW–how much experience do you think that Humes and Boswell had in forensic examinations of gunshot wounds?
The correct answer: ZERO! That’s right, the two pathologists, Humes and Boswell–who were not coroners–had ZERO experience in gunshot wounds, and yet were charged with performing one of the most important autopsies in U.S. Government history. And when Dr. Perry from Parkland tried to contact Humes, Humes, under orders from the U.S Secret Service and the FBI was informed that he could not discuss the case with ANYONE, unless they specifically approved it. No wonder Humes BURNED his autopsy records and notes before writing the official story he was ordered to write.
Here’s Dr. Crenshaw describing what he observed and experienced on November 22, 1963:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYPXy63EWDo
Of course, everything of spoken of is fact. And you have failed to present so much as one fact. But that is to be expected. Liars, dupes, dupes, and dolts don’t like facts. And they run from facts like most cockroaches do when faced with a glaring light–with apologies to the cockroaches.
Ralph…
4 of the 5 MDs aho treated JFK at Parkland reviewed the autopsy report, and stated that the those results were consistent with what the observed in the ER.
What THEY observed”
Incorrect, tnash80hotmailcom. The autopsy report did NOT refer to the huge gaping wound at JFK’s right REAR in the occipital parietal area of his skull. Yet, as you can see in this video of the some of the many surgeons who actually treated JFK at Parkland, they ALL recall the huge gaping wound at JFK’s right REAR in the occipital parietal area of his skull. And that can ONLY mean one thing: JFK’s fatal wound was caused by a FRONTAL shot, thereby eliminating Oswald as a possible shooter of that fatal shot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTPAYVEl4LY
However, as part of the coverup of the assassination by the U.S. Government, many bogus documents, records, and photos were made to CONCEAL the fact that part of JFJ’s brain and skull was blown out the BACK of his head, because that fact destroys the official lie. You can see some of those bogus photos in the following video:
noted that his throat wound was an ENTRY wound and that the fatal shot to his head blew out the occipital parietal region of his skull, which could ONLY have resulted from a shot from the right front of JFK. Among those doctors were Perry, McClelland, Carrico, Crenshaw, Baxter, Clark, Jenkins, and more.
The doctors at Parkland were not there to perform an autopsy, but to treat his wounds. Assessments of gunshot wounds are the business of forensic pathologists, not trauma surgeons.
Unless you fancy Nellie Connolly crouched down in the jump seat and shot him in the throat, it wasn’t an entry wound. The back would is higher than the throat wound. As for the source of the head wound, the President’s brain matter splattered all over the occupants in the jump seat and bullet fragments were found in the front of the car and the windshield. A small amount of back spatter hit a motorcycle cop riding next to the limousine.
desperatelyseekingleftism, ultrasubcretin, Humes and Boswell the, the two pathologists ordered by their military superiors at Bethesda to perform the autopsy had ZERO experience in gunshot wounds. That’s zero, as in zilch, zip, nada, nothing. Get it: ZERO! And that’s for the most important autopsy to date in the entire history of the United States involving gunshot wounds. Let that sink in, ultrasubcretin. Zero experience.
Yet–in stark contrast to Humes and Boswell– ALL of the physicians and surgeons at Parkland who observed JFK’s skull had EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE in examining and treating gunshot wounds.
And when Dr. Perry, who observed and stated that the wound to JFK’s neck was a FRONTAL WOUND, had tried to speak with Humes, an FBI agent ordered Humes to cease talking to ANYONE about the assassination. It’s small wonder that Humes had BURNED all of his autopsy notes and records after receiving his orders from the FBI and his military superiors.
Are you getting it, ultrasubcretin? —-No, I know you won’t. You wouldn’t otherwise be an ultrasubcretin that is desperately seeking leftism.
Why would any person shoot Lee Harvey Oswald?
What THEY observed”
You of all people should have some insights into that:
Half the people in America felt like killing Oswald after the assassination.
Given the lax security, it’s not surprising that someone was able to get to Oswald.
When Oswald was arrested at the theater, the police had to shield him from an angry mob that wanted to tear him apart.
The lax security was deliberate. The Dallas Police were warned several times that Oswald’s life was in danger. Yet, the Dallas Police, who immediately began to take their directions from the FBI, made sure to bring out Oswald on cue for his public execution, despite those warnings, thus ensuring that there would be no trial and so all evidence could be quickly brought under the control of the U.S. Government.
What THEY observed”
Ralph,..
I would bet that far more Americans have seen the Oliver Stone fantasy “JFK” than have read the Warren Report.
And that pop fiction like that movie is the primary cause of of the majority belief that you cite.
Incorrect, tnash80hotmailcom. Americans were more intelligent in 1963 then they are today. And immediately after the assassination and the swift termination of the patsy (or alleged assassin, if you prefer), polls were taken about whether Americans believed the immediate official story that was put out instantaneously after the event. The majority of American rejected the official story and the ones who believed the official story were a thin minority of the public. That’s why Johnson & Co. came up with the Dulles Commission (or “Warren” Commission, as it’s officially known) to attempt to persuade the public of the official lie. The official government report did stem the skepticism for a brief period, but once some people actually began to read the testimony and examine the evidence, the official story immediately fell apart again, adn even more questions were raised. Then, the researchers started to produce many best selling books that proved that the official story was a lie using the government’s own evidence. From then on, the majority of Americans did not believe the government’s lie, and that majority remained in place long before Oliver Stone’s JFK came on the scene. In 1967, for example, the CIA became so concerned that their lies weren’t being believed that they began to use the mainstream media assets in a much more direct way to attack the truth. They coined the term “conspiracy theorist” as an attempt to cast aspersions on truth seekers. The CIA”s directives are outlined in CIA document 1035-960. http://www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html. Today, only a relatively small percentage of people who know about JFK believe the official lie. And virtually all of that small percentage have never actually studied of read any of the evidence of the case, as desperatelyseeking leftism exemplifies.
Ralph,
A majority of Americans agreed with the Warren Commissions conclusions when it came out.
People like Mark Lane and Jolly Green Giant soon began to question the Warren report, although Jim Garrison’s farcical prosecution attempts made him a laughingstock.
Those who knew Jack Ruby said he was nuts, and about the last guy you’d recruit as part of a conspiracy.
He was in the area of the Dallas PD about 20 minutes ACTER OSwald was scheduled to be yransferred.
He was also know to the Dallas PD, as he curried their favof by giving them free drinks, food, and “floorshiws”.
Had Oswald not requested going back upstairs cor a sweater, Ruby would have missed him completely.
Sonce Ruby knew, and was known by, Dallas PD, he could walk in off the street into the PD garage, or into the main part of the PD building.
Security overall WAS lax, but a city police department typically did not have much experience in securing/ yransferring presidential assassins.
Ironically, I think Iswald was in the process of being transferred to a mors secure facility.
False, the majority of Americans did NOT believe the official story, even before Marke Lane came onto the scene. You know nothing about the JFK assassination, just as desperatelyseekingleftism knows nothing.
You cannot argue ANY point with me, as I’m an expert in the assasination. But to shut up you thoughtless argument once and for all, here is a historical measure of the poll results:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/165893/majority-believe-jfk-killed-conspiracy.aspx
Are you getting it now? —-I know, the answer is that you’re not getting it. As a dedicated leftist, you’ve been programmed to believe lies like an automaton.
Ralph,
I “get it now”.
I didn”t even know that I was a “leftist” until this exchangd with you.
You found me out.
Self-proclaimed “experts” on the JFK assassination are a dime a doz.
There is one Warren Commision report, and seemingly endless conspiracy theoties.
Many of those theories conflict with each othet…..I don’t think it mattered much which conclusion was onitially avcepted, when “experts” have infinate time to keep putting forth their own oet theories.
I have a pretty good idea of what the Warren Report concluded, and how they vame to those conclusions.
And I’m familiar with many of the conspiracy theories, and how unproductive it is to pursue endless wild goose chases.
“DOCTORS AFFIRM KENNEDY AUTOPSY REPORT”
-New York Times, May 20, 1992
New York Times has been lying about the JFK assassination since it happened. They continue to lie about it to this day. I’ve already presented the videos of the doctors themselves commenting on the fatal wound, a lare EXIT wound blowing out the REAR of JFK’s skull. It doesn’t matter what lies the NYT writes. They cannot change the fact that ALL of the physicians and surgeons who personally observed that wound said EXACTLY the same thing. The two pathologists who performed the autopsy under orders from their military superiors had ZERO experience in gunshot wounds, unlike ALL of the physicians and surgeons at Parkland that observed JFK’s fatal head shot wound.
Ralph,
When the media rightly concluded that Jim Garrison was a fool, his “defense” was that the media was obviously a part of the conspiracy.
Ralph,
The left cannot be educated for they are seemingly, crazy and stupid. The women March as Female body parts and the Illegal Alien Mexican’s in LA, burn the flag and destroy property. I could go on and on, They don’t mind killing an 8 month old fetus but God forbid you have a ban on people who would like to destroy our country, they are a confused part of OUR population.
Interestingly, Fox commentator Bill O’Reilly was once a genuine investigative reporter and had close connections to some of the JFK investigators working with the House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations in 1977. In the following video, O’Reilly delivers a stunning report implicating the CIA in JFK’s assasination. Unfortunately, although the politicians and attorneys had caught a key CIA officer, David Atlee Philips, in a major lie, they ultimately chose not to nail Philips as they should have. Clearly, they were simply affraid to go after Philips and the CIA, fearing adverse consequences to themselves and members of their families. But here, researchers have tied the CIA to Oswald shortly before the assassination, and have demonstrated that Oswald WORKED for the CIA. Of course, the powers that be have told O’Reilly after stories like this that he had a great career in store for himself if he would “play ball.” And by “playing ball” that meant that there would be no more stories exposing the U.S. Government’s official lies. As you know, O’Reilly has been playing ball ever since, and has become extraordinarily wealthy and successful as a result.
Just because Trump says it, does not make it so……Trump is not super human….
Lack of self awareness comes with petulant behavior.
No, it’s professional suicide. That’s takes zealotry not petulance.
FYI…another US Attorney, Robert Morgenaehteu, in 1969 was also fired..he went on to serve with distinction as the DA in Manhattan……
I guess his dad was Secretary of the Treasury under FDR and author of the New Deal, too. You can’t be that dumb to compare these two. LOL FYI
Bharara is going to be just fine. He has been a great prosecutor. Can’t say as much for the Bannon group and the ever-growing corruption of the Trump family.
They’er smarter, prettier, richer, more powerful and have better jobs than Preet. They’ll be “finer.” As for Preet, where ‘s all those Wall Street types he took down for ruining the economy in 2008? Oh, that’s right, he didn’t take any down. Great prosecutor.
Working for Trump
Foreclosure king Mnuchin is now US Treasury Secretary. Although he worked at GS, he did most of his damage to the citizens of California.
What’s his tie to junk bonds?
Mainly subprime mortgages, CDO’s and foreclosures. You can research the junk bonds should you care to.
I thought you might since you said he was one of the ones responsible for 2008 crisis. Since you didn’t I assume he wasn’t and you’re just playing fast and loose.
Those who don’t learn from history are doomed…you seem not to embrace this simple view genius…that’s cool…cheers….
You just need to learn some history before you say silly things.
Never assume–it is bad for your health. Cheers
One never has to assume when ignorance is out on full display.
..and when one assumes an infallibility of knowledge, it actually denotes a closed mind and prejudice which is of course a sign of the times here and now…cheers….
Look, you just don’t know the facts and your conclusions are just sIlly. You’re just digging a deeper hole with these juvenile attempts to save face.
Why don’t you then elighten us with your views of “FACTS” and educate us–and by educating us I don’t mean Briebart and its’ clones–something that is verifiable. And if you think by trying to insult me, it makes you big and strong–have at it–we have free speech in America and you’re entitled to your opinion–but not your own facts–whether you find that “juvenile” is your personal problem–Cheers 🙂 🙂
I did nimrod. Your every comment confirms my assessment of you.
Newsflash: I guess it takes one to know one….Cheers….
You’ve now devolved into juvenile repartee. Must be the alcohol. Cheers.
sorry to disappoint..don’t drink ..Happy St. Pat’s Eve..cheers…..
They all say that.
Ha ha ha. The Southern District office is chock a block with people doing tours between lucrative gigs in BigLaw. This guy will land on his feet.
Oh, he’ll get a job just not as a federal prosecutor which is what he wants — obviously. Btw I had no idea you were so intimately aware of that office and it’s occupants. What’s you opinion of the employment chances of the guys and gals in the Utah District’s office?
No clue. I’ve read magazine profiles of the Southern District office and its inhabitants, with particular focus on Mary Jo White. It’s a career stepping-stone to something more lucrative, though some do multiple tours there.
U.S. Attorneys generally work 4-8 years in their post and move on to something else. I would guess there are AUSAs who do make it a career, but he’s already tapped out. The AUSA I used to know did make prosecuting a career, but in the DAs office in Buffalo.
Preet’s a career government trougher. He doesn’t need the money with his parents connections and just wants to be a do-gooder. Note his role with Schumer investigating the last firing of AGs “scandal.”
He was in BigLaw for about 7 years. The Schumer deal indicates he’s people that know people. Coming to a Washington firm with a ‘government relations’ practice near you….
If I recall correctly, W had the same problem with at-will U.S. Attorney’s refusing to resign. It used to be that resigning when you were no longer wanted was a sign of class. No more, at least as far as the American left goes. The American left believes that rules don’t apply to it and is completely unabashed when it displays a lack of good graces and is called on it. Unfortunately, there will be some leftist employer who will applaud Bharara’s actions and give him a job.
The complaint ca. 2005 was that Alberto Gonzales had canned 8 U.S. Attorneys to disrupt investigaitons into local pols in these areas. Didn’t have much to do with anyone ‘refusing to resign’.
Greater accuracy would describe the Gonzales firings as actions against US Attorneys who were not aggressively pursuing claims of fraudulent voting.
Perhaps. Granular knowledge about that sort of thing is hard to obtain. The press just reprint their templates.
Not ‘perhaps’ at all. The cause of the firings was well covered by the press and their coverage was likely responsible for Gonzales’ fate. To discount the press coverage is to deny the evidence.
Or you can even be an alleged Child Molester and get hired by The Washington Post when your team doesn’t win the presidency.
Alleged by Roger Stone’s pals a Gucifer. Head on over to Comet Pizza.
Gee, Ter Ber, don’t lapse into nastiness so easily.
And the reference seems to be an “in joke” or “drinking the Kool Aid” reference.
BTW: “alleged” means “innocent until proven guilty” in the USA.
In what universe does the word “alleged” have any evidentiary value whatsoever?