“And Why Stop There?”: CNN Analyst Calls For Sweeping Regulation of Free Speech On The Internet [Updated]

We previously discussed the unrelenting drumbeat of censorship on the Internet from Democratic leaders, including President-elect Joe Biden. Those calls are growing as anti-free speech advocates see an opportunity in the Biden Administration to crackdown on opposing views. One vocal advocate of censorship and speech controls has been CNN media analyst Oliver Darcy who just ratcheted up his call for de-platforming opposing views. Like many anti-free speech advocates, Darcy simply labels those with opposing views as spreading “disinformation” and demands that they be labeled or barred from social media. In a recent newsletter, Darcy calls for every tweet by Trump to be labeled as disinformation while asking “and why stop there?” Precisely. Once you cross the Rubicon of speech regulation, there is little reason or inclination to stop.  Just look at Europe.

Darcy wrote:

“Nearly every tweet from the president at this point is labeled for misinfo. Which had me thinking. Why doesn’t Twitter just take the step of labeling his entire account as a known source of election disinfo? And why stop there? Why not label accounts that repeatedly spread claims the platform has to fact-check?”

There was a time from the very touchstone of American journalism was the rejection of such calls for censorship, including at CNN.

What is chilling about Darcy’s writings is that they reflect the view of many now in Congress and in the Democratic Party.  Indeed, they reflect many in the Biden campaign. Once a party that fought for free speech, it has become the party demanding Internet censorship and hate speech laws. President-Elect Joe Biden has called for speech controls and recently appointed a transition head for agency media issues that is one of the most pronounced anti-free speech figures in the United States. It is a trend that seems now to be find support in the media, which celebrated the speech of French President Emmanuel Macron before Congress where he called on the United States to follow the model of Europe on hate speech.

Darcy is calling for more active and extensive regulation of speech to protect users from thoughts or views that he considers false or dangerous: “Think of it as a version of NewsGuard for Twitter.”

“NewsGuard” has a lovely Orwellian sound to be added to other codes for censorship like Sen. Richard Blumenthal recently calling for “robust content modification” on the internet. Who can object to a NewsGuard, which Darcy describes like some beneficent St. Bernard watching over our news and social postings?  Of course, what Darcy considers “disinformation” or what Blumenthal considers “robust content modification” is left dangerously undefined.

So put me down as preferring free speech without the helpful guards and content modification. Instead, I hold a novel idea that people can reach their own conclusions on such is disinformation just as Darcy does.

Update:

While not directly at issue, the posting quoted Darcy on the need for a version of NewsGuard.  I made reference to the term in the context of Darcy’s call for greater regulation of speech. After this posting ran, I was contacted by Eric Effron, Editorial Director, NewsGuard. In fairness to them, I wanted to include a statement from him and the company:

“I believe you are misconstruing NewsGuard’s role vis-à-vis censorship. Our ‘Nutrition Labels’ provide readers with insights and information about more than 6,000 news and information sites. When we write that a site does not run corrections, say, or that it obscures its true owner, we are not censoring, but rather, empowering citizens to make smarter decisions about the information they consume. That’s the opposite of censorship.”

120 thoughts on ““And Why Stop There?”: CNN Analyst Calls For Sweeping Regulation of Free Speech On The Internet [Updated]”

  1. Haha. Been there, seen that. In the Soviet Union we believed rumors and gossips because official press lied and only spread communist propaganda. The sources we used always were unofficial and most trustworthy only because of that. They just don’t know what they are playing with.

  2. Which party do constitution-voters go? Generally speaking, Republicans only support the 2nd and 10th Amendments. Democrats generally support every other amendment except the 1st, 2nd and 10th Amendments. The 1st Amendment is now generally opposed by both political parties and is vitally important to a free press.

    Seems like it would benefit Democrats the most to support the entire U.S. Constitution, since most Republicans only support less than 10% of the U.S. Constitution. Democrats could very easily become the constitution party.

  3. CNN is propagating “propaganda” according to James O’Keefe and Project Veritas.

    Zucker is a traitor committing treason “…in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort,” the enemy being China et al.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Article 3, Section 3

    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

  4. Should we start it with getting rid of the Communist News Network? Actually no but we might start teaching civics instead of brain washing students then insulting the nation with a social promotion. Looking stupid did a lot to expose the far left regardless of how they got elected. Has Comrade Pelosillyni released the food money now two months late Has any one refuted Just Facts on the left? No too busy defending or worse memorizing the garbage version from CNN. Let them hang themselves. I care not what that ignites as long as it cleanses the country.

    1. I’m in full agreement with you, Michael Aarethun; yes, we should start with eliminating Communist News Network, it’s nothing but a propaganda machine. We should start teaching civics again, instead of brainwashing students then insulting the nation with a social promotion. I agree that looking stupid did a lot to expose the far left, regardless of how they got elected. Has Comrade Pelosillyni released the food money – now 2 months late? Has anybody refuted Just Facts on the left? No, too busy defending, or worse, memorizing the garbage version from CNN. Yes, just let them hang themselves. I, too, care not what that ignites as long as it cleanses the country.

  5. This is the beginning of all that we feared would happen under a Democratic administration. This is BS. This is the beginning of communism. Have we not read history to see it happening here as it happened in the USSR, in Germany with the Nazis? To those citizens it appeared normal, like the right thing to do. But here in the US, blood was shed to protect these rights. Turley asks “Why stop here?” Precisely…except why stop raping and desecrating the Constitution with just this one right, when there are so many the Democrats don’t like? Watch and see what you have wrought, you snakes…

Leave a Reply