Suspect Who Dragged NYPD Officer Was Previously Released Pending Trial For Attempted Murder

The recently released video of a NYPD officer being dragged by a fleeing suspect took an even more controversial turn when it was disclosed that the suspect was out on bond despite being charged with attempted murder. Takim Newson’s earlier release by a judge is baffling given the alleged crime and Newson’s prior criminal record.

Newson, 32, was stopped by police officers after he doubled parked on a busy street and the car had heavily tinted windows. The officers noted that his speech was slurred and Newson admitted to smoking marijuana. He was told by the officer that he was not under arrest but they asked him to get out of the car.  He then threw the car in reverse and dragged the officer.

After the traffic stop, Newson is accused of breaking into a home in Queens and threatening a 66-year-old woman by pretending he had a gun. He then left without taking anything and allegedly stole a Jaguar sedan. He was finally apprehended in Suffolk County, Long Island, according the New York Post.

What is surprising is the fact that he was out after an arrest in February without bail.  Newson is accused to shooting a person in the groin during an attempted Valentine’s Day robbery at a Queens bar. Prosecutors demanded that he remain in jail pending trial.  His lawyer was asking for $50,000 bail. However the court reportedly released him without bail even though he was arrested after fleeing the scene.

According to media reports, Newson served a 3½-year prison sentence for an armed robbery in Nassau County before being paroled in 2011. He was also accused of shooting at police officers in  2008 and another shooting in 2011.

The New York Post reports that Newson is a reputed member of the Edgemere Crew gang. The judge in Queens was Judge Denise Johnson who was rated “not approved” by the city Bar Association before her election November. She ran unopposed for the judicial seat. The not approved rating was due to the fact that Johnson failed to submit information and papers for review by the Bar.

64 thoughts on “Suspect Who Dragged NYPD Officer Was Previously Released Pending Trial For Attempted Murder”

  1. Oh but but but criminal lives matter, especially if they are blax… so tired of the communist takedown of America. Drooling potus, hooker of a vp, it’s ok if mad max says sic em… or jobama says ok jury, do ya hear me… but whitey be soooo bad. Mr Turley, you are either a con artist or you’re fooling yourself.

  2. Lets see now, you get a call about a knife fight, you rush to the scene
    and see a black teen only half a second away from plunging a large
    knife into another black teen. You shoot the knife wielder and save
    the other teens life and now you are a racist black teen murderer. Raise
    you hand if you want to be a police officer.

    1. Defund the police is lefties trying to get rid of local police and install a national police force run by the federal government. That way they will harass, intimidate, bully, assault and kill law abiding whites.

  3. ” I can’t understand why every Democrat I’ve spoken with is totally, stubbornly blind on the trends in their party of punishing political dissenters with financial ruin, rioting, looting, supporting criminals, and prejudice against cops. “

    I see the same, but what I believe is true for a number of them is they know a lot of these things. However, they know their entire narrative would come tumbling down like a house of cards. If that happened they would be out there alone and naked. They want to remain part of the group and feel they have no way out.

    1. Anonymous, by now we know that u r a Chinese bot with a broken chip. Please, move your senseless comments to your favor rag NYT.

  4. Compare the treatment this Killer got….compared to the protestors at the Capitol Building on January 6th….and tell me we do not have a completely failed Criminal Justice System?

    Allowed to run free and commit yet more mayhem despite his past and current criminal misconduct….and if he. had been shot dead by Police….guess who the villains would be.

    1. This type of permissiviness for Democrat Voters, their Base who are now openly Racists and committing crimes and shouting racism, if apprehended or shot in commission of their crimes, is now a trademark of the Democrat Marxist NE Fascist Insurrection Party! They have successfully placed in power their own and Black and other Democrat Felons now have no fear of society and laws! It is open season on American Honorable Citizens/Patriots for a Democrat! At the same time they are unleashing their Insurrection and Felons on Americans they are trying to disarm Americans to make their predation even easier and prevent resistance to their Racist Dictatorship! Why aren’t they wearing their hoods?.

    2. There is no justice any longer, the commiecrats have destroyed it. Crime is going to soar, it will get like the 1980’s and Early 1990s again. NYC had 2145 murders in 1990 mostly young Black and Hispanic men, that will again be coming this way because the anti-crime strategies that worked are offense to the left. They’d rather see people die than peace and prosperity.

  5. it goes without saying so thats why im going to say it:

    if it was a white dude with a maga hat they would have found a reason
    -any reaso-n
    to keep him locked up pending trial
    and we all know it

  6. How much damage to society must this man do before he is kept behind bars. The liberals virtue signal to us all the time about how much they care for black lives. How many victims of this mans crimes were black? He probably didn’t spend much time hangin out in the white hood. No Democrats gave a damn about releasing this piranha into the neighborhood to strip the flesh from the bones of his victims to satisfy his voracious appetite. You might say that I am too harsh but it is the Democrats who have come up with the no bail approach. Will they take any responsibility for the animalistic deeds of this man. They don’t have to take responsibility because their followers will just continue to follow and they know it. Present company included.

    1. To “Karen S: Your very good points and provocative thoughts get lost in your verbosity. More people will read your important commentary if you would stop waxing prolix and simply make your point(s). thanks

  7. Thanks to Gascon and Newsom here in CA, cash bail was eliminated. It was portrayed as unfair to those too poor to pay bail. In reality, it was the only means to leverage those released prior to trial to show up, and behave while out.

    CA just releases prisoners like a turnstile. Did you finally turn in a domestic abuser? Knock knock. He’s on your doorstep the same day. Did you burn down a business and financially ruin an innocent person. That’s cool. You’ll be back on the street to do more damage in a few hours.

    If you can’t pay the bail, then the Court also holds no leverage over you when you’re released. You’re not concerned your behavior will make you lose money.

    Fines for failure to leave the country when your visa runs out have also been abolished. Why not overstay a visa? What’s the downside? Apparently, moving to the US is a basic human right for the 7.5 billion people on Earth, most of whom don’t hold Western values towards women, apostasy, and violence against those with which they disagree.

    How long will legal comments be “astonished” that dangerous people are out of jail or prison? That scenario appears to be the goal of the Democrat Party. After all, Kamala Harris bailed out rioters and looters so they’d be back on the street again. And then she publicly said, “Beware, because they will continue, and they should continue.”

    Think really, really hard. Which party is the one of law and order, and which party is the one that opposes laws and supports criminals? Which party works to get criminals back on the street as quickly as possible? Which party removes leverage to ensure people show up for court? Which party supports illegal immigration, and excused riots, looting, arson, and autonomous zones? Remember, Republicans denounced the one single storming of the Capitol perpetrated by a tiny handful of their people, regardless of the fact that millions had peacefully rallied.

    Think back 25 years ago from today. Would you have thought it was a conspiracy theory if someone told you Democrats would be for open borders, have sanctuary cities that protected even the most violent illegal aliens, including rapists and murderers, that they would oppose a bill that would have stopped racial discrimination against Asians in universities, that they would try to expand the seats on SCOTUS to pack it, that they would ignore, excuse, or even bail out Democrats rioting, looting, and burning down businesses during a pandemic for months upon end, that they would deny cities under seige by violent Democrats the use of the National Guard to keep innocents safe, that they would espouse violent anti-cop prejudice, that they would defund police leading to many thousands more murders in unprotected neighborhoods, they oppose free speech and seek to financially ruin political dissenters, cancel culture, that they would openly be racist against black conservatives, that they would shut down churches and arrest pastors while allowing people to use airplanes, that they would shut down restaurants and outdoor dining while allowing Hollywood craft service, aka outdoor dining, they would allow biological boys to compete against biological girls in girls sports and punish girls who complained, that they would encourage the spread of gender confusion among small children, promote the castration of young boys, and seek to criminalize those who object?

    All of this would have sounded like raving lunacy. All of it is true, and it’s evolved very rapidly.

    I want everyone to project the current trend forward 25 years. If this trend continues, what will happen over the next 25 years?

    Meanwhile, we have conservatives waiving their arms, jumping up and down, and shouting, “We believe in the Constitution, strong individual rights, and limited government. Fascism cannot exist in a limited government with strong rights. You can’t criminalize speech, dissent, or differing opinions if there are strong individual rights. Tolerance goes both ways.”

    Just because Democrats claim to be the party of tolerance doesn’t make it true. They target dissenters for financial ruin. That’s not tolerance.

    Which belief system leads to a brighter more tolerant future, viewing the current trends and facts with a dispassionate eye? Which is the more intolerant of the two?

    1. Ironic you cry out in protest when Dems condone crime, but you ignore it when GOP international felons like Cheney and Bush invade foreign nations and attack them with bombs, etc. ala Syria, and our arming of the Al Saud Krime Syndikat who have killed and still kill thousands of innocents in Yemen and causing the planet’s worst human suffering and starvation. (In all honesty the DNC is also on board with the above crimes and human suffering.)

      Why give the GOP a pass for the above innocent deaths?

      1. They don’t get a pass in my book either.

        I think Karen does her best to be fair. The focus of her ire, right now, appears to be with the Democrats, domestically. That doesn’t mean she’s giving the GOP a pass, though.

        1. I do have issues with the GOP, as well.

          The reason why I’ve been harping on Democrats lately is because I think they are on track to create a Leftist tyrannical government.

          Democrats used to have so much in common with Republicans. “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.” Merit based Kennedy Airlifts. Opposing illegal immigration. Pride in America. Color blind. Free speech proponents.

          That’s long gone. No mainstream Democrat politician would ever talk like that today.

          I want Democrats to return to those beliefs, but I don’t think I’ve ever convinced a moderate Democrat that anything is wrong, let alone to take action.

      2. “international felons like Cheney and Bush”

        Constance (great name, BTW), they are not international felons anymore than Obama was. You’re engaging in hyperbole. Bush, Cheney, and Obama never had criminal intent in their foreign interventions.

        Good ol’ Takim is nothing but criminal intent, and a judge arbitrarily released him. That’s the issue here. Let’s not treat hyperbole as states’ evidence.

        1. What a horrible joke on America: Cheney did not have criminal intent? Team warmonger/MIC player Obama: the primary result when Obama spat on his oath of office and stopped all criminal investigation into the confirmed, well known and well-documented felony criminal torture of Arab POWs was to insure Cheney got to sleep in his $10k bed and eat the best food extant instead of dying a miserable death like he deserves in a Federal or International prison.

          They had and still have all the goods on Cheney. There’s probably a dozen or more lower level scum of the earth who would have turned on Cheney if Obama just let the wheels of justice turn as they did till Obama woke up and said, “Screw it! I know my oath to uphold the US Constitution and I don’t give a damn about that because my job is to protect war mongers like myself from suffering the legal consequences of their crimes.” His actual words were some BS like, “It’s time to turn the page…” He took the public oath, spat on it, and used it for toilet paper.

          Those low-level CIA and military scum would surely given up Cheney if it would save them from life sentences or death sentences they richly deserved. The military excuse that I only followed orders went out of style 80 years ago at the WW2 trials for the Third Reich. Little did we know that Obama would resurrect that excuse! Imagine the Baby Black Jesus blessing torture deaths! The horror is that most Western “Christians” believe this, as if they share anything with Christ other than his name.

          Cheney had ONLY felony intent, even international felonies, and it’s a closed debate to anyone who looks at it with an open mind. Turley himself well discussed it in his interview with John Cusack.

      3. You’re comparing waging war with Democrats rioting and looting? I can’t understand why every Democrat I’ve spoken with is totally, stubbornly blind on the trends in their party of punishing political dissenters with financial ruin, rioting, looting, supporting criminals, and prejudice against cops. The party has a problem. Only moderate Democrats can fix it, but they won’t as long as they deny they have a problem.

        You do know that Biden promptly bombed Syria upon taking office, right? And that he has refused to take China to task, despite their genocide against the Uighur.

        No one gets a pass for wrongdoing. Unless you’re a Clinton or a Biden. I actually agree with you that any wrongdoing should be exposed, whether it was deliberate or accidental, and that the law should apply equally.

        You mentioned arming the Saudis. Do you know why we did that? We are allied with Saudi Arabia. Against us are Iran, North Korea, and often Russia. This parallels the Sunni/Shi’a strife. We wished to prevent Saudi Arabia pouring their billions into communist and socialist nations that we oppose, such as the USSR back in the day. It’s about a balance of power.

        I once asked my father, who used to work at the DOD in this area, why we helped nations that don’t share our values. He explained that most nations don’t share our values. We have to either be isolationist, while other nations maneuver to oppose us, or we have to form alliances with nations we disagree with to maintain a geopolitical advantage. When we arm someone, there are certain tactics we use to prevent an ally gaining superiority over us, when odds are they won’t always be our ally. We armed and trained the Mujahideen to fight the Soviets, providing lesser training and older weapons, knowing full well that the Mujahideen despised the West and would turn on us. And boy did they. Were it not for various intelligence agencies partitioning intel, we might have stopped that.

        Saudi Arabia provides access to the Gulf region for our military. They have a long friendship with us, while simultaneously abusing their own people and funding terrorism. It’s a bargain that’s long troubled me. I would not be able to make these Machiavellian partnerships. It comes at a price.

        This is one of the reasons why I’ve been so frustrated with Democrats for blocking domestic oil production. Biden cancelled the Keystone Pipeline, costing many Canadian jobs. He opposes domestic fossil fuel production. This makes us more dependant on the Middle East. We also have to waste fossil fuel shipping oil to the US. A leak in a tanker is catastrophic, as the Exxon Valdez proved. A leak in a pipeline would have been far easier to cap, with far less environmental damage. Plus, the oil would come from a Western neighbor.

        I don’t get criticizing Saudi Arabia, while simultaneously making us more reliant upon OPEC. Solar only works when the sun is shining. Energy storage requires lithium. There isn’t enough lithium in the world to make solar a major energy producer, and mining it is incredibly toxic to the environment. When solar panels are junked, they are usually shipped, using fossil fuels, to India where children pick over the toxic components to scavenge. Wind only works when the wind is blowing, the turbines only last 20 years, and it costs $200,000 to $500,000 to decommission, i.e. “junk” each one. Democrats oppose nuclear energy, which is the only clean, reliable energy source to date. All of this makes us reliant upon fossil fuels that the Left’s NIMBY is determined that we get from the ME.

        1. Our values? Your drivel is excrement to me. We incinerated and lied a thousand times to most of the indigenous people here. We finance obesity by paying the flat land corn growers to grow corn converted into poison AKA high fructose corn syrup. We also add corn to fuel which adds to pollution instead of decreasing it (fuel consumption increases at a rate greater than the ratio of corn fuel added to dino fuel.)

          The primary reason the US has so many foreign enemies (a lot) is because we are so god damn greedy and spend so much money (equal to the next 3-5 nations combined) on war machines. When you make mostly hammers every problem is a nail. When you spend $3T/annual on defense all you see is a commie under every rock. (Never should have changed the name from the “War Dept.,” Defense Dept. is so Orwellian.)

          George Washington forbade (in his Farewell Address) “permanent foreign entanglements” which exactly describes our relationship to Israel (Hillary called it, later parroted by Obama) a “Permanent bond” to really drive the point home and spit on GW’s warning. Gee, you jump in bed permanently with the most hated nation on the planet (Israel a self-described Jewish religious caliphate) and you wonder why you generate so much ME hatred?
          And we don’t even have any need any more ME oil, our primary reason for inventing Israel by threat of violence 80 years ago with the League of Nations..

        2. Karen…..yours is an exceptional comment! I enjoyed it very much, and as usual, learned something.

        3. Karen S you are wise beyond your years. Maybe you or Turley should run for President! Constance Oxley appears fixated on Cheney! And hates America. Perhaps she should move to Russia, Pakistan or Mexico and see how well she has her freedom unmolested. I wonder if she has thanked veterans and intelligence officers who kept her safe all those years- at their peril. She is correct, we should let Shia-Sunni and their neighbors obliterate themselves. She has lost her mind and sense of perspective. If, good viable decisions were so clearly easy to make, most of us would do so. Sadly, they are not…we trash our politicians but they are in an unenviable position. She needs to find a worthy cause and move on.
          Constance- how many poor or underserved have you helped? How many Mexicans or blacks have you shared your table with? Did you condemn Weinstein or Epstein for horrible crimes against women and children? Do you condemn all these hateful clans that run Africa and annihilate those that oppose them? Have you condemned France for marginalizing immigrants?

      4. Correction: Obama started the Syrian debacle, after promising, “No boots on the ground.” After being confronted with the lie, Obama’s spokesman warmonger (forgot his name) said, “No, what you think are boots are not boots,” as if CIA operatives wear sandals in the desert. Obama: “Who ya gonna believe, the baby black Jesus (me) or you’s lying eyes?”

      5. Dear Constance, Wow that’s one long sentence. I guess your protesting that racist English language. Also, what interesting spelling. It must be the result of your black privilege to allow you to act like a left wing intellectual.
        By the way, if you ever really gave a shit, put on your big boy/girl pants and move back to the Middle East.

    2. Karen S, you make too much sense!! I was a Democrat in my 20s, Republican in my 30s/ early 40s, until I switched to an Independent voter. Both sides are too extreme. The judge was most likely looking out for a poor minority who in her opinion deserved another chance . However there will be no justice or equality until both sides gain perspective, sensibility. We are being led amok by the extremists in journalism, broadcast news and social media (think jerks like Dorsey, Zuckerberg). when we lose perspective and vehemently oppose sensibility or moderation we become Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren or Ted Cruz. Democrats patronize minorities to get their vote but dismiss them the remaining 364 days of the yr. Many Blacks feel the world is against them but guess what- everyone has their struggles too..Dr Ben Carson has repeatedly said, you have to take ownership of YOUR life! Not the Al Sharpton way of blame everyone for everything that goes wrong in your life. We want equality not entitlement for whites, blacks LGBTQ or the like. Barack was too full of himself to do anything for his people. He had a responsible mother who cared for him, like so many young black children who have moms or grandmas. Barack shared the same loss when his father walked out on him. Yet instead of denouncing absent fathers, he said nothing/did nothing to advance our race. He attended Harvard for free by an endowment funded by wealthy people, and oddly denounced the very same group. Republicans say they’re for freedom, liberty, legal immigration yet we had a Neanderthal who called Hispanics rapists. Sure, some are but the overwhelming majority are hard workers. They want to eliminate abortions but it’s their lot who rape/assault women or walk out on them. Are they prepared to adopt all those children? They want no benefits for the poor, so how do we begin to help children from broken homes or abused, discarded? How do we retrain individuals who have lost their jobs, or those less fortunate? they fail to allocate money to those groups to nip it in the bud instead we have to deal with crime, violence or hate from those who grow up to become monsters. Also, Why have Republicans neglected women, Asians or Hispanics? Do these men think they have all the answers?? Clearly women don’t, just look at floundering Nancy Pelosi or this ridiculous judge who released the criminal in NY. do not find it sensible to run background checks on all? Just like crazy Dems denouncing so-called “Jim Crow” voting laws in GA? Do male or female college campus presidents not find alarming the continued assaults or rapes on young women? where are the militant feminists or men who “support” women?? Instead you get male judges like the one who released the Stanford male swimmer who assaulted a girl who had too much to drink? We should have booted him out of office and sent him to Pakistan to be with those who appears to share beliefs with. How many assaults do you know of when men have had too much to drink? Extremism is not the answer.

  8. most cities like this are now past the point of no return

    that is to say:

    if they were somehow smart enough to now start voting republican to fix things

    they would have been smart enough to vote republican back then to keep this from happening in the first place

    AND

    no serious republican would run anyway

    who wants to have a bunch of crazies on your front lawn attacking you because youre trying to take common sense steps to make THEIR lives better

  9. what we are now witnessing is what future historians scholars and political scientists will refer to as:

    “the end stage of the blue city/blue state governance model”

  10. Millennials, the Takim Newsoms of the world are already becoming the norm.

    Millennials have the chance to be the greatest generation or the worst generation, but the country is increasingly in your hands and to avoid being the worst, you must come to terms with the lies you’ve been told by the left in education and corporate media.

    My generation, the boomers, had our crazy times, but we learned. Teach was a radical feminist and we smoked pot with our anthropology professor, but we eventually saw through the BS because we had time to figure it out. Today, the Democrats are flooding the country with third-world people so they’ll be able to cancel out your vote if you ever start to question them. In other words, you don’t have a lot of time, and that is by Democrat design. It’s called California. It’s enclaves of the very wealthy surrounded by vast dominions of poverty and ruled by an invincible, one-party state. The middle class is being annihilated and nobody can stop it.

    It’s officials who are more loyal to their Beijing business partners than they ever were to the Bill of Rights.

    Whether you agree with your parents or not, do you really want the Democrats to make your vote irrelevant? The Democrats want you to think they are protecting voters from Republicans. No, they’re making sure you’ll never have the power to question them. They’re making sure they can rig elections by cheating or making citizenship meaningless. In time, you learn the only thing the Democrats really want is an all-powerful, one-party state.

    That’s assuming you have enough time to figure it out. God bless you all.

    1. Diogenes says “Today, the Democrats are flooding the country with third-world people so they’ll be able to cancel out your vote.”

      This is White Supremacist “Replacement Theory” pure and simple. Tucker Carlson adds a nice touch to the theory by adding that these immigrants will make this country “poorer and dirtier.”

      We once were an exceptional nation of immigrants, but not anymore thanks to Trumpism.

      1. “This is White Supremacist ‘Replacement Theory’ pure and simple.”

        Jeffrey, you can put whatever silly label you want on it, the Democrats are manipulating immigration to create a one-party state. It’s also true that 80% of immigrants today hold racist attitudes towards whites and Christians. That’s not Tucker’s number. That’s the Pew Research Center’s number.

        You might argue that that is just the immigrants reacting to white supremacy. No, it’s the immigrants believing third-world, anti-America propaganda but coming here anyway because of the lack of jobs in their Marxist-socialist utopias.

        Trump didn’t make immigration a dirty word. The left did.

    1. “…the judge’s evident unfamiliarity with the jurisdiction’s criminal code.”

      – mistressadams
      _____________

      Hear, hear!

      You go, Girl!

      Much like the U.S. Supreme Court can’t (or won’t) comprehend the “manifest tenor” of the Constitution which prohibits Central Planning, Control of the Means of Production, Redistribution of Wealth and Social Engineering, while said document does not qualify the right to keep and bear arms, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly including its inverse, freedom of segregation, freedom itself, defined as “the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action” and the ability to tell the difference, etc., establishing the fact that all of the rights and freedoms provided, therefore, are absolute and not subject to the opinion, “interpretation” or whimsy of that eminent institution, which, incidentally, has no power to execute legislation, to legislate or to modify legislation in any facet and/or to any degree.

      Article 1, Section 8, provides Congress the power to tax ONLY for “…general Welfare…,” omitting and, thereby, excluding any power to tax for individual or specific welfare, redistribution of wealth or charity. The same article provides Congress the power to regulate ONLY money, the “flow” of commerce and land and naval Forces. Additionally, the 5th Amendment right to private property is not qualified by the Constitution and is, therefore, absolute, allowing Congress no power to claim or exercise dominion over private property, the sole exception being the full taking of property under the principle of eminent domain.

      Government exists to provide maximal freedom to individuals while it is severely limited and restricted to merely facilitating that maximal freedom of individuals through the provision of security and infrastructure.

      The entire communistic American welfare state is unconstitutional, including but not limited to, affirmative action, quotas, welfare, food stamps, rent control, social services, forced busing, minimum wage, utility subsidies, WIC, TANF, SNAP, HAMP, HARP, TARP, Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Labor, Energy, Obamacare, Social Security, Social Security Disability, Social Security Supplemental Income, Medicare, Medicaid, “Fair Housing” laws, “Non-Discrimination” laws, etc.

      Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto 59 years after the adoption of the Constitution because none of the principles of the Communist Manifesto were in the Constitution. Had the principles of the Communist Manifesto been in the Constitution, Karl Marx would have had no reason to write the Communist Manifesto. The principles of the Communist Manifesto were not in the Constitution then and the principles of the Communist Manifesto are not in the Constitution now.
      _______________________________________________________

      “[A] limited Constitution … can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing … To deny this would be to affirm … that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

      – Alexander Hamilton

  11. Never been to a bail hearing, but I’ve seen many on TV.

    Judge: Councilors, what do I hear as bail recommendations?
    DA: Hold without bail, your Honor.
    Defense: $50,000 cash or bond, your Honor.

    Judge: let’s split the difference. Defendant is released ROR

    Am I missing something other than the possible political ambitions of a Judge?

  12. George Soros should be indicted as an accessory to these crimes for getting judges like this elected. Then deport Soros.

  13. A chilling story but……
    Let’s look at another violent man who has been enjoying his freedom, in part, on our dime!

    DONALD Trump, ex president of the USA defeated in the 2020 Election
    Trump is a Suspect in attempted violent overthrow
    Of the US government on January 6, 2021 that resulted in deaths
    and the brutalizations 130:police officers.As well other alleged crimes against the USA
    And it’s people. STILL AT LARGE.

    Disturbing fact : this suspect still enjoys the support of the Republican Party and Senators and Congress members who also incited the actions of January and allegedly assisted the mob
    Bit we don’t talk about that here because Trump is a Republican!

    1. Move on, compare the world in 1945 and 2021, Trump clearly was not Adolf Hitler. If you can wait he might well be back as the TV news ratings have crashed. I’m sure Rachael Maddow and friends can’t wait to get him back in 2024so they can get their ratings back/save the world all over again

    2. Dear Injustice Holmes, please provide a link to your claim of 130 police officers brutalized. The link in your head does not count. It’s broken. I must give you a few brownie points for your deflection from the subject of the post. However, the brownies are growing very stale. It took so long to make them and somebody left the brownies out in the rain. Or brain.

    3. Oh, just stop. By any existing historical or judicial precedent what President Trump said on January 6 is so well-within constitutional borders as to be unimpeachable. The unlawful acts of persons who were also at the Capitol on January 6 are entirely their own responsibility. Take an aspirin or some other action to cool the fever swamps of your imagination.

    4. Injustice Holmes, we so appreciate your virtue. We are sure that you will soon be inviting this fine young criminal over to your house for dinner. You would scream bloody murder if this fine young man attacked your family. When a cop with loved ones is put in serious danger you whisk it away with a diatribe about Trump. We know your compassion is from the deep dark bottom of your heart.

    5. That was not an insurrection. Not even close. It had a nice whiff of eu d’psyops about it, though.

      1. Well, then there’s that!
        __________________

        “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

        – William Casey, CIA Director

    6. “We will stop him.”

      – Peter Strzok to FBI paramour Lisa Page
      —————————————————-

      “[Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing.”

      – Lisa Page to FBI paramour Peter Strzok
      ________________________________

      The Obama Coup D’etat in America is the most egregious abuse of power and the most prodigious crime in American political history.

      The co-conspirators are:

      Kevin Clinesmith, Bill Taylor, Eric Ciaramella, Rosenstein, Mueller/Team, Andrew Weissmann,

      James Comey, Christopher Wray, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Laycock, Kadzic,

      Sally Yates, James Baker, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Priestap, Kortan, Campbell,

      Sir Richard Dearlove, Christopher Steele, Simpson, Joseph Mifsud,

      Alexander Downer, Stefan “The Walrus” Halper, Azra Turk, Kerry, Hillary,

      Huma, Mills, Brennan, Gina Haspel, Clapper, Lerner, Farkas, Power, Lynch,

      Rice, Jarrett, Holder, Brazile, Sessions (patsy), Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi, Obama,

      Joe Biden, James E. Boasberg, Emmet Sullivan, et al.
      __________________________________________

      Joke Buydem is obstructing justice by suppressing the product of the taxpayer funded Special Prosecutor Investigation Into the Origins of FBI investigation “Crossfire Hurricane” by United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, John Durham.

  14. Incompetent or ideological judges and DAs are part of the reason the BLM/Antifa mobs have been burning and looting for over a year. Having dangerous criminals also turned loose is just a bonus!

Leave a Reply