U.S. Capitol Police is reportedly investigating the shocking videotape of two men having sex in public in what appears the Senate large hearing room in the Hart Senate Office Building. The room is familiar to many citizens from Supreme Court confirmations to impeachment proceedings. Indeed, I have testified repeatedly in the room and argued much of the Porteous impeachment case in that space. First reported on a conservative site, the video of two men having sex led to reports that one of the individuals was a staffer for Sen. Ben Cardin (D., Md.). Update: Cardin aide Aidan Maese-Czeropski, 24, has now been reportedly fired.
The video shows one of the men hunched over the dais at the center of the seating for senators in Senate room Hart 216.
The video was reportedly shared on the Internet on gay sites.
Obviously, the videotape will result in the termination of any staffers involved. However, the question is any possible criminal charge. We have previously discussed porn videos shot in churches or other locations. Such porn shoots in church have also raised calls for prosecutions in other countries.
Staffers have access into such rooms, but the question is whether this unofficial use would constitute trespass. It also uses an official area for personal purposes, though it is not clear if there were any commercial benefits garnered from the video found on various sites.
One obvious criminal provision under the D.C. code is Section 22-1312 for lewd, indecent, or obscene acts:
“It is unlawful for a person, in public, to make an obscene or indecent exposure of his or her genitalia or anus, to engage in masturbation, or to engage in a sexual act as defined in § 22-3001(8). It is unlawful for a person to make an obscene or indecent sexual proposal to a minor. A person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, imprisoned for not more than 90 days, or both.”
The question is whether this is “in public” in a locked committee room — any more than sex in a congressional office after hours would be viewed as “in public.”
There are also provisions concerning the misuse or damaging of government property such as Section 1361, which protects “any property” of the United States from willful depredation or attempted depredation. “Depredation” is defined as the act of plundering, robbing, pillaging or laying waste. However, mere possession of such property is not viewed as depredation. United States v. Jenkins, 554 F.2d 783, 786 (6th Cir. 1977).
There is also 18 U.S.C. 641 on the misuse of public money, property, or records:
“Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof; or
Whoever receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the value of such property in the aggregate, combining amounts from all the counts for which the defendant is convicted in a single case, does not exceed the sum of $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
The Capitol police could argue that this constitutes purloining or using government property for personal purposes.
The key factor is the fact that this videotape was made with the apparent intent to publish or to distribute. Sex in congressional offices — by both members and staff — have long been known to occur on Capitol Hill. Yet, this was a public hearing room, albeit closed at the time, and a tape made for what appears public viewing.
That brings us back to trespass. The question may be whether this was access under legal authority for a staffer. The Capitol police can argue that access to a staff position does not mean a license for entry for any purpose. Under 18 U.S.C. 1752, trespass covers anyone who “knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so.”
Does a staffer have legal authority to enter any hearing room for any purpose? That could be a defense raised by counsel, but it would seem likely that any access is premised on an official function.
The pressure on the Capitol police is likely to be considerable in the coming days. Only recently, House members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Rep. Jamie Raskin claimed that house rules were broken by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene showing Hunter Biden and a woman in a revealing picture, though he was purportedly wearing a swimsuit. Raskin objected that it would constitute “pornographic exhibits that might not be suitable for children watching.”
While this was not a public hearing, those objections now seem almost puritanical in light what just occurred over in the Senate hearing room.
Maese-Czeropski was named in an earlier incident in Congress when he was accused of confronting Ohio Republican Congressman Max Miller over his support for Israel. He has categorically denied that accusation.
He is listed working of Cardin since October 2021, and previously worked as a field organizer for the Democratic Party in Virginia. He also lists work as a climate researcher for charity Friends of the Earth.
What is likely to get the most attention, however, is that he also reportedly appeared in a campaign ad in 2020 with President Biden with the words “thank you for teaching.”
Maese-Czeropski went on to social media to issue a statement of regret but to say that “[t]his has been a difficult time for me, as I have been attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda.” When one films a porn scene in a Senate hearing room, the resulting anger is likely focused on the conduct rather than the identity of the parties. A heterosexual tryst would produce the same obvious objections.
The spin on the controversy is similar to the effort of Susanna Gibson in a Politico article. In a bizarre piece on Gibson’s scandal involving sex acts on the Internet, Politico was mocked for leaving out key details as Gibson claimed that she was shocked that other people saw the intimate videos with her husband.
Gibson and her husband posted more than a dozen videos that were archived on a site called Chaturbate in September 2022 shortly before she announced her candidacy for office. Viewers were told that they could pay for her to perform specific sex acts “for tips.” While the scandal was revealed by the Washington Post, the article suggests it was skullduggery by conservatives and that her privacy was shattered.
Gibson has made dubious threats to sue over the disclosures of the videos and even alleged that the disclosures constituted a sex crime. She attempted to portray the controversy as an attack on all women. It seemed to work. Gibson came close to winning the recent election despite the scandal as the Democratic candidate for the state legislature.
In the controversy involving Maese-Czeropski, the video was posted to a private group for gay men and the owner identified himself as a “twink” engaging in sex acts with his older “bear” partner. The group posting does not suggest a private intimate video shared between a couple.
The site does not appear to generate revenue, which could have bearing on potential charges discussed above. Using the congressional space for commercial purposes can factor into possible charges.
The resignation of Maese-Czeropski will not necessarily end any Capitol Police investigation. Given the possibilities of charges, further public statements are unwise until the former aide speaks with counsel.
OT
Poll of Palestinians
75% support the Oct 7 Massacre
85.9% reject coexistence with israel
71% are committed to “historical palestine” as final resolution
74.7% support “from river to sea” as the end of the conflict
Sadly, Hamas is Palestine. The other 25% arguably value their own lives over Islam.
+100
88.6% believe that Hamas’ armed wing, the Al-Kassam Brigades, plays a somewhat to very positive function.
88.6% of Palestinians polled in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria
The % of Gazans who feel that way now is probably much lower.
And remember how Bill Clinton used government property, the desk in the Oval Office, with the young intern, Monica Lowinski.
It all depends on the context.
Probably want to sanitize those gavels and microphones thoroughly.
And the mood lighting.
Is is?
“CAR 54, WHERE ARE YOU?”
COME IN, SERGEANT AT ARMS, DARREN SMITH!
_____________________________________________________
Civility Rule
Civility and Decorum Policy:
This blog is committed to the principles of free speech and, as a consequence, we do not ban people simply because we disagree with them. Indeed, we value different perspectives and do not want to add another “echo chamber” to the Internet where we each repeat or amplify certain views. However, the Turley blog was created with a strong commitment to civility, a position that distinguishes us from many other sites.
…
– Professor Turley
“Contacted by DailyMail.com Saturday morning, shortly before his firing was confirmed, Maese-Czeropski’s mother Magdalena Rivera Maese implied her son had been left distraught by what had happened, saying: ‘You don’t want to know how he’s doing.'”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12871463/Aidan-Maese-Czeropski-sex-tape-ben-cardin.html
If I had his contact info, I would definitely top him, um, bottom for him, no wait, I would be on all fours comforting me, um him, um….us?
REGARDING ABOVE:
Wally does not have the staying power I do. I would have videos to prove it but Wally dumped me for that skank in Senator Cardin’s office
What??? I was just in Wally’s bung Monday night!!
That four flusher (pardon the pun)
The pitcher and the catcher and the filmmaker should all be arrested
I want a role in that film! What does a queen have to do to get an audition?
“What does a queen have to do to get an audition?”
Speak to Dennis. He is the producer.
Bug Anon is the director.
Svelaz will be your co-star.
Gigi does make-up (because bug anon is a closet misogynist)
Wally and fishwings are the key grips (Pardon the pun)
Bob and Larry are props and costumes.
Sammy gets a cameo, and is your understudy for lead
Turley is the brilliant stage manager, because there is NO WAY he didnt see this coming.
Estovir-Golden-Mayer is the Studio
+100
The title of this film will be…..drum roll….
Get Your Kicks From the Fili-buster-ed Sixty Six
Thought about *d!cks* instead of kicks, but didnt want to violate George’s civility policy.
+100
See the elvis bug turd below
vvvvvvvvvv
Tom Is Same Old Estovir
The name ‘Tom’ has exploded in frequency on these comment threads. This comes after many recent posts identifying the many puppets linked to Estovir.
For quite some time Estovir liked to post as Thinkthrough because that name sounded so ‘thoughtful’. But at the same time Estovir was also posting as James, Upstate Farmer, Iowa2, Hullbobby, Feldman, Guy Ventner, Ralph Chappell, Ralph DeMimus, dgsnowden, Edward Mahl, Jimmy, Margot Ballhere and many, many more.
But after numerous posts identifying these puppets, Estovir has been leaning hard on Tom. And one can see how totally obnoxious Estovir is just by reading Tom’s comments.
But even more obnoxious is that green anonymous Estovir has been using even more frequently than Tom. ‘Mr Green Slime’, one might call him, is responsible for all those ‘turd’ posts we keep seeing. He also keeps posting a ‘K’ word that should let women know Johnathan Turley isn’t real concerned with reaching women readers.
For close to 4 years, Estovir has maintained a chokehold on these comment threads. Which makes one seriously wonder if Estovir is an invalid in a wheelchair with no life outside this blog.
Comes now Elvis Bug, aka The Lawn Boy, aka brandrunner aka ynot aka david benson, aka Smeagol, among others, to drop another steaming turd and out himself as the little kunt that he is.
He has outed himself in the past by posting the same drivel under both his name and brandrunner.
He outs himself again by repeating his newfound word of the day to describe Tom—-obnoxious.
He outs himself again by using his favorite pasttime, speaking to some imaginary third party. I use it in response as a form of ridicule, and it flies right over his head. Its how he earned the name Smeagol.
I predict that he will act like the tiny little twat that he is, denying his sockpuppets again. Watch.
As an aside, he has also outed himself as a closet misogynist by arguing that a woman would be more “triggered” than a man by the word kunt, despite the fact it has only been used to describe “men” and trans (like him) here.
Cue now the lying, cowardly little kunt, Elvis Bug, to deny another FACT.
“many recent posts”. You are the source of those posts.
He also outed himself as the turd brained psychopath who was posting for days “no, it isn’t” et al, dozens of times a day. When he was called out for it, he denied it, like the little kunt he is, and the random posts stopped shortly thereafter.
This did not age well
😂
Dr. Jill Biden
@DrBiden
Decency is on the ballot.
7:49 am • 28/10/2020 from Earth
“In the controversy involving Maese-Czeropski, the video was posted to a private group for gay men and the owner identified himself as a “twink” engaging in sex acts with his older “bear” partner.”
REGARDING ABOVE:
What is the name of the internet site where the video was posted for the private group for gay men?
Asking for a FFriend
Svelaz ex-bf
Lmao inswear to god this was not me
Tom
🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸
@Travis_in_Flint
They call us deplorable.
They’re making adult films in Senate chambers.
They have topless activist on the White House lawn.
They have a male staffer stealing women’s luggage at airports.
They have a man dressed as a woman in a leadership role for children’s health.
They’ve found drugs in the White House.
The Presidents son is under investigation for multiple felonies.
They refer to women as birthing people.
They defend men in women’s sports in school.
The more I see this stuff the more I long for the days of the stocks and whipping post.
They have a male staffer stealing women’s luggage at airports.
Correction:
They had a non binary cross dresser, who still had “they” package (pardon the pun), serving as an official in the DOE Nuclear Energy office. Sam plead no contest to stealing luggage and in so doing was allowed to claim it was an accident. “They” got a suspended sentence, despite having committed the same crime previously.
O T
There is an article in the DM today showing that recent property sales in the vicinity of M-AL show that the valuation of M-A-L in the so called “fraud” trial in New York is absurdly low. This case is going to blow up on appeal.
Judge Engoron repeated the value the tax assessor had stated. Are you suggesting that Trump should have been paying more property taxes all this time?
As many people have pointed out, tax assessments are a very unreliable guide to market value.
Which is irrelevant to Judge Engoron’s statement about it, because he did not suggest that the tax assessor’s valuation was the market value of the property.
Have you ever bothered reading what the Judge actually wrote?
ATS, are you that unintelligent? The judge is not there to talk about real estate values but instead to adjudicate a false accusation against Trump, one of them being the value of MAL. He is not supposed to find opposing values to what Trump opined. Instead, he is supposed to determine if Trump had a reasonable opinion of value, which is proven true based on other property values, the size of MAL, and other attributes.
This does not mean I agree the suit has substance. It has none, for if Trump can be tried for overvaluing a property, then the judge should be tried for stupidity and undervaluing it.
As usual, you need help understanding the essential points involved in the dispute. The judge and prosecutor aren’t as lame as you seem to be. They, at least, know this is a political stunt. You need to get on board and stop with your ridiculous comments.
S Meyer
I seriously doubt this is ATS. He is this stupid, but not this ignorant.
Or do you use the term ATS generically now? Who could blame you?
Tom, this is one of those generic ATS responses that anyone could have written, but it has some features of Anonymous the Stupid, or ATS. In the past, when he was all puffed up before his head exploded, he would write under the anonymous label agreement with himself as well as other comments, thinking he could gain credibility with numbers. He failed then, and that is what we may be seeing here again.
I don’t know how long you have been on the blog or what your previous aliases were if you were on the blog, so I am not sure if you ever saw me show what he was doing by copying and linking to a bunch of his posts.
I do vaguely recall that. I lurked here for years. I may have posted half a dozen times before idk, 6 or 8 months ago. I started posting more frequently because the lies were just intolerable. Soon after, i was calling out Gigi for her lies, and the gallant Dennis stepped in to “defend” the defenseless. He challenged me to “find one instance of him ever lying”. It took me 67 seconds. I posted his two contradictions from a single post, kinda the founding entries to the Wall of Shame and he has to his day ever acknowledge his lies. And the rest is history.
If i had the patience to dig into the info the way you did, i could easily triple the Wall, its that bad around here. I applaud your dogged determination to out him.
Tom, keep doing what you are doing. You have humiliated the leftists on the blog, and that can be seen by anyone who has casually looked at the comments.
I have to disagree – the Judge is not there for ANY reason at all.
Fraud requires someone to be harmed. No one was harmed.
The courts and govenrment have absolutely no role in manufacturing what are esssentially contract disputes when neither party has asked them too.
There is not a single problem with this case there are layers and layers and layers of problems.
First is the 2 millenia old legal principle – Caveat emptor.
The responsibility for verifying what you have purchased rests on the buyer – not the sellor.
There is good reason for this – which is why it is a 2000 year old principle.
Only the buyer knows what is important to them.
If I buy a large victorian mansion on a busy corner – does it matter if the roof has failed and the building is termite ridden – if I am knocking it down to build a 7-11 ?
Conversely it would matter allot if I was converting it to a Bed & Breakfast.
“Market price” – is a FICTION. It does not exist. The only price for anything is what a buyer and sellor agree to.
Fraud on the part of a sellor has always been extremely difficult and as time passes becoming nearly impossible.
When I was much younger we had the last significant group of fraud claims – as environmental laws started to take effect and properties that had been industrial sites or had toxic waste burried on them lost substantial value.
BREIFLY it was possible to sell a contaminated site and not disclose the contamination and lose a massive lawsuit.
But today there are very very very few places were toxic waste has been dumped in the US that are not publicly tracked.
And DESPITE that pretty much every single commerical sale (opr refinance) REQUIRES an ESA – Environmental site assessment.
One of my businesses does the site visits for ESA’s – I do not do the reports. But I have personly done hundreds of the site visits.
We look for wetlands, wells, septic tanks, burried trash, changes in vegitation, rubble, improper waste disposal. underground tanks (USTs) Above ground tanks (ASTs). Stored hazerdous materials, ….. There is an entire ASTM standard on what we must look for.
The Sellor is NO LONGER responsible. If you own love canal and you try to sell it – lying about the toxic waste burried there today – your lying is legally irrelevant. Because an expert is going to check the records – and today there are excellent public records of nearly all environmental aspects of most sites in the entire US. Not only will there be a record check by a third party – but someone like me will visit the site and scour it to be sure that the records did not miss anything. Furthert the report writer and the site inspector are Heavily insured. If I miss an underground tank – I not the sellor are on the hook. I will get sued, my insurance will pay for the cleanup, and I will never get insurance again.
And that is just the environmental aspects of a commercial sale of refinance.
For high value properties there will be MULTIPLE property inspections and appraisals and audits.
If this is an income producing property – all commercial properties are. The companies books will be audited.
The occupancy rate will be verified, the rental income will be verified. Several separate valuations of the property will be done using different formulas formula that use the iuncome (and/or expenses) to set a value for the property.
You can look these up online – look for Gross rent valuation or net rent valuations. These are valuations of the property that have NOTHING to do with the condition of the proprty, or the assessment, only the income from the property.
If you are looking to buy income producing propertiy – you have the rules of thumb for this on the tip of your tongue.
Again these are all BUYERS responsibilities. There have been a few high profile cases in the past decade where major property owners lied to lendors about their vacancy rates or their rents. These are now Audited – or you will not get a loan.
Next a real estate appraisal will be done – this is different from the valuations above. The state heavily regulates real estate appraisals.
Frankly I think they are crap, regardless they are done based on formal rules established by law. Most of us are familiar with home appraisals which are simpler versions of the same thing. Appraisers must be trained certified and licensed. Since 2008 it is no longer possible for sellors (or buyers) to choose or have any input into the apraiser.
Nor is the end of things – often there are multiple appraisers on a commerical property.
There also will be a title search and title insurance. This establishes that you actually own what you are buying selling or refinancing.
Increasingly large commerical properties also have Property conditions assessments done. If you have a mortgage with the top banks in the world or the country – there will be a PCA, if the government is involved in any way – FHA, Fannie, Freddie, VHA – there will be a PCA. If you are dealing with a smaller bank MAYBE they will not ask for a PCA – but within the next decade all commmerical sales will require a PCA. What is a PCA ? That is where an architect or engineer evaluates your building – NOT the price of the building but its condition. How well maintained is it, is it code compliant ? Is it structurally sound, what is the condition of the roof, the exterior, the interior, the caulking. the life safety systems, ADA compliance, the condiction of the parking, the sidewalks, and on and on and on.
We will produce a report of all the defects of the property and what it will cost to fix them.
We will prioritize those defects. We will estimate the property maintanace costs for the life of the loan. We will determine what you are going to have to pay to replace RTU’s or split systems or roofs, or water heaters or ….
And again – if we make a mistake WE are liable – not the sellor, not the buyer. not the bank.
All of this derives from that latin phrase I started with – Caveat Emptor.
The responsibility for determining the value of comercial property being purchased lies with the BUYER.
Where there is a mortgage – with the LENDOR – not the sellor. Not the refinancer.
You can lie through your teeth about your property to the buyer to the bank
and you have NO LIABILITY – except in the few if any rare remaining instances were something the buyer can not discover through due dilligence is deliberately hidden from them.
Increasingly due dilligene is so thorough – especially on high value properties that there is nothing that can be hidden – and ever if something is missed – it is the due dilligence team that is liable not the owner.
I do not know that I have ever done a Trump property – but I have done PCA’s and ESA site visits in Florida, and Manhatttan.
I have done half a billion dollar properties on Central Park.
There is absolutely no possible way that the Trump organization – or any other commerical property owner could have defrauded anyone had they gone to enormous amounts of trouble to do so deliberately.
Where does Caveat Emptor come from ? Why is it always the buyer’s responsibility ?
Because ALWAYS the Buyer can walk away. We knew that since the time of the romans.
The responsibility for verifying that something is worth to you what you are paying for it ALWAYS rests with the buyer.
Even outside of realestate – which is the area with the deapest and most formal due dilligence.
Even with purchases in a grocery store – the buyer is ALWAYS responsible for everything that is not hidden.
The actual value of something is NEVER hidden – because the BUYER always decides what they want to pay for something.
This case should have been dismissed the day it was filed – it is garbage.
It runs afoul of massive amounts of realestate and commerce law and principles.
“I have to disagree”
Excellent, John. I agree. Unfortunately this comment was directed at S. Meyer rather than ATS or anonymous.
These leftists are woefully ignorant.
TL;DR
But I liked your last paragraph.
Rather than tell us all that we are wrong because we have not read what the judge said or wrote – CITE IT.
I do not care what you think someone said – you have no credibiulity on that score.
Tom is doing an excellent job of listing major false representations by left wingnuts.
You have no credibility.
Florida tax assessments do not adequately reflect property appraisals. You should have learned that by now, but perhaps you are impervious to correction.
property tax assessments are done differently accross the country.
But pretty uniformly they have little or nothing to do with the actual value of a property,
Nor do property owners have much input into property tax assessments – except through their vote.
Property tax assessments are nearly always way LOW – because raising asssessments raises property taxes and that gets politicians removed from office with near certainty.
Are you suggesting that Trump should have been paying more property taxes all this time?
No dumba$$ keep up. The county of palm beach ASSESSED the property based on giving an intentional tax break. Do you honestly think this was some Biden-admin-level f*ckup by Palm Beach County??? He paid exactly what they wanted him to pay.
Get a grip man. An assessment is not an appraisal.
Do you need a goddam history lesson on why they would give him a tax break on this property?
Or are you just bug, “pretending” to be stupid and then pretending to be pretending?
yes he is
Are you entirely clueless about the differences between a tax valuation – and a property tax assessment and an a comercial apprasial ?
Yes Engron cited the assessed value – that alone should have given him a HUGE clue this case is full of BS.
In most of the country property tax assessments are way below market values – often by a factor of 10 or more.
Further property tax assessments are determined by the local municipality – with virtually no participation by the property owner.
Are many paying less in taxes than they should ? Absolutely. But their is not fraud involved – because the property owner has little involvement in a property tax assessment.
At best they can appeal it if they think it is too high.
Regardless property owners have no input and very little control fo property tax assessments – short of their vote.
They are typically conducted without the permission of the property owner, without contact with the property owner, and without visiting the property.
Many factors effect property tax assessments – pretty much all of which are political. Local governments need revenue and that is mostly through property taxes, while at the same time nothing gets you voted out of office quicker than raising property taxes – including doing so by raising assessments.
If Engron is not aware of the difference between a property tax assessment and a real estate appraisal he not only should not be a judge – he should not be a lawyer.
Yea, dimwit Dennis tried to opine on this once, acting as though he had some knowledge that rest of us dont’, claiming some universal 80% factor applied to the “appraisal” by the county. I’m sure he read it somewhere or found it on a quick google search. Such is the nature of their “knowledge.” I spent an entire day shoving all of their ridiculous arguments up their noses, including the idea that someone could do an “appraisal” from the road at the end of the driveway. From there, you couldn’t even know if Mar-a-lago had sheetrock on the walls, or was still bare studs. So nuts it was laughable. Dennis went one further. He suggested that Trump was guilty of both, overvaluing his property (loan fraud) AND underpaying his taxes (tax fraud). How does one even deal with that sort of stupidity?
The singular American failure has been and remains the Supreme Court which has withheld ad hoc, spontaneous and emergency Judicial Review, the efforts of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney against “Crazy Abe” Lincoln’s unconstitutional suspension of habeas corpus notwithstanding.
Abuse of power and the welfare state must have been struck down at every step.
______________________________________________________________________________________
“…courts…must…declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void.”
“…men…do…what their powers do not authorize, [and] what they forbid.”
“[A] limited Constitution … can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing … To deny this would be to affirm … that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”
– Alexander Hamilton
________________________
The Power of Judicial Review
The Supreme Court can strike down any law or other action by the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution. This power of judicial review applies to federal, state, and local legislative and executive actions. The Constitution does not specifically provide for the power of judicial review. It arises instead from an 1803 decision known as Marbury v. Madison.
– Justia
“the valuation of M-A-L in the so called “fraud” trial in New York is absurdly low.”
You’re lying. The judge never stated the property’s value.
And he never said “property’s value” either, Rain Man.
Try to keep up. The case is wrong, to begin with, but in this portion of the case, Trump opined a value. Therefore, the judge needs to compare likes to likes. You are throwing BS to hide your face.
What has the judge got to do with it ? he should not be hearing a case.
The constitution bars states from interfering in private contracts.
Govenrment does not decide value – buyers and sellors do.
Trump can Sell MAL tomorow – for any amount that anyone will agree to – and there is ZIP, ZILCH, NADA that the courts can do about that.
The content of the video is a perfect metaphor for the Biden administration and what it has done to America.
This D brand party virus just brings perversion to the table and expects Americans to take it. Filth is filth and the D brand party is overloaded with filth.
Maese-Czeropski deep fake? He did not apologize for doing it, maybe it is a deep fake. If there is more than 8 seconds it may be real. There are a lot of ways to fake it. Homegreenscreen over a pic of the hearing room. But the butt I saw looked a lot bigger than that skinny boy’s butt. (I have not seen the video, just stills)
I knew a radical high schooler in 1970 who was obsessed with the idea of screwing on the Judge’s bench in the county courthouse. So that is a thing for radicals.
Elect degenerates, expect degeneracy.
After “Crazy Abe” Lincoln’s wholly unconstitutional “Reign of Terror,” Karl Marx’s “RECONSTRUCTION Amendments,” the utterly irrational 19th Amendment, and a series, a dynasty, of antithetical, anti-American, anti-Constitution, communist (liberal, progressive, socialist, democrat, RINO, AINO) presidential regimes, and pervasive, ever-increasing internal rot, America has reached its nadir. Since the end of American freedom in 1860, America has shared the misery in fine communist fashion, and now conservatives want to create and share the opportunity to succeed in and benefit from freedom, free enterprise, endeavor, and the “pursuit of happiness.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
“They consider…that it fell to the lot of Abraham Lincoln…to lead his country through…the RECONSTRUCTION of a social world.”
– Karl Marx Letter to Lincoln, 1865
_____________________________________
How will actual Americans ever Make America Great Again?
Actual Americans require “asylum” from illegal aliens and international criminal leeches. Start with mass deportation of dependents and parasites, ending deleterious trade with and ridiculous most-favored nation status for America’s principal enemy, China, and its satellites, and the abrogation of unconstitutional communist laws, agencies, departments, and programs—the communist American welfare state.
The singular American failure is the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has been woefully and high-criminally absent in its sworn-oath duty to “support” the anti-communist freedom and free enterprise provided to Americans by the Constitution.
I’m finding it interesting that such a large proportion of the comments in this comment section are devoted to suggesting that this comment section is terrible and therefore posting a comment is a waste of time. Any opinions on whether such comments are meant to be self-referential and therefore humorous in a roundabout kind of way?
Ralph is the most self indulgent, self important, humorless person on the planet apparently. It would never occur to him that humor or entertainment might be a motive for much of it. He wants this site to exist so he can deride Turley and share his wisdom with all, and he just hates it when his posts scroll down the page! I’ve never seen him actually engage anyone for any significant period, without resorting to the exact conduct he squeals like a pig about. Stay tuned for his high IQ response. He exhibits the EXACT same narcissistic behavior as the lefty turd farm, by addressing Turley, as though there is a scintilla of possibility that Turley will see it, much less respond. Delusional.
Updated 12/16 Lefty Wall of Shame aka The Lefty Turd Farm
Standby—Bug will be along shortly to deny ownership, but pat himself on the back for making the list again.
R.C.A.W.T. was a good pneumonicElvis Bug aka The Lawn Boy
Nuclear ICBM’s are more accurate, the closer you are to the target.—*Elvis Bug aka The Lawn Boy
Hunter doesn’t have to testify because Comer changed his mind—Dennis aka Mr Alpha Bank
The quid has to be illegal for a quid pro quo to be illegal—-*Elvis bug aka The Lawn boy
If Joe’s quid results in Hunter’s quo, that’s not illegal—-*Elvis Bug aka The Lawn Boy
Inflation was on a rising trend from 2015 until Trump left office—-Elvis Bug aka The Lawn Boy
(1.3, 2.2, 2.5, 1.9, 1.3)
Comer said that the mere presence of shell companies is *proof* of a crime—-Svelass aka Mr. Peetape
Hunter Biden showed up for his hearing today—–Svelass aka Mr. Peetape
Hunter Biden agreed to testify to a public hearing—–Gigi the LIAR
(who did he agree with?)
The Consumer Price Index was indeed at 7.6% when Trump left office—–Elvis Bug aka The Lawn Boy (it was 1.4%)
Archer gave no details about the meeting at the Naval Observatory with Marc Holtzman—-Svelaz aka Mr Peetape
Archer had no idea what was on those phone calls. He admitted it under oath—Svelaz aka Mr Peetape
Evidence isnt permissible unless its incontrovertible—-ATS
Circumstantial evidence alone is not enough to convict——Svelaz aka Mr Peetape
Republicans are the only ones calling for violence these days—-Dennis
Democrats call for violence when the cause is right—-Dennis in the same post
Gas prices spiked because Texas uses crude oil to make electricity—-Gigi the LIAR
AR-15’s ruin the meat—-Dennis
The inflation rate was 8% when Trump left office—-Gigi the LIAR
(it was actually 1.4%)
Biden only released the strategic oil reserve once—-Svelass Mr Peetape
Archer never said it was Joe that was called from Dubai—-ATS
The State of Florida does property tax “appraisals”—-Svelass Mr Peetape
You can’t convict without incontrovertible proof—ATS
Trump was convicted of rape—Svelass Mr. Peetape
The Jefferson County school board has a supermajority of republicans—-lawn boy EB
Trumps attorney forgot to “check a box”——Dennis
An insult or name calling is not a personal attack—-Svelass Mr. Peetape
The DC NG answers only to the President—-Gigi the LIAR
Christianity teaches to treat your fellow man the same way you treat Jesus—-Svelass Mr Peetape
The ideal athlete is 6’2” and 175#—-Dennis
There is no way a fat person can shoot a 67 in golf—-Dennis
“Bright red Alabama is the “wild west”,” (when its bright blue Birmingham that accounts for 95% of the gun violence in Alabama)—-Dennis
That’s why McCarthy didn’t hold a vote. He was going to, but upon realizing he didn’t have the votes he chose not to hold one.—-Mr Peetape
McCarthy never said he didn’t have the votes.—-Mr Peetape.
*These statements are attributed to the booger eater, because they were posted by a green anonymous. If that clown wants to step up and claim ownership, I will change attribution.
This conduct, allegedly of staffers for Sen. Ben Cardin (D., Md.), comports well with that of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Barack “Barry Soetoro” Obama in high school, and the entire Biden Crime Family.
Why are there so many “(D.)s” there?
_________________________________________
“… she was deeply wounded to discover that Franklin had been having an affair with her secretary, Lucy Mercer.”
– “FDR and His Women”
__________________________
“I knew that John F. Kennedy was a compulsive, even pathological adulterer, given to taking outlandish risks after he entered the White House. I knew he treated women like whores. And I knew he had more than a few issues with his father about toughness and manliness and all that. But before I read in the newspaper that Mimi Alford’s just-released memoir, Once Upon A Secret: My Affair With President John F. Kennedy And Its Aftermath, described giving Dave Powers a blow job at JFK’s request and in his presence, I didn’t know that Kennedy had an appetite for subjecting those close to him to extreme humiliation.”
“Dave Powers was sitting poolside while the President and I swam lazy circles around each other, splashing playfully. Dave had removed his jacket and loosened his tie in the warm air of the pool, but he was otherwise fully clothed. He was sitting on a towel, with his pants leg rolled up, and his bare feet dangling in the water.
“The President swam over and whispered in my ear. ‘Mr. Powers looks a little tense,’ he said. ‘Would you take care of it?’
“It was a dare, but I knew exactly what he meant. This was a challenge to give Dave Powers oral sex. I don’t think the President thought I’d do it, but I’m ashamed to say that I did. It was a pathetic, sordid, scene, and is very hard for me to think about today. Dave was jolly and obedient as I stood in the shallow end of the pool and performed my duties. The President silently watched.
“Afterwards, Alford says she was ‘deeply embarrassed,’ and as she climbed out of the pool she ‘could hear Dave speak in as stern a tone as I ever heard him use with his boss. ‘You shouldn’t have made her do that,’ Dave said. ‘I know, I know,’ I heard the President say. Later, a chastened President Kennedy apologized to us both.’ Alford believes that Kennedy showed ‘his darker side … when we were among men he knew. That’s when he felt a need to display his power over me.’ Kennedy didn’t just have a thing for Social Register girls; he had a thing for humiliating Social Register girls. He also had a thing for humiliating his fellow Irishman, Dave Powers.”
– JFK, Monster
_________________
“I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.”
– Bill Clinton
______________
“In regard to homosexuality, I must say that I believe this is an attempt to remove oneself from the present, a refusal perhaps to perpetuate the endless farce of earthly life. You see, I make love to men daily, but in the imagination.”
– Barack Hussein “Barry ‘I-Have-A-Statue-In-Jakarta’ Soetoro Obama, 21, to Alex McNear, November, 1982
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“I got high for just the opposite effect, something that could push questions of who I was out of my mind.”
“…when he wrote that he most frequently used marijuana and cocaine “when you could afford it.’”
– Obama/Soetoro to High School Classmate
________________________________________________
“Obama was not only active within the gay community, but also a heavy cocaine user during his years in Hawaii.”
“Obama was having sex with these older white guys and that’s how he was getting this cocaine to be able to freebase.”
– Mia Marie Pope, Obama/Soetoro High School Classmate
_______________________________________________________________
WHOSE COCAINE WAS IN THE RECEPTACLE IN THE VESTIBULE IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
OH, THEY KNOW, SWEETHEART!
Hoping perps will Kill over from AIDS!!!