“That is Not the Judgment of the Press”: The White House Calls the Media to Heel With Disinformation Campaign

“That is not the judgment of the press.” Those words from President Joe Biden were a telling moment after a reporter noted that there is widespread concern that he is mentally diminished. Biden’s cranky response was overshadowed by his confusion on other points during the press conference, including mixing up the presidents of Egypt and Mexico. However, it captured the sense of license and expectation of the Biden White House that the press is supposed to toe the line, as it has for three years.

In the disastrous press conference, CNN correspondent MJ Lee reminded Biden that he had urged Americans to “watch me” when he was confronted over his age: “Many [of the] American people have been watching, and they have expressed concerns about your age.”

The President angrily responded: “That is your judgment!. That is your judgment! That is not the judgment of the press.”

The next day, many in the media came to Biden’s defense and attacked the Special Counsel report which detailed his “diminished faculties.” Others cleaned up the remark about the press. Biden clearly stated “That is your judgment! That is your judgment. That is not the judgment of the press.”

NBC did not include the line in articles on the press conference despite showing it on the live coverage. Roll Call actually edited the President’s remarks to insert “for” in the key line: “That is not the judgment [for] the press.” That changed the line from questioning the right of the press to make such judgments to telling a reporter what the press view should be. Even if it was a Freudian slip, it was a telling slip. Other media inserted or suggested “public” rather than the press in the line.

The obvious exasperation of the President reflects years of a passive, enabling media that shielded Biden from difficult questions on various scandals, including the corruption scandal.

What was striking, however, was the degree to which President Biden and his staff spent this week putting out clearly false statements.  In an administration that has pushed for the censorship of citizens accused of disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation, the President openly lied about his conduct and the report.

President Biden, for example, stated that the Special Counsel report found that he did not willfully retain material. It found the opposite . . . repeatedly.

He stated that he did not disclose classified material to his ghostwriter.  Special Counsel Hur found precisely the opposite.

Biden stated that the material was not highly classified with “that red stuff…around the corners.” In fact, Hur found that the material was “highly sensitive,” including an Afghanistan-related memo from the National Security Adviser to President Barack Obama in 2009 marked “TOP SECRET/SCI” (Sensitive Compartmented Information).

Biden stated that all of the material was kept in locked or lockable filing cabinets. That was a lie. As the pictures vividly demonstrated, Hur found material in unlocked areas and virtually spilling out of torn boxes in his garage.

What is notable is that Biden works almost entirely off teleprompters, reading statements clearly crafted by his staff. That would indicate that some of these comments were promulgated by staff.

Even in the press conference on Friday, Ian Sams, spokesman for the White House Counsel’s Office ran into a skeptical reporter in the form of Jon Decker, the White House correspondent for Gray Television. Decker is the former head of the White House Correspondents Association and one of my former students. Decker is the gold standard for reporters and has always been objective, tough, and fair. His approach has not changed from the Trump to the Biden Administration.

Decker challenged Sam on coming to the podium to address the President’s statements and proceeding to make a false claim that this is the first Special Counsel to end his investigation without charges.

So why would the White House risk looking like it is going full “Baghdad Bob” in denying readily observable facts? Because this is no real risk.

The reason was evident the day after the report. While usually supportive outlets had to acknowledge the President’s false claims, media figures from MSNBC and CNN quickly fell into line and launched a full attack on Hur, often repeating identical words used by the White House about his observations being “gratuitous.” The problem is Hur, not a President who not only appeared confused in the press conference but openly lied about various established facts.

We have previously written how the level of advocacy and bias in the press has created a danger of a de facto state media in the United States. It is possible to have such a system by consent rather than coercion. The Biden White House has become more open in its marching orders to media, including a letter drafted by the Biden White House Legal Counsel’s Office calling for major media to “ramp up their scrutiny” of House Republicans.

The Decker-Sams exchange is key in this regard. I have previously noted that Sams is now actively managing a media campaign to blunt investigations into the President’s conduct and the alleged corruption by his family. As Decker noted, he is not a lawyer but has used that office to put an official imprimatur on these false statements. That could prove precarious in the weeks to come as the House explores impeachment allegations against the President. The use of White House staff for such purposes has been cited in past impeachment articles.

 

234 thoughts on ““That is Not the Judgment of the Press”: The White House Calls the Media to Heel With Disinformation Campaign”

  1. My opinion is that neither Mr. Biden nor anyone else should be prosecuted under the espionage act for mishandling of classified documents. The leaking of classified documents has been a cottage industry in D.C. for decades. Too much stuff is classified, and materials seem to remain classified far longer than they should. But then why is Trump almost exclusive being prosecuted?

    1. Trump refused to return all of the documents after being asked. He refused to return all of the documents after being subpoenaed. He had Nauta move the documents after being subpoenaed. The FBI had to get a warrant to search for the missing docs. Trump had Nauta and de Oliveira attempt to erase security tapes. Trump engaged in obstruction. That’s why he’s being charged. If he’d returned them when asked and not engaged in obstruction, he wouldn’t have been charged.

      1. Trump didn’t refuse. He was never served with a court order.

        Get things right for a change.

        1. S. Meyer: YOU need to get things right for a change. DJT was served with a subpoena to return all the docs he was keeping at Mar-a-Lago. After a year of giving his middle finger to NARA/DOJ he was served with a search warrant. All of the foregoing were “court orders”. It seems to never miss a chance to get it wrong!

          1. Trump had a right, as an ex-POTUS to tell NARA to pound sand.
            NARA does not have higher authority than the president.
            Biden, as a senator and ex vp, had NO right to keep hundreds of highly classified docs for decades.

          2. Also, Dennis, Biden’s ghostwriter destroyed evidence upon hearing of the special counsel investigation. That is a federal offense. Any explanation as to why he was not charged?

          3. Get it right, Dennis. You are mixing things up again. That search warrant needed a court order. Other court orders didn’t apply.

      2. A citizen, even Trump, has the right to contest a subpoena. An ex-President also has to think of the powers and perogatives of his office. When there is a contest, lawyers should negotiate the dispute, at least before a court becomes involved. Hunter Biden was not thrown in jail when he defied a subpoena from the Comer committee. Fani Willis will be contesting a subpoena from Jim Jordan’s committee.

        1. Trump didn’t contest the subpoena, he simply defied a valid subpoena.

          HB’s lawyer noted that the original subpoena wasn’t valid because no impeachment inquiry had been approved at that point. The current subpoena is valid and HB will be showing up to testify.

          1. The Comer committee was not prevented from issuing a subpoena by the absence of approval of an impeachment inquiry. A Congressional committee always has subpoena power. As for Trump, he did not simply ignore the FBI subpoena. If memory serves, I believe he sent a letter claiming that some of the records were personal in nature.

    2. EdwardMahl: I think Anonymous has adequately answered your Q. But you are right on one point. Much, way too much has been classified. For a long time the mantra in the FBI, CIA and DOD has been “When in doubt, mark it TOP SECRET or CLASSIFIED”. We found that out during the Vietnam War when Daniel Ellsberg was unsuccessfully prosecuted for revealing the real truth about Nixon’s war. What we need is more sunshine about what our government is doing in our name.

      1. Dennis – You say you are a lawyer. Are you familiar with the term spoliation of evidence? Biden’s ghostwriter, upon hearing about the special counsel, destroyed the recordings he had with Biden, that included references to classified materials. That’s a federal offense. The ghostwriter was not charged. Any thoughts as to why not? It seems pretty straight forward. We know you do not reply to anonymous posts. But rest assured, we are all ears.

  2. Turley,
    The angry outbursts from Biden are a symptom of his dementia.
    You can google it, but anyone who has dealt w those who have dementia can tell stories about it.

    Demented Pedo Joe is not fit for office. We all know this.
    However, it will take a qualified physician to perform the tests and to make the actual judgement before anyone can talk about the 25th Amendment.

    The issue though is that many will not make that determination because of the potential for malpractice.

    -G

  3. OT:
    “BREAKING: HAMAS RAN A DATA CENTER UNDER UNRWA’S GAZA HEADQUARTERS”

    The wires from UNRWA fed power to a main Gaza center.

    Yet there are those who trust the news from Hamas and UNWRA. What does that make those types of people?

    “UNRWA’s very existence has perpetuated the false “palestinian” narrative which has now infected much of the younger generation around the world. By never resettling any of the Arabs that left their homes in 1948 in the countries they found themselves in - UNRWA has allowed the myth of the eternal ever expanding “palestinian” refugee to continue.

    With fake keys to non-existent properties in Israel as well as spreading blood libel lever antisemitism – UNRWA has become the global generator of the newest form of anitsemitism – anti-zionism.”

    Videos etc. at the site below.

    https://www.israelunwired.com/breaking-hamas-ran-a-data-center-under-unrwas-gaza-headquarters/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=BREAKING%3A+Hamas+Ran+A+Data+Center+Under+UNRWA+s+Gaza+Headquarters&utm_campaign=IDF+Strikes+Back+In+Arab+Occupied+Tulkarm

  4. If Joe Biden is incompetent, then all the executive orders he signed must be invalid. What was the date of his mental incompetence?
    If he is competent, then put the SOB in jail, along with the whole crime family.

  5. I am thankful the Special Counsel pointed out, as one example of biden’s mental health failings (a/k/a memory problems) the fact that he was not able to remember when his son Beau died. Keep in mind that biden cites the death of this son when he wishes to appear sympathetic with ANYone and EVERYone whose family member died … but in this recent interview with Special Counsel could not identify when that son died. Also keep in mind what I heard while watching tv coverage of biden talking with the parents of one of the three soldiers recently killed by Iran-supported terrorists: “I know how you feel. My son served in Iraq. THAT’S HOW I LOST HIM.” Gee … methinks that son died of cancer … not while serving in the military or because of injuries suffered in service. So … was that poor memory, evidence of serious dementia or a flat-out lie??

    1. The Leftist MSM (but I repeat myself) are spreading lies (aka misinformation) by painting Biden’s predicament as a victim of ageism. Pope Francis is 87, older than Biden, and he has no problem in his public speaking. In fact he is quite sharp to the current problems in the world, and has weekly if not daily public audiences, regularly interviewed by the international press alone without teleprompters or cue cards.

      Once again the MSM is lying. Biden has been confirmed by his hand picked DOJ of suffering from cognitive impairment and memory loss. So it follows: has the Chairman U.S. of the Joint Chiefs of Staff called General Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army ala U.S. General Mark Milley?

      Justice Clarence Thomas must be ROFLMFAO in the worst way.

      Karma baby.

      1. Estovir,
        Do not forget, many are trying to claim that Biden is more informed than Trump.
        The difference is, Biden is not informed. It is whom ever wrote what Biden read off the teleprompter is more informed, and had a degree of time to think it out what Biden would read off the teleprompter.
        That is not leadership.
        That is what Joe Biden’s handlers told him to say.
        Joe Biden is not in charge of anything.
        He is mentally incompetent as Hur pointed out.
        The whole world knows it.
        We all see it.
        But those with TDS will continue to declare Biden is fully functional and a great leader.
        As we all laugh.

    2. Biden has always been a pathologic liar. That statement (about his son) may well have been just another one of his lies.

  6. Democracy Dies in Jurinalism

    Hair on fire: Democratic worries grow over claims about Biden’s memory lapses

    The broad conclusion, both inside and outside Biden’s inner circle, is that a dangerous and misleading caricature of the president’s performance is at risk of setting in….The emotions of Democrats across the country ranged from fear to despondency

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/09/biden-memory-age-hur-documents/

    TL;DR: if you thought trolling by Dems was bad, you aint seen nothin’ yet

    🔥🔥

    1. As a rare observer of the Washington Post, I usually run into a paywall. This article had none, and neither did another article on Biden. Anyone out there, Is this an indication the WP is turning against Biden, or today, the lack of a paywall is a usual occurrence?

      1. S. Meyer: Paywalls are a big problem if you want to get information. The Washington Post is not the biggest offender. I pay just a few bucks a month to get their online sub. But it’s the only I subscribe to because I refuse to pay what, for example, the NT times charges.

        1. Dennis, I have no problems with paywalls, as these companies need to be paid for what they produce. I pay for some, but there is so much I don’t want to add more to add to my general knowledge. Neither the Washington Post nor the NYTimes have been honest when it comes to politics. They were wrong on almost every major Trump issue, using anonymous sources and outright lying. They are worthless. If one gets political news from these sources, they are essentially ignorant of what is happening.

          My question had to do with my accessing specific articles about Biden that weren’t behind a paywall. I don’t follow the WaPo so that things may have changed, but if usually there is a paywall and now there isn’t, that is an important thing to know.

  7. After a couple of days here, it is pretty easy to figure out who the trolls/paid DNC shills and disinformation agents are. I actually feel sorry for them on this one. I mean, a special counsel says The Big Guy is guilty, but too old, feeble and memory-deficit to charge with a crime. I mean, how do you spin that one? Flat denial? Distraction? Disinformation? I mean, have you ever been in court, and the opposing attorney has such a dog of a case that you feel sorry for them? That is what this feels like. A sense of awkward embarrassment, where your own face turns kind of red at the suffering of another human being, who is caught, on a cruel hook, and being reeled in to be filleted. But you don’t even have to knock it on the head, because it is DOA.

    1. Check the headlines at the Washington Post main page on the internet. The headlines are something out of the Twilight Zone. There is only one problem: WaPo is read by fewer Americans today than ever.

      LOL

  8. How soon will the DNC announce its new replacement candidate?

    Aren’t there filing deadlines?

  9. I do not believe Congress Impeach President Biden and in the end his son will not go to jail. What individuals might want to prepare for is the fact he will be allowed to retire or step down and be allowed a hefty salary at the tax payers expense foe his family. This also will allow his business dealings to carry on as usual. I hope Professor , someone that the people can trust will explain all the perks the president receives, what the dollar amount is yearly at the tax payer expense. My understanding it worth in dollar amount equal or over one million.

    1. What Daddy/Pres Joe would get from taxpayers would be a drop in the bucket compared to what he and others will continue to get from the Biden family RICO inspired sources of money.

  10. Jonathan: Let’s move on from Special Counsel Hur’s 345 page report that, to put it mildly, was an attempt to tarnish Biden as a candidate and to serve the political interests of DJT. So let’s talk about “grifting” and the “Grifter in Chief’.

    For years DJT has taken millions from Mr. & Mrs. MAGADONIAN, average Americans who often live from paycheck to paycheck. They thought they were donating to their leader’s political campaign. Instead, DJT has taken $60 million of that money to pay his legal fees and that of his family members and co-defendants. According to a Business Insider report (2/6/24) DJT’s Save America PAC paid over $2.3 million in donor money for the law firm representing Ivanka Trump. The PAC also spent an additional $5.3 million for attorneys representing Ivanka, Eric Trump and Don Jr. So what are we to make of this?

    DJT has been deceiving Save America donors to use their hard earned money to pay his and his family’s legal bills and maintain their lavish life-styles. And I do mean “lavish”. Ivanka and Jared live in a $24 million mansion on Indian Creek Island in Miami. Don Jr. lives in a $9.7 million mansion in Florida. Eric and Lara Trump have a $3.2 million mansion in Jupiter, Fl.

    So Mr. & Mrs. MAGADONIAN. When are you going to wake up? Would you give your hard earned money to any other self-declared billionaire so they could maintain their lavish life style?

    1. You said, “Jonathan: Let’s move on from Special Counsel Hur’s 345 page report that, to put it mildly, was an attempt to tarnish Biden as a candidate and to serve the political interests of DJT. ”

      BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Yes, I bet you want to move on. But you are going about it the wrong way! Try this, instead! Go find 51 former Intelligence agents to say that the Hur Report has all the earmarks of Russian Disinformation!

    2. Joe Biden has senile dementia. I have been saying this for some months now.

      pic.twitter.com/GoSplIBhUm
      — Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) February 9, 2024

    3. Dennis: thank you. According to “The Independent”, Trump PAC paid Melania’s stylist (someone who teaches her how to dress) $108,000, and according to “The Bulletin”, $260,000 of donated money was paid for Melania’s hairdresser. And, bear in mind, she’s yet to show up at any campaign rally. Talk about grifting…Wow!

      1. Natasha,
        Now, do the grifting of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden from the Ukrainians, the Chinese and even Russian oligarchs.
        But you wont.
        In your TDS twisted mind, despite all the evidence, those things never happened.
        And you wonder why we and the rest of the world are all laughing at you.

    4. If it were not for Biden and Bidenonmics, no one would be living paycheck to paycheck.
      If it were not for Biden and Bidenonmics, record numbers of Americans would not be maxing out their credit cards just to pay the bills.
      If it were not for Biden and Bidenonmics, record numbers of Americans would not be raiding their retirement and 401ks to just pay the bills.
      If it were not for Biden and Bidenonmics, record numbers of Americans would not have to get second or third jobs just to pay the bills.
      Of course what it does not occur to your feeble mind is maybe Americans do not mind Trump using their money to help fight the corruption of the Democrats in their lawfare against Trump.
      Of course what it does not occur to your feeble mind is Biden donors are mega rich people and corporations while Trumps, the majority are small donations. Or average Americans. The see Biden for the corruption he is and now his questionable mental soundness. They are fully awake and see it all.

    5. Dennis, fighting Democrat criminal lawfare requires a group effort to protect all. That is how writers were protected from the Islamists, another part of the Democrat Party. Such lawfare ended when the money came from third parties. The criminals realize their criminal lawfare will not work.

      1. S. Meyer,
        Well said.
        The only time I have ever contributed to a political campaign was to Tulsi Gabbard. Twice. Would of a third time, but she dropped out.
        In order to fight against the Democrat lawfare weapon, I just might donate to the Trump campaign.
        For me, that is saying something.
        But Democrat lawfare is a greater threat. Almost, but not quite as wokeism.

    6. As so many have said … it’s one thing when those who have made money/a fortune in the “real world” enter politics and serve – while it’s quite another happening when a some make their fortunes because of their political “careers.” Like Daddy Joe, the latter have oftentimes never worked in that real world!

    7. Dennis — How’s Fani’s totally corrupt political persecution of Trump going?
      Looks like Fani, and maybe even her Boo, are gonna be the ones going to prison.

      @PeterBernegger (independent investigative journalist)
      I caught Fani Willis laundering money into her campaign. I filed an ethics complaint with the State of Georgia yesterday. Interview by Emerald Robinson in the link. Final numbers: $23,459.54 into Willis’ campaign by contributors who gave no name or address: blanks. Secondly, I found $44,295,80 over the limit of $3,000 per person (note: includes gross total of these, GA ethics might only include the over $3,000 amounts). And the big one: smurfing by Fani Willis abusing our elderly senior citizens by using their names and addresses without their knowledge – $184,916.45. Smurfing is campaign money laundering, structuring large sums into smaller sums over time. Using the names and addresses of citizens without their knowledge, let alone permission. Willis committed money laundering, identity theft, and elderly financial abuse. The unaware Smurfs are all over the age of 65. Willis’s campaign conspired to do all with the likes of Actblue. I know the bank(s), I have receipts. These findings and numbers are based on her reports to the State of Georgia, the GA’s campaign database and the FEC database. Over two campaign cycles. I call for an immediate investigation of Willis’ campaign.

      11:25 AM · Feb 10, 2024

    8. Dennis — Wanna bet Fani and her Boo are going to prison?
      You know, because as you Dems like to say: NO ONE is ABOVE the LAW. Righto.

      @henryrodgersdc

      EXCLUSIVE: Fani Willis failed to take service of a House Judiciary Committee subpoena over email, requiring the U.S. Marshals Service to hand deliver it to her personally…

      “Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to take service of a House Judiciary Committee subpoena over email, requiring the U.S. Marshals Service to hand deliver it to her personally, the Daily Caller has learned.”

      “The House Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to Willis on Feb. 2 for documents germane to her potential misuse of federal funds related to her indictment of former President Donald Trump. Willis did not accept the subpoena after it was emailed to her, causing the U.S. Marshals Service to have to serve the subpoena to her themselves, a source familiar with the matter told the Daily Caller.”

    9. Hey Dennis you useless eater,
      Tell us, why would Garland let Hur go pubic? If it was not to prove that Biden is mentally incompetent to stand trial?
      Mentally incompetent to stand trial, yet be the president?
      LOL! Your narrative is failing!
      Just like all your other narratives are failing!
      Keep up the good work!
      You are only guaranteeing Trump’s re-election!

    10. Dennis — now that we’ve brought some of Fani’s probable crimes to your attention…
      Let’s sum up Biden’s defense of his own crimes….

      “Their entire argument is that he gave back the classified documents he wasn’t legally authorized to take in first place and those classified documents ended up in open grocery bags at his house and address which received $250,000 wire transfers from his son CCP business partner, which Joe Biden lied about on a national debate stage, and he had no idea!” @redsteeze

    11. Dennis says: “Ivanka and Jared live in a $24 million mansion on Indian Creek Island in Miami. Don Jr. lives in a $9.7 million mansion in Florida. Eric and Lara Trump have a $3.2 million mansion in Jupiter, Fl.”

      Yes and all the Trump ‘children’ have had actual real jobs and careers BEFORE their father got into politics.

      Whereas….Joe Biden’s filthy degenerate son’s job has been “international bribery bagman” to his family’s crime syndicate, selling our country and his dirtbag father to our enemies for decades….a very lucrative family business.

      1. Crimes including, but not limited to….money laundering, tax fraud, tax evasion, wire fraud, lying on federal firearms form, illegal drugs, international sex trafficking, and now contempt of Congress….

        But…as Democrats tell us: No One is Above the Law….
        not even a filthy corrupt president’s son….
        or filthy corrupt president’s brother….
        or even the filthy corrupt, lying sack-o-sh*t president himself….

        #Biden’s Banana Republic

      2. and the biggest irony of all:
        Joe Biden is one of our longest serving “law-makers” in Congress….
        Making the laws…..that Biden and his own family break with impunity!
        Isn’t it ironic?
        Biden’s drug laws resulted in mass incarceration….
        for crimes his own son has openly committed for years…
        because “laws” are for the little people, not the elite “law” makers, or their families…. get it?
        Why any blacks still vote Democrat is a dang shame.

    12. Dennis McIntyre, Bribery Biden’s version of Baghdad Bob, was dispatched here to attempt this desperate defense of his boss:
      Jonathan: Let’s move on from Special Counsel Hur’s 345 page report that, to put it mildly, was an attempt to tarnish Biden as a candidate

      This pathetic, degenerate pathological liar wants to combine a “Nothing to see here, don’t believe your lying eyes, please move on…” with his latest “BBBUBUUUTTTTT… MUH TRUMP!”

      Because in America, where we regularly prosecute felons for crimes they created while at the peak of their mental facilities because their mental disabilities aren’t yet so bad that they are no longer capable of living a normal life… Hur could have supposedly have just said “Yeah, I have all these instances of 40 years of The Big Guy committing felonies as both a senator and then a Vice President… but I’m not only going to refuse to prosecute this older felon, but I think I can get away with not providing a justification for doing that”.

      Dennis/Baghdad Bob: do you believe people here are as dumb as your fellow Soviet Democrat Marxist Useful Idiot police state fascist voters? That they’ve never seen this Soviet Democrat excuse before letting one of the criminal Soviet Democrats you voted for off the hook? You believe they don’t remember James Comey seizing the power of the Attorney General to describe Clinton’s four years of crime and then say “No reasonable prosecutor would indict her”? You believe that Hur saying “No reasonable jury would convict him” doesn’t look like exactly the same thing to normal Americans?

      Tell everyone again how your party’s “Russia Dossier” proved Trump was a Russian agent. Right after you try and convince us he’s just as criminal as The Clinton Crime Cartel, Obama/Weinstein, or Biden Bribery Incorporated that you voted for. And now pimp yourself out shilling for.

      So Mr. & Mrs. MAGADONIAN. When are you going to wake up?

      How long do you Soviet Democrat police state fascists think it will take for you to convince normal Americans that Bribery Biden isn’t selling this country to the ChiComs and Russia – and American troops are paying with their lives while American taxpayers pay for Bribery Biden to be a police state fascist in the White House, delivering Obama’s Third Term?

  11. Somebody gets it! Thanks to Ms. Tenney. I was unable to find her actual letter (it’s not on her website yet), she has raised the 25th Amendment with Garland.

    If he’s not “mentally competent to stand trial,” Ms. Tenney wrote in her letter to Mr. Garland, then he “most seemingly lacks the ability to execute his presidential responsibilities.”

    “President Biden needs to be charged, or he needs to be removed,” she said. “There is no middle ground.”

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/feb/8/rep-claudia-tenney-asks-merrick-garland-explore-in/

    And thanks to Mr. Hur; I’m sure that he wishes that he’d never accepted this role.

    1. Here is Congresswoman Tenney’s Letter to Garland:

      February 8 th , 2024

      The Honorable Merrick Garland
      Attorney General
      U.S. Department of Justice
      950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
      Washington, DC 20530-0001

      Dear Attorney General Garland:

      I write to you today with grave concerns regarding the confidential report provided to you by Special Counsel Robert K. Hur. After concluding that President Biden knowingly and willfully removed, mishandled, and disclosed classified documents repeatedly over a period of decades, Mr. Hur nevertheless recommended that charges not be brought against him.

      Special Counsel’s reasoning was alarming. He recited numerous instances in which President Biden exhibited dramatically compromised mental faculties and concluded that a jury would be likely to perceive President Biden as a sympathetic and forgetful old man.

      I need not tell you that selective prosecution is morally, ethically, and legally prohibited. We don’t prosecute or decline to prosecute people based on their personalities, or on the public’s anticipated perception of them. If Special Counsel finds that the evidence forms a reasonable basis to bring charges, he must do so. The Department of Justice cannot ethically bring charges against former president Trump because he has mental acuity and a forceful personality and decline to bring charges against President Biden because of his cognitive decline. President Biden needs to be charged.

      Unless he is not mentally competent to stand trial.

      Candidly, the Special Counsel’s report makes a reasonable case that he is not. Being unable to remember what position he held, and when, is exceptionally concerning. Being unable to remember when one’s child died – even within a time frame of several years – is perhaps more frightening. He may not be competent to stand trial.

      And he most assuredly lacks the ability to execute his presidential responsibilities. Accordingly, it is incumbent upon you to begin proceedings to remove the President pursuant to the 25 th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

      President Biden needs to be charged, or he needs to be removed. There is no middle ground.

      Sincerely,

      CLAUDIA TENNEY

      Member of Congress

      https://www.scribd.com/document/704654971/Tenney-Letter

      Republican Speaker Mike Johnson will do nothing. Had a report like Hur’s been written about a Republican, Pelosi and Schumer would have moved to expel a Republican President in a heartbeat even if they were in the minority. All Republicans are enabling this catastrophic rogue Presidency…all of them

      1. What happens if you remove Biden? A clown becomes President. Why stop the Dems from self-detonating? But here is what I think will happen. Give it a month or two, and Biden will develop a physical illness, like heart problems, where he will resign. In the meantime, the longer Biden sucks up all the campaign money, the better.

        1. Floyd,
          With respect, I disagree.
          I want them, the DNC, to run with Biden.
          With each and every day of them putting him out in the open, we all see his mental incompetence. I want to see more mumbling, bumbling, confusion when he goes off the pre-written telepromter points. Some say Biden is more informed than Trump. But what they over look, purposely, is Biden is reading off a pre-written telepromter script. He does not even know what he is saying. He just parrots what they have pre-written for him to read.
          To resign him is to admit that he was never mentally competent in the first place and his whole admin was a sham. Then what? Run with Newsome? Clinton? Michelle Obama?
          Newsome will have to run on a very failed CA track record. Even CA people are rejecting his and the Democrats failed policies.
          Hilary Clinton? Who is the most hated white woman in the US? Hilary.
          Michelle Obama? She has the name recognition. After that, then what? We have already seen the Black, Hispanic, Asian and to a degree the Jewish communities ditching the Democrat party. There are more than a few in the Black community whom have felt Barack Obama failed them in his tenure of president. If anyone tore the Constitution in half it was Obama.

  12. Man Ruled Too Senile To Stand Trial Still Fine To Run Country.
    Babylon Bee – Politics · Feb 8, 2024

    Several posters below mentioned that they don’t know who is really running the country. I’ve felt the same way for at least a couple of years. Biden was supposed to be this “normal” guy who was going to restore sanity and he has done everything but that. No one mentioned senility or dementia. Age was occasionally brought up but it’s not an age problem — at nearly 20 years older, Warren Buffet can run mental circles around Biden. Rather than being a firefighter, Biden has been an arsonist, setting fire to our borders, economy, ignoring SC rulings, and inflaming the whole world. I have a family member who has Alzheimer’s, a former CEO who is now in memory care. He can no longer run his company. Anybody who needs an Easter Bunny escort cannot run this country. Who really is in charge? Did we vote for them? How does the constitution apply to this situation?

    I think that they hope to continue gaslighting us.

    1. My fear is that even the people running the country do not know who is running the country. In other words, there are no clear lines of authority and decisions as re made haphazardly on an ad hoc basis.

      1. Edwardmahl,
        And that is exactly what I have seen of the government.
        They will lead to our destruction.

  13. In 18 Days (February 28th 2024) The President – Joe Biden will have a suffered a total lapse of memory. His current lucid clarity will have suddenly evaporated due to a schizoid embolism, and a new found reason will have explained the void of what He and The First Lady knew about any of their past lives.

    I don’t recall will be the mantra of the Leader of the United States. All total recall will be gone out to pasture.

    Hunter of course has the inherited deficiencies that of his Father, and will subsequently Plead the 5th Amendment due to lack of recall and on the advice of His’ Star Team of Lawyers.
    And indeed it may be due to a condition going around these days in Washington D.C., as the DOJ, FBI, CIA, DHS, IRS, … will have contracted the mysterious plague of which causes mental Black-Outs.

    Comer & Jordan Statement on Hunter Biden Deposition
    https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-jordan-statement-on-hunter-biden-deposition%EF%BF%BC-2/

    1. Thank you for the video! This is how I picture the FBI and CIA running! Is that a young James Comey?

  14. Dear Prof Turley,

    Special Counsel Hur’s report is certainly the most bizarre I’ve read. How could SC Hur possibly know Biden is a “well meaning” doddering old fool? Do they teach that @ Harvard Law?

    Probably read it in the NYT .. . like the rest of us.

    One can be sure SC Smith (nor the ‘media’) needs no sodium pentothal to determine Trump’s malicious intent and ‘willful’ retention of classified docs. .. not to mention the Trump-Judge overseeing the case!

    At the very least, these twin SC probes into mishandling of classified docs by Presidents, Vice Presidents and Senators could shed some light on the inscrutable process/hierarchy of why and how, exactly, critical information is classified and retained. see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13526

    For example, evidently the National Archives/Records people were unaware Biden had retained classified docs for over 50 years (it was just an accident his ‘staff’ found them.). Yet knew the subject matter, scope and scale of classified docs stored in Trump’s Florida estate.

    One can only hope the subject matter, scope and scale of all these highly classified docs are fully vetted and examined – if not by Biden/Trump Special Counsels then by the U.S. Congress.

    In the past, a lot of highly classified top secret information has turned out to be illegal and unlawful. (see Assange, Snowden etc., etc.)

    *What is notable is that Biden works almost entirely off teleprompters, reading statements clearly crafted by his staff. .. and still needs English subtitles.

  15. Dennis McIntyre, Bribery Biden’s version of Baghdad Bob, seems to be a bit late in showing up for work here at professor Turley’s blog today. So let’s try this in Dennis’s style while we await his arrival:

    Jonathan, I am grateful that you took no notice that federal prosecutors in this country on a very regular basis indict elderly criminals with the same level of cognitive ability as Joe Biden, the man what we are told at the same time is competent enough to hold the office of president. Federal prosecutors indict Nazis who came here under false pretenses after WWII as immigrants, violent crimes, sex crimes, even serious cases of fraud.

    The rule is that they were completely competent when they committed the crimes in years past, and they’re still competent enough to function outside of an old age home, so they’re competent enough to stand trial. President Biden is competent enough to have control of the nuclear football – but he’s declared too incompetent to stand trial for a 40 year long record of felonies while in public office.

    We Soviet Democrats are equally grateful that you did not take the time to point out this is just a different version of James Comey’s “No reasonable prosecutor would indict Hillary Clinton excuse”.

    Thank you for not mentioning any of that in your column, my good friend. Doing damage control is going to be hard enough, but we can always take comfort in the short attention span of Soviet Democrat voters.

  16. So today’s Turley assignment is to trash non-MAGA media and feed into the “Biden is senile” trope. Uh, Turley, if you want to talk about media and unfair use of it’s power, why don’t you do a piece on Senator Lankford being threatened by a MAGA media personality if he brought forward the border security bill? And that the reason is to prop up Trump, who is controlling the Republican Party despite being rejected by 80 million Americans? Trump commanded the d*ckless Republicans to refuse to allow a vote on border security and the impotent wimps obeyed. Oh, I guess that wasn’t on the assignment list, but attacking mainstream media is.

    How about this? Why did the so-called “special counsel” take cheap pot shots at Biden in the first place, which is not done when someone is not going to be charged? The headline should have been that he found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Period. End of report. Instead of being able to get Biden criminally because he didn’t do anything wrong, he had to throw red meat for the MAGA crowd and attack his cognitive abilities. Biden makes gaffes, but so does Trump—the difference is that Biden has accomplished more than Trump ever could and isn’t an inveterate liar, narcissist, misogynist, racist or xenophobe. Biden is not motivated by power, attention, adulation or other narcissistic needs. Trump has proven himself to be totally incompetent—just look what he did to our economy, foreign relations and our public health. But Republicans know that most Americans do not agree with their agenda that includes banning abortions, cutting back Social Security and Medicare, abolishing Obamacare, even though they have no alternative, and lowering taxes for the wealthy, that Biden has been wildly successful, so they have to trash him. Turley is one of their tools. He should be ashamed.

    1. Dear Gigi (Dennis)
      You are sounding desperate and we are only in the first moments of the final act. Is it because you feel your ship, the S.S. Icannotseetheforestforthetrees is sinking after hitting the famous ‘Rock of Lame Excuses’?? Your captain will jump ship. Do you want to go down with that ship?

      1. Nah, Gigi is hopping mad with jealousy of Trump, whom she secretly worships because he’s successful while she’s a failure. She just needs a little TLC … that, and to get laid (lord knows it’s been a long time). Then she’ll calm down and speak rationally for the first time in about 18 years.

        1. Trump’s successful?????? On what planet? Certainly not Planet Earth. Let’s look at unassailable facts, shall we? He’s taken bankruptcy 6 times–and his business failures include casinos. All of his properties are under water–i.e., he owes more than their value. Summary judgment was rendered against him in New York for falsifying tax and loan documents–we are awaiting the judge’s ruling on damages. He’s under 91 criminal indictment charges, all for his own misconduct. He was found responsible for sexually assaulting a woman and defaming her to the tune of $88 million +. He’s been divorced twice and has cheated on his third wife. He brags about assaulting women. He consorts with porn actresses and nude models. He lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary Clinton, but “won” the Electoral College by conspiring with Russian hackers who spread lies about her on social media. He lost both the popular vote in 2020 AND the Electoral College vote, and because of his ego, continues to lie about nonexistent voter fraud resulting in him being cheated of a “landslide victory”. He turned the successful economy he inherited from Barak Obama into the worst recession since the Great Depression due to his stupid trade war with China. He sided with a Russian dictator over his own head of American intelligence, and lobbied to try to get Russia back into the G-7 unsuccessfully. He botched the pandemic, repeatedly lying about how serious it was, pushed for fake “cures”, all of which resulted in America faring far worse than other industrialized countries–unnecessary deaths and illnesses. He started an insurrection by lying to his fans about his nonexistent “victory” being “stolen” by fraud, and one of them got shot to death trying to break into the Speaker’s Lobby in the Capitol. He sat idly by for over 3 hours while his fans hunted the Vice President, intent on lynching him, and did nothing to stop them during this time. Trump earned a lifetime reputation as a cheater and liar in business and craftsmen and material suppliers want nothing to do with him. He agreed to a consent decree against him for racial discrimination in housing in NYC, but lies about “winning” this case. The list goes on and on and on.

          As to me, you don’t know anything about me, and I’m not going to feed you with any details about my life, except to say that I am far better educated than Trump, I’ve never been sued for cheating anyone, I don’t have any criminal record and I’m still on my first marriage.

          1. You may be better educated, but Trump is clearly smarter than you.
            And you have a mental illness, TDS.
            Your husband may beg to differ.

          2. “conspiring with Russian hackers”? You should not accuse anyone of living on the. wrong planet. The Russian collusion train left the solar system many months ago. You are last believer.

            1. Edwardmahl,
              Well said.
              The problem is those with TDS are the real zealot cultists. Despite all the evidence, the facts presented, they still hold to Blue anon conspiracy theories.
              They are pathetic. They are the real losers.
              Say Biden resigns or Trump wins in 2024, watch as they continue their TDS delusions.
              We all laugh at them.
              Even world leaders who can plainly see the truth are laughing at them now.

            2. Tell that to the REPUBLICAN Senate Committee who investigated and concluded that Russia DID help him cheat

              1. Birthing Person Gigi, performing here as a Soviet Democrat Marxist Useful Idiot, on command regurgitated this Soviet Democrat line:
                Tell that to the REPUBLICAN Senate Committee who investigated and concluded that Russia DID help him cheat

                Gigi never actually read ANY of that report – he did a Schiffy thing and regurgitated what The Russia Dossier Congressman said.

                Gigi never read that report – or he would have mentioned that it was a Soviet Democrat Senator, Mark Warner, actually ran that committee during ranking Republican Richard Burr’s absence. Gigi doesn’t want you to know you that one of his fellow Soviet Democrat ‘Russia Dossier’ liars had the final say and final edits on that report in the absence of the Republican Richard Burr who headed that committee.

                Gigi certainly never read that report – because even Soviet Democrat Warner didn’t release the report with it saying “helped Trump cheat”. It doesn’t say that.

                Senate Intelligence Committee finds no collusion between Russia, Trump campaign
                https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-europe-russia-campaigns-senate-elections-9d80e603ac231ece201f6cef3ade1740

                Birthing Person Gig, IF it actually read the report, would have had to report that the committee found that the only actual collusion and cheating to help a candidate win was the Obama FBI perjuring themselves regarding the Clinton/Obama/Soviet Democrats’ “Russia Dossier” to try helping Clinton and the Soviet Democrats cheat to win.

                Birthing Person Gigi would have had to inform readers that report said the FBI was informed by DoJ’s Bruce Ohr that the Soviet Democrats “Russia Dossier” was almost certainly nothing but a pack of lies spawned by the Soviet Democrats. (Page 910, Gigi)

                Soviet Democrat Birthing Person Gigi – if it were honest AND had read the report – would have had to inform his readers that the report determined that Steele made up the contents of his “Russia Dossier” and then enlisted the FBI and Bruce Ohr in the DoJ to lie about them to FISA justices and the American public (Page 900, Gigi)

                And of course, Gigi (had that Birthing Person actually read the report) would have honestly posted that the report found that Russia did minimal interference to help BOTH Clinton as well as Trump. (Gigi, as you claim you read the report, this page number you can find for yourself… it’s at the end, there’s your clue)

                Now why would a Soviet Birthing Person Apparatchik like Birthing Person Gigi not mention that report it allegedly read found that the Russians ALSO helped the Killary Campaign?

                Of course, Gigi might just be another Soviet Democrat Apparatchik – it might actually know the report says the Russians spread confusion for both campaigns.

                It it just hopes that readers here are as dumb as your average Soviet Democrat Marxist Useful Idiot, and never thought to read the report. And so lying about the report will go undetected. Didn’t work, Gigi.

                You would think the Soviet Democrats would have more credible liars and apparatchiks than Dennis McIntyer/Baghdad Bob and Gigi. But this is the party of Dementia Joe, Bribery Biden, The Big Guy. The Soviet Democrats were colluding with Putin long before Trump got into politics, and Biden Bribery Inc. has been colluding with – and paying off – Bribery Biden both during Trump’s term in office and since.

    2. Democrats have refused to allow a vote on HR2 the House border security bill that is over 9 months old.
      I know that democrats do not follow any rules – but the constitution requires that bills that involve spending or taxes must originate in the house.

      Illegal immigration is the most significant issue regarding the election that is on the mind of voters.
      Did anyone Threaten Violence to Lankford ? Only a left wing nut such as yourself would beleive that campaigning to defeat a politicians because of their unpopular policies is wrong.

      Regardless, there is a problem with Lankford’s conduct.
      This bill is more of the “you’ll have to pass the bill to get to find out what is inside it nonsense of the left.

      This is the most important public issue of this time – it whould be thoroughly discussed in public, it should not be some back room deal forced down people’s throat.

    3. “The headline should have been that he found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Period. End of report. ”

      Except that Hur DID find evidence of Criminal wrong doing and the report spends 300+ pages establishiing MANY MANY occasions in which Sen. Biden or VP Biden WILLFULLY mishandled classified documents and WILLFULLY disclosed them.

      He explored Biden’s competence to find a way to avoid recommending prosecution.

    4. “Trump has proven himself to be totally incompetent”

      Then lets have a Trump Biden debate ? and we can all judge.

      “just look what he did to our economy”
      3% crowth for 23 years average growth of 2% over 4 years, significantly higher than grownth under Bush or Obama.

      ” foreign relations”
      China was contained.
      Russia was contained
      Iran was contained
      The largest mideast peace deal ever and the first in 40 years.
      The world was more peaceful than it has been in the 21st century.
      ” and our public health.” 1M covid deaths under Biden.
      “banning abortions” The majority of americans support banning abortion after 20 weeks.

      “cutting back Social Security and Medicare”
      No one wants that – and Trump explicitly removed that from consideration – but it is GOING to happen.

      “abolishing Obamacare, even though they have no alternative,” If only – Obamacare is costing 2-3T/decade and it has ZERO net benefit.
      There is no need for an alternative.

      “lowering taxes for the wealthy” That actually resulted in increased tax revenue.

      “that Biden has been wildly successful”
      ROFL

    5. Gigi asks:

      “Why did the so-called “special counsel” take cheap pot shots at Biden in the first place, which is not done when someone is not going to be charged?”

      Because the ‘cheap pot shot’ is the excuse the SC used to let Biden off the hook for his actual crimes. Otherwise Biden would have to be charged for obvious crimes that anyone else would be prosecuted for, and almost certainly serve prison time.

      Gigi asks:

      “Instead of being able to get Biden criminally because he didn’t do anything wrong, he had to throw red meat for the MAGA crowd and attack his cognitive abilities.”

      Actually, Biden did a LOT wrong. The investigation found that Biden “willfully”committed numerous, blatant, felony crimes — that almost anyone else, at a lower level, would be fully prosecuted for, and do prison time.

    6. Gigi asks:

      “Why did the so-called “special counsel” take cheap pot shots at Biden in the first place, which is not done when someone is not going to be charged?”

      Because the special counsel Mueller, spent 488 pages doing the same thing to Trump.
      No charges, but let’s smear the sh*t out of him — which was the whole purpose of the Russia hoax.

  17. Jonathan: I seriously doubt many on this blog have actually taken the time to read SC Counsel Robert Hur’s report. And it has nothing to do whether Joe Biden “lied” and that the press has covered up for the President. It’s about what Hur actually said in his report and why it falls apart upon close examination.

    Although Hur concluded that Biden could not be criminally charged for the “willful” retention of classified material, he spent a lot of time in his report taking gratuitous and unwarranted potshots at Biden’s fitness for office by describing him as a “sympathetic well meaning elderly man with a poor memory” who a jury would be unlikely to convict. What does Biden’s age or mental acuity have to do with whether he should or should not be prosecuted?

    Hur opens his report that invites a lot of misrepresentation by stating that he “uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials”. “Uncovered” is one of the operative words. Hur didn’t have to “uncover” anything. Biden and his lawyers didn’t hide anything. They readily provided access to all of Biden’s material. “Disclosed” is another operative word. In the process of writing his memoirs Biden showed classified material to his ghostwriter. But Hur also decided not to charge the ghostwriter.

    What Hur also did in his report was to compare Biden’s actions with those of DJT in his “willful” retention and hiding of classified docs. On page 10 of his report Hur says: “With one exception, there is no record of the Department of Justice prosecuting a former president or vice president for mishandling classified documents from his own administration. The exception is President Trump”. Beside the fact that DJT is no longer “President Trump”, under DOJ regulations it is improper to comment on a different, pending prosecution of a different person in a case over which Hur has no authority.

    Hur should have written his report in a factual, non-pejorative way without commenting on Biden’s mental acuity or comparing Biden’s actions with those of DJT. But Hur was appointed by DJT and seems to go out of his way to suggest that his former boss should not be prosecuted when he can find no factual basis to charge Biden. Such a suggestion is not within the bounds of Hur’s authority as Special Counsel. His only authority was to investigate Joe Biden.

    Hur tries to make excuses for not charging Biden. He tries to play the role of amateur psychiatrist, a role for which he is not qualified. He suggests that a “sympathetic” jury would not convict Biden because of his lack of memory, his age and supposed related mental infirmities. That’s not the reason Hur did not charge Biden. The reason is that Hur, after over a year of investigation, could come up with no evidence that Biden intentionally hid or withheld classified material. Everything was voluntarily turned over to the government or was discovered by the FBI in a consensual search. That’s makes the Biden and Trump cases completely different and Hur had no business trying to compare them.

    Except for clearing Biden, Hur’s report will be compared with the Durham report. Two lessons on how not to write a report!

    1. Dennis, do you think about what you have written ?

      You claim the report in Biased – Hur could just as easily ignored Biden’s incapacity. Hur found – what was obvious.
      That Sen. Biden and VP Biden willfully removed classified information from government control and then willfully disclosed it.

      None of this occurred while Biden was president. There is no actual innocence defense.

      You call Hur biased for concluding that Biden can not be prosecuted because he was unfit to stand trial.
      The alternative is that Biden is mentally competent and should be indicted as soon as he is no longer president.

      I happen to agree that Hur should NOT have included the assessment of Biden’s mental competence.
      That is not a prosecutors determination. That is a claim that must be made by the defense to a judge.
      Hur’s report should have ended with his findings that Sen. Biden and VP Biden repeatedly violated the law and that Biden can be prosecuted when he is no longer president.

      I would further note that Garland could easily have directed Hur to remove the material regarding Biden’s competence.
      The law requires that the SC provide a report to the AG. It does not require a public report, it does not prohibit the AG from constraining the report to the facts, and the law.

      This report and the damning “biased” assertions regarding Joe Biden’s competence appear to me to be Garland’s – not Hur’s efforts to get Biden to remove his hat from the presidential ring. To send a message to Biden that he can allow his presidency to end on Jan 20,2025 and walk away without fear of prosecution.

      This report apears to me to be damage control on the part of the “deep state”. Pushing Biden out of the 2024 race gives democrats and the “deep state” a tiny bit more hope of defeating Trump in 2024.

      Almost the entire country knows that Trump is going through the deep state in 2025 like a hot knife through butter.
      Trump has promised that he will not be seeking revenge in 2025. He has not promised that he is going to leave the corrupt in power.

      1. John Say posted this in part:
        Almost the entire country knows that Trump is going through the deep state in 2025 like a hot knife through butter.

        What makes you so certain that’s what he’ll do? This is the same Trump who promised that, if elected, he would appoint a special counsel to investigate Clinton corruption, espionage act felonies, destruction of subpoenaed evidence, etc. And after being elected, said that the Clintons were nice people and she’d suffered enough.

        And he continued with that during the four years of his presidency as the Clintonistas and Soviet Democrats left over from Biden not only tried to end his presidency, but personally destroy him, members of his family, people who had dared to commit the crime of working for him, etc.

        I’m supposed to believe that if Trump wins the next election, after four years of doing nothing about the Deep State and the felony committing Soviet Democrat politicians they work hand in glove for, NOW, the next time, he’s actually going to do this?

        No he won’t; he’ll do a few things, but it will be olive branch again, just like he did with Hillary Clinton And Her Russia Dossier and Espionage Act felonies before that.

        Go ahead; change my mind on that.

    2. The single statement in Hur’s report regarding Trump is a meaningless throw away line.
      Hur is not prosecuting Trump, he admits he is dealing with allegations not facts.
      Hur’s investigation of Biden does not involve any consideration of the national security powers of presidents, of declassification authority, of the ownership by presidents of the WH documents of their presidency.

      This is typical of left wing nuts – fixate on a bit of meaningless spin – filler, in an otherwise damning report.
      Hur’s observations regarding Trump have no more relevance than his oppinions on the superbowl.
      They are outside the domain of his investigation. He is not speaking with knowledge of the facts or the law regarding Presidents and classified information, he is not speaking about the results of his investigation.

      Yesterday the WH counsel held a press conference to defend Biden.
      The WC did an excellent job of proving historical precedents for presidents and ex-presidents keeping classified information and for disclosing it to the press.
      There was only one flaw in the WC’s argument – Biden was not president or ex-president during the time this conduct occured.

      The WC did an excellent job of proving that presidents are different regarding classified information.
      But he expected that no one would notice – that Biden’s handling of classified information was not done while president or expresident.
      While Trump’s was.

    3. “Hur should have written his report in a factual, non-pejorative way without commenting on Biden’s mental acuity or comparing Biden’s actions with those of DJT.”

      I agree completely.

      Though I beleive you are wrong about the purpose of Hurs comments about Biden’s mental capacity or comparisons to Trump.

      Neither of us can know more of Hur’s intent than he writes.
      But Garland had to approve this report and Garland had to chose to make it public, and Garland almost certainly was aware that Hur’s investigation was examining Biden’s competence.

      My guess is this report would have been quite different had Biden withdrawn from the 2024 presidential race.

      My read of the Tea leaves is that this is the Biden DOJ’s last ditch effort to get Biden out of the 2024 election in the remote hope of blocking the tsunami that will hit in November.

      This report is NOT intended as fodder from Trump or MAGA or republicans. It is intended as providing the way out for democrats in the Batan Death march that is Biden’s re-election efforts.

    4. Hur came up with PLENTY of evidence of willful mishandling and willful disclosure of classified documents.
      I would note that is a higher standard than Hur needed to meet to charge crimes.

      Under the espionage act reckless handling of classified documents and unintentional disclosure is a crime for a secretary of state, for a Senator, for a vice president. But not for the president.

      Hur found that Biden removed classified information from the Senate SCIF as Senator.
      That he removed substantial classified information as VP and that he stored it recklessly. That it was often not locked up, That it was not even in closed boxes and/or closed closests, that it was sitting in an often unlocked garage with easily defeated locks in open boxes haphazardly scattered about the garage. That he left classified materials all over the place – pretty much everywhere he went. In officers in Biden center, in his garage in his guest home, in his home, in his library. In places that were protected by secret service and many many places that were entirely unprotected.

      Hur found that Sen. Biden and VP Biden’s handling was not merely reckless, but willful. That he acted deliberately to remove classified information from government control without the authority to do so.

      Hur also found that on ATLEAST 3-4 occasions that Biden willfully and knowingly disclosed classified information to the press as a private citizen.

      Sorry
      Dennis but those are the actual findings.

      And most of them were known to all of us prior to this report.

      Hur told us very little that we did not already know.

      I mostly agree with you that the mental capacity information did not belong in this report. Just as it was not Comey’s job to make a determination based on the likely hood of a DC jury convicting.

      SOME of the information regarding Trump DOES belong in this report.
      It is Hurs job to determine how the law was applied in the past – because recommendations that match with similar fact patters from the past are presumptive correct. While the analysis of unprecedented use of the law requires a much higher standard of proof that deviating from past practices is lawful.

    5. Dennis says: “Although Hur concluded that Biden could not be criminally charged for the “willful” retention of classified material…”

      No. He concluded that Biden willfully committed multiple felony crimes, but that, in his estimation, a DC jury would be sympathetic to a drooling, dottering old fool….and find it hard to convict him of his actual crimes.

    6. Dennis says: “Biden and his lawyers didn’t hide anything. They readily provided access to all of Biden’s material.”

      No. They waited about 14 years of Biden knowingly keeping top secret classified docs strewn about his house and garage, not protected by secret service….fully accessible by his ‘bribery bagman’ son….
      and Biden ONLY came forward to say “oops, here’s what I’ve got” when they realized Trump was about to get the full-on, surprise, FBI, guns-drawn, dawn raid on Mar-a-Lago so Biden’s Gestapo thugs could rummage thru Melania’s closet and get back incriminating documents the government gangsters didn’t want Trump to have, and frame Trump for trumped-up “crimes” no other POTUS has ever been charged or prosecuted for….

    7. Dennis McIntyre, notorious pathological Soviet Democrat liar and Biden’s version of Baghdad Bob assigned to disparage Turley, posted

      Jonathan: I seriously doubt many on this blog have actually taken the time to read SC Counsel Robert Hur’s report. And it has nothing to do whether Joe Biden “lied” and that the press has covered up for the President. It’s about what Hur actually said in his report and why it falls apart upon close examination.

      And everybody believes that Professor Turley and Dennis McIntyre/Baghdad Bob are not only on a first name basis, but also believe that Dennis/Baghdad Bob actually read the entire report himself? Seriously… we’re supposed to believe either of those claims from this noted pathological Soviet Democrat liar? The one who assured us the Russia Dossier was all verified fact – and if a hunter used an AR-15, it “would completely destroy a deer, leaving nothing to eat”?

      I seriously doubt anybody here believes a single word Dennis/Baghdad Bob posts. Cringe Jean-Pierre is a more effective liar for Bribery Biden and the Soviet Democrats. And it gets boring having to take the time to call this pathological serial liar out.

  18. This report is DAMNING.

    SC Hur gave Biden a gift by finding him unfit. The alternative was recomending that he be indicted.

    The report found Willful mishandling of classified information. It found Willful disclosure of classified information.
    It found reckless handling of classified information. It found lying to the public and to the press about classified information.

    All of this was done while Biden was NOT president and therefore did not have the constitutional perogatives regarding national security information that he has now as president.

    Hur had little choice – either Biden was unprosecutable due to incompetence, or Hur was obligated to recomend ciminal prosecution when Biden’s term expires.

    The more Biden and his supporters say he is competent, the more it must be asked why he is not facing prosecution ?

    SC Hur’s report did not – because it could not, leave room for competent, but not criminal.

  19. The “press” are mere poorly educated stooges that have found employment with grifters. And who are the pigeons they target? YOU!

  20. Did anybody not know that Biden was a feeble old coot with memory problems??? No, the only thing that surprises us when some non-Republican, non-Democrat actually comes out and admits it. We have, all of us, become so used to a lying press and a lying government (51 Former Intelligence Agents Say The Laptop Could Be Russian Disinformation!, for example) that it is big news when the truth slips out. That is a sorry state of affairs.

Comments are closed.