Below is my column in Fox.com on the approaching end of the Trump trial in Manhattan. With the dramatic implosion of Michael Cohen on the stand on Thursday with the exposure of another alleged lie told under oath, even hosts and commentators on CNN are now criticizing the prosecution and doubting the basis for any conviction. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper admitted that he would “absolutely” have doubts after Cohen’s testimony. CNN’s legal analyst Elie Honig declared “I don’t think I’ve ever seen a star cooperating witness get his knees chopped out quite as clearly and dramatically.” He previously stated that this case would never have been brought outside of a deep blue, anti-Trump district. Other legal experts, including on CNN and MSNBC, admitted that they did not get the legal theory of the prosecution or understand the still mysterious crime that was being concealed by the alleged book-keeping errors. The question is whether the jury itself is realizing that they are being played by the prosecution.
Here is the column:
In the movie “Quiz Show,” about the rigging of a 1950s television game show, the character Mark Van Doren warns his corrupted son that “if you look around the table and you can’t tell who the sucker is, it’s you.”
As the trial of former President Donald Trump careens toward its conclusion, one has to wonder if the jurors are wondering the same question.
For any discerning juror, the trial has been conspicuously lacking any clear statement from the prosecutors of what crime Trump was attempting to commit by allegedly mischaracterizing payments as “legal expenses.” Even liberal legal experts have continued to express doubt over what crime is being alleged as the government rests its case.
There is also the failure of the prosecutors to establish that Trump even knew of how payments were denoted or that these denotations were actually fraudulent in denoting payments to a lawyer as legal expenses.
The judge has allowed this dangerously undefined case to proceed without demanding greater clarity from the prosecution.
Jurors may also suspect that there is more to meet the eye about the players themselves. While the jurors are likely unaware of these facts, everyone “around the table” has controversial connections. Indeed, for many, the judge, prosecutors, and witnesses seem as random or coincidental as the cast from “Ocean’s Eleven.” Let’s look at three key things.
1. The Prosecutors
First, there are the prosecutors. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg originally (as did his predecessor) rejected this ridiculous legal theory and further stated that he could not imagine ever bringing a case where he would call former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen, let alone make him the entirety of a prosecution.
Bragg’s suspension of the case led prosecutor Mark F. Pomerantz to resign. Pomerantz then wrote a book on the prosecution despite his colleagues objecting that he was undermining their work. Many of us viewed the book as unethical and unprofessional, but it worked. The pressure campaign forced Bragg to green-light the prosecution.
Pomerantz also met with Cohen in pushing the case.
Bragg then selected Matthew Colangelo to lead the case. Colangelo was third in command of the Justice Department and gave up that plum position to lead the case against Trump. Colangelo was also paid by the Democratic National Committee for “political consulting.” So a former high-ranking official in the Biden Justice Department and a past consultant to the DNC is leading the prosecution.
2. The Judge
Judge Juan Merchan has been criticized not only because he is a political donor to President Biden but his daughter is a high-ranking Democratic political operative who has raised millions in campaigns against Trump and the GOP. Merchan, however, was not randomly selected. He was specifically selected for the case due to his handling of an earlier Trump-related case.
3. The Star Witness
Michael Cohen’s checkered history as a convicted, disbarred serial perjurer is well known. Now, Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., is under fire after disclosing that “I have met with [Cohen] a number of times to prepare him.”
Goldman in turn paid Merchan’s daughter, Loren Merchan, more than $157,000 dollars for political consulting.
Outside the courtroom, there is little effort to avoid or hide such conflicts. While Democrats would be outraged if the situation were flipped in a prosecution of Biden, the cross-pollination between the DOJ, DNC, and Democratic operatives is dismissed as irrelevant by many in the media.
Moreover, there is little outrage in New York that, in a presidential campaign where the weaponization of the legal system is a major issue, Trump is not allowed to discuss Cohen, Colangelo, or these conflicts. A New York Supreme Court judge is literally controlling what Trump can say in a presidential campaign about the alleged lawfare being waged against him.
The most striking aspect of these controversial associations is how little was done to avoid even the appearance of conflicts of interests. There were many judges available who were not donors or have children with such prominent political interests in the case. Bragg could have selected someone who was not imported by the Biden administration or someone who had not been paid by the DNC.
There was no concern over the obvious appearance of a politically motivated and stacked criminal case. Whether or not these figures are conflicted or compromised, no effort was taken to assure citizens that any such controversies are avoided in the selection of the key players in this case.
What will be interesting is how the jury will react when, after casting its verdict, the members learn of these undisclosed associations. This entire production was constructed for their benefit to get them to convict Trump despite the absence of a clear crime or direct evidence.
They were the marks and, like any good grift, the prosecutors were hoping that their desire for a Trump conviction would blind them to the con.
Bragg, Colangelo and others may be wrong. Putting aside the chance that Judge Merchan could summon up the courage to end this case before it goes to the jury, the grift may have been a bit too obvious.
New Yorkers are a curious breed. Yes, they overwhelmingly hate Trump, but they also universally hate being treated like chumps. When they get this case, they just might look around the courtroom and decide that they are the suckers in a crooked game.
The trolls are out in force. Leftist desperation is the new pandemic.
Cionnath,
Well said.
Their narratives are failing or have failed.
Turley starts his post as “getting played” And since his conversion and his paying gig on FOX and his speeches to the Federalist Society he has learned very well about getting paid. It’s a shame his name will go down in history with Trump.
For being successful?
Respected?
Accomplished?
Another example of a toll crawling out, the spit out yet another ad hominem attack, Careful to avoid defending the indefensible.
It does really become more clear everday the ones that show up here, only to disrupt. Never engaging in the facts
Jonathan: As the red tie brigade of MAGA Congressmen continued their religious pilgrimize to NY (at taxpayer expense) to show their support for their cult leader, what was actually happening in Justice Merchan’s courtroom?
Todd Blanche continues his cross of Michael Cohen that will continue into Monday. Despite your claim of a “demolition” derby by Blanche, he has been unable to challenge Cohen on the underlying facts–that DJT was involved in all the details of the hush money payments to Stormy Daniels and the falsification of the business records to cover it up. All that is backed by previous witness testimony, bank records and phone logs. Cohen was able to tie that to election interference–that DJT was preoccupied that if the Stormy Daniels story saw the light of day it would be devasting for his 2016 campaign. Blanche has been unable to challenge that. So the defense strategy is to portray Cohen as a liar, a convicted felon who should not be believed. Frankly, I think the jury has already made up its minds on the credibility of Cohen. If they believe him Blanche’s cross will unlikely change that.
But you continue to urge there are “three key things” to remember about this trial. They are all irrelevant. It’s irrelevant that Matthew Colangelo was third in command at the DOJ and consulting for the DNC. He was chosen by DA Bragg because of his expertise in handling high profile cases. And it’s irrelevant that Justice Merchan’s daughter is a political consultant for Dem candidates. And it’s irrelevant that Cohen was previously convicted of perjury. All that is a distraction and won’t affect how the jurors sort out the evidence in this case. But you are right on one point. Jurors don’t like to be “treated like chumps”. They won’t be swayed by the opinions of legal commentators–the “three key things” in your column. They will only consider the evidence and the facts in this trial.
Which leads to the Q as to whether DJT will testify. Melania wants her husband to testify. Her opinion won’t affect his decision. The weight of legal opinion is that DJT will not take the stand. No doubt that is what DJT’s attorneys are telling him. In every case in which DJT testified he lost! If DJT were to decide to testify it would be a disaster because he would have to lie–about everything. Something you don’t want to discuss– when you can talk about all the lies of Cohen!
Nice copy/paste propaganda.
DNCRoboDennista, whatever will you do on November 6?
https://youtu.be/wDYNVH0U3cs
Dennis McIntyre, notorious and inept Soviet Democrat liar returned to steal more space from Turley’s blog with this:
Jonathan: As the red tie brigade of MAGA Congressmen…
Dennis is beyond being pathetically slimy and pathetic. Not smart enough to create his own blog – instead shows up to post his lies and propaganda in each and every one of Professor Turley’s blogs; hijacking them for his own slimy use.
And to add insult to injury, beginning each one with “Jonathan”… as though he and Professor Turley are the deepest of friends. The reality is that Professor Turley probably thinks of Dennis McIntyre operating on his blog as Biden’s version of Baghdad Bob as we do: akin to discovering you have dog feces on one of your shoes. It’s NOT what you want to see on your shoes… and you don’t want to see the same thing with Dennis McIntyre using your blog as though it were his.
The jury will be instructed that if they believe Cohen has lied on even one matter addressed during his testimony they may believe he has lied on everything else as well. What has now become known as the infamous phone call Cohen placed to Trump’s former bodyguard Keith Schiller on Oct. 24, 2016 should seal the fate of the prosecution’s case by a jury offended having been given to realize their time has been wasted and having all along been made guppies cast in a political charade.
Ron, I think that is wishful thinking. The judge will give a charge that is approved by Bragg’s team. The jury may acquit, or hang, only because of great lawyering by Trumps team.
Well let’s just wait just a minute here. Even the propaganda crews from MSNBC and CNN have admitted that Cohen’s creditability has been “chopped off at the knees” and yet the lovers of the propaganda crews on this blog tell us that there’s just nothing to see here. I heard the blaring sound of remotes of the leftist turning off the TV when they heard the conclusions brought forth by their heroes of the past. So sad to watch good love go bad. They believe that Hippo ocracy is just a large animal that swims in a river in Africa.
No matter what happens, the leftists on here will cling to their lies and stay in denial.
First, Trump is guilty of being criminally stupid to hire Michal Cohen in the first place.
Second, the Judge should be disrobed of his Judgeship, Disbarred of his Law License, and Deported back to Columbia for destroying this Country’s legal reputation that took over 230 years to create.
The Trump defense is that everybody in the Trump organization was a criminal except the boss.
No
The Trump defense is … What-a-Grift
Most Expensive One-Night Stand EVER!
You obviously missed the testimony exposing the Cohen/Stormy shakedown.
Looks like your “Trump-screwed-a-porn-star” narrative fell apart.
Find that pee tape yet?
Because. You may think so. But crimes need elements
A core element missing from charging the Trump staff, is none of them are running for President on the Republican Ticket
In 2016 Hilary was the darling of the left/media/big tech/Hollywood and all “right thinking” Americans. She was called the most qualified person to ever run for the WH, forgetting Washington, Adams, Lincoln and even Ike, but the minute she lost she was the worst person ever because to not blame her would be admitting that the leftist views were what was on the ballot and were rejected by the voters.
The point I am trying to make is get everyone to watch what happens to Alvin Bragg if Trump is acquitted. It won’t be the fact that he was railroaded, or that it was a Biden led political trial, it will be that ONE MAN brought a weak case and that he did so badly.
The same thing happened to Robert Mueller, the light bringer that was going to deliver justice to Trump only to be humiliated in front of the country.
The same thing happened to Saint RBG after movies, t-shirts and other merchandize was created for her holiness and her greed and desire to allow Saint Hilary to name her replacement ended up costing the left Roe. She is now hated for her hubris.
Watch what happens if Biden loses this year. Idiots like Dennis and all of the Anonomi trolls will pretend that they never liked the guy (which is true from 1975-2019) and that it is the fault of one man and not a leftist ideology that lost at the ballot.
hullbobby said: “watch what happens to Alvin Bragg if Trump is acquitted”
Yeah, unless Bragg secured some iron-clad comittment in writing guaranteeing an appointment to some cushy job that has tenure, he must truly be an idiot. He evidently did not want to file this case, but succumbed to pressure to do so. Whatever threats were leveied at him to make that happen, they will pale in comparison to the dead man walking that he instantly becomes in the event of a mistrial or acquittal.
From its beginning years ago, with the raid on Cohen and the Feds unconstitutional seizing of Cohen’s privileged client communications with Trump, this case was a plan to obtain a conviction of Trump BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY with no concern of the conviction surviving appeal. The plan all along, especially the timing, was to get a conviction before the 2024 election to make Trump a convict even though everyone involved knew that their methods and Trump’s planned conviction would not survive appeal. SHOULDN’T THE ATTORNEYS INVOLVED BE DISBARRED?
“New Yorkers are a curious breed.”
Current New Yorkers are a stupid breed, unable to think critically, or understand cause and effect, given the extensive decay and squalor caused by their electoral decisions.
Professor Turley, given that the prosecution has not stated what crime is involved in order to trigger the “cover up” clause, would that not be a 6th Amendment violation, which requires the accused be “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation”?
Exactly, I wondered that myself
Mr. Scratch: You shall have your trial, Mr. Webster. But I’m sure you’ll agree, this is hardly the case for an ordinary jury.
Daniel Webster: Let it be the quick or the dead, so long as it is an American judge and an American jury!
Mr. Scratch: ‘The quick or the dead!’ You have said it.
[he stomps on the barn floor; a door opens]
Mr. Scratch: You must pardon the leathery toughness of one or two.
Jabez Stone: [afraid] Mr. Webster!
[a line of ghosts begin entering from the trapdoor]
Mr. Scratch: Captain Kidd – he killed men for gold. Simon Girty, the renegade – he burned men for gold. Governor Dale – he broke men on the wheel. Asa, the Black Monk – he choked them to death. Floyd Ireson and Stede Bonnet, the fiendish butchers. Walter Butler, King of the Massacre. Big and Little Harp, robbers and murderers. Teach, the Cutthroat. Morton, the vicious lawyer… and General Benedict Arnold. You remember him, no doubt.
Daniel Webster: A jury of the damned…
Mr. Scratch: [laughs] Dastards, liars, traitors, knaves. Your suggestion, Mr. Webster – ‘the quick or the dead.’
Daniel Webster: This is outrageous, I asked for a fair trial…
Mr. Scratch: Americans, all.
~Stephen Vincent Benét “The Devil and Daniel Webster” (1936).
The jury will say Trump had something to gain in covering up his affair. He’s guilty.
Waste of time.
The jury will say Trump had something to gain in covering up his affair. He’s guilty.
Except there is zero evidence Trump covered up anything. All the witnesses have been presented. Not a single thing ties this to PDJT
This type of spin from the professor was expected. The defense did not really make any headway in sowing doubt.
Still making claims that “no crime has been presented”? Tsk, tsk, tsk, professor Turley come now, you should know better. The documentation and testimony have laid out the evidence of the alleged crime in a very straightforward fashion. The use of denial and obfuscation is not going to change reality.
Here’s George, Dennis, and Gigi’s version of the ‘law’ in USA:
Innocent (democrat) until proven guilty (republican).
But you don’t actually need real proof. Just accusations, lies, etc.
What act by Tump is the crime
George doesn’t appear to either live in reality, or has no idea of what ‘elements of a crime’ means – or both.
Take a seat George, while somebody tries to find your caretakers.
The defense did not really make any headway in sowing doubt.
CNN, MSNDC, and other leftist media, have openly said Cohens testimony is now junk and cannot be used to convict.
Lets see… there was a fake company set up to make the payments, an NDA side agreement using aliases, and Trump wanted the payments made in cash. The payments themselves were made to keep the liasons secret until at least after the election. Are you sure there’s no evidence Trump covered up anything? The evidence includes an audio tape where the fake company is discussed with Trump that only existed to hide his liasons. There is testimony that Trump was in the room when the repayments were discussed. Your definition of “zero evidence” must differ from mine.
How many fake companies (and names) does dumb Joe have that you never care about?
enigmainblackcom is a black racist and race hustler (and failed writer) who has written on his mostly unknown blog that he comes here occasionally to see what the honkeys are saying in hopes of finding some material to write about on his blog.
That’s why he – like every other Soviet Democrat Marxist Useful Idiot and police state fascist here – does not care in the slightest about the corruption and crimes of Biden delivering Obama’s Third Term. Or the crimes and corruption of Obama and his administration in Obama’s first two terms, long before their excuse could be “BBBBUUUUTTTT…. MUH TRUMP!!!!”
It takes a while to find enigmainblackcom’s blog (showing how successful he is), but once you do you’ll quickly see how race hatred and virulent Marxism have poisoned what few brain cells he’s operating with.
and Trump wanted the payments made in cash.
That’s a lie, evidence proves the opposite
He may have been convinced otherwise. I only know the words that came out of his mouth. Have you heard that tape? It may not be available where you get your news.
enigmainblack, barely known failed author and slightly better known infamous black racist and race hustler, popped in hoping for more material for his next race hustle on his barely known blog:
The evidence includes an audio tape where the fake company is discussed with Trump that only existed to hide his liasons. There is testimony that Trump was in the room when the repayments were discussed.
Did you make those lies up on your own with your failed author skills? Or just lazily cut and paste them from a fellow Soviet Democrat police state fascist liar?
Seems like a fair question, given that your fellow black police state fascist racist and liar, Alvin Bragg, never played an audio tape that you claim exists in the trial. If he had, it would have been all over the news, and race hustling police state fascists like you would be up all night writing volumes about it.
But instead, Bragg relied on a felon found guilty of perjury multiple times before to give his version of that claimed conversation went like. And Bragg did so while attempting to hide texts and phone records that showed the phone call was less than a minute long with Trump’s security – regarding prank calls he was getting from a 14 year old kid.
You’re about as credible as the convicted perjurer that you’re trying to justify – and Alvin Bragg: who suborned perjury while hiding exculpatory evidence from the judge, the jury, and the defense after weeks of him and his prosecutors coaching Cohen on what to say.
Just claim everything you don’t want to believe exists is a lie. Here’s the tape that was played for the jurors. BTW, the call you’re refering to was 90 seconds long, not less than a minute. Try to stick to the facts.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/jurors-hear-secret-recording-trump-michael-cohen-allegedly/story?id=109908089
enigmainblackcom, notorious racist, failed writer and Black Liars And Marxists race hustler tried to justify his sleazy grift with this:
Just claim everything you don’t want to believe exists is a lie. Here’s the tape that was played for the jurors.
The link that refers to a tape that the ABC news story says is ALLEGEDLY about a DIFFERENT woman? The woman that hasn’t even been subpoenaed to testify?
NOT the woman your fellow racist and police state fascist Alvin Bragg is claiming is where the alleged crime occurred: the extortionist and whore who uses the bed name ‘Stormy Daniels.
Well, there you are… grifting and lying that the tape from the felon convicted multiple times for perjury was relevant to this latest instance of perjury your fellow racist police state fascist Alvin Bragg got from Cohen relating to the whore ‘Stormy Daniels’.
There’s that word sticking out in the story about this convicted felon for perjury: “alleged”. But a Black Liars & Marxist race baiting police state fascist like you would hope that normal Americans would accept that when a perjurer’s testimony is described as “alleged”, that means “verified truth”. No, it doesn’t.
And then there’s the recounting that this story has to do with a non-disclosure agreement with Karen McDougal – NOT the whore and extortionist who calls herself Stormy Daniels in bed.
Whether Cohen is actually telling the truth for once while under oath, these are two completely different women and McDougal has nothing to do with your fellow racist police state fascist Alviin Bragg’s evidence being put before the jury.
If you weren’t a race baiting police state fascist, you would be asking why Bragg would spend weeks coaching Cohen to play that tape he made with Trump about McDougal – BUT NOT subpoena McDougal to actually testify. Why wouldn’t he? Because under cross examination her testimony would turn that taped conversation regarding her into even greater trash?
If you weren’t a race baiting police state fascist, you wouldn’t be attempting the lie that testimony regarding McDougal was supposedly about NDAs relating to the whore and extortionist Stormy Daniels.
This Soviet show trial by your fellow Soviet Democrat racist and police state fascist Alvin Bragg is about attempting to claim the NDA payment to the whore ‘Stormy Daniels’ – made AFTER the election – was a crime. NOT a payment made to McDougal even before that.
To kick you back into your Lyin’ Like A Proud Biden sin bin, the star witness convicted felon perjurer testified to claim that he extensively discussed the NDA with that whore ‘Stormy Daniels’ in a phone call made on a specific date. Under cross examination, he confessed that on the date in question he called Trump’s security chief about prank calls he was getting from a 14 year old kid. Not about an NDA.
The phone call lasted less than a minute and a half – and was mostly about wanting help with the prank calls. When this perjurer was asked if he had even actually spoken to Trump during that brief short call, rather than just to Trump’s head of security, the best Cohen could do is say he was pretty sure he did.
You score points back on your unknown blog by bragging to your handful of readers that you came over here to lie to the honkeys, hoping to get a reaction that you can perhaps get some monetizing clicks from?
Such desperation from you. Not a good look!
What year was the “fake” company set up?
Why wasn’t setting up the illegal “fake” company prosecuted 10 or 20 years ago?
How many thousands of NDAs did this argument just void?
How many affairs and “arrangements” have democrats executed?
How preposterous and vacuous is this accusation?
JFK, Monster
By Timothy Noah“I knew that John F. Kennedy was a compulsive, even pathological adulterer, given to taking outlandish risks after he entered the White House. I knew he treated women like whores. And I knew he had more than a few issues with his father about toughness and manliness and all that. But before I read in the newspaper that Mimi Alford’s just-released memoir, Once Upon A Secret: My Affair With President John F. Kennedy And Its Aftermath, described giving Dave Powers a blow job at JFK’s request and in his presence, I didn’t know that Kennedy had an appetite for subjecting those close to him to extreme humiliation.
This part of Alford’s story doesn’t really add anything to what we already know about Kennedy. Nor does it really change my opinion of the 35th president. But this part does:
Dave Powers was sitting poolside while the President and I swam lazy circles around each other, splashing playfully. Dave had removed his jacket and loosened his tie in the warm air of the pool, but he was otherwise fully clothed. He was sitting on a towel, with his pants leg rolled up, and his bare feet dangling in the water.
The President swam over and whispered in my ear. “Mr. Powers looks a little tense,” he said. “Would you take care of it?”
It was a dare, but I knew exactly what he meant. This was a challenge to give Dave Powers oral sex. I don’t think the President thought I’d do it, but I’m ashamed to say that I did. It was a pathetic, sordid, scene, and is very hard for me to think about today. Dave was jolly and obedient as I stood in the shallow end of the pool and performed my duties. The President silently watched.
Afterwards, Alford says she was “deeply embarrassed,” and as she climbed out of the pool she “could hear Dave speak in as stern a tone as I ever heard him use with his boss. ‘You shouldn’t have made her do that,’ Dave said. ‘I know, I know,’ I heard the President say. Later, a chastened President Kennedy apologized to us both.” Alford believes that Kennedy showed “his darker side … when we were among men he knew. That’s when he felt a need to display his power over me.” Kennedy didn’t just have a thing for Social Register girls; he had a thing for humiliating Social Register girls. He also had a thing for humiliating his fellow Irishman, Dave Powers.
Changing the subject much? You can’t face the facts about Trump
enigmainblackcom, notorious sophomoric pathological liar and Black Liars & Marxists race baiter, tried this distraction when caught lying like his hero Cohen:
Changing the subject much? You can’t face the facts about Trump
Got nothing better than that after your failed attempt to insinuate the tape regarding a completely different woman was supposedly about the extortionist and whore who your fellow race baiting grifter Alvin Bragg is making his charges about? Hoping the honkeys here are too stupid to realize that Karen McDougal on that tape is a completely different woman than the whore Stormy Daniels that Bragg put on the stand?
If Trump did a tenth of what police state fascist angry race baiters like you lie that he does… you wouldn’t have to do any lying at all to put him in jail
Testimony was elicited about both women from David Pecker, Trump accountants, and Michael Cohen. You can’t argue the facts so you just plain argue.
Judge Freisler has joined the chat
Greetings MAGA Losers !!!!!!!!!!
Well it’s another beautiful morning, and we have another pathetic hit-piece written by Turley’s handlers at Fox and published under his name.
I hope you you have a wonderfully enjoyable day wallowing in self pity and your perceived victimhood.
I rest easy in the fact that we “Leftists” live rent free in your empty heads.
The only empty head I can see is Pedo Joe’s, your favorite president!
GEETINGS to another pethetic ad hominem attack.
If the facts are against you, attack the messenger.
So true.
I suppose that is because your head is full of Trump.
Oh yeah, well you’ve got cooties.
Thanks again to GEB. I would only add that if a not guilty verdict is rendered by the jury, the Left leaning head -spinners will take to the airwaves to remind us how superior they are. They will continue along the track of a new Trump Administration ” will be the end of democracy, as we know it”. I would ask every Democrat to read about the Oxford debate with Nancy Pelosi and Winston Marshall. It is a stunning rebuke of her ilk and the Democratic Party.
Watched the post debate interview of this, stunning, Pelosi mouthing the words “who are you” to the conservative opposition as he delivered the goods. Her attempt to marginalize him as, do you know who I am? For I am the great and powerful Nasty Pelosi! How dare you state these truths, another good one is her flip out with CNN while she tries to blame Trump for Bidenomics and job losses during COVID. She is truly a despicable person.
But, since the powers that be are working towards
turning America into a third world dictatorship
these trials helps show they’re right on schedule.
Ok, so now what is the remedy? This case has (a) taken away the rights of a citizen and (b) has sidelined a presidential candidate. Prosecutors are not supposed to do things like this, and yet they did. Does Trump (and the polity) have to take it? I think not.
Alvin Bragg, another Harvard DEI chipmunk.
“For any discerning juror, …”
“… this case would never have been brought outside of a deep blue, anti-Trump district. …”
A Case wherein the Jurors were selected from a ‘deep blue’ pool.
I Believe in Miracles – “You Sexy Thing”
Bragg (Mouse) Cohen (Cheese on the Witness Stand)