Months ago, I wrote a column about how Democrats have continued to try to block voters from being able to vote for candidates while claiming the mantle of the defenders of Democracy. This effort not only included Democratic Secretaries of State attempting to remove former president Donald Trump from the ballots, but efforts in the primary from the ballot. Many of these Democrats now calling for a “blitz primary” previously said nothing as voters were barred from having a choice in the primary. Now, in North Carolina, Democrats are seeking to bar third-party candidates from the general election . . . all in the name of perfecting democracy.
The Democratically controlled North Carolina’s Board of Elections voted against giving ballot access to new parties supporting presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Cornel West. All three Democrats (Alan Hirsch, Jefferson Carmon, and Siobhan Millen) voted to prevent voters from being able to vote for Kennedy and West, though the decision will have to be reconsidered. Yet, even if reversed, they are preserving uncertainty as to whether they will be viable candidates in the minds of voters.
The excuses for this action are superficial and manufactured.
Chairman Alan Hirsch insisted that their organizations were “problematic” in how they gathered signatures and how Republicans may be supporting their efforts to allegedly “take away votes from Joe Biden.”
They also said that they were concerned that the third-party candidates were using the new party rules to gain an easier path to ballots. That is a bizarre objection. They are opting for the best approach under the existing rules. It seems openly partisan for these three Democrats to suddenly raise concerns over the existing rules when it could harm Joe Biden or the Democratic Party.
Yet, Democratic commissioner Siobhan Millen worked hard to rationalize what is a raw political muscle play to prevent voters from having a choice:
“If this board keeps rubber-stamping thinly veiled so-called parties, national operatives are going to continue to come in and keep manipulating our system. Allowing unaffiliated candidates to follow the more lenient new-party rules is allowing a blind eye to partisan mischief, potentially.”
If Millen wants to see partisan mischief, she does not have to look far. She and her colleagues are engaging in precisely such mischief to deny voters choices this election to try to bolster the chances of Biden in a swing state.
Democrats continue to claim to defend Democracy while resisting democratic choice and abusing the legal process. This glaring disconnect was evident when President Joe Biden spoke on the top of the Point-du-Hoc in Normandy on the 80th anniversary of D-Day. Biden again used the event to suggest that democracy was in danger in the United States with the upcoming election.
Yet, Biden has overseen widespread government censorship with federal agencies targeting those with opposing views on everything from elections and climate change to COVID-19 and transgender policies.
As Democratic secretaries of state sought to bar Trump from ballots, Biden refused to oppose the efforts. When liberal law professors and members demanded to pack the Supreme Court to guarantee a liberal majority, Biden refused to denounce it during the last campaign.
This is why some in the country may view Biden and the Democrats as existential threats not just to Democracy, but to themselves. They see a party that is engaged in efforts to cleanse ballots (of Republicans), censor dissenting voices and prosecute political opponents.
The effort in North Carolina continues this hypocritical and cynical narrative. These three Democratic board members just voted to prevent their fellow citizens from being able to cast votes for third-party candidates who are attracting increasing support among disgruntled voters.
“If this board keeps rubber-stamping thinly veiled so-called parties, national operatives are going to continue to come in and keep manipulating our system. Allowing unaffiliated candidates to follow the more lenient new-party rules is allowing a blind eye to partisan mischief, potentially.”
Nothing says defending democracy like banning candidates that follow the rules. What’s next, banning voters that followed the rules to vote?
Only those with no legal right to vote will be allowed to do so.
America has been outside the law since Lincoln’s wholly unconstitutional denial of not-prohibited secession.
Everything Lincoln did subsequently, is illicit and unconstitutional, with emphasis on the failure to deport illegal aliens and the unconstitutional “Reconstruction Amendments.”
America must be repealed back to the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Professor Turley,
In NC, political parties only need 13,865 signatures for recognition, while independent candidates need 83,188 signatures. In the petition script used by We the People to sign up voters, Kennedy is referred to as “an independent” rather than the representative of a new political party.
We the People did not secure 83K signatures but it did meet the lower political party threshold. The legal challenge to their ballot access stems from whether the party was formed for the sole purpose of allowing Kennedy to circumvent NC’s tighter rules for independent candidates.
While I think the difference in signature requirement is rather dumb, it was the GOP that enacted this requirement over Democratic Governor Roy Cooper’s veto in 2017 (SB 656).
Before you delve into topics like this, please make sure you check your facts. This process would have been entirely avoidable had the GOP not created a different threshold for independent candidates with SB 656.
More proof that two wrongs make a right.
You missed the point. My post was a response to Turley’s misguided blame on “Democrats” writ large for trying to prohibit block voters from the right to choose a third party candidate.
Based on the letter of the law that the GOP drafted, voters will not be able to vote for a third party candidate.
If you believe a suit that seeks to protect the arbitrary difference between independent and third party candidates is wrong, then Turley should be advocating that the GOP-controlled legislature change the law!
As required by N.C.G.S. § 163-96(b), the organizers and petition circulators for the new party are required to inform the signers of the petition of the general purpose and intent of the new party.
https://www.ncsbe.gov/candidates/petitions/petition-recognition-political-party
Despite this context, Turley writes: “If Millen wants to see partisan mischief, she does not have to look far. She and her colleagues are engaging in precisely such mischief to deny voters choices this election to try to bolster the chances of Biden in a swing state.”
There is no “mischief” here. This is the way the statute was written. Allowing a new party to openly describe itself as “independent” would reduce this distinction to a nullity.
Of course, none of this was discussed above because Turley did not appeal to statutory text. The only possible reasons for this omission are either (a) he was too lazy to conduct the research; or (b) he intentionally omitted the statutory language to make a misleading partisan claim.
Which do you think is accurate?
Anonymous 12:20pm- I agree, even though I support DJT and I am generally a republican voter I feel all candidates should have the same requirements. Same number of signatures or same fee, if you want do do away with signatures.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon, wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” (John Adams).
Good thing we’re a Republic
Poor old Founder John Adams apparently didn’t know the distinction.
More CIA-Covert OPs Playbook activities on the Domestic Front.
Madam Director Avril Haines has some explaining to do (Not going to happen soon ever)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avril_Haines
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_National_Intelligence
Think about this, Democrats prohibit their own people from being able to vote for the candidate of their choice…in the name of saving democracy 😂😂😂
Team Blue’s only redeeming charactor trait is their complete lack of self awareness.
And hiring unemployable, Axis II, Cluster B trait, rejects of society, to troll the internet ala Act Blue / Media Matters for Team Blue, “work” (cough, cough) for the US Government remotely and rape our bank accounts
See the number of remote jobs currently offered via the US Jobs site:
Only show remote jobs
Viewing 1 – 25 of 280 jobs
https://www.usajobs.gov/Search/Results?rmi=true&k=&s=enddate&sd=asc&p=1
Salaries are 6 figures with quite a few GS13, GS14, GS15 and above…….. remotely
Ballot cleansing is the Democrats’ starting point for rigging elections.
For example, in 2022, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer was facing a tough re-election challenge from James Craig, a former successful Detroit Police Chief (and, incidentally, African-American). Democrats were able to remove him and other GOP candidates from the ballot by challenging signatures on nominating petitions. (Challenging signatures on absentee ballots is called “election denial” and possibly “racism” if done by Republicans.)
So, instead of being a political has-been, Whitmer is now in the running to be a Presidential candidate.
California dragged a mental health homeless veterans flim flam ballot prop. It was dragged across the finish line by “signature curing”. IOW, after some 4 days of “signature curing”. if it’s a “YES” it’s good enough”.
Typical.
“. . . ‘problematic’ in how they gathered signatures . . .” (JT)
Now the Left is concerned about the validity of signatures?!
Cry me a river.
Probably they should require legal ID to sign.
Jonathan: What is more interesting is the farcical attempts by Republicans that would mandate their obsession with a requirement to prove citizenship in order to vote in federal elections. You are writing about your concerns about candidates being deprived of their right to run for office. Meanwhile, entire segments of the population are under attack by Republicans attempting to strip them of their right to vote.
As you know, it has been a fact of criminal law for centuries that it is a crime to vote in a federal elections if not a US citizen. And yet, despite that, the Republicans are pushing this. Why? Clearly, this is just a Republican dog whistle and an attempt to disenfranchise people of color, specifically black and Hispanic Americans. As President Biden pointed out early in his presidency, it is extremely difficult for marginalized black and Hispanic Americans to obtain the documents accepted as voter ID.
If Trump can manage to avoid being sent to jail until after the election, he will no doubt use the dictatorial powers SCOTUS has given him immunity from using to continue his racist attacks on black and Hispanic voters as well as our new migrant population. Perhaps it will be an inventive new version of a poll tax, but it will be coming just as certainly as his public endorsement and support for neo-Nazis at Charlottesville and statements that all migrants are vicious criminals or mental health patients.
Republicans, as we have expected, are fully on board with Trump’s race baiting and attempts to ethnically cleanse state voter lists of black and Hispanic voters. This is one of Trump and the GOP’s threats to democracy that President Biden and Senator Schumer have been repeatedly warning the American people about for years. It is time that we as American people rejected Trump’s attempts to take America back to the 1800’s where there the rich like him owned and profited from slaves and those slaves were adjudicated as not having any civil rights.
How would one know if a voter is an illegal person, if one is not required to show identification? Do not the blacks in America have identification of any sort? This seems to be a simple thing, that one should identify themselves to vote.
Mr. Toulon,
Dennis McIntyre is what we, in America, call a Democrat Troll. His job is not to make sense, but to sell whatever nonsensical ramblings support the Democrat party. It is an open secret, that the Democrats are crooked people who steal votes and “stuff the ballot box” with phony votes. It is how Joe Biden won the last election. That is why Democrats oppose voter identification. Blacks in America do have identification – they drive cars, and buy alcohol and cigarettes, and have to have identification to obtain employment, get social security and welfare benefits such as Medicaid. Nonetheless, Democrats require an excuse to be able to cheat more easily, so they make up silly nonsense, which they then pretend to believe.
Nothing that a Democrat says can be taken as Truth. Such as, Joe Biden is as sharp as a tack.
Floyd,
Well said and spot on.
Merci!
Nothing that a Democrat says can be taken as Truth.
Floyd, there is an uncanny, strange form of truth in what the Democrats say. It’s found in taking the opposite meaning to whatever it is.
>> As President Biden pointed out early in his presidency, it is extremely difficult for marginalized black and Hispanic Americans to obtain the documents accepted as voter ID. <<
No, it's not. Furthermore, most polls have it at around a 70% issue. Democrat pollster Monmouth did a poll showing 80% support it. Meaning most normal people, including many blacks, Hispanics and the handful of Democrats who remain sane, want photo voter IDs to vote. Why? Because normal people have common sense.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/25/politics/voter-id-election-law-voting-rights/index.html
President Carter, a Democrat, and SoS James Baker, a Republican, chaired the BI-PARTISAN Commission on Federal Election Reform. Among the recommendations in their report was to require a photo ID to vote. They followed up with letters to the editor in the New York Times. In one letter, they cited a study which found that in several states with a disproportionately high black population, only about 1% of registered voters lacked a valid photo ID. All the states that have enacted the laws provide YEARS notice before the law goes into effect. That you think black and Hispanic Americans can't figure out how to get a photo ID to vote with YEARS notice suggests you don't think much of their ambition or intelligence.
In addition, most of the states, if not all of them, provide the photo IDs for free. South Carolina's law even provided free transportation for people to get to and from where they needed to go to get the free photo IDs. With a state population of about 5 million people, a grand total of about 20ish people had used the free transportation option in the first year after the law was enacted.
Puking up your party's propaganda just proves your brain has been poisoned by partisanship – or you lack the drive, ability or skill to do the most basic research.
@dennismcintyre
I am Hispanic and have zero problem with showing a government ID when voting.
I was a victim of ID theft 15 years ago by some illegal immigrant because I have a Spanish name and my SS # works. I went out of my way to make sure he was prosecuted and deported. Guess I should been more “understanding” of his plight.
I wonder if that makes me an “uncle tom” of this Hispanics? I need some upper middle class suburban white liberal to school me on this.
Wonder if Mexico allows individuals to vote without an official ID? Or any other western country. Spoiler alert, they don’t.
antonio
Every other voting democracy in the world requires a valid ID. Some also require a government issued letter stating that the potential voter is in the correct voting precinct. In the state I live in, California, anyone can register to vote. It is totally on the honor system and illegally registered individuals turn up all of the time, not by any government investigation (California is a one party oligarchy) but by a non-citizen wanting to be removed from the voting rolls who complains to media who then exposes this situation. With Democrats having been caught cheating in Bridgeport, CT, Paterson, NJ and Arizona and are clearly conducting rampant illegal vote harvesting in California it is obvious that individuals shouting about racist voter ID’s are merely trying to protect an illegal racketeering scheme.
Let’s guess. As a troll, do you live under a bridge or in mommies basement. As a Hispanic electrical engineer who is still working at 82 and enjoying it, I don’t feel “marginalized” and don’t want a fool like you lumping together “Blacks and Hispanics” as if they should vote in lockstep with your progressive ideas.
Mr. McIntyre: even accustomed to seeing outrageous posts on line is hard to find so many false and misleading progressive talking points in one.
The excuse that voting by non citizens is already against the law to oppose a law strengthening our voting regulations that emphasizes it ignores the fact that breaking laws happen every day.
No, it is not a fact, even if President Biden says so (many would say ‘specially’), that it is extremely difficult for marginalized black and Hispanic Americans to obtain the documents accepted as voter’s ID. That is very offensive and patronizing of minorities that show Democrats real sentiment against ‘people inferior to them’. As a proud American, not born in the US, when I swore to become a citizen I registered to vote shortly after and HAD my citizenship documents available (I guess Democrats expected me to throw them away). Once registered I did not have to present them again, although after 57 yrs I still have them.
Why do Democrats are opposed to purging the voting rolls every few years? People move and people die but I guess for Democrats they should be able to vote from the grave.
You don’t have to like Mr Trump (for the record I don’t) to see all the lies on the paragraph you mention him. SCOTUS did not give him, or any past and future President, dictatorial power but let’s lie anyway. I see you consider black and Hispanic gang members worthy of being defended but that is to be expected. Worse is the outright lie of Trump public endorsement and support for neo-Nazis at Charlottesville, which you know it’s an outright lie. And statements that ALL migrants are vicious criminals or mental health patients is another lie, but it is a fact Maduro have sent criminals and patients from mental facilities to the border, having learnt that from Castro in 1980.
As shown in the last 3.5 years Democrats continue to save democracy by trying to destroy it
“…extremely difficult for marginalized black and Hispanic Americans to obtain the documents accepted as voter ID”… ? Where you from, Dennis?
If you’re incapable of providing a valid ID, you probably don’t HAVE a right to vote.
One vote for one US citizen, with Biden’s open border there are approximately 35M illegal immigrants in our Nation. Democrats want them to vote, that’s why they are here. Americans that understand our laws and the foundation of our Republic want an honest vote. It will prevent alot of bloodshed in the future to do so.
Dems also have some problems with logic and common sense. They criminally prosecute Trump expecting that to decrease his popularity and it did the opposite. Then, when they prosecute him they fail to anticipate the immunity defense and then are in an uproar when a 6-3 conservative court approves the concept of immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. Now they are in an uproar about a decision rather easily anticipated. A decision which never would have been issued if they simply did not prosecute him. Finally, they forgot about the concept of what goes around comes around. Naturally, if Trump is elected this time he will prosecute his political opponents. He did not prosecute Hillary last time which he easily could have. He probably perceives that as one of his biggest mistakes since the democratic attack dogs mercilessly prosecuted him. Next will be the Biden crime family.
Remember it isn’t ‘democracy’ until the correct result can be assured and occurs; and the proles vote as they are supposed to.
S@@ew ‘Our Democracy”(tm).
I do not want to dialog, understand or reconcile with these people, I want a divorce.
Don’t worry, s@@tlibs, you’ll support the idea of a national divorce in another 30 years when Aztlan in the US Southwest reverts back to Mexico in order to correct the injustice of the Mexican War.
antonio
So far from God, but so close to the United States ….
Democrats are the definition of “projection” and lie and smear others for the last decade. Here’s the proof:
– Who hates democracy? Democrats who ignore the millions who chose Joe to be their candidate and want to choose their next emperor.
– Who encourages voter fraud? Dems who won’t pass the SAVE act and sent millions of ballots to voters who are dead.
– Who is a “friend of Putin”? Joe and Dems who hindered US oil and gas production, putting billions in Putin’s pocket, and encouraging Russia’s transgression into Ukraine. Oh yeah, and Obama, who gave Putin Crimea.
– Who creates “havoc on the world stage”? Dems, Blinken, Biden who have facilitated 2 wars (Ukraine and Israel) and let China threaten Taiwan.
– Who colluded with Russia and other foreign interests? The Biden family. Remember, Joe told Ukraine to fire anyone investigating Burisma. Bidens also made over $20M via Hunter’s absurd “consulting” projects, just payment to the family for political cover.
– Who helps the rich and taxes the poor? Democrats who created the highest inflation since Carter and have net wage loss during the last 3 years.
– Who incites insurrections? Democrats and Pelosi who kneeled in obeisance to BLM and Antifa who burned down cities, businesses, and public buildings for 8 months.
– Who can’t control Xi? Democrats who pass legislation that requires the US to buy minerals/ores/solar panels from China to fund the ineffective global warming scam.
– Who gave billions to Mexican cartels? Dems and Biden who allow 10M illegals to be trafficked into our country.
– Who has corrupt children? Biden who’s son is a crack and porn fan, who has sold the Biden name to international interests.
– Who doesn’t believe in science? Dems who pushed Fauci’s lies about masks, distancing, and obvious lab leaks.
Great post!
Highlyeducatedsuburbanwomen-
Excellent comment. Gee I wonder what the answer is to all of your questions? It might take me awhile. Ranging from 10-15 seconds
Locust
Well, this isn’t surprising. Professor Turley, as a usual, is not telling the whole story.
The board does have legitimate concerns about RFK’s party and how to obtained the signatures. I thought Republicans were all about election integrity and all that jazz.
What Turley didn’t tell you,
“ Both Kennedy and West’s parties were denied in June because of concerns that signature gatherers were misleading voters while asking for signatures. Staff for the Board of Elections contacted voters who signed petitions for both parties and then later signed affidavits to have their signatures removed. These voters were a very small minority of those who signed; West’s Justice for All party has over 17,000 validated signatures, and Kennedy’s We the People Party has more than 18,000, but there are fewer than 100 affidavits.
Only nine voters who revoked their signature for Kennedy’s party were able to be reached, and none could explain the purpose of the political party, said Lindsey Wakely, acting general counsel for the State Board of Elections, during the meeting Tuesday. For West’s party, staff made contact with 22 voters, 12 of whom said they did not sign or did not remember signing the petitions.
All of the organizations involved in obtaining signatures were subpoenaed by the Board of Elections, which is still waiting on responses. Staff members are continuing to verify if the unconfirmed parties communicated the “purpose and intent” of creating new political parties to petition signers, which they are legally required to do.
Board member Siobhan O’Duffy Millen said that the current numbers may be indicative that voters did not know what they were signing. ‘
Turley also “neglected” to mention the two Republicans on the board ALSO wanted to deny the constitution party a place on the ballot for the same reason the democrat majority wanted to deny the RFK’s.
“ Both of the Republicans on the Board, Stacy Eggers IV and Kevin Lewis, voiced opposition to authorizing the Constitution Party, which would divide Republican votes, but ultimately voted in favor of it.”
https://www.courthousenews.com/north-carolina-elections-board-holds-off-on-certifying-rfk-jr-s-and-cornel-wests-political-parties/
@George
You’re right, Professor Turley is a ‘nazi’ too for noticing and pointing out.
You have to destroy the village ro save it, right?
And before you call me some slur, (lefties love calling those who disagree a slur) remember I’m Hispanic and member of a recognized victim group. If I were a leftist one, you’d be k@@sing my a@@ right now in an attempt to suck up and make me like you.
antonio
Antonio,
Nothing that drastic needs to be inferred of the professor. But it does point to the glaring problem of republicans suddenly forgetting the all important “election integrity” rhetoric and how it is necessary to fully vet the applicants. Right? If some voters who allegedly signed on the petition are saying they never signed or were not aware what they were signing it runs contrary to the rules.
Here we have Turley being nonchalant about a valid issue regarding the legitimacy of the signatures and the sketchy methods the party used to get people to sign. Voter fraud was a big issue with republicans in 2020. Now, not so much? They are not outright denying the party to be on the ballot. They are doing their due diligence in following the rules and the investigation into some of the affidavits and interviews with some of the voters for RFK’s party showing some were not aware of what they were signing and some that stated they never signed for it raises suspicion. The party shouldn’t be granted certification until a full investigation is conducted. Voter fraud is a serious issue for republicans, right?
A glaring question that our resident Confederate Soviet Democrat, George, needs to answer:
But it does point to the glaring problem of republicans suddenly forgetting the all important “election integrity” rhetoric and how it is necessary to fully vet the applicants.
George suddenly cares about election integrity? I’m shocked! The question George: what have President Biden And The Democrats done FOR election integrity, versus ATTACKING election integrity? What have the done to reduce voter fraud? What have the done to eliminate ineligible people being on the lists of qualified voters?
After all George, surely you can comment on Democrats instead of just attacking Republicans all the time.
How are Democrats Saving Democracy LLC by opposing the SAVE act? Explain.
@George
I am going to go out on a limb and say you were highly upset at the following:
The vote count being stopped at 11 pm on election night.
Thousands of ballots suddenly being dumped into several swing states.
The count taking several days as absentee ballots kept pouring in.
The disbarring of Rudolph Guliani for reprinting Donald Trump in the election dispute.
I need to be careful or you’ll try to get me disbarred for spending “hate” and “misinformation”.
Please, stop the pearl clutching and moralzing. You and other s@@tlibs support whatever position you think will help “Our Democracy(tm”).
S@@ew “Out Democracy(tm)”.
I want a divorce but my abusive husband won’t allow it but I know it’s supposed to for my own good.
antonio
Dr Jordan B Peterson
@jordanbpeterson
Cowardly (sockpuppet troll) basement-dwelling cluster B victimhood-claiming manipulative attention-seeking narcissistic psychopath says what?
B-R-U-T-A-L
🔥🔥
George our resident constitutional racist Confederate tried this:
Well, this isn’t surprising. Professor Turley, as a usual, is not telling the whole story.
How quaint, George, The Queen Of Just Telling A Small Part Of The Story, is channeling his usual sophomoric posts here onto Turley. Followed by a long clip and paste that doesn’t mention the thrust of Turley’s piece – the obsession of his Soviet Democrat party to attempt to remove Trump from the ballot and at the same time demanding SCOTUS be packed. All while Bribery Biden, Commander In Chief And Defender Of Democracy LLC, gave his quiet approval to all of that going on.
Why didn’t you tell that part of the story, George? Had a bad look for Bribery Biden and your fellow Soviet Democrats? Cultist belief that Soviet Democrats have to burn democracy right down to the ground in order to save it? Build a brave new world with a better democracy later, George?
It begs the obvious question: why does Kluxxer George show up every day to post an objection to a Turley opinion piece, whatever the subject? Usually accompanied by his ongoing and almost invariably off topic claims that a Prussian and Brits’ writings are more persuasive than the record of the debates and discussion regarding ‘natural born citizen’ at the Constitutional conference.
Question: is Kluxxer George posting here as Dennis McIntyre in drag?
Old Airborne Dog-George is so conflicted and confused that I’m not sure the Klan would have accepted him. Granted the Klan had really low standards but they did have standards. You know, the ability to sew a pointed hood and poke 2 holes in the sheet so you could see. I guess that would eliminate George. Probably failed the pointed hood part.
If only the democrats were so discerning during elections. Remember when Pat Buchanan got all those old Jewish votes in FL?
Voter ID would go a long way to ending the deciet the democrats need to compete. If only they had good ideas, instead…oh well, tough to fool the masses you’re for them when you’re selling them out to the banks, pharma, MIC, AG, etc…
This is one of the reasons why so many traditional, JFK Democrats are so disgusted with their own party. My own sister, a registered Democrat, says she does not recognize the party anymore. It has become something grotesque.’
Unless something changes and soon, she is voting third party. She is even considering ditching the Democrat party and registering as Independent.
I read your Democrats butcher the children to make eunuchs of them. Sacre Bleu!
@Upstate
That’s good to hear. That’s tough information to come by when the dem narrative is so tightly controlled; it’s encouraging that many are waking up. Wish it had been after the 2008 election (I got duped that year too, in 2012, not so much), but I’ll take it!
It’s becoming a cliche, but so Orwellian to say “ban voter choice to protect democracy.
Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia…until it wasn’t.
In the words of George Orwell, it went down the memory hole. It never happened and you’d better not say otherwise.
antonio
Antonio-I not sure George ever read 1984.
Probably also thought Animal Farm was about racism since Snowball was white.
Democracy evolves as a dictatorial duality.
The ends always justify the means to a cult on a misguided mission to “save” the world so that they can rule over it.
Even TYT (The Young Turks) are telling the truth, for a moment:
Don’t believe it. Once a liar always a liar. It’s a scam. It’s not even clever.
The Democrat Party are Fascists who HATE America
Now you see why China gave Bidens and their cronies Millions!
Wait the FASCIST Democrats don’t believe in VOTERS right to choose?
Time to DEFUND DEMOCRATS…END all Federal Aid to cities, states, non-profits and colleges
Cut 50% Of Federal Spending!!!
If you Vote Democrat…YOU HATE AMERICA!
Your Democratic Party seems to be contemptible how you say le coquins? Knaves?
Oui! You have that right!