Carnegie Mellon University Professor Uju Anya has joined the ranks of academics spreading the conspiracy theory that the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump was “staged.” As for the killing and wounding of bystanders, Anya explained that “that’s exactly what they do.” We previously discussed other academics who have spread this conspiracy theory. However, few are willing to go as far as Professor Anya in explaining how the other victims were used to make the staging more plausible. Anya declared:
“It was staged. Like a stupid Tubi movie set in the Bronx with palm trees in the background. They lie, and people die. That’s exactly what they do
…That’s the record. Whatever ‘attack’ on him they set up to stoke his followers’ fears and sentiments threat and persecution has now cost lives.
…And people died behind this farce. Actual people’s lives gone for them to stage this stupid show. People dying doesn’t make the attack any less staged. Someone who thought the attack was real could’ve killed others trying to prevent harm. Also, someone could’ve shot the shooter to hide the plot.”
The faculty bio states that Anya is an Associate Professor of Second Language Acquisition. She describes herself as
“a scholar of language learning and Black experiences in multilingualism. My primary fields of inquiry are critical applied linguistics, critical sociolinguistics and critical discourse studies examining race, gender, sexual and social class identities in new language learning through the multilingual journeys of African American students.”
Likewise, in a now since-deleted Threads posting, Professor of Psychology at San Diego Mesa College Inna Kanevsky also fueled the baseless conspiracy theory. She posted
“‘He took a bullet for his country!’ No he didn’t. He took it, like everything else he took and keeps taking, for himself. For his own personal aggrandizement.”
Professor Anya has long been a controversial figure including her wish that Queen Elizabeth would die a long “excruciating” death. She later doubled down on the hateful statements.
She also tweeted out crude remarks about the 2022 elections: “contrary to all these major media outlets, the red wave coming is my period on Friday.”
So these and other faculty believe that Trump enlisted a kid who was thrown out of his high school shooting club as a bad shot to wing him at 130 yards from a sloped position. The conspiracists also decided to kill or wound some supporters to make the staging look real. In our age of rage, this all makes sense to these professors.
I agree with Professor Anya that such political statements are protected speech. However, her unhinged and hateful commentary exposes the radicalism of many faculty in higher education today.
Does anyone actually think Civil Upheaval/War can be avoided?
I don’t want a war – I do not want to kill all those people nor do I want to govern them, I want to segregate the left from the right. Let them have their world and the sane folks ours. The left is trying to turn the entire nation into a version of late 1960’s urban America with no suburbs to move to, the Detroitization of the nation.
You people keep playing to the powers that be.
What is coming is a REVOLUTION, not a civil war.
You don’t attack the weak controlled sheep that are often difficult to identify.
You attack the creatures from libturd pravda and the power centers and the government complex.
Try reading the declaration of independence and focus, focus, focus.
Ron Paul tried to tell you. Ron Paul ran on it as a campaign slogan.
If you are stupid enough to go “civil war”, all the garbage pushers that got us here will be untouched.
I guess you are “that stupid”.
Does anyone actually think Civil Upheaval/War can be avoided?
Put me down for “ain’t gonna happen”. Basing that on numerous all expenses paid vacations government sponsored trips to countries where exactly that was going on.
First, conservatives, constitutionalists, independent and undecided aren’t soaked in hate like the Soviet Democrats and their street thugs in Antifa and Black Liars & Marxists.
Second, revolutions and civil wars require a leader. Who is going to step to the front line to direct the Soviet Democrat revolution/civil war like their version of George Washington or Robert E. Lee?
Third, the Soviet Democrats are evil, amoral, and completely bereft of humanity. They are Cheap Fake Americans. But they are not stupid.
If there is a war, they know which side owns the great majority of weapons. They know which side as the vast majority of combat veterans who know not only how to effectively use those weapons, but also the tactics to manoever and fire those weapons to kill the enemy without being wounded or killed themselves. On their side, who do the Soviet Democrats have? MS13 Illegal Aliens and street gangs, pimps, and drug dealers with their experience in drive by shootings and drug wars?
The Soviet Democrats aren’t about to die in their pursuit of a Soviet Democrat hegemony in federal politics.
They’ll wait like Biden’s ChiCom customers do, believing that time is on their side and eventually SCOTUS and saturating America with Illegal Alien Future Democrat Voters will give them hegemony if they just wait long enough.
Damn! Just when the crazies thought they could play 3D chess with Trump, he went all 4D on them.
This is truly spiritual warfare.
Olly: One of your best.
lin……Amen!
🤙
🤙
The Radical Left Wing, Corrupt/Power hungry DEM leadership, Radical Bernie Sanders crowd, etc. are in PANIC, they could lose their radical policies, face masks, ban cows, etc All their Dreams and control gone. Its going to get worse as we get closer. The Radical DEMS/Deep State will try again and again to prevent a Trump win. If Trump wins perhaps these Radicals and Corrupt Dem leadership will all leave the US along with the illegals Remember they are all promising to leave if Trump is elected. I hope they keep their promise
In Other News: Donald Trump accused of staging an epic fight with a lion. Fake blood capsule revealed on lion’s underbelly.
“a scholar of language learning and Black experiences in multilingualism. My primary fields of inquiry are critical applied linguistics, critical sociolinguistics and critical discourse studies examining race, gender, sexual and social class identities in new language learning through the multilingual journeys of African American students.”
In plain English: Ebonics.
Sam: Here is an Abstract from her work:
“To address racial inequity and the exclusion of African Americans in applied linguistics, second-language acquisition, and world language (WL) education, our field must reckon with social justice problems of racism and anti-Blackness. Theoretical frameworks of critical race theory (CRT) and critical race pedagogy (CRP) elucidate how such injustices are perpetuated, plus, propose solutions for them.”
https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/critical-race-pedagogy-for-more-effective-and-inclusive-world-lan
Sam posted: In plain English: Ebonics.
In much plainer language: virulent black racism, once again on public display.
Reeking of the black racist stench of Obama’s hate filled religious leader, Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Reeking of the black racist stench of Obama’s friend and the most successful racist in modern history, Louis Farrakhan.
Reeking of the black race baiting stench of Reverend Al Sharpton and Reverend Jessie ‘Hymietown’ Jackson.
Reeking of the racist/Marxist stench of the Soviet Democrats’ street thugs in Black Liars & Marxists.
Reeking of the race baiting stench of the Soviet Democrats, particularly the New Hitler Youth Movement that is the Anti-Semitic Genocidal Socialist Sisterhood in the House.
And reeking of the black race baiting stench of Obama.
That’s as much a problem for ordinary, normal black Americans as the rest of us. But no, all Americans (regardless of DNA and culture) are assured by the Soviet Democrats and their propaganda arm in the Mainstream Media that America is systemically white racist. And according to Dennis McIntyre, especially Republicans.
The very word university means a place where all the ideas are presented, including the hated ones, so students can sort them out on the way to thinking critically. If the professor mix is designedly incomplete to exclude either extreme, the campus work product is not university. It is merely Un.
“either” extreme? There are infinite extremes, therefore you can never have a complete set of them. Because of that, you needn’t include the obviously farcical ones simply because they may represent an extreme.
Did you get your ability to think critically without grappling with farcical extremes?
See her Carnegie Mellon web page. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/news/news-stories/2022/january/fs-anya.html Enough said.
Uju Anya, associate professor of Second Language Acquisition, joined the Department of Modern Languages in the Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Science in 2021. Her scholarly work is focused on critical applied linguistics, critical sociolinguistics, and critical discourse studies examining race, gender and sexual and social class identities in new language learning through the multilingual journeys of African American students. She is a scholar, a teacher and an author.
I am a linguist. By education and training, I am an applied linguist. In particular, I study second language acquisition (SLA). I examine how adults and older adolescents learn new languages in schools, local communities and study abroad. Language learning is personal change. It transforms your identity as you learn new ideas. In essence, I study how our various social identities like race, gender, sexuality, social class are experienced in language learning and how we shape and negotiate these identities in new languages and cultural contexts.
There is a dearth of Black scholars in the U.S. in language studies, linguistics and language education. When you have few scholars from particular groups, those groups are rarely examined meaningfully. Because of systemic exclusion, my voice is unique and foundational in the field. I am the main scholar looking at race and experiences of Blackness in language learning and one of the few who examine language education from a social justice perspective.
I study how Black students in the U.S. learn new languages in classrooms and multilingual communities. In essence, how we speak our Blackness in new languages. Ultimately, I seek to understand and improve the experiences of Black students in language education. To learn a language, you need opportunities to interact in the language and use it. When you suffer social oppression (race, gender, sexuality, class, etc.), opportunities to engage, interact and improve proficiency are limited. We need to look very closely at how racism and other forms of oppression targeted at people with minoritized identities affect their experiences and outcomes in language learning.
Professor Uju Anya gave the world this:
I am the main scholar looking at race and experiences of Blackness in language learning and one of the few who examine language education from a social justice perspective.
Really!!! As a former scholar from my time spent completing a graduate degree in criminology in anticipation of spending my working career in law enforcement, I no longer think of or present myself as a scholar of my field. However, I claim the right to comment on this alleged scholar and the claims presented to the world that relate to ‘justice’.
First, I view with deep suspicion ANY alleged scholar who claims to be the one and only main scholar in whatever discipline they claim to be a member of. That this professor claims be the “main scholar”, self-appointing themselves as THE authority on this discipline pretty much stinks in the academic world. A parallel of Dr. Fauci labeling himself as “The science” of virology and epidemiology. (How did that work out for us, BTW? How many Americans dead?)
Second, as a criminologist, I remember that criminology does not recognize any such thing as this linguist’s claimed “social justice”.
It. Does. Not. Exist.
Justice is a society’s system of laws promulgated by the elected representatives of that society. The claim that “social justice” exists is a claim made by bitter, calculating liars. The losers at the ballot box who cannot get what they want as a justice system by electing politicians who will put forward and pass the laws they want. When you can’t get it at the ballot box, you attempt to get it through the back doors of bureaucracy and the courts.
“Social justice” primarily is a repressive system, usually claimed and demanded by racists and Marxists (more often than not, the same thing). Cultural, economic, and political Marxists.
Again, if they can’t get the system of justice they want by presenting the laws they want to be voted on by the nation – then they call it “social justice” and attempt to go around American voters.
I will tell you there were three distinct schools of criminology when I completed my degree in the mid 1970’s. As mentioned, none of them were named “social justice”. The only one of the three that resembled “social justice” was named ‘Radical Criminology’.
To generalize that school of thought, that is the one that is based on the claim that criminals (and the deviants that took part in what is termed ‘societies disreputable pleasures’ i.e. prostitution, gambling, illegal drug use) are in fact the victims, not the perpetrators. They are actually victims of the laws of the justice system they are expected to comply with. Forced into criminality and deviance – it isn’t their choice.
So radical criminology says society’s criminals and deviants are in fact the victims of the criminal justice system. And now the Soviet Democrats and our cultural, economic, and political Marxists enlist the criminals and deviants as Identity Politics voter groups and put forward prophets, ideologues, and demogogues to talk about “social justice”.
Nothing to see here other than another chapter of cultural, economic, and political Marxism, presented by this Marxist town cryer . Propped up, as always, with flat out lies.
A perfect fit to be used as a weapon by the Soviet Democrat party, Professor Turley.
START BELIEVING WHAT YOU’VE TREATED SO FAR AS YOUR LYING EYES!!!!
Another clown DEI hire. There is no evidence whatsoever of a “staged” assassination attempt. Oh wait, other than, of course, the fact that Democrats screw up everything they touch. lol
It’s odd that professor Turley pays this much attention to conspiracy theories. He didn’t criticize Alex Jone’s constant conspiracy theories about school shootings being staged and faked as part of “the age of rage.”
Regardless of what is said about the incident, it’s still free speech. People are entitled to believe whatever they think is true. It’s probable that Trump staged the whole thing, after all he IS a known fraud, liar, and a convicted felon. The shock and dismay over the incident will fade away as time goes by. There are still 4 months to go before the election and milking the incident can only go so far before people would get tired of hearing about it.
“It’s probable that Trump staged the whole thing,”
I have said for months that you are not a serious commenter.
The closer we get to a Trump presidency, the more unhinged your little cry baby rants become.
Its looking more and more probable that you are Gigi, or at the very least, reside in a cubicle next to xim/xer.
Saying it’s probable is not saying it was really staged. But……as it is with any conspiracy theory and the fact that Trump is a fraudster and liar….to some it’s probable.
Those on the right believe in all kinds of conspiracy theories regarding Biden. Difference is Turley chooses to emphasize them over the ones about Trump. It’s simply his preferred bias.
Saying its probable means YOU think its supported by evidence strong enough to establish presumption but not proof
Is English your first language?
No, saying it’s probable does not mean I think it’s true. I’m saying to SOME it’s probable just as many Trump supporters believe in conspiracy theories regarding Biden and the ‘deep state’.
You do know why they are called “conspiracy theories” right? Because they lack evidence.
It’s probable that Trump staged the whole thing, after all he IS a known fraud, liar, and a convicted felon.
YOU said it was probable.
I gave you the definition of probable.
You’re an idiot.
You didn’t give a definition of probable.
Probable: likely to be the case or to happen.
It’s saying, maybe it’s possible. That’s not saying I believe it’s true. It’s simply saying that it could be. Perhaps, probably true, etc. Just like it’s probably true that Trump slept with a porn star.
Moron. The definition is in my response. Are you a 3rd grader?
probable
1 of 2
adjective
prob·a·ble ˈprä-bə-bəl ˈprä(b)-bəl
Synonyms of probable
1
: supported by evidence strong enough to establish presumption but not proof
Look familiar???
Trump sleeping with Daniels is supported by 1000 times more evidence than him staging his own death attempt, which is zero.
This idiot cant be a primary language English speaking person.
Impossible-implausible-possible-plausible-likely/probable-true
Thats the progression, moron. Just because something is possible does not make it probable.
Its like you’re in a contest with Gigi for who can say the dumbest things.
“ Just because something is possible does not make it probable.”
Yes it does. Because it’s possible it also means it’s probable. It’s a 50/50 chance that it might be true and because it’s a conspiracy THEORY to some it’s entirely possible. How are you not understanding that?
No it doesnt. What kind of moron are you pretending to be? I gave u the definition of each. Something that is probable is definitely possible. Something that is possible is not necessarily probable. You gave the definition of probable as likely to be true. I gave the definition of likely as having a high probability of occurring or being true
Its possible you speak English as your first language. Its not probable.
Its also not a 50/50 chance unless the truth is a dice you roll looking for an even number, or a coin you flip. Idiot.
You just keep spouting these most ridiculous things. Hilarious things. Do you say them out loud first? Might help
Probable: likely to be the case or to happen.
Gee, what could the word likely mean? That its just possible its true? What a douche.
likely
1 of 2
adjective
like·ly ˈlī-klē
likelier; likeliest
Synonyms of likely
1
: having a high probability of occurring or being true : very probable
Hard to have a discussion with someone who wants their own definition for words.
Here was another chance for you to skulk away early and be thought an idiot. Instead you decided to double down and be shown to be a spastic idiot.
LOL!! You are simply confirming my point. It’s probable that Trump’s assassination attempt was staged. That does not mean I believe that it was. It’s merely saying that it could be possible. Who knows maybe it was. Trump is a big fan of that kind of thinking and he’s a stable genius.
Its NOT probable you ignorant fvck. You think it is. You said it is. Which means you think it is likely.
And i gave u the definition of likely.
Possible and probable are NOT synonymous
Keep digging, spastic idiot.
It’s as probable of you banging taylor swift.
“He didn’t criticize Alex Jone’s constant conspiracy theories about school shootings being staged and faked as part of “the age of rage.””
Once again you prove yourself to be an ignorant sociopath.
The professor has written numerous times about the nut job Alex Jones and discusses him in his book as well. Maybe you should pick up a copy and stop spewing lies, Gigi-Svelaz.
Anonymous 8.02am
I agree that Alex Jones was and is a “nut job”. Just shows that there can be nut jobs on both sides of the center. Remarkably the further left and right they are, they seem to come closer together eventually in the universe called “Nuttiness world”. In that world Nuttiness is the only qualification, right or left has no meaning. I think this professor also resides there.
You didn’t read the book did you? Turley only criticized those who banned Alex Jones from social media. Not his conspiracy theories regarding Sandy Hook.
You obviously didnt read it.
Make up your mind douchebag. You earlier defended your and others right to claim ridiculous conspiracy theories.
George the pathological liar who didnt read the book:
Who is the University of Arizona professor mentioned in the book. There is only one.
Thats what i thought. You just cant help lying.
Lying? What makes you think that? Do YOU have evidence that Turley did criticize Alex Jones in his book? What chapter does he mention it? Odd that you didn’t specify.
You lied by implying that you have read the book and i had not.
You havent read the book. If you have a copy, find the professor i asked about and name it.
You cant because u didnt.
I dont care that he didnt criticize jones.
He rightly criticized those who would silence jones, just as he would anyone attempting to silence some sociopath who claims trump staged his own death.
I didn’t imply anything. I asked a question. How did you miss that?
“ He rightly criticized those who would silence jones, just as he would anyone attempting to silence some sociopath who claims trump staged his own death.”
Yeah, he criticized those who tried to silence Jones, but he wasn’t critical of Jones peddling his conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook. In this column he’s criticizing the person peddling the conspiracy theory instead.
How did I lie? What is the lie?
In the book he criticizes Jones. You havent read it, have you?
Have you read the book, Svelaz?
Which chapter does he criticize Jones? Why don’t you mention it? Are you sure you have read the book?
“ I dont care that he didnt criticize jones.
He rightly criticized those who would silence jones, just as he would anyone attempting to silence some sociopath who claims trump staged his own death.”
LOL! Thanks for confirming I was correct. He didn’t criticize Jones.
You tell me. You claim to know whats in it.
I know the answer. You havent read the book, have you?
And there it is.
“LOL! Thanks for confirming I was correct. He didn’t criticize Jones.”
When Svelaz is cornered its always “LOL” and claiming someone said what they didnt say.
I didnt say he didnt criticize Jones. In fact I said he did. Just as i said he has NUMEROUS times before.
Read for comprehension Svelaz.
You’re the one who brought up Jones and the book. Why didnt YOU mention the chapter?? Lmao
What a douche. Curious that you dont say.
Hint. Its more than one chapter, laughingstock.
Now, what chapter is the Arizona professor mentioned in?
You havent read it, have you Svelaz?
“You didn’t read the book did you?”
You really should take a good English as a Second Language class.
That question is implying something. Thats how English works.
How could you miss that?
And its YOU who does not have a copy of the book, nor has read it, which is why you have yet to answer the question.
“ That question is implying something.”
It’s not implying anything. It’s questioning whether you read the book or not. It’s a yes or no proposition.
“It’s a yes or no proposition.”
You can claim its not an implication until you are blue in the face. It is.
A question that isnt an implication would not include the potential answer in the answer. Ergo
“Have you read the book?”
Keep digging, spastic idiot.
“I didn’t imply anything.”
Additionally, among intelligent people, when you claim to know whats in a book, you are implying that you have read it. Or, you’re just making shit up. Which is it, in your case?
“ when you claim to know whats in a book, you are implying that you have read it. Or, you’re just making shit up. Which is it, in your case?”
I didn’t claim to know what’s in the book. When did I say it was in the book? To say that I claim to know what is in the book I would be literally saying “it’s in the book” or “Turley wrote in his book”. I never said that. It seems you are the one making things up.
Your’e making an assumption based on something I never said.
So you’ve no idea what is in the book?
“You didn’t read the book did you? Turley only criticized those who banned Alex Jones from social media.”
All in one paragraph. Svelaz again demonstrates his lack of comprehension regarding his own writings.
What were you referring to here, Svelaz?
Were you suggesting that you know what he wrote in the book, or that you know every word he has ever written or uttered?
“ What were you referring to here, Svelaz?
Were you suggesting that you know what he wrote in the book, or that you know every word he has ever written or uttered?”
If you don’t know then why are you falsely saying that I claim I read the book? You keep making an assumption about something I never claimed. I was not suggesting anything or implying anything. You are the stuck making assumptions based on things I never said or claimed.
No you are stuck with my allegation because you wont answer the question. In the absence of you explaining what you meant, others a free to infer that which makes the most sense. Either you were purporting to have knowledge of everything Turley has said or written, or you were just making shit up again.
Your refusal to say which is SOP for you. You do it every time.
So you resort to “i wasnt saying anything”
Which sadly, is often true
Is it less honest to be a fraud, liar, and a convicted felon or a fraud, liar, and a yet-to-be-convicted felon?
George the Constitutional Confederate racist and liar posted this massive but feeble deflection:
It’s odd that professor Turley pays this much attention to conspiracy theories. He didn’t criticize Alex Jone’s constant conspiracy theories
He wrote opinion pieces on that trial. What’s odd that you self-identify as pretending you don’t remember you commented on it. In short, yet again, you can’t put up a single post without depending on lies and insinuations.
Now tell your laughing audience why you skipped right past the biggest conspiracy theory since “who killed JFK”.
Tell everybody your version of your Soviet Democrats’ bought and paid for “Russia Dossier proves Trump is Putin’s stooge!” conspiracy theory.
There are still 4 months to go before the election and milking the incident can only go so far before people would get tired of hearing about it.
Follow up question Confederate George: How many YEARS did Bribery Biden and the Soviet Democrats monetize and milk their “Russia Dossier” lies and police state fascism?
The Soviet Democrats could at least quit insulting us by sending liars and gaslighters like Confederate George. At least they could send more amusing and entertaining liars like Circle Back Psaki was.
Wow just wiwAbd they walk among us
i hope she’s proud of herself. i’m sure some Dems are patting her on the back for being such a fine scumbag.
Insanity. n. mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.
How can any of these people be considered to get close to the mind of any young person? They have a venom called hatred flowing through their veins and like a snake are injecting their venom into our children.
One look at her cv and you know Anya is just another race hustler.
“race hustler”–that’s a great description
Another person who is above the law. Unlike Alec Jones, she will never have to face consequences for her conspiracy theory.
I’m guessing that her first language is Pig Latin, being the swine that she truly is.
Just a testament to the low caliber of people entering the education profession these days. So sad!
Rick said: ” the low caliber of people entering the education profession these days”
“these days” makes it seem like you think this is a recent, sudden phenomenon. It is anything but, and imo is the end result of education being (predominantly) turned over to the State, and the State turning it over to its proxy, the teachers’ unions. I was a HS sophomore in 1965, and up to that point in time, virtually all of my teachers appeared to be dedicated to improving students’ knowledge. I had quibbles with the methods used by some of them, but not the motivation. My sophomore English teacher (very young; straight out of teachers’ college) dramatically changed my perception of the profession. The first day of class, she began by telling her students that if they had not yet made up their minds about a career, they should seriously consider teaching. Why? Not because of any satisfaction from improving the knowledge and skills of their young charges. Her sales pitch was: teachers were paid well; had short working hours; could either earn money at another job during Summer vacation, or just laze around; and were immune to any job loss for poor performance because the teachers’ union protected them. Yes, this was high school, but the students who bought into that kind of “free lunch” promotion graduated and took that corrupt philosophy with them wherever they went, including the short path up the ladder of educational institution hierarchy.
The Hard Left is called “hard” because they are, both of mind and heart. They have no problem with thousands of Americans dying each year from Fentanyl poisoning as an indirect consequence of supporting open borders. Why not a “staged” murder? So what. It’s only one death. They think, “What’s the problem with that?” This is hard, Stasi or KGB style.
Fox did man on the street interviews (I think in CA) and just about everyone thought the shooting was staged. They just are programmed to believe the absolute worst about Trump.
My thoughts of quantifying credibility has changed over the years. Originally I believed one could measure credibility using Natural Numbers from zero and upward as one’s credibility increased or in the opposite, credibility devolved toward a ground state of having zero credibility. I then revised my measurement in that the credibility scale should incorporate Negative Numbers to measure levels in that a foolish person’s credibility having negative value actually decreases the credibility of worthwhile and positively credible person who has somehow made the unwise decision to debate such fools and consequently lowered their own credibility among others.
After this latest conspiracy theory rave, I realize the need to involve the Complex Numbering system to fully quantify these True Believers’ credibility, because they truly reside on a different plane of existence, and for them their own belief of their intellectual superiority and credibility is truly imaginary.
Kind of like trying to make mathematical sense of spaghetti. I think there is some value in hearing what these people actually think, though good advice to not argue with them – completely pointless and could cause a loss of brain cells as well as credibility.
Many on this blog believed or agreed with Alex Jones when he was peddling conspiracy theories about the school shootings. Conspiracy theories were once the domain of supermarket tabloids and fringe internet kooks. Now they are main stream news in people’s social media news feeds.
Really?? Who. Name them.
“Many on this blog believed or agreed with Alex Jones when he was peddling conspiracy theories about the school shootings. “
Well, thats a lie.
Name them.
By the way, how long have you been on the blog?
Are you Peter Poopy Head?
Hard to name those who constantly post as “anonymous”. So… many believed and agreed with Alex Jones on this blog.
George the Constitutional Confederate racist and liar posted this lie: Hard to name those who constantly post as “anonymous”. So… many believed and agreed with Alex Jones on this blog.
Hard indeed when it never happened, never mind “many”. I have never seen a single post, Anonymous or other, that expressed belief and agreement with Alex Jones on this blog. In fact, the only time Alex Jones’ name appears in this blog is when Soviet Democrat liars like you introduce his name as part of your day’s schedule of channeling, deflecting, and gaslighting in hopes of defending the Soviet Democrats and Bribery Biden.
In comparison, your racist claims that the Constitution says black American slaves born in America should have been deported by Lincoln after you lost the Civil War make a regular appearance.
I will correct myself: Prof. Turley has written about aspects of Alex Jones legal troubles. Those Turley columns you swiftly commented on, criticizing Professor Turley – while today you lied again by posting that Prof. Turley has never written about Alex Jones.
You are as much a liar as you are a racist, Confederate George. Filthy from the top of your hair above your bile filled brain, to the bottom of your police state fascist jackboots.
George our Confederate Constitutional racist and liar posted this supposed statement of fact:
Many on this blog believed or agreed with Alex Jones when he was peddling conspiracy theories
One unsupportable statement of fact deserves a similar response:
George and every single other Soviet Democrat who spent YEARS pitching the Soviet Democrats’ “Russia Dossier” lie KNEW for a fact it was a lie.
They KNEW it was lie that was illegally commissioned and paid for by Obama, Clinton, Biden and the DNC. Illegally written by their chosen author, one of Putin’s FSB apparatchiks in America, under investigation for espionage at the time the Soviet Democrats illegally hired and paid him to write that “dossier” for their 2016 campaign.
At one time over 80% of Soviet Democrat voters surveyed believed the Soviet Democrats’ “Russia Dossier” political conspiracy theory. What percentage still believe that conspiracy theory you peddled and continue to peddle, Confederate George?
(yes, I do despise modern day Kluxxers who try to make constitutional arguments for deporting black Americans who were born in America, because they’re only property, not human beings. Won’t hide that as long as it pops up – off topic, deliberately – from Confederate George on a weekly basis)
So let me get this straight… Trump set this all up… He hired the assassin…to graze his head. He negotiated with Biden’s secret service to stand down because they knew that the assassin was there on Trump’s orders ???? Exactly HOW was this staged? I she (and others) claiming that Trump and Biden were in cahoots to stage an assassination so that Trump would get more votes? Did she get these ideas from CNN or MSNBC? Trump better go 3X on his personal security from here on…
President Trump having a blood capsule taped to his ear was the best one I read.
More sycophants obediently chime in
Ah, yes……the mating call of the Democrats.