“For posterity’s sake.” Those words from President Joe Biden sum up the crushing impact of the leaked audiotapes from the interview between then-President Joe Biden and Special Counsel Robert Hur. Not only did they remove any serious doubt over Biden committing the federal crimes charged against President Donald Trump, but they also constituted what is akin to a political racketeering indictment against much of the Washington establishment.
The interview from Oct. 8-9, 2023, has long been sought by Congress, but was kept under wraps by the government even as Biden campaigned for a second term.
Many of us balked at Hur’s conclusion that no charges were appropriate despite the fact that the President removed classified material for decades, stored it in grossly negligent ways, and moved it around to unsecure locations, including his garage in Delaware.
Given President Donald Trump’s indictment for the same offenses, it was hard to imagine how the Special Counsel could not recommend the same criminal charges (presumably after he left office).
Instead, Hur declared it would have been hard to get a jury to convict Biden because he was “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”
It appears that Trump, on the other hand, was presumptively not sympathetic or well-meaning and possessed a good memory for prosecution.
The contrast was glaring and only reinforced the view of many citizens that there are two tracks for justice in Washington.
Soon after the report’s release, President Biden gave an irate press conference in which he lied about the findings of his culpability and lashed out at any suggestion that he had gapped or stumbled in the interview.
For example, when reporters raised how Biden forgot when his son Beau died, Biden angrily responded, “How in the hell dare he raise that?” Frankly, when I was asked the question I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business.”
However, it was not Hur but Biden himself who raised the death of his son, and he forgot a wide array of dates, including when he served in office.
Nevertheless, media outlets like the Atlantic followed the lead of the White House in attacking Hur for “misleading” the public on Biden’s memory.
The interview shows that in 2023 it was clear that Biden was mentally diminished despite claims from many allies and former aides that there was a sudden loss of capacity just before the disastrous debate in 2024. It is now undeniable that the White House staff actively hid the president’s incompetence from the American public. That includes questions over the assurances of White House press secretary Jen Psaki (who left her post in May 2022) and Karine Jean-Pierre who portrayed Biden as sharp and running circles around the staff.
Of course, the media is now covering the story after the public saw the truth in the debate. Figures like CNN’s Jake Tapper have even written books that belatedly pursue the question despite previously insisting that there was no evidence of a diminishment in Biden’s mental state.
Tapper repeatedly dismissed the claim and even mocked Lara Trump for raising it. In one interview, he pushed a White House talking point that such suggestions were mocking Biden for a childhood stutter:
“It’s so amazing to me- a ‘cognitive decline.’ I think you were mocking his stutter. Yeah. I think you were mocking his stutter and I think you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody’s cognitive decline. I would think somebody in the Trump family would be more sensitive to people who do not have medical licenses diagnosing politicians from afar.”
When Lara Trump insisted that this was clearly evidence of a “very concerning” cognitive decline, Tapper dismissed her statement by saying “Thank you, Lara. I’m sure it’s from a place of concern. We all believe that.”
Keep in mind that others beyond Lara Trump were raising this issue and there were tapes showing physical and mental diminishment. The media simply refused to seriously pursue the story until the cover-up no longer mattered after the debate.
Over on MSNBC, Joe Scarborough was equally apoplectic at those raising the issue and stated
“start your tape right now because I’m about to tell you the truth. And F— you if you can’t handle the truth. This version of Biden intellectually, analytically, is the best Biden ever. Not a close second. And I have known him for years…If it weren’t the truth I wouldn’t say it
This media effort continued all the way up to the debate itself. On CNN, Oliver Darcy wrote, “Right-wing media figures are desperately pushing conspiracy theories about Biden ahead of the debate.”
Once the public found out, the media was ready to tell the story when there was no longer any advantage or ability to deny it. Articles began to appear with the same realization of “Oh you meant THAT mental decline. Well sure.”
It was the same belated acknowledgment that came, after the election, with Hunter Biden’s laptop. The media just moved on with a shrug and a collective “our bad” concession.
As for the President himself, the one moment of clarity in the interview may have been his most incriminating line. When asked why he removed classified material on Afghanistan, Biden admitted “I guess I wanted to hang on to it for posterity’s sake.”
That is precisely what critics on CNN and MSNBC accused Trump of doing: removing material as types of keepsakes or trophies.
One president was indicted for that and one was sent along his way to a second term in office.
The real indictment that comes out of these tapes is a type of political racketeering enterprise by the Washington establishment. It took a total team effort from Democratic politicians to the White House staff to the media to hide the fact that the President of the United States was mentally diminished. If there were a political RICO crime, half of Washington would be frog-marched to the nearest federal courthouse.
Of course, none of this complicity in the cover-up is an actual crime. It is part of the Washington racket.
After all, this is Washington, where such duplicity results not in plea deals but book deals.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
This column ran in Fox com
Every person who worked in the Biden WH, or Cabinet, should have their Security Clearance revoked With Prejudice.
Maybe someone walking on a beach will find shells arranged to read “86 46.”
THAT would get the left-wing media’s attention, would it not.
Bottom line: only the elite escape punishment. Regular folks or civil servants would go to jail for doing what Trump and Biden did.
Equal Justice under law – not!
Jen Psaki and Karine Jean-Pierre are simply two more examples of the pathological liars that infest the democratic party. Absolutely nothing that the democrats say can be believed, and they have proven it countless times in the last 8 years alone.
“That is precisely what critics on CNN and MSNBC accused Trump of doing: removing material as types of keepsakes or trophies.
One president was indicted for that and one was sent along his way to a second term in office.”
Yet, only one was actually the President when he “took” them, whilst the other stole his classified documents in the years before when he was only a Senator from a SKIF
Not SKIF, but SCIF – Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility.
#. The bomb article today by Professor Turley!
A link to the tapes? The memo to BO for posterity? They were looking for something specific at Maralago. It must be quite incriminating… probably a sales receipt for military equipment.
The MaraLago raid was about retrieving DJT’s criminal evidence of Crossfire Hurricane I heard a noted pundit say.
OT
I’m getting heebie jeebies with DJT in love with the Saudis. It’s creeping me out. These are monarchies. He left out the part in his speech praising the Saudis- look at what endless supplies of money can do and look at all the money the USA spent in Saudi Arabia for oil.
It’s creepy
My God my God praising a civilization for its marble palaces. The sand dunes they’re built on are out of water. Bizarre unless DJT has something else up his sleeve.
I suppose only the Saudis can afford American labor at 20 bucks per hour minimum wage. Americans can’t afford it. Perhaps this will provide Americans with jobs so they’ll be able to buy the 150.00 dollar Nikes the chinese made for 1.50. At least there’s that.
We see darkly through a glass now but then face to face.
Good Grief! All I read of today’s potty piece was the headline— it’s all my stomach could handle. Biden is not president anymore— so why the harping about him, other than a distraction away from Trump ingratiating himself to MBS, another murderous dictator Trump would like to be.MBS ordered the murder and dismemberment of Jamal Khahshoggi, a US based journalist. MBS also finances Hamas and Hezbolla. Trump’s debasing himself to MBS is an absolute disgrace, and the effusive praise he gushed over MBS was sickening to watch . Anyone with common sense could plainly see that MBS and his entourage were laughing at Trump.
Then, there’s the SCOTUS hearing that didn’t go well for Team Trump, “deals” Trump made for himself for golf courses and hotels in the Middle East by groveling like some pathetic rookie, Putin refusing to meet with Trump and let’s not forget the blatant bribe of the 13 year old used aircraft that Qatar has been trying to unload for a couple of years but never got any buyers for. But the disciples need affirmation, so Turley diverts attention from the daily Trump fiasco to harp about Joe Biden.
Regardless of anything Turley writes, Biden is still a much more successful POTUS than Trump could ever hope to be and is still one of the most successful Presidents in recent history. Trump keeps setting records for low approval ratings, damage to the economy, failure to pass any meaningful legislation and getting EOs reversed by Courts.
“Biden is not president anymore— so why the harping about him”
Because it is an example of another in the very long list of egregious lies that you, the MSM, democrats and the left have told over the years.
Big lies.
Because we are still dealing with the fallout of Biden’s disasterous presidency and we still do not even know who the real president was at the time.
“a distraction away from Trump ingratiating himself to MBS”
As did Biden. Though there is a difference. Trump gets what he wants,
Biden got the cold shoulder.
MBS is not a good guy, nor is Erodigan and a long long list of other world leaders the US has to deal with.
“another murderous dictator”
Probably true.
Also the leader of a critical allie
“MBS ordered the murder of Jamal Khahshoggi”
Probably. World leaders often do that – Obama did. As did Trump and Biden or whoever was running the country for the prior 4 years.
“MBS also finances Hamas and Hezbolla.”
Almost certainly false.
SA and Iran are competitors for power in the Mideast.
Hamas and Hezbolla were funded by Iran. SA likely funded those competing with Hamas and Hezbolla.
” Trump’s debasing himself to MBS is an absolute disgrace, and the effusive praise he gushed over MBS was sickening to watch . Anyone with common sense could plainly see that MBS and his entourage were laughing at Trump.”
Biden said all the same things. Biden kissed the ring.
Trump left with what America Wanted.
MBS gave Biden the cold shoulder.
“there’s the SCOTUS hearing that didn’t go well for Team Trump”
Aparently we listened to a different hearing.
Trump is with near certainty going to lose the Birth Right citizenship case.
But that was NOT the issue before the courts. What was before the courts was the failure of lower courts to follow the rules of judicial procedure. I do not know what SCOTUS will do, but it is near certain they are NOT leaving the status quo, and that will be a victory for Trump.
I think he would have done better if this was not an appeal from a TRO on the Birth Right citizenship EO.
“Biden is still a much more successful POTUS than Trump could ever hope to be and is still one of the most successful Presidents in recent history.”
ROFL
Biden’s approval rating is still the worst since presidential approval was being polled.
It is 20pts lower than Trumps.
“Trump keeps setting records for low approval ratings”
ROFL
Rassmussen has Trump at 51%. Bidens approval was negative from the disaster in Afghanistan in Aug 2021 and never went positive after. He ended at -18 – ten pts lower than Trump in 2020.
RCP currently has Trump at -4 – that is higher than any time during his first term and Higher than Biden for almost his entire term by 15pts.
Further Trump’s base is rock solid. He will ALWAYS have 45% who approve.
“damage to the economy”
What damage ? Trump averaged higher growth over 4 years than Obama over 8.
“failure to pass any meaningful legislation”
We are still suffering from the disasterous legislation Biden (and Obama) got passed
hopefully we will have no more abysmal legislation.
“getting EOs reversed by Courts.”
While there is a massive amount of lawfare against Trump – he is doing fairly well – both in his first term and 2nd.
This nonsense is a delaying tactic. And everyone knows it.
Trump is following our actual immigration law – and the left is fighting that tooth and nail.
While SCOTUS should do a better job of smacking down rogue judges.
The latest AEA decision by SCOTUS is a disasterous mess, but it is a win for Trump – just not as big a win as he hoped for and should have gotten.
Trump won nearly all EO cases in his first term.
and is likely to do the same in his 2nd.
John Say,
Well said and an excellent take down of the ignorant Gigi. She still thinks American citizens own fully automatic machine guns. anti-tank missiles and grenade launchers.
John Say: If you write the lengthy epistles you post here for my benefit, let me save you time–I don’t read what you write because: 1. you are either paid by MAGA media or you are suffering from MAGA OCD; maybe both 2. you NEVER post any attribution to support the “facts” you claim support what you write, which are mostly untrue, or partially true or which, at minimum, need context. If what you claim are “facts”, you would cite a source so a reader could fact-check you. But MAGAts are fact-immune. Just like MAGA media, you throw out conclusions that cannot be fact-checked; MAGAts have been indoctrinated not to ask questions; in fact, those who want to check facts can never be MAGAts. 3. but you probably write your lengthy unattributed BS as more of the daily affirmation MAGAts need because things aren’t going so well–so you do what MAGA media does–personally attack the person who points out inconvenient truths–Democrats are evil, mainstream media lies, Trump is a very stable genius in astonishingly good health–the list goes on. It’s a waste of time to try to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed person like you who will spin facts and attack Democrats no matter what.
But, in any event, it’s not working any more. The majority of Americans are catching on to the truth about Trump–that he’s just a showman, a chronic, habitual liar, a power-hungry loser who has bankrupted and/or failed at more business ventures than most of us could even imagine. That he is a malignant narcissist who surrounds himself with people to head up agencies who are unqualified and who only got the position because they will do whatever Trump tells them to do, and because they will lie and debase themselves by gushing praise on this pathetic excuse for a human being to meet his ego needs. The Constitution means nothing if it gets in the way of his ego. Our way of government means nothing–King Donald rules by “Executive Order”, and then forces people who oppose his mandates to go to Court. When Courts rule against him, he tries to take away the power of Courts. He tried to overrule birthright citizenship via an Executive Order, but has started with trying to get the SCOTUS to say that federal courts do not have the authority to issue injuctions that are applicable nationwide–without anything resembling legal authority. Excerpted from “The Hill”, 4/2/25:
“Donald Trump won the election in part because voters endorsed his broadly stated goals, if not his specific policies. As I argued here a few weeks ago though, the worm is turning on the president. That’s partly because Americans fear he’s gone too far.
Voters wanted a president who would be “tougher” on immigration. But as I reported, they rejected Trump’s plan to deport everyone who is here illegally.
The courts have now intervened in some immigration cases and, as concerned as many voters are about the border, most are unwilling to yield total control over the issue to Trump.
As courts enjoined some of the president’s actions, a Yahoo/YouGov poll found only 32 percent saying it was right for Trump to ignore a judge’s order to turn around planes bearing immigrants being expelled, so the court could review the case. Fifty-four percent said Trump went too far, that it was wrong of him not to comply with the judge’s order.
Responses in an Ipsos poll were similar — 56 percent said the Trump administration should halt deportations until they are allowed by the courts.
The Hill’s Headlines – May 18, 2025
Trump then went further, labeling the judge in question a “lunatic” and demanding he be impeached*. Just 26 percent went as far as Trump, agreeing that the judge deserved impeachment, while 55 percent believed Trump went too far and that the judge should not be impeached.
This case is, of course, part of a broader debate about the relative authority of the President — the executive — as against the judicial branch. Only 14 percent in the Ipsos survey said presidents should not obey court orders if they don’t want to. Eighty-two percent, including 68 percent of Republicans, say the president should follow court orders. Ignoring court orders goes too far for most Americans.
More broadly, by 57 percent to 40 percent, voters believe Trump has gone “beyond his authority as president,” instead of acting within his authority. Nearly two-thirds of independents (62 percent) share the view that this president has exceeded his authority.
Fox News found 68 percent at least very concerned that “Trump’s use of executive orders and acting without Congressional approval may be permanently altering our country’s system of checks and balances.”
As I’ve discussed here before, voters favor reducing government spending generally (while opposing cuts in almost every specific category). A recent Fox News poll found 57 percent saying at least a great deal of federal spending is wasteful and inefficient.
Indeed, the majority support the idea of a federal agency dedicated to cutting spending.
But the public dislikes the Department of Government Efficiency. It’s gone too far.
By 11 points Americans disapprove of the way DOGE is cutting spending. Two-thirds are at least very concerned “that not enough thought and planning has gone into the government spending cuts.”
A Quinnipiac poll found Americans saying DOGE was hurting rather than helping the country by a 14-point margin. To take just one example, by 60 percent-33 percent voters oppose Trump’s plan to shutter the Department of Education.
Voters did want Trump to fix an economy they thought was not working for them. But the public believes he is going about it the wrong way.
Tariffs are Trump’s fix. Yet 55 percent of Americans told CBS News pollsters the president is focusing “too much,” on tariffs. An even larger 72 percent think tariffs will increase prices, while voters are focused on how to hold down the cost of living.
Analysts repeat endlessly that Trump won because of immigration, the economy and the deficit. The president is working in each of these areas, but he’s gone too far. Trump’s extremism, his narcissism and his disregard for democratic norms are alienating Americans and squandering what support he had.”
Mellman is president of The Mellman Group a political consultancy. Mellman served as pollster to Senate Democratic leaders for over 20 years. He is also president of Democratic Majority for Israel.
Americans are figuring out that our values are being eroded–from taking food away from starving people, to our so-called “President” schmoozing a murderous dictator who ordered the killing of an Amrerican journalist to get favors and for his own personal business reasons
*a familiar MAGA tactic–attack anyone with whom you disagree, even if he or she is a sitting judge.
Did ANYone at all ever stop “harping” after Trump “was not president anymore?” In point of fact, the hate-filled gossip and law-fare never stopped. Your arguments are typically regurgitation of the same red herrings and potty pieces of the past. As for current events, you may have some claims that might be entertained if your diatribe were not so laden with uncivilized accusals.
You are literally proving Mr. Turley’s point.
Bro, get a grip ….
So basically you’re saying ‘Who cares that the president was impaired & we have no idea which UNELECTED people were running our country during his term – Democracy is irrelevant!’
A majority of us, speaking of democracy, would like steps to be taken to punish them & prevent it from happening again. Trivial as that might seem to you
WHERE IS THE PROOF that “unelected people” were running our country? Where is you citation to a poll proving that any “majority” wants your un-identified “them” to be punished? This is just MORE MAGA media manure.
Gigi has brains of coprolite.
“…..MBS ordered the murder and dismemberment of Jamal Khahshoggi, a US based journalist….”
Sorry Gigi, you’re a victim of mainstream media propaganda.
He was neither a dissident nor a journalist.
Khashoggi had requested $2 million from the Saudi government for a think tank in Washington, which, according to the article, would “work on behalf of Riyadh ‘to regain its positive role and image.’” In other words, he was brokering his services to influence U.S. policy and public opinion on behalf of MBS, until he was pulled in the other direction—by Saudi Arabia’s Gulf Cooperation Council rival, Qatar.
The entire story about Khashoggi—that he was a U.S. person, a dissident, a journalist—was false. He was a Saudi national whose murder was used to launch a successful intelligence operation targeting his home country and U.S. policy. The news was fake, but the information campaign set off by his murder was real.
Excerpted from “Wikipedia”:
“On 2 October 2018, Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi dissident journalist, was killed by agents of the Saudi government at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.[4][5] Khashoggi was ambushed and strangled by a 15-member squad of Saudi operatives.[6][7] His body was dismembered and disposed of in some way that was never publicly revealed.[8] The consulate had been secretly bugged by the Turkish government and Khashoggi’s final moments were captured in audio recordings, transcripts of which were subsequently made public.[9][6][10]
The New York Times reported in June 2019 that Saudi government engaged in an extensive effort to cover up the killing, including destroying evidence.[7] By 16 October, separate investigations by Turkish officials and The New York Times had concluded that the murder was premeditated and that some members of the Saudi hit team were closely connected to Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia.[11]*
After repeatedly shifting its account of what happened to Khashoggi in the days following the killing, the Saudi government admitted on 25 October that he had been killed in a premeditated murder,[12][13] but denied that the killing took place on the orders of bin Salman.[12][14][15] Bin Salman said he accepted responsibility for the killing “because it happened under my watch” but asserted that he did not order it.[6]
By November 2018, the US Central Intelligence Agency had concluded that bin Salman had ordered the murder.[1] In the same month, the United States levelled sanctions against 17 Saudis over the murder, but did not sanction bin Salman himself.[16] President Donald Trump disputed the CIA assessment, expressed support for bin Salman, and stated that the investigation into Khashoggi’s death had to continue.[17]**
The murder prompted intense global scrutiny and criticism of the Saudi government.[18] A report by the United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions in June 2019 concluded that Khashoggi’s murder was premeditated and called for a criminal investigation by the UN and, because Khashoggi was a resident of the United States, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation.[7][18] Saudi prosecutors rejected the findings of the UN investigation and again asserted that the killing was not premeditated.[18]
In January 2019, trials began in Saudi Arabia against 11 Saudis accused of involvement in Khashoggi’s murder.[19][18] In December 2019, following secretive proceedings, three defendants were acquitted; five were sentenced to death; and three others were sentenced to prison.[18] Two of the acquitted defendants, Saud al-Qahtani and Ahmed al-Asiri, were high-level Saudi security officials. The five men sentenced to death were low-level participants and were pardoned in May 2020 by Khashoggi’s children.[18][20] The results of the trial were criticized by Agnès Callamard, then-UN Special Rapporteur who investigated the murder.[18]”
To Mike: each of the numbers in the above piece ties to a footnote that sets forth the source of the facts cited. You cite NOTHING to support what you claim.
*This is “MBS” that Trump grovels to.
**Of course, The Donald “disputes” what our own CIA concluded.
And, Khashoggi was lured to go to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to obtain a copy of a divorce decree from a previous marriage because he was intending to get married in the US and was told that he had to go to that consultate to get the necessary paperwork. THAT’s why it was concluded that the murdere was premeditated.
Wow, you would make a great reporter for MSNBC or for The Atlantic. You’ve got every narrative and paranoid delusion and lie down pat.
You should see a doctor for your Trump derangement syndrome. Biden was a crook and a puppet. The open border disaster will take years to clean up.
Hey gigi. Who was using the Auto-pen? Hmmm
Excerpted from “The New Republic”:
“Donald Trump got back into his hobby of sucking up to autocratic dictators Tuesday, when the U.S. president made several effusive comments about Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
During a rambling address at a Saudi investment forum in Riyadh, the president showered the head of the country’s royal family with praise, touting the crown prince as an “incredible man.”
“We have great partners in the world, but we have none stronger, and nobody like the gentleman that’s right before me, he’s your greatest representative, your greatest representative,” Trump said, as MBS beamed up at him from the audience.
“And if I didn’t like him, I would get out of here so fast. You know that don’t you? He knows me well,” Trump said. “I do, I like him a lot. I like him too much, that’s why we give so much, you know? Too much. I like you too much!”
But who exactly does the president like so much? The 39-year-old prince rules over a modern surveillance state, where political dissent is not tolerated, and human rights standards are abysmal. MBS also serves as the chairman of Saudi Arabia’s massive sovereign wealth fund that has both facilitated and benefited from rights violations.
But still, a drowsy-sounding Trump couldn’t help from gushing over the kingdom.
“We are rockin’, the United States is the hottest country—with the exception of your country, I have to say, right?” Trump joked, addressing MBS in the crowd.
“I’m not going to take that on. No, Mohammed, I’m not gonna take that on. Wouldn’t that be a terrible thing if I made that full statement. I will not do it. You’re hotter! At least as long as I’m up here, you’re hotter.”
“I LIKE HIM TOO MUCH”?
“Biden is not president anymore— so why the harping about him,” Oh, I don’t know. It might be nice to know who was actually running our country….
I think President Autopen may have committed forgery.
Imagine Biden is in Neverland and a White House aide decides to sit down and sign executive orders and pardons, imitating Biden’s signature as best he can. Maybe pardoning himself while he is at it.
Isn’t that forgery? Yes, it looks like forgery enough to at least warrant a criminal investigation.
Does it become less of a forgery if his hand-drawn forgery isn’t good enough and he uses a machine to sketch it instead? Does the machine magically convert a forgery into something legitimate? No. It is still a forgery….and maybe much more depending on what the intention of the forgery is.
President Autopen should he worried. Somebody will talk…maybe somebody already has.
Yes, it is and forgeries are graven images. Imitations, fraud , theft…true.
He needn’t have signed anything on the otherhand. There’s no signature required in the power to pardon. He has no idea what he’s done.
Drugs and electroshock…
“There’s no signature required in the power to pardon. ”
Maybe not for a true pardon but if you are trying to fake one then you will want to provide evidence–forged evidence.
“He has no idea what he’s done. Drugs and electroshock…”
If you mean Biden, then in that state he has no power to pardon, or execute a will or sign a contract. The power to do those things requires that one be of sound mind and capable of understanding what he is doing.
You can be sure of one thing. This will be the biggest cover-up of all time.
gee you did not notice when he said he got to the Senate 180 years ago.
Lots of people knew, but a few knew better:
Jill Biden-pulled one over on the good We The People. Sedition and Conspiracy.
JAKE SULLIVAN-the primary perpetrator of this Weekend At Bernie’s facade, er, Conspiracy to hold power, Sedition against We The People should be INDICTED! ASAP!
MERRICK GARLAND- after Garland heard Special Counsel Hur, he had an obligation to We The People to effect disclosure to us and Congress! DAMN IT TO HELL! HE did NOTHING to protect and serve We The People!! Conspiracy and Malicious Sedition!
These are the closest people but far from all that are culpable. Save the “plausible deniability”! That dog doesn’t hunt! If I knew all the way out in fly-over OKLAHOMA, We The People, all of us knew.
Now, yes, THAT WHAT NOW, is time to ask the question of who?, who benefited?, who got paid?, who did it for power, status and prestige?, who was giving order?, why didn’t the AG adhere to his OATH?,…
Yes, THAT WHAT NOW!
The list of indictees is long and distinguished!!!!!!!!
There is a glaring grammar issue with the title of this article. Do better.
Um no. Ever heard of a collective noun wherein the members of the group (tapes) are acting as one, in this case the tapes taken together.
OT
Everyone once in a while, some Congresscritters show us they may be afterall human beings with a soul.
Deo Gratias
Congressman Moore Introduces Resolution Honoring Pope Leo XIV
May 14, 2025
Press Release
Washington, D.C. – This afternoon, Congressman Riley M. Moore introduced a resolution with 20 of his House colleagues to honor Pope Leo XIV after his historic election to the Chair of St. Peter. Born Robert Francis Prevost, Pope Leo XIV is a native of Chicago and graduate of Villanova University. He was ordained a priest in 1982 and named a Cardinal by Pope Francis in 2023.
Congressman Moore issued the following statement:
“I was thrilled to hear of Pope Leo’s XIV election to the Chair of St. Peter, and have felt a tremendous sense of national pride that an American now leads the Catholic Church.
“I pray the Lord blesses the Holy Father with the great wisdom and unyielding courage necessary to preach the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”
Represenative Tom Suozzi (D-NY) co-led the resolution with Congressman Moore. Joining on as original co-sponsors were Representatives Tom Barrett (R-MI); Ryan Zinke (R-MT); Ann Wagner (R-MO); Michael McCaul (R-TX); Rob Bresnahan, Jr. (R-PA); Michael Rulli (R-OH); Stephanie Bice (R-OK); Lisa McClain (R-MI); John Rose (R-TN); Bryan Steil (R-WI); Mark Messmer (R-IN); Carlos Gimenez (R-FL); Chris Smith (R-NJ); French Hill (R-AR); John Rutherford (R-FL); Tony Gonzales (R-TX); Jeff Hurd (R-CO); Don Bacon (R-NE); and Jen Kiggans (R-VA).
https://rileymoore.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-moore-introduces-resolution-honoring-pope-leo-xiv
That crazy old bastido almost got us killed by his antics in Ukraine and his Party and their lapdogs media were complicit. Indictments are needed now. Oh and buy True Value stick now as the hanging rope market will be bullish.
I just want to know who was president! I want to know which laws and EO need to be negated due to fraud.
Susan Rice and Tony Blinken along with a cadre of staff attorneys who spoon fed the loon. Faux Dr. Jill ran domestic with Obama’s consent. Can’t you tell?
Barack Hussein “Barry ‘I-Have-A-Statue-In-Jakarta’ Soetoro” Obama.
And none other.
“[Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing.”
– Lisa Page to FBI paramour Peter Strzok
It’s all fraud, mam, for money.
It was being “run” by committee, mam, as the cabinet and heads of various departments ran as they wanted, were inclined and by circumstances out of any control as congress sat numb watching in dumbstruck disbelief. Joe was the opportunity and could have been a talking corpse of some eery kind. That’s pretty much the “who”.
Probably one place to be is with the Amish. They know how to exist without civilization. They are meek.
*86 is for voicemail. The seashells were telling DJT to call his voicemail. Maxwell Comey, agent 86, was transferring the message in the photo shoot. Max found a tiny map in his lunch fortune cookie saying find me.
Military code 86 is absent without leave either that or we’re out of tomatoes.
OT^^^^ JAMES COMEY is dubbed agent 86, Maxwell Comey, for Control agent and spy. The enemy is Chaos.
KAOS
For years I thought that Hillary was the most evil woman alive. I’m starting to think that Jill Biden has her beat.
How can you do what she is doing to our country and still be a member of the human race?
I’m still waiting for Dick Cheney, wearing his Stetson, telling us that he was wrong and that the current Democrat party along with his daughter is the worst thing to ever happen to America. Whatever Donald Trump could do to hurt our country would only be trivial compared to what we are seeing right now.
Yes, you’re supposed to apply the law. Not a twisted form of the law, not a maybe it really means this form of the law but the actual law. Crime is seated within every branch of government even if it’s one tentacle at a time it must be disinfected.
It’s like Jesus said, you clean and sweep your house before leaving but upon your return the criminals are replanted worse than before.
Ask for heaven’s help.
It’s the meaning of the first shall be last and the last first. It means upside down with idiots like Susan Collins, Crockett, Cortez, Greene , Mace, Murkowski, Waters, Harris, mayorkas, Buttigieg, AWOL Austin, jackson, sotomayor, Barrett and so many more sitting in seats of power.
Hold to the law.
Uh hem but they’re very nice people and many quite attractive.
You are spot on!
If we can imply one word of direction from any of the foreign sources of money into the biden family then it does become a real crime called treason that all of those you mentioned should be punished for.
How many leftist cover-ups does that make it now? Biden’s senility coverup, the classified document prosecution/hoax, the J6 hearings, Hunter’s Laptop, the Whitehouse coordinated lawfare, the deep-state COVID response, the 2020 election, Russia, Russia!, the Mike Flynn prosecution, Comey and Co. Logan Act plan and spying on the Trump campaign, the Ambassador to the UN unmasking Trump telephone calls. Maybe the idea of shipping these people off to an El Salvadoran supermax isn’t so bad.