In the 1933 classic movie, The Invisible Man, the local constable responds to a question of the problem present in dealing with the main character: “He’s invisible, that’s what’s the matter with him.”
In some ways, Ghislaine Maxwell may be the ultimate villain for many in the establishment. As the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell was often invisible, an enabling character who allegedly helped Epstein collect young girls for himself and his high-powered friends. As a result, she saw everything and knew everything.
As the Invisible Man explained in the movie, “an invisible man can rule the world. Nobody will see him come, nobody will see him go. He can hear every secret.”
I have recently noted reports that the Justice Department previously interviewed her. Yet, I spoke with her counsel Leah Saffian, who confirms that the Justice Department never interviewed Maxwell over the many years of investigations into the scandal. The legal team insists that neither federal nor state investigators have ever interviewed Maxwell.
That struck me as remarkably odd in a scandal that has involved a myriad of state and federal investigations and reports. After all, Maxwell was the ever-present sidekick of Epstein. Indeed, she was vilified as a virtual scout for new girls to feed the insatiable appetite of the wealthy pedophile and human trafficker.
I have been skeptical that, after all of these years, Maxwell would be sitting on anything new. The expiration date on this milk ran years ago. It has been three years since she was sentenced in federal court in New York City to twenty years’ imprisonment. If she had the “goods” on anyone, she would have presumably shopped the evidence to secure a better deal.
However, that raises the question again of this curious failure to interview Maxwell in the many years that have transpired since Epstein was first charged. Is it possible that she is sitting on a mountain of undisclosed facts on the “who’s who” of celebrities who flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” or visited his island? Figures from Bill Clinton to Bill Gates have been linked to such trips. Most recently, a woman stepped forward with allegations against President Donald Trump.
The public could learn the answer to this question after the House Oversight Committee approved a motion to subpoena Maxwell for testimony before Congress.
The Trump Administration is also fighting to demonstrate its support for full disclosure, following allegations that Attorney General Pam Bondi was withholding information. In a very unusual move, Todd Blanche, the Deputy Attorney General (and former personal counsel to the President), is arranging a sit-down meeting with Maxwell at her prison.
The question is not whether there is much that Maxwell knows that has not been made public. She clearly does have such information. The question is whether any of that information is material and significant in terms of criminal conduct. Epstein clearly hosted a wide range of influential figures, but they have denied having sexual relations with these “associates.”
Many in the public remain skeptical of third-party accounts or interpretations of the evidence. The only way to quell much of the lingering suspicion would be for the evidence itself to be transparent and public. The concern over special treatment and protections for the rich and powerful was magnified in the Epstein scandal, with its luxury jets and private island.
Even assuming that Maxwell has evidence against some of these celebrities, it is unclear whether criminal or civil charges would result, given the passage of time and relevant statutes of limitation. For example, there is a statute of limitations of ten years for human trafficking crimes. However, in September 2022, President Biden signed the Eliminating Limits to Justice for Child Sex Abuse Victims Act into law, eliminating the statute of limitations for TVPRA civil claims brought by minors. It is not retroactive.
However, child abuse and human trafficking violations could still be prosecuted. The question is whether the victims previously made allegations that could now be corroborated by Maxwell. If so, she has something to trade in a cooperation deal.
In the federal system, the government can file a Section 5K1.1 motion under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for a reduction in sentence if Maxwell provides “substantial assistance” in the investigation or prosecution of another person before sentencing.
The key is the word “substantial.” These motions can only be filed by the Justice Department, which requires a witness to offer material testimony to support the prosecution of others.
If Maxwell simply has embarrassing information, that is not sufficient for 5K1.1.
Maxwell could also hope for a pardon or commutation by Trump, which would more likely come near the end of his second term. She could defuse any allegations against him in these interviews.
The interviews or hearings pose risks for Maxwell. She can be charged with lying to federal investigators under 18 U.S.C. 1001 or perjury in any testimony. She would likely explore an immunity grant from Congress to avoid incriminating herself through any testimony.
All of this has made many people in the Beltway nervous. This is a city filled with crisis managers and the greatest danger is always the unknown. Maxwell is the ultimate example of the menace of the unknown. As the Invisible Man himself explained, “Suddenly I realized the power I held, the power to rule, to make the world grovel at my feet.”
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
Don’t know her, but let’s give Pam Bondi the benefit of the doubt that she has fidelity to her oath to the Florida legal bar and a genuine devout Christian woman.
Epstein, Maxwell and Trump have serious conflicts-of-interest with the State of Florida. Bondi was the Florida Attorney General.
If Bondi has the integrity we hope she has, Bondi would have to recuse herself from this case and appoint a Special Counsel to continue this investigation.
For example: if Epstein committed crimes in Florida and a victim reported that crime to the Florida authorities, Bondi would have either ignored or conducted an investigation into Epstein, Maxwell and Trump. The local Florida DA would have been supervised by then Florida AG Pam Bondi.
There is no connection to Trump. How can one have a conflict of interest if there is no association? Nice try though.
Pam Bondi told Trump in May 2025 that he was in the Epstein files.
There are photographs and other solid evidence that Epstein and Trump were very good friends. Bondi was the lead Florida prosecutor when these crimes happened. That’s a clear conflict of interest requiring recusal.
First of all, “very good friends” is a complete fabrication. Nice try, again. Bondi wasn’t in on the Florida trial as far as I know, and just because she was higher up in the prosecutorial chain doesn’t mean much of anything. There is no conflict here, you’re just desperately reaching.
We knew Trump was in the Epstein files to the extent of 7 flight manifests between Palm Springs and Teterboro, and a handful of pink While You Were Out messages
The Independent Counsel act expired in 1999. Any “special counsel” would have to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, to be legally valid.
It’s hilarious that low-rent pseudo-intellectual George is ignoring the fact that U.S. District Judge Robin L. Rosenberg, appointee of Barack Obama, is holding back the release of Epstein grand jury testimony. The conspiracy runs deep!
Judges withhold personal identifying information of crime victims in Grand Jury testimony.
For example: if Epstein raped one of your children, the judge would withhold your child’s name so they wouldn’t be attacked by press organizations and victimized again.
Oh, so we’re moving the goalposts now? Noted.
This is just the Trump administration trying to release the so-called Epstein files, and some Obama judge is blocking that, but no big deal. Gotcha.
The proverbial “Don’t ask the question, if you can’t stand the answer”!
The Epstein case is a fascinating international conspiracy theory involving both alleged organized blackmail and alleged organized blackmail protection. It isn’t clear whether anything Maxwell claims to have heard or seen would necessarily rise to the level of evidence of a crime.
If Joe Biden had that kind of dirt on Trump, it would have been leaked years ago with great fanfare. Joe was spectacular in his hypocrisy because he knew the media would hide his sins from his supporters while publishing scurrilous lies about Trump. Professor Derschowitz has already debunked the Trump hoaxes concerning Epstein.
I’m quite done with this Epstein crap. We can speculate all day about the latest bimbo eruptions. There will always be more because the Democrats have a limitless supply of perjurers looking for 15 minutes of fame.
And I don’t care what Maxwell’s testimony might “reveal.” Maxwell might spin a deal with either side. She’s a psychopath. Deals are funhouse mirrors with such people. The truth isn’t even a factor.
MAGA has strong split opinions about this, and Democrats exploit this by spinning fresh hoaxes in real time to split the base. This is so stupid of our side to be played by these deviants like this.
The supposed split is not as serious as the media is playing it out to be. Last poll that I saw had Trump’s numbers UP among Republicans. Anyone not a compete moron like George here knows that there’s nothing to this invented scandal.
That’s good news. Thanks.
@Diogenes
I saw that too, there is no split. Even if there was, the dems are simply displaying their hubris again thinking it would mean anyone with a functioning braincell would choose the DNC instead. They really can’t accept that we voted against all the modern left does, stands for, and is. They just can’t do it. And they are incapable of considering most are not as myopic, petty, and binary as they are in their ideology and thinking.
“anyone with a functioning braincell”
So, not Democrats. Yep, you nailed it in one.
*. DJT had the Miss Universe Pageant as the debutante ball. They were all 18.
Epstein island was Epstein’s stable for personal use and what the girls did on their own was their business. Did Andrew pay anyone or leave a tip? This is 🤪.
The men and women clients were billionaire finance. The list you want and more interesting are the scientists and geniuses who invested. There’s no evidence of blackmail. Money is easy by IQ.
No one wanted to marry the young ladies. The young women could have left unlike true victims in cellars and on streets with pimps taking the money the girls earn.
It’s insane with names like Marvin Minsky of MIT being part of the crowd. I’m more interested in the collective brain trust than this sordid story.
*. ^^^ I’ll give DJT a pass on this. He’s a rules guy–> no drugs, no cigarettes, no alcohol and no underage girls. His interest is in the accumulation of wealth. He won’t compromise that interest.
Liked the Invisble Man, 1933, reminder. I wonder if Andrew had proposed marriage to Guifree and they skipped off to France for the rites, if she would have accepted. One thing is for certain. There are no blacks involved. Dodged that bullet.
Thanks, PT, and does AI have freedom of speech and press? I hope not, Asimov.
Spot on! Excellent thought and analysis!
“Squirrel!!!”
This so called “scandal” is being dragged up to feed the 24/7 news monster.
I followed the Watergate scandal with fascination. What happened there pales In comparison to the abuse of government power that occurred within the later part of the Obama administration’s efforts to kneecap incoming President Trump. They spent tens of millions of dollars and impeded the administration and the operation of government. Bleach Bit, smashing government phones, falsifying warrants, withholding information, lying before Congress, etc.
Brennon, Clapper, Comey are going to have to lawyer up. They destroyed the careers of many people in the wake of their criminal arrogance. The man who is going to really have to lawyer up is Adam Schiff. He now has immunity. If he lies under oath, he will face perilous consequences. He can’t simply deploy the “Potomac Two Step” and develop amnesia.
Obama will skate on this one.
Meanwhile, the bizarre fixation on the Epstein “scandal” is, well, bizarre.
The left is full of pedophiles, so naturally they assume that everyone else is a pedophile like them.
…. in September 2022, President Biden signed the Eliminating Limits to Justice for Child Sex Abuse Victims Act into law, eliminating the statute of limitations for TVPRA civil claims brought by minors. It is not retroactive. However, child abuse and human trafficking violations could still be prosecuted.
Reports have been published that Biden’s admin enabled human trafficking and child abuse.
HHS WHISTLEBLOWER, RETIRED BORDER PATROL AGENT, COUNTER-TRAFFICKING EXPERT TESTIFY ON BIDEN-HARRIS REFUSAL TO PROTECT UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN CHILDREN
November 21, 2024
“Child trafficking has evolved into an international syndicate of gangs and cartels that is highly organized and very efficient. Smugglers and traffickers, during this administration, have moved many of the more than 500,000 unaccompanied children that have flooded across the U.S. Southern border.”
“Sadly, due to the failed open border policies of the Biden-Harris administration, we have delivered these unaccompanied children to criminals, traffickers, and members of transnational criminal organizations, who are using the UC Program as a white glove delivery service of children. These criminal sponsors are defrauding the U.S. government by using the UC Program as the logistical chain of their child trafficking operation.
https://homeland.house.gov/2024/11/21/hhs-whistleblower-retired-border-patrol-agent-counter-trafficking-expert-testify-on-biden-harris-refusal-to-protect-unaccompanied-alien-children/
Biden and his apparatchiks are hiding behind Epstein enabling Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, et al child abuse when Biden’s people did just that to thousands of illegal immigrant children. Biden / Mayorkas lost these children to child traffickers many of whom were recovered by Trump’s administration.
Once again, Democrats show us if it were not for double standards they would have none, other than lying to Americans because they see us chumps. Happily Americans see them as thugs. When do we drag out the guillotine?
A limerick for these crazy times:
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a General named Clapper,
By trade a clandestine wiretapper,
But he joined the Steele Hoax,
Now his rep is a joke,
And his life is going down the crapper.
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a G-man named Comey,
Who didn’t see Steele was a phony,
He said: “Hilary is Ok!,
It’s the Donald who must pay!”
Cause he couldn’t tell sh** from baloney.
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a lawyer named Page,
Who was lovely but not very sage,
Her texts to her man,
Only helped get him canned,
As they wallowed in impotent rage.
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a spook name of Brennan,
Who loved him the writings of Lenin,
His ICA was a fraud,
Cause Steele he did laud,
Now he’s worried he’ll end up a felon.
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a lawman named Strzok,
Who thought less with his brain than his c***
His legal predicate sucked,
He didn’t care who got f*****,
But now he may be facing the dock.
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a dolt name of Andy,
Who lapped up the dossier like candy,
Number 2 at the Bureau,
Couldn’t out-think a dιldο,
So a lawyer may now come in handy.
Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸
@McAdooGordon
There once was a bloke name of Steele,
Who fancied himself a big deal,
But his sources were junk,
The whole thing was a punk,
And history will brand him a heel.
https://x.com/McAdooGordon/status/1948229283979084121
Sometimes the facts are right in front of our noses, and we don’t see them. The only reason a prosecutor doesn’t interview a defendant to see if they wish to cooperate is that the prosecutor already knows what the defendant can and will say and doesn’t want it on the record. Why? It will incriminate the source, which must be protected.
A crucial aspect to note is how Epstein’s Florida case was handled. Alexander Acosta was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida when the case came through. He cut a secret deal with Epstein’s defense attorney, amounting to almost a walk for Epstein and immunity for potential co-conspirators. Maxwell’s current case before the SCOTUS argues that this deal covered her and she should not have been prosecuted. Acosta had a good record as a tough prosecutor and had handled several high-profile cases. Why then would he toss this one?
Although rescued by Trump and made Secretary of Labor, Acosta was never able to escape his role in the Epstein case. On one occasion, he claimed he was told by someone in the intelligence community that Epstein was a source. That makes sense. For decades, the CIA and KGB launched honeypots to capture each other’s spies, so why not entrust the job to a real pro like Epstein? And we know that he got Prince Harry, the brother of King Charles of the UK.
As I said, you don’t talk with a potential witness only when and if you already know what they might say and do not want to hear it or have it memorialized in writing. Maxwell may turn out to be a valuable witness, but first, Bondi’s people need to debrief Acosta on the alleged intelligence connection. Additionally, even a US Attorney cannot offer a defendant a universal non-prosecution agreement without superiors in the Department of Justice reviewing the basis for it and giving their approval. Bondi should already have all the paperwork from the SDFL and can easily review it to see what reason(s) Acosta gave for allowing Epstein to receive a sweetheart deal.
Wow, ex-Prince Harry is even randier than we knew. And he’s his father’s brother! Incest in the House of Windsor!
Maxwell could be the spy, just like her father. I doubt an interview of her will reveal much, because she is a confirmed liar, and any physical evidence (videos, etc) that once existed in her possession was probably transferred to Mossad long before she got arrested.
If there was proof that DJT was involved in this, why did nothing come from the Biden Crime Family. Their lawfare threw virtually any and everything they had at DJT and yet we never heard a peep about this from them. Maxwell may have something important but apparently she has lied frequently and so did Epstein. Why should we believe anything she has to say now. And the main person who can corroborate her lies or truths is dead and also was a liar.
How do we know that she will just launch unguided missiles at all of Washington with glee just to wreck havoc. What could it possibly cost her since already in prison for a long time.
If it looks like a grenade, smells like a grenade and possibly will throw shrapnel everywhere, guided or not, why pull the pen.
They tried to put a bullet through Trump’s head, but somehow leaking highly damaging documents that they had for years, now that’s just a bridge too far. Sure.
It makes sense to sooper geniuses like our Georgie here, but then again, he has the intellectual capacity of a retarded baboon.
“Biden Crime Family”! Hahahaha.
And they accuse us of having TDS.
Yeah, because normal families need Presidential pardons. How could one ever think that the Bidens had any committed any crimes.
Hey Wally, how many preemptive pardons did the members of the Biden Crime Family get from their Don in the last hours of his failed maladministration? You don’t seem to have an answer for that.
Ahem… P I N.
*. It’s a club of geniuses including Bill Gates and Marvin Minsky. The girls are the widgets to get a list of the genius club, GEB.
It’s hilarious to watch George try to appear intelligent and witty, when he lacks the capacity for either. It’s such an obvious attempt to appeal to the host of this blog, who is an actual successful public intellectual, and who’s affirmation George desperately desires. George here is your typical internet genius, he has heard just enough talking points and has come across enough headlines that he probably thinks that he has some body of knowledge, but in reality it’s all trite, shallow, and meaningless, since he doesn’t know any topic on which he opines to any depth. One day it’s his sudden expertise in FARA regulations, the next day it’s his unproven allegations of bias in Fox News shows. He cannot present any logical argument for whatever position of the day he is claiming, and instead spends a few seconds googling for anything that seems to support whatever point he thinks that he’s making at the moment. And today it will just be something else, and whatever foolery he wrote yesterday will have been forgotten. He’s truly a sad specimen. All we can do is point and laugh.
That the DOJ never interviewed Maxwell adds to the evidence confirming my view of legacy gov workers in general and those of the DOJ in particular! These people are sgt. Schultze from Hogan’s Heroes, who keep their heads down and mouth shut while getting paid, “I know nothing, I see nothing.” Further confirmation is Thomas Sowell’s experience working in the dept of Labor. Additionally, thes DOJ Schultzes turned a blind eye to the gov being the world’s largest child sex trafficking organization.
https://youtu.be/DXV6l-NzkOY?si=BawJLfkIj1lWIe4j
Maxwell has first hand knowledge and reveal valuable info. that a list can’t tell you. She knows all involved and she socialized this crowd. She could blow the lid on the cover up, her live words, on TV, will hit home. I hope she is secure and the TV cameras are working. These are powerful people who would suffer and possibly go to jail. Let’s here what she has to say, in public, not behind closed doors. Dems are pushing for full disclosure I think this will back fire on them, too many powerful DEMS could be named, same with Republicans and powerful business people. Remember the victims have already collected over $1 billion Dollars.
“too many powerful DEMS could be named, same with Republicans and powerful business people. ”
That is exactly why I think that Trump & co are trying to scuttle the potential release of information. I do *not* think that Donald Trump was personally involved. I do think that Trump’s carefully cultivated reputation as an outsider is exaggerated, and that he thinks (or knows) that so many pedophiles and accomplices on both sides of the political aisle (as well as many nominal non-partisans in high level bureaucratic positions) would be outed that it would fundamentally disrupt the operations of Fedgov, which (in spite of that cultivated reputation) is something that he does not want to happen on his watch. That could also go a long way to explain why the Dems never outed any Republicans involved (including Trump himself, *if* he was involved, which, again, I do not believe)
Turley spoke with her counsel and she says neither state or federal law enforcement interviewed her? Ghislaine Maxwell showed in court she’s a prolific liar. I wouldn’t be surprised if her lawyer is lying too. If Turley is supicious about that claim it’s because even he can’t fully trust what her lawyer is claiming. But why would it matter if the Justice Department didn’t interview her? She was already ‘interviewed’ in court under oath and she literally lied multiple times. The grand jury documents that were recently requested would have to show that she was interviewed by either state or federal law enforcement. Otherwise how would a grand jury issue an indictment?
The only thing that is certain right now is the continuing growth of the Epstein files scandal and it is a scandal. It’s funny how Turley is avoiding calling it for what it is…a scandal, because he loves scandals.
Crazy George at it again.
Right on cue, internet genius George is here. Hey Georgie, where is that evidence that you said was all over the internet regarding the “obvious” blurring of news and opinion at Fox News? I never saw you post any, yet you had said it was everywhere. Strange that, makes one think that you’re full of it, but that can’t be, since you’re so smart.
“She was already ‘interviewed’ in court under oath and she literally lied multiple times.”
How did you concoct that particular piece of garbage?
She never testified in court.
Don’t ask Georgie for citations, he’s too busy being sooper smart to have to stop and back up his smears.
Maxwell might have reason to lie – though I can not think of a reason that makes any sense.
One of the problems with your constant pontificating is that it presumes that all people are stupid and do not act in their own interests.
Putin wants to get Trump elected in 2016 – because he Wants the US to adopt policies that are harmful to Russia ?
Maxwell is lying about meeting DOJ because what ?
Maxwell may well be a liar. But almost no one lies when telling the tryth serves their interests.
Then we have your claim that maxwells lawyers are lying Again WHY ?
Many people – including lawyers lie – but not for no reason.
What do the lawyers get from lying about whether Maxwell was interviewd by DOJ ?
Is the epstein mess a “scandal” ?
Obviously it has been in the past.
Right now, I think it is just revelatory of how difficult it is to release information that is the product of investigations that is not presented in court, when there are numerous people involved – both innocent, and likely guilty people who have not been charged.
Prosecutors are ethically and constitutionally bound to speak through the courts. The presumption of innocence means that if you do not prosecute someone you can not “try them in the press”.
Everyone wants all the information on epstein and those arround him. But this has been going on for a long time, and only Maxwell and Epstein where arrested an only Maxwell prosecuted
There are only to possibilities remaining – either there is not enough evidence to prosecute anyone else, or there are so many powerful people on all sides that do not want outed.
Derschowitz who represented Epstein in Florida and who has “seen” most of the “evidence” has repeatedly said that there are very very few names that have not already leaked.
As to specific allegations regarding Trump.
Trump is the most investigated man in history.
Multiple special counsels, the FBI, the intell community multiple administrations, multiple local governments, just about every reportr on the planet have chased down bizzarre and stupid allegations about Trump.
The Biden Harris adin had everything for years – do you honestly think if there was anything regarding Trump they would not have used it or leaked it ? Do you think Mueller would not have leaked or used information tying Trump to Epstein ?
Do you think Bragg or James or EJC’s lawyers would not have used anything they could find tying Trump to epstein ?
The one person NOT likely to be implicated is Trump.
Anything is possible – but rational people do NOT presume that the nearly impossible is cetain.
But you do that all the time.
So what is the likely truth ? Most if not all of those mentions publicly allready and a tiny number ho have not, have through estein had sex with underage girls. In most cases that occured outside the US and either for jurisdictional or strength of the evidence or statute of limitations reasons that is not prosecutable.
Maxwell and Epstein were charged and Maxwell prosecuted for trafficking – which is much easier to prove.
Can Maxwell name names – certainly. But it is unlikely that she can do anything that makes a prosecution against any of these people easier.
And nearly all the names have already been made public
You do know that we can fact-check your own stupidity, right, Dennis?
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=did+ghislaine+maxwell+testify+at+her+trial
AI Overview:
No, Ghislaine Maxwell did not testify at her trial.
After the prosecution rested their case, Maxwell’s defense team presented their case, which included calling several witnesses over two days. However, Maxwell herself declined to testify in her own defense.
Judge Alison J. Nathan informed Maxwell of her right to testify or decline. Maxwell stated that the government had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt, so there was no need for her to testify.
Maxwell’s lawyers argued that their client was innocent and unfairly targeted for Epstein’s crimes, especially after his death in jail. They also suggested that the accusers’ memories were unreliable and possibly influenced by media reports. However, the jury found Maxwell guilty on five of the six charges.
And liking your own comment is utterly pathetic. 🤦♂️
“The only way to quell much of the lingering suspicion would be for the evidence itself to be transparent and public.”
Well duh!
Problem is Trump promised complete transparency. But when he found out his name was mentioned multiple times in the files he suddenlty felt it was not important. That’s what enraged his MAGA supporters which reinforced the implication of a cover-up which is exaclty what Trump is now doing.
Turley’s implication of Maxwell not being interviewed by the FBI and his suspicion that the claim is simply ridiculous because it’s very…odd overlooks the fact that any testimony by Maxwell cannot be taken seriously. Turley “forgot” to mention the fact that Maxwell was also charged for perjury for lying in court. She’s in prison not only for facilitating Trump’s best buddy Epstein’s sex trafficking of minors but for constantly lying in court.
Trump desperately wants Maxwell to help him accuse others besides himself of being associated with Epstein. Clearly Trump is afraid of this getting more out of hand than it already is and he’s the one making it worse by reneging on his promise to MAGA to release all the files.
Pervert Trump is looking more and more guilty of something. Why did he have thousands of FBI agents poring over the Epstein files for anything with his name on it. It seems WSJ corroborated the reporting when they disclosed Pam Bondi told Trump his name is indeed all over the files. What is Trump trying to hide? We all know he’s immune from prosecution thanks to the Supreme Court. Speaking of immunity, even Obama would be immune from any prosecution by Trump for his alleged “treasonous” actions Trump claims. Obama is immune too. Trump is desperate, why?
If there is nothing important why is Trump expending a lot of political capital to prevent the release of the files? He’s scared about something.
Delusional george is here.
He thinks Maxwell appeared on a witness stand some time, somewhere.
Hey Georgie, we’re still waiting for your report on what President Harris and her crack team of DOJ officials are doing about all of your allegations here. I mean, why would President Harris not be all over your well researched and laid-out arguments, buttressed by irrefutable evidence and logic. Hurry up and get on the phone to the White House now before it’s too late!! Just in case you didn’t write it down before, the switchboard number is 202-456-1414 be sure to ask for the Attorney General directly, you’re so smart and witty that I’m sure they’ll put you right through. Good luck super genius!
To my knowledge there is not even the most outlandish allegation regarding epstein that would have implicated Biden or Harris.
They had the epstein information for 4 years. If it was damaging to Trump – even if it had implicated oher demorats – their would have used it.
Anyone think that this tripe makes sense to even Georgie? I don’t. What a maroon.
Trump did promise complete transparency.
And is learning that if you are going to behave ethically as a prosecutor that is very difficult or even impossible to acheive.
The “Trump is implicated” dog wont hunt.
Of course Trump would like the Epstein information to implicate others – we ALL want everyone associated with this forced to wear a scarlet letter, if we can not send them to prison – and that would include Trump too.
No the supreme court did not giv Trump immunity from prosecution for acts he committed decades ago when not resident.
According to those of you on the left Trump has been looking more and more guilty of something for the past 10 years.
So far your efforts to get him have failed.
He is president – because almost no one beleives the few things you have managed to “get him” on and fully expects those to be tossed soon enough.
There was no russian collusion,
Putin wanted Clinton not Trump
There was no pee tape
no secret back channel to the kremlin.
The hunter Biden laptop was real,
And on an on.
Obama did not commit Treason – though he likely did break the law. Yes, his actions would be covered by presidential immunity
But that does not mean we can not further bring the truth to light.
Though many of us are yawning over recent revalations – because none of it is new.
WE KNEW Obama was involved from reporting in 2017.
What separates those of us who have been mostly correct for a decae from those who have been wrong about everything,
is knowing what sources and information to trust – it is called critical thinking.
Some people are good at it – you are not.
“No the supreme court did not giv Trump immunity from prosecution for acts he committed decades ago when not resident.”
That’s “president,” John, not “resident.” The term “resident” is only reserved for Joe Biden until someone worst comes along which I doubt. 🙃
“Obama did not commit Treason – though he likely did break the law. Yes, his actions would be covered by presidential immunity”
While it’s true that Obama didn’t committed “treason” as defined by the United States Constitution. He did broke the law and should be charged with at least seditious conspiracy and perhaps a few other charges to along with the first charge, IMO. And no, committing seditious conspiracy isn’t covered by presidential immunity nor should it be, again, IMO. But that’s something the Department of Justice to decide if they want to prosecute Obama (along with John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, and quite possibly Hillary Clinton) on such charges and a grand jury to decide if they want to indict, not me nor you or anyone else.
After all, if you allow Obama to be given a pass at this, a scandal that some is claiming to be even worse than Watergate (and it’s something I think it’s correct even though I didn’t live through it as I wasn’t born yet) and not charging him, you will be giving Trump and any other future presidents a “free ride” to do whatever they want. Just imagine that Trump did that for Vance against his Democratic opponent, the Left will be raging (as they usually do when things don’t go their way) and may even take up arms over that.
george
But when he found out his name was mentioned multiple times in the files he suddenlty felt it was not important.
*********************
Hey loser, care to show us where you got this proof? Or like most of the stuff you post. Is just you and zero proof.
It’s been mentioned to Georgie before that simply asserting something does not make it a fact. His limited intellectual abilities prevent him from grasping that, however.
George, where’s all that evidence of news bias at Fox News? You assured us that the evidence was available everywhere online, and you’re very smart as you like to tell us, so help us out please. Throw us a bone here.
“Problem is Trump promised complete transparency. But when he found out his name was mentioned multiple times in the files”
Do you mean like the flight logs, which is part of the Epstein Files, and have been in the public sphere since 2022?
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=is+the+flight+logs+part+of+the+epstein+files%3F
AI Overview:
Yes, flight logs associated with Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane are included in the publicly released documents often referred to as “Epstein files”.
The US Department of Justice released a first batch of files on February 27, 2025, which included flight logs, a redacted version of Epstein’s contacts book, a heavily redacted list of masseuses, and an evidence list. The majority of these documents, including the flight logs, had been previously made public through the prosecution of Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell or through civil lawsuits.
These flight logs have garnered significant attention due to the inclusion of high-profile individuals as passengers on Epstein’s private jet.
This website should eliminate “Anonymous” postings. It allows trolls and fools to hide in the bushes.
Wait, “this website should eliminate…” so says the “troll” and “fool” “Anonymous” commenter. Geeezzzz…
Wiseoldlawyer,
Well said! I agree. It is very annoying,
What this site really needs is a blocking feature.
Will she live long enough to testify?
There is another “invisible” potential witness, possibly even a victim that has never been interviewed. That person has been photographed partying with Epstein and Trump and according to a recorded interview with Epstein, he introduced her to Donald Trump and the first time she and Donald had sex was on Epstein’s plane. Melania came to New York a 26-year-old model, working for an agency that used models to sell real estate (none of them licensed). Her entire dating history before Donald Trump is unknown back to one guy in Europe. Everything I’ve said has appeared in print or in books although Melania denies ever being on Epstein’s plane (so does Donald though he’s in the flight logs seven times). I’m not accusing Melania of being involved in sex trafficking with Epstein, I do wonder if she was trafficked herself, a victim in plain sight.
“invisible” got proof? But if its invisible, how can you know?
That’s some nice and tasty slander there. I think we’re done with this topic at this point, since the leftist trolls are now just throwing even the kitchen sink out the window, it’s therefore obvious that there’s nothing here of note regarding anybody other than noted pervert Bill Clinton.
Desperation is a stinky cologne. You reek of it.
The fact the FBI and/or the DOJ did not conduct even a suspect interview of Ms. Maxwell is a scandal in and of itself. Having been a LEO, I cannot even imagine not interviewing the suspect involved in a conspiracy???? The Congressional investigation being conducted now is many years late. Their Investigation and associated interviews must date back to the original investigation (2008) to find how and why these blatant investigative missteps occurred……..
FBI, DOJ did not conduct… You got prove of that?
In English, “to prove” is a verb, while “proof” is a noun. English does not use verbs as nouns. Based on your posting, one can only assume that Mandarin does.
Use a better online translator than whatever Alibaba is offering, because it stinks.
Interesting comparison. I’m sure Maxwell has lots of secrets.
You’re sure? Prove it.
How does one go about proving an opinion, exactly? Who are are you to be commanding anyone to do anything? Who appointed you god of this blog?