In the 1933 classic movie, The Invisible Man, the local constable responds to a question of the problem present in dealing with the main character: “He’s invisible, that’s what’s the matter with him.”
In some ways, Ghislaine Maxwell may be the ultimate villain for many in the establishment. As the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell was often invisible, an enabling character who allegedly helped Epstein collect young girls for himself and his high-powered friends. As a result, she saw everything and knew everything.
As the Invisible Man explained in the movie, “an invisible man can rule the world. Nobody will see him come, nobody will see him go. He can hear every secret.”
I have recently noted reports that the Justice Department previously interviewed her. Yet, I spoke with her counsel Leah Saffian, who confirms that the Justice Department never interviewed Maxwell over the many years of investigations into the scandal. The legal team insists that neither federal nor state investigators have ever interviewed Maxwell.
That struck me as remarkably odd in a scandal that has involved a myriad of state and federal investigations and reports. After all, Maxwell was the ever-present sidekick of Epstein. Indeed, she was vilified as a virtual scout for new girls to feed the insatiable appetite of the wealthy pedophile and human trafficker.
I have been skeptical that, after all of these years, Maxwell would be sitting on anything new. The expiration date on this milk ran years ago. It has been three years since she was sentenced in federal court in New York City to twenty years’ imprisonment. If she had the “goods” on anyone, she would have presumably shopped the evidence to secure a better deal.
However, that raises the question again of this curious failure to interview Maxwell in the many years that have transpired since Epstein was first charged. Is it possible that she is sitting on a mountain of undisclosed facts on the “who’s who” of celebrities who flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” or visited his island? Figures from Bill Clinton to Bill Gates have been linked to such trips. Most recently, a woman stepped forward with allegations against President Donald Trump.
The public could learn the answer to this question after the House Oversight Committee approved a motion to subpoena Maxwell for testimony before Congress.
The Trump Administration is also fighting to demonstrate its support for full disclosure, following allegations that Attorney General Pam Bondi was withholding information. In a very unusual move, Todd Blanche, the Deputy Attorney General (and former personal counsel to the President), is arranging a sit-down meeting with Maxwell at her prison.
The question is not whether there is much that Maxwell knows that has not been made public. She clearly does have such information. The question is whether any of that information is material and significant in terms of criminal conduct. Epstein clearly hosted a wide range of influential figures, but they have denied having sexual relations with these “associates.”
Many in the public remain skeptical of third-party accounts or interpretations of the evidence. The only way to quell much of the lingering suspicion would be for the evidence itself to be transparent and public. The concern over special treatment and protections for the rich and powerful was magnified in the Epstein scandal, with its luxury jets and private island.
Even assuming that Maxwell has evidence against some of these celebrities, it is unclear whether criminal or civil charges would result, given the passage of time and relevant statutes of limitation. For example, there is a statute of limitations of ten years for human trafficking crimes. However, in September 2022, President Biden signed the Eliminating Limits to Justice for Child Sex Abuse Victims Act into law, eliminating the statute of limitations for TVPRA civil claims brought by minors. It is not retroactive.
However, child abuse and human trafficking violations could still be prosecuted. The question is whether the victims previously made allegations that could now be corroborated by Maxwell. If so, she has something to trade in a cooperation deal.
In the federal system, the government can file a Section 5K1.1 motion under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for a reduction in sentence if Maxwell provides “substantial assistance” in the investigation or prosecution of another person before sentencing.
The key is the word “substantial.” These motions can only be filed by the Justice Department, which requires a witness to offer material testimony to support the prosecution of others.
If Maxwell simply has embarrassing information, that is not sufficient for 5K1.1.
Maxwell could also hope for a pardon or commutation by Trump, which would more likely come near the end of his second term. She could defuse any allegations against him in these interviews.
The interviews or hearings pose risks for Maxwell. She can be charged with lying to federal investigators under 18 U.S.C. 1001 or perjury in any testimony. She would likely explore an immunity grant from Congress to avoid incriminating herself through any testimony.
All of this has made many people in the Beltway nervous. This is a city filled with crisis managers and the greatest danger is always the unknown. Maxwell is the ultimate example of the menace of the unknown. As the Invisible Man himself explained, “Suddenly I realized the power I held, the power to rule, to make the world grovel at my feet.”
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
Paul McCartney has explained that “Maxwell’s silver hammer” is a metaphor for things that go wrong out of the blue. He might be onto something, time will tell.
OT, President Macron of France “recognized” a Palestinian State — apparently he recognizes things that don’t exist. What’s more, he loves to reward terror, and incentivize more of it. What happens when French citizens are victimized by Islamic terrorists?
IMO, Bibi had a great idea: Israel should recognize a Palestinian state located in the French Riviera. Ideally Bibi should do so right after a mass-casualty terror attack in France.
“apparently he recognizes things that don’t exist”
Now everyone, hold back on the obvious, unless you also want to get sued like Candace Owens.
Pretty accurate. You gotta love it. https://youtu.be/Q1xR3Xidq84
Good satire is supposed to have a grain of truth. I guess if this is the caricature of Trump in your head, then it works for you. For the rest of us who live in this thing called reality, not so much.
You live in a reality where Trump isn’t obsessed with what he looks like in a painting, where he doesn’t sue anyone who says something he doesn’t like, where he isn’t constantly insulting everyone he doesn’t like, where he’s not obsessed with what women look like, where he wasn’t one of Epstein’s best friends, where Putin is a good guy, where the Japan trade deal is awesome even though they didn’t sign it just like Saudi Arabia didn’t sign theirs and the trade deal evaporated, etc., etc., etc. Your reality is a moronic world of stupidity.
I live in a world where I’m not obsessed with Trump. You should try it sometime. That, or you might as well start charging him rent because right now he’s living in your head full-time for free.
LOL, “he’s living in your head full-time for free.” How original. Do you remember these or do you have a list you copy and paste? May I borrow it?
You keep replying. I am living in your head rent free.
Whatever makes you happy. I’ll be going on with my life now, you go ahead and keep obsessing over Trump. Toodles.
I knew you’d reply. I own you.
One picture is not evidence. The lady actually has no evidence and the picture was before anyone knew anything about Epstein behavior. Get over it, if there was anything credible on Trump it would have been released between 2016 and Jan. 20th 2025. It’s not like she said she saw him on Epstein island or that she had sex with him when she was underage like the accuser of Prince Andrew who also paid in off.
The leftists need to believe.
Like Global warming?
*. The age of consent in Europe is ages 14-16 generally. In 1920 26 States US, AoC was 16, Hawaii was 14 when it entered the union and Georgia was 14 in 1920. 21 States AoC was 18. The switch to federal 18 came in with the 26A and dropping draft from 21 to 18. Consent meaning marriage of course.
Just data
*. Who was the lucky girl that got Stephen Hawking? Names in a hat? Musical chairs?
I don’t know, but somehow Stephen used to get the ladies. Maybe there’s hope for nerds after all.
*. ^^^^Mel Brooks moment
Marriage laws and age-of-consent laws vary state to state. It is not a federal issue and has nothing to do with federal voting age or age at which a person can be drafted or required to register absent a draft. In some states, age of consent is 14, but for a 14-17 year old girl the guy cannot be more than four years older. Marriage is sometimes 16 and even 14 with parents’ consent. Again, depends on the state.
The age 18 came in federally at 26A. Yes , various by States. For transport interstate with other than marriage in mind is a federal crime.
4 years older thing is new or two juveniles aren’t prosecuted. I guess juveniles are incapable of exploiting people.
*. It goes to multiculturalism. The US is the melding pot. Just south of the US are Mexican States with 12 as consent who cross the border. How would they know the age of US consent and South America is a hot spot for trafficking.
It’s doubtful Abrego García understands beating women is against the law. Many Islamic males think beating women is appropriate. The US is multicultural.
PT brought up Hull House in a previous post. Perhaps that’s a fine idea and a way to explain the expected lawful behaviors within the US? It’s doubtful they’ll up anything from msm, tv, radio, concerts and bars.
The Epstein investors are highly intelligent and accomplished men. They do know the laws. Multiculturalism is a strength, it’s said, as is intelligence and education. The clients were all of that.
Children in California can marry at any age, provided a judge agrees.
The age of consent there has always been 18.
I don’t know who is worse in the comments here today. On the one hand, you have proven serial liar and prevaricator George stinking up the place. And on the other hand, you have the Anonymous account who calls everyone a “tard” and then proceeds to call the president a multiple child rapist. Tough call.
Yet, the comments are so relevant they get under your skin and you have to reply. Truth hurts.
Truth like, Harris lost the election? The only Russian collusion was from the Clinton campaign? That truth?
In terms of evidence, wouldn’t the accusations of the survivors formally waged in sworn affidavits carry the most weight? I mean, some of these now 30ish women have decided to put this behind them, having been well paid for servicing men at the parties, and some having received a slice of the $15M coughed up by Epstein’s banks. We shouldn’t expect any cooperation from these women.
The question is, are there any unsatisfied grievances among women who will cooperate? Only in those cases, would it help to get corroboration from Maxwell. It’s really questionable how many of these unsatisfied cases exist.
So you’re saying Clinton, Prince Andrew, et. al., should be able to molest children and walk free.
In re Georgiana: remember, she is the troll who said the Kelo dissenters agreed that property could be taken and given to private developers but they just needed more evidence of the tax benefits of doing so.
That, of course, was a blatant lie. The Kelo dissenters expressed their view that it was always unconstitutional for the government to take private property and give it to private developers. The odd thing is, the dissenters’ position is right there in the Kelo decision in black and white. I guess Georgiana, when she makes sh*t up, figures we can’t read Supreme Court opinions for ourselves.
Don’t blame Giogina-blame the spirochetes.
Guaranteed Ghislaine got nothin’!
She’s alive.
All the judicial “sausage making” will be sealed “From Here To Eternity.”
Maybe Maxwell can sue the Epstein estate.
Sorry, that was “Ebonics,” such as it is, for “It is guaranteed that Ghislaine has no evidence to divulge; if she had, she would be sleeping with the fishes.
Maybe she’s ill.
With all the talk about Ghislaine Maxwell being interviewed and possibly have a pardon or reduced sentence. We should perhaps remind MAGA how much they hate groomers and pedophiles. Guess what? Ghislaine Maxwell is a groomer. She groomed teenage girls to be sexually abused by rich men and people of power like Trump.
Trump is afraid about being associated withthe grooming business. Since he is well known for his pervert ways and bragging about walking in on beauty pageant contestant as they change and musing on dating his daughter because he’s…good looking speaks volumes about why he was such good friends with Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Let that sink in. Trump’s name is in files about two serial groomers and sex traffickers. He’s been friends with Epstein and Maxwell for a decade. He wasn’t naive. He must have know what was going on and let it slide because he may very well have enjoyed the services Epstein and Maxwell offered.
Where’s the Maxwell testimony Georgie-boy? You said that she lied multiple times under oath, and yet it sure looks like you’re the one with the truth problem, as she never even testified. You’re very smart, so obviously I’m missing something really basic, but could you clear this up please? I’d hate to think that we caught you in yet another George lie.
Also George, maybe you could finally show us rubes some of that credible evidence about Fox News and it’s advocacy journalism. And since you’re very smart, we’d love to hear some more from you on the FARA topic, since you’re such an expert in everything.
Everyone has at least one serious fault or flaw. What’s yours, George? Feel free to speak up.
You sound desperate.
Misreading others must be your weakness. Noted.
george
Trump is afraid about being associated with the grooming business.
________________________
Got any proof there george? As usual, none.
Maxwell was convicted for supplying underage girls…to Epstein, and no one else.
From UPI
DHS inspector general: 448,000 unaccompanied kids transferred under Biden
Testifying before the House Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement, DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari said the government had not reliably tracked children after their release from custody, leaving them vulnerable to labor exploitation, human trafficking and other abuses.
“Our review found that DHS lacked the ability to monitor or reliably determine the location of unaccompanied children after transfer to HHS,” Cuffari said. “As a result, children have been released into situations where they are unaccounted for or placed at risk.”
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2025/07/23/unaccompanied-migrant-children-house-hearing/2011753304034/
Where was the outrage by Democrats during Biden/Mayorkas failed immigration policies? There were none then as there are none now.
It wouldn’t be surprising if Democrats employed these children and their mothers considering Democrats are fond of bragging that Americans can’t wipe their a***** without the help of immigrants
Epstein’s list pales compared to Biden’s list of abused children.
The Dem trolls on this board are extremely immature. Like children all they’ve got is false smears against Trump. They are driven to insanity by their hatred of one man. Meanwhile, they care very little about major problems like the hundreds of thousands of children that are possibly being trafficked due to the “Joe Biden” administration’s open border policies.
This is what one can expect from a part that promotes such things as (a) defund the police, (b) men in women’s sports, locker rooms, and showers, and (c) borders that remain open for fentanyl trafficking and child sex trafficking.
Yes, the Biden admin was involved in trafficking.
DOJ is interviewing Maxwell today in Florida.
Why don’t they just use the (non-existent) testimony that George already “saw”? I mean, it doesn’t exist, but George is an expert in hearsay so it should be admissible in court.
Maybe while he’s waiting to download his non-existent Maxwell testimony, George can regale us with some of his deep thoughts regarding FARA and the various legal implications surrounding it. His wit and intelligence always makes his legal analysis enjoyable.
I’m still scratching my head as to why George here would seemingly lie about non-existent court testimony. It’s seems so off-brand for George to lie about something. I hope that he’s all right. If not, get well soon George!
BUT BUT BUT……her EMAILS
TO: Ghislaine Maxwell
Make Recording – Video, Audio, Written … of it All, don’t leave anybody out.
And get them to as many as you can. You won’t be forgotten,
-Never Forget-
Ghislaine Maxwell
Best line in the movie: “I just saw the invisible man”.
Re: Dianna Bec
Point No.#1 – I concur with your analysis.
But if I was in her position, I would make it a point to ‘Tell All’ to her fellow Inmates and Guards, everyone around her. tell as many as she can and tell it all. So if she were to be Clintoned, then there are plenty of people that have first hand knowledge of the information Ghislaine held.
Point No.#2 – You are right again, “Obviously”.
Point No.#3 – Agreed completely. In so far as ‘The Island’ and the ‘Freak Offs’ go they were very similarly aligned, although ‘The Island’ had an International Political affinity as affiliated with Jeffery Epstein’s “Case Worker(s) – Handler(s)” (i.e.: His Foreign Overloads).
Great comment Bec.
Even more to the Point of the “The List” is that it shows an enormous lapse of Security, Fidelity and Integrity of the U.S. Intelligence Agencies. The CIA, The FBI, Homeland Security and The Secret Service. For not Redlining Epstein’s Island and curtailing interactions with Epstein.
The Secret Service in particular has proven to be “The Holder of Secrets” as you consider the U.S. Dignitaries (Presidents, Congress Members, and all Other Branches) that indulged their time at Epstein’s Island, and of course the Secret Service’s handling of Hunter Biden, of which his unlimited debauchery we will never hear of is – stellar.
‘THE LIST’ represents Failure. So be it, whist it’s release or not.
And ‘complicity’ of the U.S. & Foreign Intelligence Agencies – ‘THE LIST’ of Names
I am baffled as to why dead Epstein and his jailed girlfriend are a story after so many years.
Because people generall dont like pedos especially when they are the potus.
Well, your Mandarin to English translator is acting up again, but I think we can figure out what you probably meant to say.
I can only assume that you’re talking about Bill Clinton, who was on the Lolita Express to Epstein island TWENTY-SIX times. Because if you’re talking about Trump, you’re sorely misinformed, as he was there a grand total of …. ZERO TIMES!!!
Hahahaha what an own goal. Loser.
Trump raped multiple children. You know he did. That’s why you support him.
Yikes, you’ve gone past libel to straight up crimes with that one. No, I don’t know that, and neither do you. Wow, what is wrong with you?
“Trump raped multiple children.”
You’d better lawyer up, because this one is going to get you a visit from the guys with the badges. Good work moron.
Clinton was on the Lolita Express. Epstein and Trump partied together on Epstein’s Island, at Epstein’s Palm Beach home, at Mara Lago, at Epstein’s New York mansion, at Trump’s Trump Tower penthouse… Nothing to see there, huh, Trumptard?
So we’re at the “just make it up and hope it sticks” stage of your insanity. There’s no proof of any of your false accusations. You’re absolutely nuts, and you need help. And no, I’m not even a Trump supporter, but you are beyond crazy at this point.
Anonymous, you make accusations hiding. Nobody takes anything you write seriously.
Does the Turley Blog Civility Rule penalize abject defamation?
Yes, that penalty is:
BAN FOR LIFE!
“I am baffled as to why dead Epstein and his jailed girlfriend are a story after so many years.”
Because morons like the one above me apparently think they can somehow invent a story that puts Trump somewhere within this sordid tale. That fact that there is nothing there doesn’t seem to get in the way; they must think that if they repeat some slur enough, it will magically become true. Maybe in the bad old days of media, but that’s not going to fly now.
If there is nothing there then why so much effort to keep the files secret? Why is Trump so worried?
Hey George, where is the Maxwell testimony that you promised? You told that she lied “multiple times” under oath, but nobody can seem to find any proof that she even testified. And you’re really smart, so we’re hoping you can clear this up for us. Thanks!
Also Georgie-poo, can you point us to some of your evidence that’s supposedly “all over the internet” regarding Fox News and their advocacy journalism? I’d hate to think that you were lying again, so maybe you can clear that up too. Thanks a bunch.
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/eostein-trump.jpg
Lawsuits, George.
I’m sure that Georgie has deservedly been on the receiving end of lawsuits before.
“If there is nothing there then why so much effort to keep the files secret?”
Ask Merrick Garland.
According to the Left’s “reasoning,” the party that spent four years fabricating “crimes” against Trump, also spent those four years *protecting* Trump against actual crimes.
Hi there: let’s review, shall we? I ask that you have the moral courage and integrity to respond. Trump has long associations with Epstein; video and photos are all over the internet, partying and laughing it up with Epstein, and more keep surfacing. Trump has been convicted by a jury of his peers for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll. Trump is on audio saying “Grab her by the Pussy” and other lewd comments about women; Trump is a convicted felon; his biographer has reported that he previously wanted to pardon Maxwell to keep her from disclosing incriminating information about him; the WSJ has reported on a salacious birthday card Trump sent to Epstein saying “May every day be another wonderful secret”, accompanied by a drawing of a naked woman with his signature serving as her pubic hair; the WSJ subsequently reported that Trump is mentioned several times in the Epstein files; Trump’s personal former attorney, Todd Blanche, is now meeting with Ghislaine, an opportunity her legal team has eagerly accepted, likely suspecting a quid pro quo will be on the table. Trump is an inveterate liar: Wikipedia has a well-documented page copiously sourced noting that there is really no other precedent in history for his level of presidential mendacity. Trump is staggeringly, gobsmackingly corrupt–to even put him in the same comparative space with any other president, republican or democrat–is farce. He tried to commit a coup in 2020 and then pardoned most of the January 6 offenders, several of whom have now been re-arrested on other charges. He is a lifelong conman and grifter. Under Trump, the Polity Project–one of the premier democracy indexes in the world–has, under Trump, assessed the US is no longer a democracy, having undergone an “executive coup.” This is all called *context*. It all suggests larger patterns of behavior and paints a psychological portrait. And what is your assessment again? And what is it based on exactly? Please muster more self-knowledge and self-awareness you ever have in your life before responding. Please try to stifle self-deceit. Thank you. Also: I’m a Democrat, but I believe everyone who associated with Epstein should be scrutinized and, where culpable, held accountable, either legally or through the court of public opinion. If that includes Clinton, so be it. You see, I’m not in a cult.
“I’m a Democrat”
Next time you should put that first, because it would save anyone else from even bothering to read the rest of your garbage comment. What a load of crap. Valiant attempt at slander and innuendo though. You suffer from the same malady as other leftists on here: just because you believe something, that doesn’t make it true.
I admire the reasoned, nuanced, evidence-based nature of your reply! So much self-awareness! So perceptive and insightful! So detailed and thoughtful! How would YOU self-assess and self-evaluate the nature of your response?
Sigh. I’m not even angry. I truly just have overwhelming pity for you. Nearly all Trumpists follow a similar pattern: refusing to engage with facts. You didn’t respond specifically to even one piece of context I provided.
Because you can’t. I wonder if at some level you know that? That’s the most interesting question of all: is there some subterranean part of you that is aware of that? It’s truly fascinating, from a sort of clinical perspective, to probe the neuroscience of MAGA. Please let me know if you’d like sources and links to any information I provided. More than happy to provide them–proper sourcing of information is a key democratic value. Cheers!
“Trumpist” “cultist” “MAGA”
I’m not even a Trump voter you nitwit, I’m a small-L libertarian but not a leftist. I just call out your type of snide condescension as I see it. You don’t even hear yourself and how you talk down to everyone. This is why you lost the election to Trump, you literally drive people away to the other side with your rhetoric.
Cheers yourself.
Excellent response! Bravo! Third time’s the charm–your most recent reply actually engaged with my original post point by point, expertly refuting each in turn with evidence and credible sourcing, making a strong and powerful exonerating case against Trump, full of exculpatory evidence . . . oops, looks like I misread. Literally not one point from my original post addressed. See how I keep returning over and over again to patterns, sourcing, credible information? Do you see how you again and again do everything possible to avoid that kind of engagement? What would be your response to the two Wall Street Journal stories? Careful! You’ve just identified yourself as a libertarian; if you cry “fake news,” you’ll be resorting to crude MAGA tactics, which you seem to want to distance yourself from. This is such an interesting experiment: can I get you to engage at any kind of sophisticated level? Can I get you to rise above infantile retorts and compose in a thoughtful way about Trump’s larger patterns of action and behavior? So what about those two WSJ stories? What are the implications you would draw out from them? What do they suggest about Trump and Epstein’s relationship?
Wow are you a real piece of work. Keep calling people names though, that will be sure to win them over! Right over to the Republicans, just like we saw in the last election. Whatever you think you’re doing, you’re not doing it right.
“. . . to avoid that kind of engagement?”
If you need someone to engage with your innuendo and random associations, I suggest spending quality time with a good therapist.
Quite likely, because the victims were children. More than likely, because the lechers got away with it. Very likely, because more people are dead!
That’s why.
Are you one of those people who loses interest, stops caring, once the news-cycle is over? … After “so many years,” the trafficking goes underground: don’t think, for one minute, this Epstein-predilection is ended just because one person is in jail.
There’s no way a man like Trump, even if he did agree publicly that his daughter was a fine piece of ass and said he’d bang a 20 year old in a heartbeat, would ever consider sex with a child as young as 12. He said that. I take him at his word. He’s innocent.
20 is not 12 dumbass. So yes, I would believe him. Just because you ,like most leftists, suffer from pedophilia doesn’t mean that the rest of us do. Get a freaking life already.
Quite likely, because the victims were children. More than likely, because the lechers got away with it.
I wish you were correct but my observation is just the opposite. As I posted earlier today, Biden’s administration enabled human trafficking including hundreds of thousands of children. I already posted the link to a whistleblower’s Congressional testimony affirming those facts. Another link follows below my comments.
Democrats made excuses for all of those 4 years, not giving a rat’s behind about immigrant children and their mothers being sexually exploited by cartels. Now their only concern re: Epstein & child abuse is to smear Trump.
Whenever a Democrat starts to moralize Americans, we know now to see them as opportunists at the expense of people because they wish to get back in power by any means necessary. They have no integrity.
“IT’S A PIPELINE”: EXPERTS REVEAL HOW TAXPAYER-FUNDED NGOS FACILITATED HUMAN TRAFFICKING, PROFITED FROM BIDEN-HARRIS BORDER CRISIS
Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security Chairman Carlos Gimenez (R-FL) asked Hopper about the Biden administration’s failure to keep track of UACs once they were delivered to sponsors:
“How many children do you think that DHS basically lost and didn’t have track of during the four years of the Biden administration that were in the United States?”
Hopper answered:
“The reports vary, but as of the last number that we were made aware of, it was over 325,000 children that went unaccounted for.”
[…]
Representative Clay Higgins (R-LA) blasted the Biden-Harris administration for facilitating human trafficking by partnering with these NGOs:
“Much to the chagrin of a whole abhorrent industry of child trafficking that prospered from the open border policies of the Biden administration for four years, 2021—‘22, ‘23, and ‘24. Much to the chagrin of these people that made bank… Mr. Howell, are you aware that ongoing right now, right now in our country, DHS, ICE, FBI, local and state law enforcement agencies [are] working on classified operations to locate, find, and rescue trafficked, tender-aged, mostly girls—we’re talking about girls 14 and younger—across the country that were trafficked into our country in 2021, ‘22, ‘23, and ‘24. Are you aware that those operations are ongoing?”
Howell answered:
“Yes, sir. They’re trying to find the children the Biden administration lost.”
https://homeland.house.gov/2025/07/17/its-a-pipeline-experts-reveal-how-taxpayer-funded-ngos-facilitated-human-trafficking-profited-from-biden-harris-border-crisis/
The 22 yo Epstein story masks the 9 yo story of Obama ordering the Russia Russia Russia investigation’s hamstringing of the Trump presidency.
A pedophile sex ring that protects the most powerful people in the world to act with impunity is masking the story of shoddy intelligence that suggested Putin favored Trump in the 2016 election, which resulted in further investigation that resulted in a confirmation of the shoddy intelligence.
When did Putin ever favor Trump in the 2016 election?
You should learn to read for comprehension.
Maybe you could try writing for clarity instead of snarkiness.
Yes, Michael
Because MAGA has been keeping it alive with incessant conspiracy theories and the deep state.
Trump’s own administration kept promising the MAGA nuts full discclosure of the Epstein files. Then he reneged on that promise because it turns out his name was all over them. Now he doesn’t want to release them. MAGA got mad and got even more suspicious about the new attempts to cover up what is on the files. It’s such a scandal.
Did your crystal ball tell you all this george?? What a liberal douche bag!! Most of us can see you and one of these radical progressive liberals living in mommy and daddy’s basement, eating macaroni & cheese, and dreaming of hugging a bear!! Is that you in the commercial george? PROBABLY!! Or maybe you’re just some 90-year liberal who hasn’t check his depends diaper lately? Go check it george!!
Georgie!! Where is the irrefutable proof that you promised regarding the advocacy journalism at Fox News? You told us that the proof was everywhere online, and you’re really smart. Since we’re so dumb that we can’t find it, maybe you can finally come through on your accusations. Thanks a bunch sweetie.
George, we need your help, given that you’re so super smart and all. You said that Maxwell lied under oath, but it looks to us like she didn’t even testify at all. Hoping you can point us to her testimony, because otherwise it kinda looks like you were just caught lying again. Anyway, talk to you soon honey!!
Turley, on Maxwell: “If she had the “goods” on anyone, she would have presumably shopped the evidence to secure a better deal.”
Three things:
1) Of course, Maxwell has, and has always had, “the goods,” but she wants to stay alive, so she will keep her mouth shut….until….there is a self-preserving reason to speak. Just knowing the Clinton-body-count would be enough to keep ANYone “loyal” to silence.
2) Obviously, there are very special privileges and protections built around the “elites” playground. Regardless of party-affiliation, they are all above the law—in the same club. When their activities are exposed, usually just one person takes the fall, despite many players (perpetrators and accomplices).
3) Example: Maureen Comey was strategically placed [again!] to keep the Diddy-Dog out of a RICO conviction, thus to protect a “client list” that was surely parallel to Epstein’s, many of the same elites involved in the same kinds of crimes.
Dianna Bec, She didn’t tell everything because she was caught lying repeatedly in court. She’s also in jail for committing perjury.
Ghislaine Maxwell made quite a reputation for herself during her trial and investigations. She’s a liar.
“She’s a liar.”
That’s funny, because so are you. Maybe it takes one to know one.
While you’re here, can you give us a link to the Maxwell testimony? Given that she never testified in court, we’re all scratching our heads here trying to figure out why you lied to us earlier. Thanks a million sweetcakes.
“She’s also in jail for committing perjury.”
Please do provide documentation of that conviction.
I’ll wait.
Interesting analysis! You might be right as to some of what you said.