Sean Charles Dunn, 37, appears to have arranged for the ultimate take-out order. After spotting CBP agents outside of a Subway shop, Dunn proceeded to abuse them verbally. That is protected speech. What is not is taking your sandwich and heaving it at an officer. Dunn is now facing a charge of felony assault on an officer. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro now wants to throw the book at him. Just in case anyone is interested in the intersection of culinary and criminal matters, I pulled up the relevant statute.
Daina Henry, a transit police detective, gave the details of the incident in a criminal complaint. Dunn at first walks away before returning and continuing a profane diatribe against the officers, who remain calm. It shows Dunn raving, “F**k you! You f**king fascists! Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city!” Dunn then throws his sandwich at officers and runs away with officers in close pursuit.
Dunn appeared to shrug off the incident, saying “I did it. I threw a sandwich.”
It is a little more than that.
I assume that the charge is brought under 18 U.S. Code § 111 – Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees:
(a)In General.—Whoever—
(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or
(2) forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person’s term of service,
shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(b)Enhanced Penalty.—
Whoever, in the commission of any acts described in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
I am assuming that a sub sandwich is not “deadly or dangerous weapon” (It is more of a deli weapon). Moreover, there was no infliction of bodily injury in the case to justify an enhanced penalty.
However, Dunn is still looking at a maximum sentence of eight years, though that is highly unlikely. His actions certainly appear to satisfy the element of a simple assault.
His counsel could hope for jury nullification in Washington, D.C., but absent a favorable judge or jury, the language of the statute leaves little room for a defense. That could leave defense counsel pushing for a plea to a lesser offense, but U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro is clearly not in the mood for negotiations, posting “He thought it was funny. Well he doesn’t think it’s funny today because we charged him with a felony: Assault on a police officer. “So there, stick your Subway sandwich somewhere else!”
Making this all the more bizarre is that Dunn was a Justice Department employee with the Office of International Affairs within the criminal division. He was promptly fired. (Update: there are now reports that Dunn is an actual attorney. However, other reports say that he held a position similar to a paralegal and his name does not appear on the D.C. bar. If he is a lawyer, he could not be subject to a bar action for his alleged assault on law enforcement.)
Dunn created this incident and wanted the notoriety. He succeeded. I expect that there will be a GoFundMe effort to cover his legal costs and he will enjoy a certain celebrity status. However, while this is not a significant assault, it is an assault on an officer. While he may have been a protester, neither he nor his sandwich qualifies as a hero.
That is why he may have to forget about any light plea bargain.
Now Pirro is likely to say you can stick a fork in yourself because you’re Dunn.
Hey loser Gigi. Troll harder. Nobody cares.
Woof, woof.
Is that what your johns like to hear, Gigi?
Can’t help noticing that my comments about cheeses for sandwiches sold to ICE agents have been deleted.
I noticed that as well.
Apparently free speech is no so free on this blog devoted to “free speech”
I agree.
Your comments are quite relevant and on point
Apparently censorship reigns supreme here.
Yes, a lot of censorship.
You are only free to make speech that conforms to the MAGA ideals.
I enjoyed your comments, but obviously they had to be deleted by the censor in chief, who clearly takes his orders from the MAGA mob.
I really don’t understand why a blog devoted to “free speech” even has a censor.
I agree.
Very puzzling why there is any censorship on a free speech blog.
Apparently there are different degrees of freedom of speech, depending on your political views.
Seems rather autocratic and authoritarian
Sorry, we’re you taking about Joke Biden and his Disinformation Czar?
Could it be that everyone is sick of you and your histrionics? Nah, no way.
Spaz out alert. What a loser you are.
So you want a binky Cletus
MAGA MAGA MAGA. Get new material loser.
Speak up it’s difficult to hear you with Joke Biden’s tubesnake in your mouth Ivan.
Grow up loser. Nobody cares about your pathetic whining.
Free speech on a private web site? So you’re also a moron in addition to being a loser? Good to know.
That’s because you’re a loser. You ought to be used to it by now.
“Can’t help noticing that my comments about cheeses for sandwiches sold to ICE agents have been deleted.”
Did you waste more of your pathetic life again, Gigi? Nobody even noticed. How sad for you.
Speak up it’s difficult to hear you with Joke Biden’s tubesnake in your mouth dude.
Everyone, be sure to point at laugh at the latest spaz out from Gigi. What a total loser.
Yes, it puzzles me as well.
Spamming the blog of a law professor. Such a pointless life. Oh well, at least Gigi has her side hustle servicing hobos for quarters.
I’m glad the sandwich was left behind and not present when police tackled Dunn and took him down.
AI technology has a wonderful way of turning ketchup into blood.
Lin (and Mark F below) – it was the sandwich heard ’round the world.
https://tastepursuits.com/6722/submarine-sandwich-vs-torpedo/
Lin – Torpedo sandwiches. Who knew?
Maybe he can become a spokesman for Subway?
Look what happened to the last one!!!
No prosecutor, judge or jury is hiving this jerk hard time.
Time served and an ass chewing and apology to the officer should do it.
Normally that would be true, but judges and juries fed up with violent crime might be red-pilled enough to actually enforce the law.
I did notice that a few Dem talking heads are acknowledging the crime problem, and that the voters are not on board with thwarting Trump’s efforts to reduce crime. In the same vein, a Dem anonymous commenter below basically complained that 99% of the Dems are giving the other 1% a bad name.
The offenses of 99.9% of J6ers were less egregious than this.
The “right” answer here is to find a way to plead this down while at the same time making a big deal of the fact that Republicans are NOT slamming someone for combining protected speech with minor unprotected acts.
In many ways this is WORSE than all the J6ers. They sought to overcome the CP precluding them from petitioning congress. They did not inherently disrespect the police themselves.
This person – a governemnt employee who should no better, equated the CBP officers doing the job they were assigned – a lawful job, With facism and venom over policies they did not like.
I doubt there are 2 J6ers that “disrepected” the police – Congress, those in government refusing to follow election laws – absolutely. Some J6ers may have disobeyed Police or tried to get arround them – a tiny few even violently,
But they did not blame the police for the misconduct of the rest of government.
Regardless – with J6 being a rare exception this country has a tradition of treating minor violence associagted with free speach as diminimus – and that should be the case here.
Trump should Pardon him – it would be an excellent oportunity to make a speech saying how important free speech is in the US – even when it is speech we do not like.
As you said – an ass chewing and an apology are on order – as well as the embarrasment of getting pardoned by Trump.
There are bad police officers who deserve our disrespect. CBP officers who are doing their job and following the law – are NOT “facists” and should be respected even if we do not like the laws they are enforcing.
We disrespect police who take the law into their own hands.
We respect police who enforce laws we do not like and work to change them.
Assault with a deli weapon in DC:
Number of gang members arrested: 0
Number of crimes prevented: 0
Amount of US tax dollars wasted: $66,667 to $266,667
Number of Subway sandwiches thrown at ICE: 1
How can the DOJ justify prosecuting a sandwich thrower while letting go MAGAs found guilty of felony assault against police officers?
Ignorance stacked on ignorance from the same anonymous. The DOJ doesn’t prosecute local crimes. In this case, the sandwich was thrown at a federal officer. Time for you to get back to the drunk tank.
Meyer – you can see from the time stamps that it’s just a single troll responding to himself like a village idiot. Not worth reading.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a true genius amongst us in the presence of OMFK.
He is so smart that he could deduce that the above comments are from one person.
This is what true genius looks like.
I agree.
OMFK is a true genius capable of amazing deductive reasoning.
I never would have figured that out
Bravo !!!!!!
I would never have realized that either.
Thank you OMFK.
You are a true genius.
Truly amazing powers of deductive reasoning, far beyond the ability of most of the regulars here.
Thank you OMFK
I agree.
Thank you so much OMFK.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
I don’t know what we would do without you.
So true.
We dimwits would never be able to figure that out for ourselves.
Thank you OMFK
I am opposed to censorship.
But the above is just SPAM
Not like what you see in the mirror, Gigi. That’s only a sad sack of crap who has wasted her life spamming the blog of a successful law professor. And you’re just turning tricks under the highway overpass for quarters. Sad.
“This is what true genius looks like.”
Yeah, spamming the blog of a law professor, that’s real genius Gigi. Truly something to behold. Damn are you pathetic.
Yes, I found that interesting as well, and thank you for the confirmation of the ignorant drunkard stacking his replies one minute after the other.
Why Turlley doesn’t insist on a unique icon and name is beyond me.
I’m so curious as to what motivates losers like Gigi here. Seriously, who comes to a law professor’s blog and acts like this. Is this some kind of performance art? If so, it reeks.
S.Meyer
Always with the alcohol related insults.
Unequivocal evidence of projection
We should all be thankful to OMFK for his ability to realize that all those comments came from one person
Gigi, maybe if you’d let the heroin actually finish the job for once, we’d all be spared your god awful boring spaz outs going forward.
Not really Gigi. We all know that you need copious amounts of drugs and alcohol to get through your day, being such a pathetic loser and all.
ATS – because throwing a sandwhich at a police officer IS “Assaulting a police officer” and it is MORE violent than most J6 Offesenes. One person – an off duty police officer was convicted of assualt for placing his hand on top of a CP officers hand on one of tthose bike rack barriers.
Over 1000 J6ers were convicted and some jailed for non-violent acts.
There is as an example ZERO evidence that Jacob Chansley laid hands on ANYONE – he was politie and peaceful and got 6 years.
Absolutely this should be treated Diminimus – but so should nearly all the J6ers.
And now you are going to have a revolt on the right if this guy does NOT get the book thrown at him.
At the very least conservatives want to FORCE the DC courts and juries to show their hypocracy by acquitting this guy.
Those of you on the left have put yourself between a rock and a hard place.
Minor acts like this in conjuction with free speech – even free speech you do not like – should be dealt with minimal charges.
But that is NOT what YOU did with J6ers and now the right wants their tit for tat.
And if they do not get it – YOU are exposed as the hypocrit you are.
This guy should get a harsher sentence than Chanesley – and Trump shoudl commute it.
But what is likely is Pirro throwing the book at him – and the DC judge or Jury letting him off.
And that works too – it exposes YOUR hypocracy.
Are we done now, princess? You all tuckered out?
Senator Kennedy never disappoints. Talking about how the Dem party is now defined solely by opposing whatever it is Trump does . . . and that the “mainstream” Dems are scared to death of the “loon wing” of their party and won’s say anything against them:
We find ourselves in the extraordinary position where mainstream Democrats have now come out firmly in favor of crime in Washington, DC. . . . Chuck (Schumer) and Hakeem (Jeffries) need to go to Amazon, buy some testicles, and stand up to the loon wing of their party.
https://x.com/JasonJournoDC/status/1955971871872090320
Because Amazon is where he buys his testicles.
Senator Kennedy is the current version of John Henry Faulk (who was quite entertaining in his day).
Clearly this type of activity substantially and significantly exceeds constitutional assembly and protest.
Proximate confrontation of law enforcement or other officials, including the projection of bodily fluids, must be terminated with extreme prejudice.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
AI Overview
In the United States, several federal laws address interfering with or harassing law enforcement officers. Here’s a breakdown of some key statutes:
Interfering with law enforcement
18 U.S. Code § 111 (Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees): This law makes it a crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with a federal officer while they are performing their official duties. Penalties can vary from fines and up to a year in prison for simple assault, to up to 20 years if a deadly weapon is used or bodily injury is inflicted.
18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 (Obstruction of Justice): This chapter encompasses various laws related to obstructing justice, including hindering investigations and official proceedings.
Harassing law enforcement
18 U.S. Code § 1512 (Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant): This law broadly prohibits using intimidation, threats, harassment, or force to prevent a witness, victim, or informant from providing information related to a federal offense or participating in official proceedings. This includes intentionally harassing another person and thereby hindering, delaying, preventing, or dissuading them from reporting a federal offense, arresting someone, or causing a prosecution or probation proceeding to be sought or instituted, according to the Legal Information Institute}. Penalties can range from fines and up to 3 years in prison for intentional harassment to significantly longer sentences for the use or threat of physical force.
18 U.S. Code § 115 (Threats against federal officials): This prohibits threats “to assault, kidnap or murder” federal officials or their family members with the “intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with” the performance of official duties, or in retaliation for official duties.
43 CFR 423.22 and 36 CFR 2.32 (Interference with agency functions): These regulations prohibit assaulting, threatening, disturbing, resisting, intimidating, impeding, or interfering with federal employees or agents engaged in official duties within specific areas (e.g., lands administered by the Bureau of Reclamation or within a park area). They also prohibit knowingly giving false reports or information to such employees or agents.
Well, my initial thoughts were confirmed. This man was drunk (or high) as a skunk. Doesn’t excuse it of course, but I bet he was seriously scared when he sobered up. What I also didn’t realize from the initial videos I saw (which were shorter and with no sound) is how he clearly thought he was somehow “on the side” of the Black guys who were filming him. He was getting all amped up thinking they agreed with him when he called the police fascists (how witty!) and then they were all in it together as he started asking them where the police vehicles were. Instead, of course, they were mocking him heartily. I lived in DC for 10 years back in the 90’s and spent a lot of time in Anacostia with kids I tutored. The Black/White divide in DC was then and still is now worse than any other city I’ve ever lived in. Actually (and I’m Black), I’d never experienced that kind of division anywhere else in the US. A significant # of Black native DC’ers despise the White professionals who live mostly in NW (and sometimes for good reason). A significant # of White professionals think they are “saving the world” or working for Black and Brown people’s rights when they would never go near many parts of NE, SE or SW DC and have little to no idea how people live in those areas. The mocking of this guy in this video just took me back and is a microcosm of that dynamic.
Silly as though it may seem, a sentence of one year is appropriate. The assaults on federal officers have to stop and the only way to do that is set some examples. As a DOJ employee (now appropriately former), it’s even worse.
I just watched the video again. Notice the complete calm of the officer being berated over an extended period of time from six inches away from his face, with repeated yelled obscenities including many F bombs. I mean, the way he kept completely calm and focused for so long, only moving when the object was thrown at him . . . that reflects some damn good training. An untrained person would not have remained that calm for so long.
He gets the eve-ho!
“BREAKING: Man Charged with Felony For Throwing Sandwich at Federal Agent Identified as DOJ LAWYER – Immediately Fired From Position: Bondi”
by Cristina Laila Aug. 14, 2025 11:40 am
“The man charged for throwing a Subway sandwich at a federal agent in DC worked for the DOJ as a lawyer and has been promptly fired.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/breaking-man-charged-felony-throwing-sandwich-federal-agent/
—————————————————
–Oddball
“Take it easy Big Joe, some of these people got sensitive feelings.”
Turns out Sandwich Man was a trial attorney AT THE DOJ. Bondi just fired him and he is now wishing he could go back in time.
Now libs please tell us that there aren’t thousands of swamp creatures in the swamp. This guy was so crazy with TDS that he was screaming expletives at an FBI agent and then this paragon of the legal world hurled a sandwich at the LEO. This is how damn insane the left is making themselves as they defend illegals and criminals (pardon the redundancy).
Wow, he’s a lawyer. Snap! Unless the DC bar is completely looney, he will be subject to attorney discipline, probably a license suspension, possibly disbarment. Even though he might become a folk hero like Luigi Mangione and hope for a career lift from that, I’m not sure he would have any marketable skills beyond his lawyering.
“Unless the DC bar is completely looney”
You sure about that? The DC bar even let Kevin Clinesmith back in. You know, the guy who knowingly doctored evidence presented to the FISA court.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/dc-bar-restores-status-convicted-ex-fbi-lawyer-who-deceived-fisa-court-during
Makes sense though, it’s not like Clinesmith did anything truly egregious, like offer legal advice to Donald Trump.
“I’m not sure he would have any marketable skills beyond his lawyering”
The Braves might be looking for a new starter.
“The Braves might be looking for a new starter.”
Pretty good 🙂 Problem with that is whether he could be counted on to hold his temper with the ump on marginal “ball” calls…
This story seems to have many layers and clearly is at times a bit spicy. The description that the professor provided was a good run-down. From the story it does not appear that the defendant is toast. It would be interesting to learn more about the defense strategy or the prosecution strategy if successful – that is their secret sauce. Do they just throw stuff up and see what sticks or is there something better? If this goes to a jury trial, one should expect that the closing arguments be a wrap.
“This story seems to have many layers and clearly is at times a bit spicy.”
Pure speculation! I have seen no verifiable description of what kind of sub he wielded. It may not have been worth eating, anyway: afaik DC isn’t famous for good ones. Need to go to Philly or (even better) AC for the best 🙂
Throw he book at him Pirro!
And if you see BP buying lunch, treat them.
Well I just I never sausage a place!
The lie of “crime is down in D.C.”, ranks up there with “Biden is sharp as a tack.”
So this is what it has all come down to. Even the criminals worked for DOJ, and still carry their service sandwich’s.
——————————————————
–Oddball
“Take it easy Big Joe, some of these people got sensitive feelings.”
What do leftists oppose: efforts to reduce violent crime, and efforts to reduce government fraud, waste and abuse.
What do leftists favor: defund the police; men in women’s sports, locker rooms, and showers; a border open to fentanyl trafficking, violent gang infiltration, and child sex trafficking; child sexual mutilation; and green cultism that destroys America’s energy sector while leaving China and India free to pollute 10x as much.
Why is the Left so consistently wrong on every issue, without exception? Not only consistently wrong, but egregiously wrong.
OldManFromKS,
It is an odd question. Defies logic, reason and common sense. Just read about electricity bills skyrocketing in Blue states where they pulled reliable baseload energy plants off line for unreliable solar and wind. Energy experts have been warning for years that the math does not add up.
“electricity bills skyrocketing in Blue states where they pulled reliable baseload energy plants off line for unreliable solar and wind”
New Jersey. Oyster Creed nuclear power plant could have been fairly easily rehabilitated when it reached the end of its planned life, but NJ just shut it down with no viable source or plan to replace it. There was a large conventional plant located on a bay point near me that was originally coal-fired, then converted to bunker oil fuel. The operator planned to convert it again, to natural gas to comply with more rigid environmental regs, had the plans drawn up and contractors identified. But NJ ambushed the plan by denying waivers for the required pipeline to cross protected scrub pine “forests”, so the plant closed. The buildings and machinery were removed over a 5 year period at great cost, which itself wasn’t great for the surrounding waters. What is replacing it? Subsidized housing, which is not exactly popular with the neighbors. However, I have little sympathy for those nimby fools, since many of the liked to vocally complain about the power plant (which was there before 95% of them moved in). There have been many other such examples in this state, removing many, many gigawatts of reliable generating capacity in favor of unreliable off-shore wind farms, which are now themselves unlikely to ever be completed. From the time we moved into this house 38 years ago, through the next 15 years or so, our monthly electric bills would frequently be $75 – $90, and that was with our kids and their friends in the house, ignoring pleas to conserve. Our most recent bill (for just the two of us) was over ~$700, and there is another rate increase about to kick in. Now, that isn’t entirely “apples to apples”, we did add ductless A/C a couple of years ago, and inflation has played a part, but nevertheless I think that increase is ridiculous.
“Oyster Creek”
Shut down coal, oil, NG, nuclear (best option), give us unreliable, crappy, worse for the environment solar/wind, and yet also put massive subsidies towards opening data centers in places that already have power issues. Seems perfectly on-par with Democrat logic.
-Rabble
You forgot, blame Republicans for all of the problems that their utopian madness cause.
Any time someone says something like leftists do this or leftists do Y, it is not a serious comment.
Supporters of neither political party are completely in agreement on policy.
You should educate yourself on the abundance movement, if you actually care about the topic of government fraud, waste, and abuse. It is a faction of the Democratic party that supports rolling back government red tape to make government more efficient and effective.
Government waste, by the way, is using our tax dollars to retrofit a Qatari plane or sending our military to domestic protests to achieve partisan political points.
“You should educate yourself on the abundance movement, if you actually care about the topic of government fraud, waste, and abuse. It is a faction of the Democratic party that supports rolling back government red tape to make government more efficient and effective.”
Uh huh. And how small of a faction is this? You and two other guys?
“Government waste, by the way, is using our tax dollars to retrofit a Qatari plane”
So in four years President Vance should still be flying around in an unsafe ancient plane? I just don’t understand this talking point. Some plane is going to be retrofitted. It’s all custom work, it’s the same freaking job no matter the current status of the airframe.
“or sending our military to domestic protests to achieve partisan political points”
You’re just mad because Trump didn’t let your pets wreck a major American city for fun this year, like in 2020.
You just disproved your own point. Downtown Los Angeles was in flames, property was being destroyed and people were getting injured, while large-mouth Bass was taking the side of the violent mob while her city burned (that’s after she skipped town while her city burned a couple months before that). By characterizing President Trump’s attempts to bring order back to a state of chaos and disorder as “achieving partisan political points,” you prove my point: the Left is completely looney and literally psychotic – it has lost touch with reality.
That is California’s problem. My federal tax dollars should not be used to deal with protesting Californians.
I am a fan of small government – Trump has no desire to actually reduce the size of government in a way that actually makes it more effective. Trump idiotically made cuts to necessary roles, and now he has had to re-hire many of those positions. That is “completely looney and literally psychotic.”
Also, the amount of pork in the BBB was appalling. On the spending side, the inclusion of the Orphan Cures Act weakens the Medicare negotiation program by allowing more drugs to avoid price negotiation — a boon to pharmaceutical companies. This giveaway required the House to cut even deeper into Medicaid, sacrificing health coverage for pharma profits. And using the reconciliation process as a vehicle to expand farm subsidies that raise grocery prices hits American families twice — first as taxpayers and then as consumers.
The pork totals $534B over 10 years. Not a small government Republican.
https://www.arnoldventures.org/stories/is-there-pork-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-let-me-count-the-ways
“I am a fan of small government”
And yet you vote for Democrats 🤣
“My federal tax dollars should not be used to deal with protesting Californians”
Your pets were attacking federal buildings, federal vehicles, and federal law enforcement officers. That makes it a federal problem.
Whoops, there goes your talking point out the window.
Criticism of pork in the BBB is justified. But the other stuff is silly. Being in favor of limited, responsible government doesn’t mean the government can’t do the most basic thing it exists for: to protect people against crime and enforce the laws on the books. We’re all in favor of legal immigration, but unvetted mass illegal immigration, not so much.
People illegally in this nation broke the law the minute they set foot on American soil, and remember your party’s rallying cry: “nobody is above the law.” “Nobody” includes illegal immigrants. And many of them are a clear and present danger to national security. Biden let in millions of unvetted migrants, including tens of thousands of convicted murderers and rapists, and the number of sleeper cell infiltrators waiting to be activated, who just ambled across the border, is virtually uncountable. I don’t mind the central government spending money on these basic safety and law enforcement issues. To use that as some kind of talking-point weapon against a conservative is the very definition of ridiculous.
“I am a fan of small government.“ “That is California’s problem. My federal tax dollars should not be used to deal with protesting Californians.”
OK. Let California burn to the ground while protecting federal property, arresting and jailing anyone who dares to destroy federal buildings and property. Get rid of SALT so that the rest of the nation doesn’t have to pay for California’s high taxes. California is a sovereign state with the right to commit suicide.
The above tends toward a smaller federal government. Since your mouth is big. Go ahead and comment on how much you like smaller government.
Hey, you forgot the Trump birthday parade talking point. I am so disappointed.
Trump’s concept of criminal justice is confusing. Who is more deserving of the full force of the law: an protester who throws a sandwich at an officer, or a protester who stomps on a police officer’s head?
Trump’s DOJ is apparently prosecuting the former, but Trump pardoned David Nicholas Dempsey after a conviction for the latter.
America in 2025 – if you are on our team, the law does not apply to you. If you are on the other team, rot in prison.
“Trump’s concept of criminal justice is confusing. Who is more deserving of the full force of the law: an protester who throws a sandwich at an officer, or a protester who stomps on a police officer’s head?
Trump’s DOJ is apparently prosecuting the former, but Trump pardoned David Nicholas Dempsey after a conviction for the latter.
America in 2025 – if you are on our team, the law does not apply to you. If you are on the other team, rot in prison.”
Nobody cares about J6. Get new material. We re-elected Trump anyway. I hope that stings.
Great response. Erudite.
Indeed. Nobody cares. It’s succinct and cuts off your annoying whining.
You confuse prosecution with receiving a pardon. Everyone who was involved in J6 was prosecuted, convicted and did time. They received pardons because they were over charged and over sentenced. But, they were most certainly punished. This guy can receive his conviction and sentence and then maybe 40 years down the line if there’s ever a Dem president again, he can ask for a pardon just like the J6’ers did. (BTW – you’re repeating falsehoods about what happened on that day. No one “stomped on a police officers head.” Believe me-that would have made worldwide news. And Dems would still be talking about it. The fact it didn’t and they haven’t is because that never happened).
“The fact it didn’t and they haven’t is because that never happened”
But doesn’t it ring true? Can’t we apply the John Brennan standard here?
Nice one!
“America in 2025 – if you are on our team, the law does not apply to you. If you are on the other team, rot in prison.”
President Autopen pardoned a judge who jailed innocent children for kickbacks.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/13/politics/joe-biden-commutations-pennsylvania-illinois
Whoops. Did you see that? It was your talking point flying out the window.
That literally supports what I said.
Supports what, the fact that Biden pardoned a judge who, for monetary kickbacks, incarcerated innocent children? You’re ok with that?
“. . . because you’re Dunn.”
JT on a pun roll!