As Democratic leaders like Rep. Dan Goldman (D, N.Y.) insist that Antifa does not exist as a group, two Antifa groups — Front Range Antifa and Colorado Springs Antifa — put out a hit list poster on a University of Colorado sophomore and leader in Turning Point USA. He was promptly attacked by a person in the signature Antifa black outfit on roller blades who used a hockey stick to mete out the punishment.
According to a press release, Boulder Police are looking for a suspect accused of attacking a 19-year-old Turning Point USA student leader near the University of Colorado, Boulder on Thursday evening. The attacker is suspected to be an Antifa member and to have followed the victim in the premeditated attack.
The suspect is described as dressed in “all black clothing, a black ski mask, and had a green Gatorade bottle with an orange top in his back right pants pocket. He was skating with a hockey stick. The suspect fled the scene after the victim called 911, and Boulder Police and CU Police officers searched the area but did not locate him.”
Police added:
“In the interest of transparency, detectives are also confirming that they are aware that the victim was the subject of some social media posts and a digital flyer circulated by others prior to last night’s incident. Whether these played a role in the reported assault is part of the investigation, and police are not commenting further on this finding.”
The Antifa flyer accused the sophomore of being “an active member” of “neo-Nazi organizations” and is “responsible for white supremacist, antisemitic, and anti-LGBTQ vandalism on campus and across Boulder,” and also “participated in a white supremacist boxing tournament.” The Boulder Students for a Democratic Society reportedly shared the flyer on their social media. They encouraged followers to “share widely” and tag the school to notify them of a “Nazi activist on CU Boulder campus.”
The TPUSA student was not seriously injured, but the point was made by Antifa that any critics can be tracked down and attacked.
Recently, in a debate with my colleague Professor Mary Ann Frank on free speech, I objected when she repeated the often-used claim on the left that “if you oppose Antifa, you are by definition a fascist.” I noted that many in the free speech community have been threatened by this group, which is the most violent, anti-free speech movement in the United States.
At the same time, Democratic leaders are ramping up denials of the very existence of Antifa as a group in an effort to deflect criticism for their own increasingly rage-filled rhetoric at a time of rising political violence.
Recently, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D) claimed that “nobody” knows what the left-wing terrorist organization Antifa is and that it does not exist. However, he previously promoted the “Antifa Handbook” in 2018 and praised the group as terrifying Trump. Now, however, he has joined the chorus of Antifa denials as political violence rises around the country.
As I previously wrote, it is reminiscent of how, roughly seventy years ago, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover famously declared, “There is no organized crime in America.” Hoover’s stubborn denial of the existence of the mafia continued despite ample evidence to the contrary, from arrests to congressional testimony.
Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) seemed to morph into Hoover before our very eyes, including a posting in which he challenged anyone to “name one member of ‘Antifa.’” The Justice Department then named two in another criminal prosecution of Antifa members.
Others on the left have joined Goldman in this absurd claim. Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel committed part of his monologue to assure viewers that Antifa is no more than a mythical “chupacabra.” “You understand there is no Antifa,” he said. “This is an entirely made-up organization.”
I have testified about Antifa before Congress, published columns on the organization for over a decade, and wrote a book discussing Antifa. I did oppose declaring Antifa a terrorist organization due to free speech concerns, but I also know that it is very real.
By design, Antifa avoids typical leadership hierarchies and organizational structures. Antifa was first created in the 1920s, associated with the Weimar-era German communist group Antifaschistische Aktion.
Many protesters belong to Antifa groups that have names like “Rose City Antifa” and offshoots like Love and Rage and Mexico’s Amor Y Rabia. Antifa members have been elected to the French and European parliaments.
Law enforcement officials, like former FBI Director Christopher Wray, have long debunked deniers like Goldman. “Antifa is a real thing,” said Wray.
Ironically, when many on the left are not denying its existence, they are rallying their members or actually selling Antifa merchandise. As noted above, former Democratic National Committee deputy chair Keith Ellison — now the Minnesota attorney general — proclaimed that Antifa would “strike fear in the heart” of Trump. His own son, Minneapolis City Council member Jeremiah Ellison, declared his allegiance to Antifa in the heat of the protests this summer.
But, with Antifa violence on the rise, Democratic leaders have gone back to denying its existence even as Antifa deploys its signature black hoodies and masks.
The Colorado case shows just how real, violent, and organized this group is in the United States.
Assailant: Roller Blades and Hockey Stick a dead giveaway – check Sports and Skate shops, Skate Parks and Hockey venues – gonna be video of this Guy somewhere.
It’s getting a little old, these stories of conservatives being attacked by teaching assistants, professors, hockey players, etc. Apparently all of those being attached immediately go into the fetal position? Blacken an eye, break a nose, knock out a tooth. Learn some self defense!
Rabble:
Turning the other cheek only gets so far before you’re back facing your opponent. Then again, the police and other law enforcement are heavily biased against Samaritans and Conservatives.
in Florida we carry…attack me and become fertilizer
Yes, thinking of Iryna murdered on a train and no one looked. I’d fantasize being armed on the train and shooting the murderer. I’d be in jail waiting trial of course for too much force. Then id be convicted and serving time. He was black.
No one was injured in this attack. Good news.
Happy Halloween 🦇
Ok, ummm….this is not as bad as Professor Turley is making it out to be. To be clear I’m not condoning the attack. But….there’s a bit of over exaggeration going on by Turley and the student whose name by the way is Nathaniel Ellis and he IS indeed a nazi sympathizer. The reason Turley blurred the flyer is that it does show Nathaniel wearing Nazi apparel.
This is the unredacted flyer,
https://www.instagram.com/p/DQKl1TxD2BO/
Second, from the reporting this attack was likely being slapped around a little with a hockey stick and nothing else. Again to be clear I’m not condoning the attack but this seems to be exaggerated for effect by Turley and the right-leaning media.
The flyer itself is still free speech. All it shows is who the guy is and evidence of his affiliation with neo-nazi groups. ANTIFA which literally means anti-fascist and the fact that Nathaniel Ellis indeed seems to be a member of a neo-nazi group would be a target for an anti-fascist. ANTIFA only attacks those who are clearly fascists such as white supremacists, neo-nazis, and anti-semites. Pretty crazy to think that these groups who oppose Nazis and white supremacists are bad guys.
geroge
To be clear I’m not condoning the attack.
BULL!
I think I’ll “slap you around a little with a hockey stick,” as you so soothingly put it. You won’t have any problem with that, right? Cuz it’s so gentle, almost like a hug…with a baseball bat. You dumb sons of whores won’t ever “get it” until you’re beaten almost to death by your enemies. Then you’ll understand why this is NOT acceptable. But ONLY then. Cuz you’re morons.
Trump condoned that kind of violence. In fact, he encouraged it. He would encourage his supporters to slap around a few protesters at his rallies. I didn’t see anyone on the right condemning the violence that Trump condoned.
“ If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously, OK? Just knock the hell… I promise you I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise,” Trump said at an Iowa rally on February 1, 2016.”
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-told-white-supremacists-attack-protesters-so-they-did-650622
“ LAS VEGAS — Donald Trump wished grievous bodily harm on a protester at his rally here on Monday night, saying he’d like to punch the man in the face and see him carried out on a stretcher.
“The guards are being very gentle with him,” Trump said. “I’d like to punch him in the face, I’ll tell you that.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/donald-trump-punch-protester-219655
This guy, Nathaniel who is evidently a Nazi sympathizer and apparently a white supremacist may have gotten slapped around a bit with a hockey stick. Again, not condoning the attack, but it seems it was not as bad as Turley and the right-wing media are making it out to be.
What is interesting is the lack of mention that a TPUSA leader is a white supremacist/nazi sympathizer. After the embarrassing text messaging leak by the young Republicans and their racist dialogue, it sure seems like the Republican Party’s racist reputation is still well deserved.
Caught in another lie george
______________________
According to multiple South Point security personnel, the man did not throw any punches. Trump “was just over-exaggerating,” said one security guard, who asked that his name not be used.
Yeah don’t use my name… And zero police report.
Sure Dustoff. Sure. Trump is on video clearly encouraging violence against protesters at his rallies back in 2016.
LOL Like the Jan 6th you loons put out these
Every time Antifa’s violence comes up, you run to the Trump tape like it’s your security blanket. Deflection isn’t proof. It’s a confession.
You claim you don’t condone violence while winking at it and lying through your teeth. Quoting rally bluster to justify an actual mob attack doesn’t make you principled. It makes you a cheerleader for thugs.
I don’t condone violence except in self-defense.
“Rally bluster”? ROFL!! Sure. If you say so. His rally goers took it to heart. They did punch protesters at his rallies. I’m sure you were ok with that as long as it was just Biden protesters, right?
You don’t “oppose violence,” you just rename it when your side throws the punches. Even today’s anti-ICE arrests didn’t need your Antifa label game: same tactics, same political mob aggression, just a different sticker. You cheer it as long as the fists land where you want.
Svelaz won’t be happy until ANTIFA is fisting him up his arse, and even then he would casually ask, “are you in yet?”
I like how you drew my words, “as long as the fists land” into his other life.
GeorgeX: “The guards are being very gentle with him,” Trump said. “I’d like to punch him in the face, I’ll tell you that.”
Oh, the outrage!!! GeorgeX was orgasmic in 2016 when The Oval Office House Plant (back when he was somewhat sentient Vice-President Bribery Biden) in 2016 told all Americans that he’d like to take Trump out back and kick the hell out of him.
As if there was ever a day when he could do that. But he said it! Repeatedly!
There’s those hypocritical Democrat Double Standards of yours on full display yet again, you snapping and snarling lap dog following at Professor Turley’s heels every day.
Somebody call Animal Control and tell them some fat lady’s lap dog is running loose, crapping all over Professor Turley’s blog as though it’s the stray dog’s lawn.
You are but a fascist criminal, Fredo.
Of course, the unredacted version promotes violence. And yes, you’re condoning violence,
Everyone is a neo-nazi / white supremacist, that doesn’t agree with Marxists. Sad!
What is X doing by making statements like this?
He is practicing fascism.
“Ok, ummm….this is not as bad as Professor Turley is making it out to be.”
Right on schedule, Mad King GeorgeX, shows up to furiously yap and bark at Professor Turley’s heels, like a fat lady’s lap dog that has gotten loose. Without his daily appearances where he yaps at Professor Turley, GeorgeX would not be able to find any meaning whatsoever in his empty, pointless wasteland of his life.
The only arrow in GeorgeX’s quiver is lyin’ and denyin’… the victim here was a Nazi and white supremacist – just as GeorgeX justified the murder of Charlie Kirk claiming at the time that Kirkwas a Nazi, fascist and white supremacist.
GeorgeX claims as his defense that this is how he provides providing meaningful content and rational rebuttal. When it is just yapping meaninglessly, this is nothing but the manifestations of Mad King GeorgeX’s Delusions Of Adequacy.
ANTIFA only attacks those who are clearly fascists such as white supremacists, neo-nazis, and anti-semites.
GeorgeX’s lyin’ and denyin’ is the only rhetoric he’s capable of presenting while yapping daily at Professor Turley’s heels. In the real world:
Antifa Cell Members Indicted On Terrorism And Attempted Murder Charges For Attack On ICE Officers
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3853827/texas-antifa-members-indicted-on-terrorism-charges-for-ice-attack-first-time-ever/
So the ICE agents and local police they attempted to murder in that coordinated assault on that ICE facility were clearly all of those things, GeorgeX?
Every one of them – how are you so sure of that?
Your narcissistic Delusions Of Bare Adequacy would cause concern if you were physically capable of doing something more than yapping like a lap dog at Professor Turley’s heels every day.
Wait a minute! Ellis joined TP and experienced a “Come To Jesus” moment, as a result of which, he has converted to Christianity???
So, now you think he deserves to get thrashed with a hockey stick?
I think you should go back to your video games and leave Ellis alone!
— Grandma
So it would be OK if I slapped you around with a hockey stick? Do you have a guideline I could follow that would show me if I was slapping you too hard with the hockey stick? Maybe the guideline could have pictures to illustrate the proper degree of permitted “slapping around,” e.g., knocking out one tooth would be OK, but not more than three teeth, or a black eye with detached retina would be O.K., or maybe it’s OK the person you hate loses an eye? What about a baseball bat? Maybe one strike of a bat be ok, but not three? How about chains, maybe small ones. At what point would you say it’s not appropriate to slap someone around, or is it only OK to slap members of TPUSA, or Republicans, or simply anyone you disagree with? After all, according to Antifa, they are Facist, are they not. According to Antifa destroying those they believe are “Facist” by any means is justified.
Better yet, why don’t we just round up everyone you and Antifa don’t like and put them in camps. Kinda of a final solution to the Facist problem.
Have you no morality, do you not know the difference between right or wrong, or is any kind of violence OK as long as it’s against those you hate. It’s obvious in your writings here that you hate anyone who doesn’t believe as you do and violence is perfectly acceptable.
What a pathetic excuse for a human being you are.
what a liar and fool and a horse’s rear-end. of course you weren’t condoning nuthin! you convinced me ADOLF!
Turley does not address the allegations in the “Antifa” poster. Was this guy a member of Neo-Nazi organizations? Did he participate in a white supremacist boxing tournament? I don’t think the poster was saying all TPUSA is neo-Nazi – they are saying this guy in particular was. Maybe he was?
Justin: If you believe the victim was a Nazi, *confront his ideas in open debate.* If your position is superior, everyone will see it. By stark contrast, if you simply object to his ideas, without being able to show their flaws, people will see that too. Or is that too complex an equation for you?
Open debate is not an Antifa does.
“ Open debate is not an Antifa does.”
No, open debate is not what fascists do.
Antifa, is just to be anti-fascist. It’s not an organization with a specific leadership structure. There are very few ‘groups’ that are anti-fascist and oppose them through doxing, protest, and yes sometimes violence. What they are certainly not is one giant organization. Some may be just lone teenagers that really don’t like white supremacists and neo-nazis.
You always hide behind definitions because reality isn’t on your side. -It’s not an organization, it’s just… coordinated, uniform, trained, networked, and funded in multiple cities!- You are not describing idealists, but a political street gang with a PR slogan. Pretending chaos has no ringleaders doesn’t make you smart, it makes you their unpaid dumb press secretary.
X Out,
You are correct. Just like other terrorist groups, they operate in individual groups in case one group is compromised/arrested, they cannot compromise other groups. They share the same ideology and goals: To fight fascists!! that dont exist. And they call anyone to the right of them fascists.
Open debate is not only a thing Antifa does not do. It is also a thing that Justin does not do. Like his missing in action doppelganger Dennis McIntyre, he drops his post/deuce here, then immediately disappears.
Did antifa provide any evidence of these allegations? In their flyer, the pic on the left, his head is too small to match the body. Obviously cut and paste and a poor job at it. The picture on the right is a very poor photoshop job. Maybe he was none of those things antifa claimed and are lies to justify attacking someone they dont like.
“Turley does not address the allegations in the “Antifa” poster. Was this guy a member of Neo-Nazi organizations?”
Justin does not address concerns that Antifa is lying about claims they made of their victim who they criminally assaulted. Nor does Justin explain why he simply believes every single label Antifa puts on those they criminally attack.
Are all the LEOs criminally assaulted by Antifa also members of Neo-Nazi organizations, Justin? Or would you prefer to avoid addressing those allegations?
And finally: Justin hides from expectations he should address concerns that he is supportive of and defends criminal violence as Antifa’s version of First Amendment speech.
This is usually the point at which Justin disappears, rather than address questions about what he posts.
Sounds like a hoax to me. Guy was not seriously injured, attacker wearing clothes to make him look like Antifa. Probably one of his TPUSA friends did it.
So you want more pain till what????
You can’t touch another person. Period.
Notice how the libs are justifying this….
DustOff,
Yeah, I noticed that too. Oh, he was not seriously injured, so that is not violence!! Just like that husband only slaps his wife around a little. That is not domestic abuse either!
Ohhh, absolutely, Anon! A hoax! Just like Trump being shot at the rally in Butler, eh? *Total hoax!* I’ve seen dozens of Dem shills bleating that it was all a hoax–he wudn’t reeeally shot at ALL! Fake blood! Fake wound! Docs who examined and treated him were GOP shills, eh? Geez, you guys are SO desperate to lie your way back into power. No lie is too absurd to try, eh? ESAD, shill.
Rabble:
Remember when they said we couldn’t say the 2020 election was stolen, rigged, or tampered with in any way? What are they saying about the 2024 election now? Oh, that it was stolen, rigged, and tampered with in every way possible!
For someone who is supposed to be a free-speech legal expert, this column is an exercise in artful evasion.
Is publishing a “hit list” with the intent of fomenting a violent attack against a named individual legal? Should it be illegal, i.e., actionable under criminal or civil law? Does it matter whether the person named in the hit list is someone important (i.e. should we settle for unequal protections under the law)?
The serious question about this incident was simply swept under the rug. Instead, JT ruminates on the question of whether Antifa exists or not. Meanwhile, everybody understands that doxxing only takes one individual with a cold, hateful heart.
If the threshold for legally challenging doxxing is having to prove it’s an organization doing it, you might as well just admit that this form of intimidation is exercising free speech, and you’ll the defend to the death the right to wage it. Why not just concede that protected free speech rises to the level of public verbal terrorist tactics?
The silence on the legality of doxxing is deafening.
Apparently everyone’s fascist who non-existent Antifa says is fascist. Maybe even Islamophobic Cuomo will get a hockey stick welcome if he keeps up his NAZI-like ways. Every candidate, from dog catcher up, (and their campaign team) better watch their back in the newest incarnation of democracy being unleashed. The John Brown template of resistance is free speech being backed up with attack, which will embolden more and normalize it all ahead of what’s coming for America and the West from within. Cowering will prolong the process, and fighting back just proves the system is fascist. No arguing with Leftist logic.
Define a liberal:
A liberal is a person that wants, nay demands a law enforcement officer remove his mask while demanding that rioters be allowed to be masked up.
A liberal is a person that demands the the US and the west shut down their energy sector while never complaining about China building coal plants weekly.
A liberal is a person that demands that a man pretending to be a woman plays against women and girls in sports and changes in their locker rooms while claiming that they are the party that supports women’s rights.
A liberal is a person that claims they are defenders of poor people and minorities as they demand that illegal alien criminals be allowed to stay in the areas where they live and allow those that prey on the poor remain free after committing crime after crime after crime.
A liberal is a person that demands the government stays closed as workers start to lose pay checks and SNAP recipients lose benefits in order to make sure that illegals get health care, NGOs get billions, pet gay projects in Africa and other countries get supported and NPR gets refunded.
A liberal is a person that demanded that the border be non-existent, remember they all raised their hands, as all that entered were given housing, food subsidies, health care and education for 4 years and then now freaks when we try to undo that act of treason.
A liberal is a person like X/George/Svelaz who will argue about anything and everything that is common sense.
Perfect analysis, Bobby.
HullBobby,
I would also add liberals are some of the most uninformed or misinformed as they only read MSM. My liberal sister did not know about the trans boy pretending to be a female who committed two rapes and the school board who tried to cover it up. Because, you know, it was not covered by the WaPo.
History = punk continues to scream, kick, punch but eventually the quiet guy who is slow to anger will respond with extreme prejudice!
There is no bigger group of fascists in America than antifa. Opposing antifa is fighting for justice, freedom, liberty, civil rights, and democracy. It’s actually pretty simple.
“. . . used a hockey stick to mete out the punishment.”
Who knew that “just an idea” could wield a hockey stick.
Just because they are hateful and dangerous and even murderous, doesn’t mean we should trample on their first amendment rights…
calling to attack people…isn’t 1st amendment.
It appears to me that they “express” their 1st amendment rights through violence, assault, and intimidation. Posting a bounty on an individual or group is a threat, not covered by the 1st amendment. They are a subversive group using violence to undermine civil order. They should be treated as the threat they represent.
Inciting violence, calling for assault on people is not covered by the 1stA.
Keep it up libs…. the numbers don’t lie.
___________________
The numbers don’t lie.
Republicans’ approval rises 5 points since the shutdown — and +8 among independents.
Democrats’ playbook is backfiring. Americans know who’s keeping the doors shut — and it’s not the GOP.
Approval ratings means squat.
RIGHT… Good luck with that one.
Sure. Just like election results, right? “Wait…we Dems *totally* support duh idea of democracy! Totally! Well, unless we lose the election, in which case ‘It’s a totally illegal coup! An ‘insurrection’! It beez, like, TOTALLY undemocratic! We demands dat Orange Hitler be impeached AGAIN! Wait…if we got enuf senate votes to *remove him,* would that make Vance prezzy? Eh, no matter! Go fer it! Then we’ll impeach Vance too! See, we Democrats are, like, TOTALLY for ‘democracy’!”
If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, and flies like a duck then I highly suspect that it is a duck. And people at first denied the SLA was real or that the Baader Meinhoff gang / Red Army Faction was real. Antifa sound very similar with being often university based, left wing, violent, anti fascist, proponents of the Palestinian cause just like the Baader Meinhoff gang and then they went on to bank robberies, kidnapping and assassinations. Also funded by the Stasi secret police of East Germany. Took a few years until they morphed into their most deadly form and expanded all over Europe. Of course they don’t need the Stasi funding now when there are billionaires quite happy to fund them or possibly political parties
I think the Antifa have morphed far past just activist at this point and they are clearly violent.
I have to disagree with the Professor because I don’t think this is a free speech question anymore and they were rightfully designated a terrorist organization.
I would also suspect they are being bankrolled by forces outside the US. China and Russia have done this before, so why should they stop now. There are always morons waiting in the wings for their day in the limelight or the lineup if you catch them
Question now. Are hockey sticks carried on campus to be considered defensive or offensive weapons.
Time to take off the tin foil hat geb…. I think… I have….I would… if it quacks its you doing it.
Afraid we see.
Of what, your low digit IQ?
DustOff,
Correct, they are afraid we are seeing for what they truly are: A violent domestic terrorist group. Another reason why they are so desperate to try to make it look like this is no big deal. Oh!! He was not hurt seriously!!! Or, it looks like a hoax!!! He staged it!!
They dont want us to believe our own eyes when we see they are the ones committing the violence.
Did you see the unredacted digital flyer? Two of the pics are obvious, poor, photoshop jobs.
See this one?
Death Threat, Slurs, Insults Meet Royal Oak School’s Charlie Kirk Followers
https://www.michigannewssource.com/2025/10/death-threat-slurs-insults-meet-royal-oak-schools-charlie-kirk-followers/?utm_source=home-headline?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home
GEB,
I agree concerning the domestic terrorist organization label. If anything they seem to be growing into that exact definition. And by trying to deny antifa’s existence, Democrats are trying to protect them.
The “big tent” Democratic party.
Yes, the Democratic Party is composed of several factions, such as
a. Socialists who want to take over the party.
b. Communists who want to destroy the socialists.
c. Feminists who want to eliminate men.
d. Blacks who want to eliminate whites.
e. Antifa* who only look for more violence.
f. Muslims who work for an Islamic state.
SEE, the Dems do have a big tent.
*Note. Dem heavyweights have never heard of them. But a call is in to
Jasmine Crockett for official confirmation.
Only in your mind.
Really, go see what the governor of CA said. Then get back to us
Gov of CA? YOu in contact with him via a tinfoil hat again?
typical lib.. use the Goggle. (if you can)
Um… you spurted that nonsense, yet no proof.
Much like most of you Ano do everyday.
Claw back and/or refuse federal funding to any college or university that does not protect and advocate for free speech on campus. Prohibit masks or any article of clothing that hides identity on campus.
Claw back? Based on what. Your hurt feelings?
No. Based on preventing crimes against people and, in the case of masks, facilitating identification and capture of those who do commit such crimes.
Once upon a time kids were taught, in home and at school, to respect other people and to treat others as they themselves would want to be treated. We were also taught to use words, not violence, to deal with differences of opinion. We were taught not to harm or steal from others, and we were appalled by the violent riots of the late sixties and early seventies. This is not to say that we were perfect, or that we never threw a punch that ended in a bloody nose. It is to say that most of us knew right from wrong and tried to live accordingly, if for no other reason than to avoid punishment by parents and / or teachers.
Many of today’s parent and teachers appear to be woefully lacking in knowing right from wrong and are teaching children accordingly. Kids without wholesome values are likely to grow up to become adults lacking wholesome values.
Woefully lacking…? Where did you get that idea? Also from a tinfoil hat?
Once upon a time… maybe you should take that time machine back to 1825.
Suze,
Well, when you teacher has blue hair, multiple facial piercings, flying anything but the American flag in their classroom, and the school officials allow it, there is the problem.
Based on the civil rights act, based on the 14th amendment, based on title 9. based on the first amendment.
Theses are all things you must comply with if you accept federal funds.
Some you must comply with PERIOD.
Better still – completely eliminate govenrment funding for education – then schools can make their own choices and parents
donors, and students can decide where they actually wish to attend.
Odd how the left keeps telling us they and not violent. Yet here we go folks.
Telling who exactly, via radio waves in your head that only you get?
So you failed to read?
What exactly are the left telling us?
Hurt anyone who doesn’t follow them
DustOff,
I would rephrase that to, “It is perfectly okay to assault, harm, intimidate anyone who does not fall in line with our dogma, to include assassination. Also it if perfectly okay to commit acts of violence against LEOs when they are trying to carry out their lawful duties as passed by Congress.”
We know this by their words and actions.
So you are saying the left is NOT saying they are not violent ?
Oh oh, ole john setup up a trap.
People like Goldman, Ellison and Nadler typify the Neanderthal ignorance of today’s Democrat Party. They are intellectual knuckle-draggers offering the Republic nothing more than stupidity and denials of reality. Little wonder that it’s hemorrhaging registered members faster than 3i Atlas is zipping around the Sun.
knuckle-draggers … You’re doing a very good interpretation of one.
Try harder. Typical lib. No brain power.
That’s really funny, you calling someone a a lib w/o brain power. Dustoff… hilarious stuff!
Notice, you failed to prove me wrong, just more child-like insults.
Not surprised.
Prove what? You’re doing a great job.
3i Atlas isn’t zipping around the sun. It is zipping past the sun, and will soon be gone.
And? Anyone who’s violent should be imprisoned and certainly should not be given a pardon after being told to “stand back and stand by.” I’m glad we agree.
President Epstein is a firehose of distraction away from himself. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a plate of cat and dog to get back to.
What in the heck are you talking about?
Too many drugs
Christianaphobia is on the rise in the United States. You are living proof.
Example of an AI response when the user is a republican.
I completely agree. The actual fascists of the last administration jailed over 1000 non-violent protesters – including BTW the very ones you are referring to.
The reason that everyone was pardoned is because you had made such a hash of people constitutional rights – running kangaroo courts, and failing to provide exculpatory information that it was not possible to correct the injustice.
Further those few who had actually committed violence had already been in jail for 4 years and had their sentences COMMUTED not pardoned.
Given that the left thinks that throwing a molatov cocktail into an occupied police car warants an 18month suspended sentence – no one at J6 got less than they deserved – except for officers like Byrd who got away with murder.
Wackjob just showed up.
Do you have an argument ?
John
Notice that Ano never has any answers.. Just child-like insults.
John Say, the Jan 6. rioters were duly charged with crimes they filmed themselves committing. Claims they were not given due process is pure BS. They were correctly charged and sentenced to prison for crimes recorded on video and social media.
Assaulting law enforcement and breaching restricted areas ARE crimes. There’s nothing fascist about prosecuting legitimate crimes. You seem to really want to ignore the reality of what happened on Jan 6. There were violent rioters and people committing crimes. Those pardoned and those who had their sentences commuted did not deserve it.
There ARE non-violent crimes such as tresspassing and vandalism. Many pled guilty. Others stupidly chose to insult judges to their faces and made things worse for themselves. Weapons were found on people and yes there were firearms present during the riots.
A federal judge held D.C. jail officials in contempt for denying a Jan-6 defendant timely medical records and care. That’s an actual due-process violation, not a “BS claim.” Before you repeat slogans, learn the facts; loud confidence isn’t the same thing as being informed.
X deflects: “John Say, the Jan 6. rioters were duly charged with crimes they filmed themselves committing.”
GeorgeX: in the exact same fashion that the Democrats’ Antifa and BLM street thugs who assaulted the White House over a two day period just weeks before Jan 6 were duly charged with those crimes? Charged previously by the same DoJ officials over the following weeks, the FBI who got incredibly efficient and within a day were tracking down every single J6, trespasser on the Senate lawn?
How many of those rioters who assaulted the White House were already in cells before the FBI started throwing the J6 trespassers in cells right beside them?
That’s correct George! Exactly NONE!
In the exact same fashion as the Democrat rioters that stormed the Senate to prevent Senators confirming Justice Kavanaugh joining SCOTUS were charged, GeorgeX?
Correct again! None!
You’re doing so well today, Mad King GeorgeX!
From BBC
“Moderator Chris Wallace asked whether the president would condemn white supremacists and tell them to stand down during protests. These have flared this year over the issues of police killings and racism.
“Sure, I’m willing to… but I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing, not from the right wing,” Mr Trump said.
Mr Biden twice said “Proud Boys” when the president asked who it was he was being told to condemn.
The president said: “Proud Boys – stand back and stand by. But I’ll tell you what… Somebody’s got to do something about antifa and the left because this is not a right-wing problem.””
What part of that is not True ?
The proud boys have made it their mission to protect people from Antifa violence.
I would further note they are CLEARLY not a white supremacist or racist organization – their head and a significant portion of their membership is Hispanic, and they have black members.
John Say,
“The proud boys have made it their mission to protect people from Antifa violence.”
ROFL!!
The Proud Boys is an American far-right, neo-fascist militant organization that promotes and engages in political violence.
They are not complete racists, but they are certainly anti-immigrant and anti-government. Nativists. When they show up Antifa shows up. That’s why Antifa is often seen around Proud Boys gatherings.
Fascists can include hispanics and black people. Franco was hispanic.
Labels don’t change conduct. The group dressing in black masks and attacking political opponents is the fascists, despite your labels. The Proud Boys will protect people that Antifa intends to attack.
ROFL!!
S. Meyer, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. The Proud boys ARE a far-right militant fascist group. That is why ANTIFA opposes them. The Proud Boys are anti-government militia members who use political violence to justfiy their existence.
I don’t defend the Proud Boys. Some of them look for fights.
But the difference in behavior, and the difference in how they’re treated compared to Antifa, is impossible to miss.
Let’s compare:
Proud Boys: fistfights and street brawls.
Antifa: firebombs, arson, and attacks on federal buildings.
Proud Boys show their faces, wear colors.
Antifa hides behind masks, melts into the crowd.
Proud Boys flare up around specific events.
Antifa riots run for nights, sometimes months.
Proud Boys get national panic headlines.
Antifa gets soft names like “activists” and “anti-racist protesters.”
Proud Boys are treated as an organized threat.
Antifa is treated as “ it’s just an idea.”
Antifa behaves like an urban insurgency, destruction, intimidation, political violence, while the Proud Boys are, at worst, a reactive brawling crew.
At this point, pretending these are the same isn’t ignorance: it’s willful stupidity, dressed as moral virtue.