There is another bizarre filing from Mark Elias, the controversial Democratic lawyer who helped to secretly fund the infamous Steele Dossier. In a new filing, Elias is challenging the district in New York City with the lone Republican member as violating the state voting rights act. Elias is effectively arguing that voting Republican is evidence of racism.
In the petition, voters bring a New York Voting Rights Act challenge, arguing that the Eleventh District “provides Black and Latino Staten Islanders less opportunity than other members of the electorate to elect a representative of their choice and influence elections in New York’s 11th Congressional District (“CD-11”), in violation of the prohibition against racial vote dilution in Article III, Section 4(c)(1) of the New York Constitution.”
The filing occurs after New York moved to further gerrymander the state, aiming to eliminate more Republican members of Congress. Across the country, Democrats have pushed for such gerrymandering, but in New York, the efforts are particularly extreme.
Trump received 45 percent of the vote. Republicans are confined to a small handful of districts. It is still too much for Elias.
Elias has not only been sanctioned in past litigation, but past courts have also criticized his group. In Maryland, Elias filed in support of an abusive gerrymandering of the election districts that a court found violated not only Maryland law but the state constitution’s equal protection, free speech, and free elections clauses. The court found that the map pushed by Elias “subverts the will of those governed.”
It was Elias who made the key funding available to Fusion GPS, which in turn enlisted Steele to produce his now discredited dossier on Trump and his campaign.
During the campaign, reporters did ask about the possible connection to the campaign, but Clinton campaign officials denied any involvement. Weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the Steele dossier as “legal fees” among the $5.6 million paid to Perkins Coie.
New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Elias denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias “pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.’” Times reporter Maggie Haberman declared, “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year.”
It was not just reporters who inquired about the Clinton campaign’s role in the Steele dossier. John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman, was questioned by Congress and categorically denied any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS. Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.
Back to the latest Elias filing. There is a pending case before the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais that could curtail or end the use of race to set voting districts to favor black voters under the federal Voting Rights Act.
However, this is a novel claim that, even in a gerrymandered state striving to reduce Republican members, a district is racist because it favors the election of a Republican Thus, as Professor Josh Blackman noted “in a district where Democratic voters cannot elect a Democrat, they can bring a VRA claim, even in an overwhelmingly democratic state where there is not even a scintilla of evidence of racial discrimination.” However, the opposite is not true. In a red state with overwhelming Republican majorities, a district that effectively bars the election of a Republican could not be grounds for a VRA claim.
The filing proclaims that the heavily Democratic gerrymandered state shows that “New York has become a national leader in protecting voting rights.” It emphasizes that the state goes further than the federal VRA:
“the NY VRA does not require the plaintiff to show that a district could have been drawn that would have a majority of residents of a single protected class. A plaintiff need only show that the current district map is responsible for the protected class’s lack of electoral influence based on the existence of racially polarized voting or the totality of the circumstances.”
The filing makes clear that Black and Latino voters support Democrats and thus a Republican member favoring the GOP dilutes their votes:
“Black and Latino voters on Staten Island are politically cohesive and consistently and overwhelmingly support the same candidates, which the rest of the electorate consistently opposes. At the same time, the white majority on Staten Island overwhelmingly supports the same candidates and votes as a bloc to usually defeat Black and Latino voters’ candidates of choice.”
In other words (with translation):
“Black and Latino voters on Staten Island are politically cohesive and consistently and overwhelmingly support [Democrats], which the rest of the [District] opposes. At the same time, the white majority on Staten Island overwhelmingly supports [Republicans] and votes as a bloc to usually defeat Black and Latino voters’ [Democratic] candidates of choice.”
So, even in a state that has artificially reduced Republican members and is claimed as a model of districting to enhance minority voters, any district that favors Republicans is still evidence of racist discrimination in voting. Presumably, the only way to truly guarantee the protection of minority voters in New York City is the effective elimination of any Republican member.
I just love the smell of democrat desperation in the morning.
Excuse me, you got that wrong. Its the reps. who are desperate. Read the article.
Mark Elias, the controversial Democratic lawyer who helped to secretly fund the infamous Steele Dossier.
Mark Elias is only doing as he learned from Hillary Clinton. Ambulance chasing is too dignified for a bottom feeding attorney like him
“Ambulance chasing is all well and good. But the serious money is in bottom feeding.”
– John Caldwell
https://www.cartoonstock.com/cartoon?searchID=WJ500384
Elias did not need Clinton. He’s intelligent and ambitious. And successful at what he does. And a true Democrat.
I’d take Elias on my team any time.
Every Democrat gloating because Elias not only successfully engineered the felonious Clinton/Obama Russia Dossier, but also walked away unscathed for all the felonies he committed himself to do that would of course continue wanting more of Elias. The Democrat’s chief players are a criminal organization – and their voters are fine with that.
Elias did not engineer the Steele docs. Podesta did. Just because his employer law firm paid for it does not make him a felon. Criminal org? Whew! Yet Trump is a convicted felon.
“Elias did not engineer the Steele docs. Just because his employer law firm paid for it does not make him a felon. Criminal org? ”
Whew! You Democrat commies have been getting high snorting your own farts for far too long down in your Democrat Borg.
GANG THAT INVENTED THE RUSSIA HOAX IS BEHIND ISSUE
https://www.ohiosenate.gov/news/on-the-record/gang-that-invented-the-russia-hoax-is-behind-issue-1
Marc Elias invented the hoax that President Trump colluded with Russia. As lawyer for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign in 2016, Elias hired two foreign operatives [NB: normally they’re called spies] to create the phony opposition research on Trump that became known as the Russia dossier. It was debunked by the Mueller report. Elias isn’t just the Democrat’s top dirty trickster. He is also Senior Advisor and General Counsel for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) [NB: like the topic topic today – gerrymandering] run by former Attorney General Eric Holder.
Perkins Coie denied any responsibility for illegally hiring those spies, illegally moneylaundering Clinton and Obama money to pay those spies, and Elias fraudulently filing HIS tax returns to cover the crimes he, Obama, and Clinton committed in this criminal enterprise. Perkins Coie swiftly got rid of Elias and his fellow henchman in this criminal enterprise once it could no longer be hidden.
So it wasn’t Podesta’s idea, and the criminality wasn’t with the law firm he worked within. It’s a unique criminal enterprise made up of Clinton, Obama, Elias, and every Obama Attorney General and FBI Director that then took the fraudulent document they paid for to repeatedly perjure themselves to FISA courts that it was 100% confirmed evidence of Trump being a traitor working with Russia.
And those two foreign spies that Elias illegally laundered the millions of dollars to pay – including the Russian spy who the FBI knew they were investigating for committing espionage on behalf of Putin… your claim is they would have composed the creative writing in the “Russia Dossier” for free!
In your Democrat Borg, Clinton/Obama/Elias providing money to hire foreign spies to create the phony lies that were the Russia Dossier isn’t a crime? Even though the FEC gave them a pass on jail sentences and just fined them for doing that?
And in the Democrat Borg, Elias then attempting to cover what the three of them had done by filing false IRS returns for the millions of dollars that flowed directly into his pockets to be laundered to the foreign spies they were paying isn’t a crime either?
Why not? Because the same IRS that hid The Crackhead Kid’s tax crimes for years did the same by also covering and not prosecuting Marc Elias for fraudulent tax returns?
Can’t be a convicted felon when the police state fascists paying you never indict you for the crimes you committed.
BTW, once those convictions of Trump fail to survive after they have to withstand appellate court scrutiny outside of New York and that grifter Merchan’s courtroom whose family pocketed millions from the trial after he refused to recuse himself as required under NY law… what are you going to say then?
“Well… he’s lucky he got off on a technicality…”????
What better admission of white-collar criminality [the malpractice of Law] is there?
The dems have seemed to be this close to making it practically illegal to vote for their competition. I can’t think of a better example of regime-like behavior as they have exhibited since at least 2012.
It’s clear what they’ll do if they ever get even the smallest toehold again, given all that has transpired while they’ve been out of power. Their apparatus is a death machine in sore need of dismantling. Beginning to think the theory that the shutdown was about the elections next week, and it is clear there is no low too low, and no one they are not happy to throw under the bus in their pursuit of power. It really is quite astonishing.
Another poster said essentially it’s ok since the courts can deal with them, but that is clearly not set in stone.
Same game plan the Reps. used in 2024.
That pursuit of power is not astonishing if understood in the whole context of American political history.
“Same game plan the Reps. used in 2024.”
Democrat commies lyin’ like a Biden to explain why voters in 2024 rejected their Democrat racist identity politics campaign to get The DEI Hire elected president on the qualifications that her skin was Indian brown instead of white. After all, it worked in 2020 when Biden announced he would flip his racism backwards and only pick from colored VP candidates.
Nothing To See Here, Please Believe Me, Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes™
Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the intended psychological manipulation by a low-IQ perpetrator of those they hope to victimize through intentionally misleading that person or persons. This involves the perpetrator lying, denying events, and other methods used with the intent to have their victims doubt their perceptions of reality, memories, and feel overly emotional or irrational. Within personal relationships, it is a form of psychological abuse and torture. The main five methods of gaslighting that may be used alone or in conjunction with others are: lying, blame shifting, countering, trivializing and withholding.
No need to take it personally.
He told the truth, does that hurt you?
Back when Democrats were corrupting the voting process during Covid with the “drop boxes”, same day registration, mail in voting, and all the rest, I stated sarcastically that eventually Democrats would pass state legislation or a state constitutional amendment in a heavily Democrat state “deeming” voting no longer necessary. The idea was that if you chose not to cast a ballot, then you’d be assumed to support the incumbent or whoever the party of the incumbent puts there (sorta like how Democrats nullified the tens of millions of Democrat primary voters who voted for Biden to be the nominee). In a heavily Democrat state, that meant the incumbent would be a Democrat in the majority of cases and cement their hold on power.
With my “deemed” voting proposal, citizens would be relieved of the burden of actually having to participate in “our democracy.” You’d only have to vote if you wanted to kick the incumbent (likely Democrat) out.
Then at the end of my comment in the final paragraph, I said the main obstacle to the plan was not that it is unconstitutional, unlawful or not democratic, but that so much money is vacuumed up by the political “strategists”, “consultants”, “pollsters” and media companies sucking up political advertising dollars that it would never happen.
It was a 100% facetious comment. Yet here we are. Elias is getting pretty close to my sarcastic “proposal”.
Great game plan from the dems in 2000. They won. Somehow Reps. just can’t think and play hard like the Dems.
So what happened in 2024? Hmmmm
The Mark Elias lawsuit over New York’s 11th District shows exactly what happens when politics turns into demographic engineering. The argument is that minority voters’ “preferred candidates” lose too often, so the map must be redrawn. In plain terms, if Republicans win where Democrats should win, the numbers themselves are treated as proof of discrimination.
This obsession with immutable traits has hollowed out civic literacy. When politicians see voters as data points instead of people, they stop persuading and start managing. It’s lazy politics—government by spreadsheet instead of by understanding.
Healthy citizenship rests on three legs: engagement, enlightenment, and self-reliance. Today those have collapsed into ignorance, apathy, and dependence on government.
Imagine the panic in Congress if the next census counted only people, not profiles. No race charts, no income tables—just a head count. Politicians would finally have to do something radical: go out and listen. That alone would restore accountability and remind them that democracy runs on persuasion, not prediction.
To state the obvious, Republicans are doing the same in Texas and Louisiana. So when Elais/democrats do it \, its the end of democracy, if republicans do it, its furthering democracy.
Dems have been doing it for years if not decades while Repubs have been asleep. Now the shoe is on the other foot and it really pinches.
How true.
Simple, look at the way the lids are screaming
Typically, Democratic party gerrymandering is to assemble districts of minority voters to allow them a chance to pick a candidate who will represent their interests. Republican party gerrymandering is to separate minority voters and dilute their votes so they are unable to pick a candidate who will represent their interests.
This chopping up of minority districts is the focus of the current Republican efforts. In Missouri the new map cuts Kansas City, Missouri into pieces and joins the fragments of the urban areas with massive areas of rural voters.
This is the difference between a surgeon plunging a knife into your stomach and a street mugger doing so. Both use a knife. Both cut you. Are these pictures the same?
Good one anon. Really good.
“Typically, Democratic party gerrymandering is to assemble districts of minority voters to allow them a chance to pick a candidate who will represent their interests.”
Democrat gerrymandering is a racist, identity politics operation where convoluted districts of black racial purity are sewn together. Ensuring that there aren’t enough of Whitey remaining in the new districts to stand in the way of a Democrat getting elected. The DNC claim is only a Democrat can represent the interests of black Americans while keeping them on Democrat poverty plantations.
Black Americans are increasingly rejecting that fraud and voting Republican instead.
And that scares the hell out of typical Democrats like this – which is why they attempted to illegally import 20 million criminal Illegal Aliens to make up for the black American vote they’re losing.
“To state the obvious, Republicans are doing the same in Texas and Louisiana.”
To state what’s actually obvious, Democrat commies feign hysterical outrage and wails of moral equivalency when Republicans do a fraction of what Democrats like Elias have already done to completely eliminate Republican districts in some Democrat states. Your gaslighting will have better success back home in the Democrat Borg, where Bluesky will enthusiastically believe your wails of grief.
Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the intended psychological manipulation by a low-IQ perpetrator of those they hope to victimize through intentionally misleading that person or persons. This involves the perpetrator lying, denying events, and other methods used with the intent to have their victims doubt their perceptions of reality, memories, and feel overly emotional or irrational. Within personal relationships, it is a form of psychological abuse and torture. The main five methods of gaslighting that may be used alone or in conjunction with others are: lying, blame shifting, countering, trivializing and withholding.
That response completely misses the point. Yes, both parties gerrymander. But focusing on which side does it better is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic — it ignores the real danger beneath the surface.
Redistricting fights may shift a few seats, but what they destroy is far greater: the civic literacy that keeps a republic afloat. When politicians use census data and demographics to carve up power, they stop engaging with the people themselves. Voters become statistics to be managed, not citizens to be persuaded.
This isn’t democracy; it’s data management disguised as representation. Both parties are guilty. The result is a public that’s less informed, less involved, and more dependent — exactly the opposite of what self-government requires.
The ship is taking on water, and we’re arguing over who gets to move the chairs.
That is the point, Olly. No need to vote when there’s a headcount. The gubment is involved in what is unconstitutional. It’s worse than worthless. It’s harmful.
It’s actually economic and not political. Reign in gubment commerce? There isn’t a moral foundation either nor a scientific foundation.
It’s partisan politics when some get snap and not all get snap. Everyone should get snap Rick and poor at the same level and that level is set by the poorest. The middle class can take a tax deduction because food prices are too high and the same for medical insurance “subsidies ” are set by the poorest and it doesn’t matter if you’re rich or poor. Take it as a tax deduction and it’s equalized. THIS special grouping business causes partisan politics and it’s a violation of the constitution and equal protection.
Politicians don’t have the guts to use only a head count to draw districts. If they had to deal with a head count then they would need to actually work honestly to persuade citizens to vote for them rather than pandering for votes as most do now.
That’s exactly the problem. If politicians were forced to rely on a true head count, most wouldn’t know what to do. They’ve built entire careers on manipulating data instead of earning trust. Real representation requires listening, persuading, and standing for something — skills most abandoned once demographics could do the work for them.
That’s why civic literacy keeps collapsing. When leaders stop engaging real citizens and start governing by charts, the people stop believing their voices matter. And once trust is gone, the republic won’t be far behind.
Section 2 of the VRA promotes Democratic Party gerrymandering and diminishes Republican Party gerrymandering. That is because Black voters largely vote for Democrats, and the courts fail to distinguish partisan line-drawing from racial line-drawing. So when Republicans gerrymander by reducing the impact of Democrats who are black, the courts stop them, but when Democrats gerrymander by reducing the impact of Republicans who are white, they do not. The government’s position in Callais would give free rein to partisan gerrymandering, so long as race did not predominate in the drawing of the map; a partisan explanation of the line-drawing would prevail in the absence of a proven racial motive. This would level the playing field, permitting Republicans to gerrymander as much as Democrats by stopping the artificial impediment that arises because Blacks largely vote for Democrats.
The proportion of Democratic politicians elected should match the proportion of voters for Democratic politicians. This proportion would indicate a level playing field, but in many states there are fewer Democrats in state legislatures or US House Representatives than one would expect. The recent Republican state legislature moves are to change that to far fewer Democrats than one would expect, a very unlevel playing field.
The proportion of Democratic politicians elected should match the proportion of voters for Democratic politicians.
No, it shouldn’t. There is no relationship between a party’s percentage of the total votes and what percentage of the seats it “ought” to win. If you want that, go to proportional representation.
So long as you have single member districts, you cannot expect any relationship at all between the two. Who wins a district depends entirely on who gets more votes in that district. If you had a state where each party’s supporters were distributed perfectly evenly throughout the state, then whichever party had the most support would win all the seats, and no other party would win any. The only reason you get multiple parties winning seats in the same state is because parties’ support is not evenly distributed. If a minority party’s support is concentrated in some areas, it will win seats in those areas. That’s all.
It’s ok to give people free stuff, try taking it away.
what does that have to do with gerrymandering?
Depends on which gerrymandered District you go to. Why some Districts, they just take your stuff, at gun point, it free!
Who is they?
Mark, please, sit down and be quiet. You had your say in court.
Diogenes, please, sit down and be quiet. You only make a fool of yourself when you comment.
You know who, know what I sayin?
Democrat thugs.
someone wake me when the Republicans jail a Democrats for committing one of the 10,000’s of crimes they commit?
10,000’s you say? Got proof?
I’m with you, the Obama, Clinton, and Biden era has been one huge crime spree. Fraud, bribery and money laundering while selling out the country. This rat helped them every step of the way.
and still guyv has not listed one single crime.
How about when Hillary destroyed the laptops and blackberries?
If they did as you write, how come they were not charged and convicted?
Because Democrats controlled the DOJ even during Republican administrations, and Republicans were too polite to insist on indicting them. And because many of these crimes would have to be tried in DC, where no jury will convict a Democrat no matter what he has done.
Hey GOP hurt the Democrats
END all Federal Aid to cities, states, non-profits and colleges(including backing loans)
Outlaw Public Unions, the political army of the democrats.
They are funded by our own government and they needs to STOP!
Okay, so how do you do it. Lay out the plan. Don’t forget to consider that there are laws and approved budgets. Not to mention a congress full of democrats.
So let’s see your plan on how to do what you want.
Start with police unions.
How do you get that through Congress? Especially the senate, with more than 40 Democrats.
is the definition of the Democrat Party…FASCISM?
No no, you got that wrong, its defined as, Republican party = fascism. With as capital F.
the Democrat Party is fighting a Civil War…AGAIN
This time we need to abolish the Democrat Party and jail their criminals by the 1000’s
Civil war? Only in your mind.
What party is calling for the murder of ICE officers. That would be the dems
What party, the news report that only 3 dems have called for tracking of ICE agents. Didnt see a word about death threats, guess you have super powers.
YOU are not paying attention.
The only reason for tracking them is so the Democrat supporters can attack them and their families.
The progressively stupid keep progressing. I am even amazed at this point.
You seem to be easily amazed.
Democrats do not believe in democracy at all. They seek power at all costs. Shame on Elias and the rest of the fascist democrats.
Don’t believe? Prove it. Show us how smart you are, argue it here and now. You know you can’t, because you lack intelligence; you’re a rep mindless drone.
They allowed you to vote for Biden in the Democrat primaries, then after he won the Democrat elites decided you made a bad choice. They forced Biden out and ran Kamala instead. You, of course, are a mindless moron so you don’t care that they nullified your vote.
Who is you? If you can’t name names, seems there’s no argument just blind accusations.
Anointing of Kamala? A primary with a better candidate winning would have been nice.
“All costs”? That sounds dramatic. Are they in the room with you, right now?
The legal arguments, tactics and positions taken by Elias in the past, the present and presumably into the future, have all the substance and appeal of aardvark droppings…, but without the charm.
If I were a rep politician battling an election decision, I would want Elias on my side.
Oh… thats a good one.
This is New York. It shouldn’t be difficult to find a judge to go along with Elias’ claim. It will take time to wind through the courts to finally get to SCOTUS while it becomes a fait accompli in the next election.
He’s not wrong.
Nope, he’s very wrong
Explain what you mean by that commnt. Wrong?
Democrats don’t know wrong from right
just like they don’t know the difference between man and woman!
Deep stuff. Please elaborate. And no insulting. Okay?
Like you do?
No. like you do.
So what is a woman. This should be fun
My problem is not with Mark Elias, Jack Smith, Adam Schiff, et al, is not with their continuing shenanigans; the American court system can still withstand them. It is with the Democrats regaining control in DC. If so, the Dems will reopen NSAID, so their NGO’s can resume suckling on the government dollar, and they in turn can resume suckling on their NGO’s to undermine the entire American enterprise. In addition, they will change the court system in their favor, forever. Then, they would be permanently in power. Redistricting is the current pathway to this, their holy grail of power.
Redistricting you say. Not like the Reps. are not doing that. Word of advice, lift the toilet seat before you shite.
Hey Anonymous, if you are going to have a snarky moronic reply after each and every cogent and adult comment at least have the integrity to create a name so we can ignore you the way women ignore you in real life.
cogent and adult comment? You’re kidding right?
And yet your adult comment is full on childish invective. Integrity… you petty little geriatric.
So you won’t. Figures
Want to rewrite that comment? Makes no sense.
Use a name you moron. Does that work?
hullbobby, are you kidding with this comment? You’re one of the biggest attack dogs on this site.
Listen George/X/Svelaz, you are a juvenile with no work, no hobbies, no girlfriend and no prospects so please take your ugly moronic comments to Huffpost, Salon or the Guardian and leave the adults alone.
When Anonymous, usually you I assume, comments after each and every other comment it becomes tiresome and I honestly believe it is your idiotic version of the heckler’s veto. I have seen other sites comments section be ruined by trolls like you and I wish there would be some way to make you create a name so you couldn’t hide behind Anonymous while commenting in support of your own comments.
“you are a juvenile with no work, no hobbies, no girlfriend and no prospects so please take your ugly moronic comments ..”
Hullbobby, you just proved anons’ contention that you’re vile, juvenile, troll, idiotic with your comments.
You lack smarts man, or should we call you child? .
Hull
LOL… nice
Nice? Hockey puck just got his butt kicked.
There’s a story goin round that hullbobby was used as a hockey puck by his parents when he was a baby. That’s explains everything.
Only you think that, but nice try.
These claims peddled by Marc Elias and his fellow travelers are so insane that no one can find logic in them.
He claims that certain groups are entitled to vote as a group to get their candidate into office while making the claim that the opposite isn’t legal. I’m surprised that he can make any claim in court or court filings without being laughed out by the judge.
Kevin
so insane that no one can find logic in them.
_________________________
Have you ever seen libs/dems use logic? All I see is feelings and hate
Can’t finfd the logic? Maybe because you and your kind are genuinely stoopid.
That fool… Give him enough time, he would sure a pumpkin for being orange.
My bad (Sue)
The fact that Elias has not been disbarred is still a source of amazement.
Why should he be disbared? Because you don’t like him? Grow up.
Read the Canons of Ethics
And was does ethics have to do with lawfare? Canons… You’re impling you have? So enlighten us.
Also you’re implying that Trumps lawyers are ethical and dem lawyers are not?
Its all about winning, by hook or by crook. Its lawfare son.
LOL… You are asking a lib to read. Good luck
Dustoff, the trending book this week for progressive men, is “How to Prove Your Virtue by Shaving in the Women’s Locker Room.” It’s a bestseller in the “modern masculinity” section.
“Why should he be disbared? Because you don’t like him? Grow up.”
Now, now, little Biden Bolshevik Birthing Boy… here’s just one small part of the bar association that Marc Elias’s belongs to has as their code of professional conduct.
Rule 8.4: Misconduct
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
(d) Engage in conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice;
Enlist all the adults standing beside you there in the Democrat Borg to help you explain how Marc Elias’s multiple crimes involved in the creation of the deceitful fraud that is the felonious “Russia Dossier” do not severely violate that Code Of Professional Conduct.
Waiting… got anything like “Well… ummm…. BBBBUTTTT… MUH TRUMP’S LAWYERS DID THE SAME THING WITH A BIDEN-CHICOM DOSSIER!!!!”
Because rep. lawyers are too stupid to put the time and effort into getting him disnarred. Or maybe, just maybe, he did nothing wrong.
One thing has to said here, you commenters are completely lacking in legal smarts. All of you are just are plain naive about politics.
have you seen the idiot democrat judges who MAKE STUFF UP?
Trump was fined $500 Million for PAYING BACK A LOAN!
Its $354.8 million. Million with a small m. Thank you.
“Or maybe, just maybe, he did nothing wrong.”
And maybe Democrat Useless Idiot apparatchiks cosplaying they have legal smarts like their SCOTUS justice says in sworn testimony she doesn’t know she’s a woman, think readers here are as stupid as the Democrat voters they appeal to.
Elias did nothing wrong that should get him disbarred? Here’s just one small part of the bar association that Marc Elias’s belongs to has as their code of professional conduct.
Rule 8.4: Misconduct
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
(d) Engage in conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice;
Enlist all the adults standing beside you there in the Democrat Borg to help you explain how Marc Elias’s multiple crimes involved in the creation of the deceitful fraud that is the felonious “Russia Dossier” do not severely violate that Code Of Professional Conduct.
Waiting…
“are too stupid”
“you commenters are completely lacking in legal smarts. All of you are just are plain naive about politics.”
Your anonymous label tells us your lack of faith in yourself.
no, he should be Jailed for Conspiracy!