The Harvard Club of New York is being accused of censorship after abruptly cancelling a book event featuring famed Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. In a statement, Dershowitz says that invitations were sent out and the event was approaching when he was suddenly told that the Harvard Club would have none of it. He blamed his representation of President Donald Trump for the cancellation.
For a club that bills itself as offering “unique experiences,” it appears that hearing from opposing or different views is not one of them.
Dershowitz has been associated with Harvard for over 60 years and remains one of its best known law faculty members.
I only recently learned of the controversy and reached out to the Harvard Club of New York, which refused to offer any statement or explanation. It simply said that it does not discuss “events,” even apparently non-events, allegedly canceled for political reasons.
The news of the cancellation was deeply troubling for one of the country’s oldest clubs associated with an institution of higher education. Dershowitz is one of the most impactful lawyers of his generation with a long list of famous cases and influential publications. While he has been shunned by many of his former colleagues and friends for defending Trump, many admire him for not just his intellect but his grit and commitment to his principles.
The timing of the cancellation is equally troubling. Harvard has been under attack for its lack of intellectual diversity and its stifling orthodoxy.
As I discuss in my book “The Indispensable Right,” Harvard is not just an academic echo chamber. It is a virtual academic sensory deprivation tank.
In a country with a majority of conservative and libertarian voters, fewer than 9 percent of the Harvard student body and less than 3 percent of the faculty members identify as conservative.
For years, Harvard faculty have brushed away complaints over its liberal orthodoxy, including purging conservative faculty. It has created one of the most hostile schools for free speech in the nation, ranking dead last among universities in annual studies by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
Only a third of students at Harvard feel comfortable speaking on campus despite being overwhelmingly liberal at an overwhelmingly liberal institution. (The percentage is much higher for the small number of conservative students).
Not long ago, I had a debate at Harvard Law School with Professor Randall Kennedy on the lack of ideological diversity at the school. I respect Kennedy and I do not view him as anti-free speech or intolerant. Yet when I noted the statistics on the vanishing number of conservative students and faculty in comparison to the nation, Kennedy responded that Harvard “is an elite university” and does not have to “look like America.”
The problem is that Harvard does not even look like Massachusetts, which is nearly 30 percent Republican.
The school itself has shown utter hypocrisy in firing one House dean (who, like Dershowitz, represented an unpopular criminal defendant) while retaining another who spewed hateful, racist messages against whites.
The Harvard Club of New York is a separate entity but has long presented itself as embodying the values of the institution. Unfortunately, it appears to be doing so all too well. If these accusations are correct, the Harvard Club engaged in the same intolerance for dissenting views that now characterizes much of the campus itself.
Despite recently declaring itself the victim of anti-free speech measures (including some that I have criticized), Harvard continues to show no evidence that it will address its own intolerance for opposing views. Indeed, this allegation suggests that this echo-chambered culture may extend to the Harvard Club of New York.
When accused of raw censorship, one would think that the Harvard Club of New York would owe not just Dershowitz but the public a full explanation. If Dershowtiz was not cancelled for his views or prior representation, Harvard Club of New York can say so and give the content-neutral reason for the change. If this was a case of content-based censorship, Harvard Club of New York should be public and honest about its censorship policies.
Of course, as Tom Lehrer explained after he “returned from his Scrabble Pro at the Harvard Club,” all Harvard graduates rally to the cause. So “Fight fiercely, Harvard” . . . but what exactly are you fighting for?
HARVARD IS A SHAM UNIVERSITY FOR HIGHER INTELLIGENCE. It excels at narrow minded thought.
There is no less tolerant group in America than leftwing fascists like those running Harvard and its associated clubs.
Alan Dershowitz is also a prominent and highly respected Jewish scholar.
Could that have been a factor in this decision? Anti-semitism seems to have been a problem in Harvard of late so why not the Harvard Club? They would deny it, of course. And perhaps keep it up.
The Harvard name is losing its cachet.
Is he a legal scholar or a Jewish scholar?
Both.
Five years ago I would have dismissed the thought that Anti- semitism was a problem at Harvard . However, the unopposed wave of anti semitic campus thuggery across the nation should be a national concern.
Mr. Turley. I replied to the x post offering Mr. D. An opportunity to have his event at my club, the Down Town Association in Manhattan. I would also like to extend the offer to you as well for you to come by and talk about your book as well as a discussion. Please reach out to me directly 860.577.0539
Hear Hear !!
Down Town Association (DTA) in Manhattan is an excellent contrast to the Harvard Club (HC).
DTA hosts talks by Charles Schumer and NY AG Letitia James, and invites Dershowitz and JT. HC, being an enclave for the “elites,” rescinds an invitation to Dershowitz.
Freedom and Self-Reliance
Vs.
Central Planning, Control of the Means of Production (unconstitutional regulation), Redistribution of Wealth, Social Engineering, and “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” under the “dictatorship of the proletariat (hired help).”
Hayek explained in one of his books why he thinks academia is so far left. His argument has two related prongs to it. First, free enterprise results in a wide disparity in incomes. Academics (incorrectly) think that is a defect of the system. It is actually a desirable feature that makes the whole system work. Academics think that because THEY are smarter than the average market participant, they will do a better job of allocating economic resources than “the market”. Academics resent that they are “smarter” but earn less and have less power than a college dropout like Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg.
The second prong of his theory is that in a centrally planned economy, the academics are the experts. They will be the ones tapped to decide the regulations, taxes, and ultimately decide how resources are allocated and distributed, not some “invisible hand” of market forces that results in wide disparities in income.
Since Democrats invented the bureaucratic welfare state, and Democrats constantly and perpetually push for more government control and interference in the economy, it’s rational for academics to support Democrats. In doing so, they are pursuing their own greed and self interest. More government power, more regulation, etc. is better for academics.
We are rapidly approaching a planned economy – however it is out of the control of citizens or government. It is by the oligarchs. There are decreasing pools of competition where monopoly control of basic commodities is under the control of a small number of people.
If one doesn’t like the price of steaks, there are only 4 or 5 companies that set the prices and they don’t really need to compete for your business; where else can 80% of the market reasonably go?
If one doesn’t like Harvard, they can go to Liberty University or any of more than 100 others.
Recall, slavery flourished under unfettered free enterprise.
“[S]lavery flourished under unfettered free enterprise.”
Except for the fact that slavery is the antithesis of free enterprise.
Slavery also thrived under the Gulag penal system.
IT IS THEIR DUTY TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT AND PROVIDE NEW GUARDS
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
– Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Some ask why it is that I continue to address the fallacies of the socialist on this forum. I take a mirror from Ayn Rand who escaped the shackles of a socialist regime known as Russia and told her story to the world. “I do not know what effect my one voice can have in a matter of this
kind. But I am addressing myself to the best within any man,
Objectivist or not, who has preserved some sense of humanity, justice and compassion.”
She was questioning if her voice would be heard. We have heard her voice loud and clear and we must carry on making sure that millions hear her warning. Her book “Return To The Primitive”made clear the danger we face. As Machiaveelli wrote, once a people have known freedom even if they live under slavery they will pass the legacy from generation to generation. Ayn Rand’s voice made a difference and so will yours. God bless your joy and given thanks this holiday season. Don’t forget that he freed the slaves.
Rand should be read and celebrated – along with many many others.
Keep railing against socialism. No more vile ideology exists.
No ideology ever has brought so much misery to so many.
If you are intelligent and advocate for socialism you were poorly educated – even if that was at Harvard.
Stalin alone enslaved and murdered more people than the african slave trade.
More people in a few decades than all the blacks and all the indians in the US that the left fixates on.
And Mao was double as bloody as Stalin.
the Communist Party of Kampuchea killed more than 1/4 of all cambodians during a brief reign of terror.
These are only a FEW of the bloody examples of the results of communism.
Socialism is the core of Christianity. The political labels used by tyrants and despots to hide there crimes being used as if they were true is a sickening spectacle of either willful ignorance or intentional lies.
East Germany was self-titled “Die Deutsche Demokratische Republik” – in English the GDR or German Democratic Republic. Is that the standard for democracy?
Cambodia had it’s horrors because the US destabilized the Cambodian government trying to stop North Vietnamese. Smooth move -kill the hostages.
” In the late 1960s the conflict between the U.S. and Vietnam was escalating. Under the auspices that the Vietnamese communists were seeking shelter in Cambodia, the U.S. began carpet-bombing the Cambodian countryside. Later, the U.S. assisted the pro-U.S. The Cambodian government, under the leadership of Lon Nol, into power. By 1973, the U.S. bombarded the Cambodian countryside with half of 540,000 tons of bombs were dropped in six months. The bombing caused major destruction to peasant villages and left many casualties. An estimated 50,000-150,000 Cambodians were killed during the bombing campaign. Due to U.S. intervention in Cambodia, Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge cadres began using the destruction and massacre of peasants in the countryside to recruit new revolutionaries.”
https://www.ilholocaustmuseum.org/cambodian-genocide/
The US helped spread the “communists” and strengthen them by being an enemy to unite the people.
Socialism is the core of Christianity…. The US helped spread the “communists” and strengthen them by being an enemy to unite the people.
Once again communists who worship at the alter of Rock Fairy Atheism – the atheism espoused by Karl Marx and his acolytes like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc hope they can convince people that they can interpret the Christian denominations that they hate almost as much as they hate individuals having constitutional freedoms and liberties.
One doesn’t have to look far in the Bible to find references such as 2 Thessalonians 3:10, which states, “For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat.”
And now, this communist wants to claims the US is to blame for his fellow communist acolyte of Marxist atheism, Pol Pot, killing millions of Cambodians. No mention of this beginning with North Vietnamese troops invading and occupying parts of Cambodia at all!
In this Democrat communist’s version of history, the North Vietnamese that had invaded and were occupying parts of Cambodia to move their war supplies – provided by Russian and Chinese communists – didn’t kill a single Cambodian while taking and occupying those parts of Cambodia! Just like UN peacekeepers, they were!
Just as he makes no mention of when US and other allied troops pulled out of South Vietnam after North Vietnam signed a peace treaty, within a year his fellow communist North Vietnamese invaded South Vietnam where they then butchered several million South Vietnamese. Hard to turn that into blame of the USA when we were long gone.
Not quite as fully developed as the Black Critical Racist Theory that America was actually created out of slavery, but you can only do so much when you compose alternate history regarding the Bible and your fellow communists in just a few hours.
the U.S. bombarded the Cambodian countryside with half of 540,000 tons of bombs were dropped in six months. The bombing caused major destruction to peasant villages and left many casualties. An estimated 50,000-150,000 Cambodians were killed during the bombing campaign.
Yes, imagine that! We bombed North Vietnamese military positions in the border regions of Cambodia they had invaded and occupied. Like we killed French, Belgian, Dutch and other Europeans while bombing the Nazis occupying their countries during WWII.
And like your little friends in Hamas, the occupying North Vietnamese built their military positions right beside and inside Cambodian villages.
Don’t post your bullSchiff and then run away little commie: stay and defend yourself!
How many Cambodians were killed by the invading North Vietnamese that occupied the border regions of Cambodia where they were being bombed by the USA? Versus the estimated 50,000 – 150,000 Cambodians killed by Americans bombing those occupying North Vietnamese troops? Sources say about 375,000 during those years of North Vietnamese occupation.
But you want to make a comparison of those incidental casualties of war over a decade to the genocide of as many as 3,000,000 Cambodians by your fellow communist, Pol Pot, just three and a half years?
How dumb can you be to think that will fly!
Sure! Come back, commie coward, and defend the comparison that you attempted to make!
Russia never was socialist. It went from totalitarian to totalitarian authoritarianism.
Bolsheviks just morphed into communist’s and became good authoritarian socialists. Their killing was greater and more organized under socialism once the framework was in place and the people identified that they wanted weeded out. Just a more efficient regime of selection and some animals are more equal than other animals on a more controllable level.
OT
Apparently 60% of Somali men in Denmark are convicted of a violent crime before the age of 30.
https://x.com/ArtemisConsort/status/1993777837070012421
We have our own Somali problems with Somali fraud in Wisconsin.
All Somali and Afghan immigrants must be carefully vetted and sent back when warranted.
Obama and Biden filled this country with poison.
..and the ongoing layers of Somali fraud in MN… how did MN ever allow this level of Fraud to happen???????????????
With a complicit Governor, it makes it very easy. The fraud in some of the Somali communities is blatant, and has been going on, unchecked, for decades! No real prosecutions, no deportations. The corruption is allowed to fester and grow, without interruption. No other country puts up with this, the way that ours does! We need to get tougher about weeding out the criminal illegal alien enterprises, especially those using our own money to fund the terrorists targeting our country! Every governor, every member of a local and state government official, every judicial activist wearing the black robe and sitting on the judicial bench, who gets in the way of the POTUS exercising his Constitutional authority to remove those who enter our country illegally, needs to be impeached and removed from their positions, to rid the rot from this country! It must be stopped!
The shooting of the National Guardsmen is all Trumps fault. The Police officers who caught the shooter should have disobeyed the lawful order to arrest him. When he goes to trial if he is convicted the jailers placing him behind bars should just disobey the lawful order by the judge ordering his incarceration. Everything is just hunky dory in Lala Land. People vote for these clowns? Slowly but surely there isn’t quite as many as there was a while ago. Load that gator up and powder his behind take him to the voting both cause the socialist have lost their minds. That gator don’t stand fer no treason.
Is this sarcasm or are you completely out of your gourd ?
Advocating for Murder is heinous.
But the depravity of the left today is so well understood it no longer shocks.
John Say,
While I have never met TiT in person, I have read his comments long enough to be pretty sure THAT was sarcasm.
Happy Thanksgiving!
I certainly hope so! Happy Thanksgiving!
..whew… ranting TDS lunacy…. you really got a hold of some bad stuff in your pipe…
“The shooting of the National Guardsmen is all Trumps fault. ”
To the extent that Trump had no need to send the National Guard and therefore would not otherwise be there, that is true.
To the extent that Trump had no need to send the National Guard and therefore would not otherwise be there, that is true.
It’s true that if you’re happy that overwhelmingly the victims of Washington DC’s disgustingly high murder rate are black Democrats murdered by other black Democrats, then I assume you could say there was no need for Trump to mess up what George X would see as a good thing.
Alan Dershowitz – The phrase “you reap what you sow” is an idiomatic expression and a proverb (originating from the Bible)
You don’t need A.I. to know that.
Interesting that Anonymous has said that the Bible is just a fallacy now uses the Bible as a source.
At long last she is using something other than her own brain as a source. Just when you think that the great wonders found on the earth have come to an end. What you talkin bout Willard? Spoken with a furrowed brow
Re: Thinkitthrough,
You have the wrong Anonymous in mind, I’m the ‘good’ Anon
The mistaken identity is understandable.
Origin: The sentiment has a biblical origin, most notably in the New Testament book of Galatians 6:7, which states, “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows”.
Galatians 6:7 states, “Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap”. This verse uses the metaphor of agriculture to teach that actions have consequences, and individuals will receive the results of their choices. The principle emphasizes accountability, particularly within the context of supporting and providing for spiritual leaders, and extends to the idea that life choices result in specific outcomes, as detailed in the subsequent verses which contrast sowing to the flesh versus sowing to the Spirit.
Galatians 6:7 NIV – Do not be deceived: God cannot be
Shooter was illegal immigrant from Afghanistan.
That was another possibility. The Afghans are happily murdering people in Europe too.
Wonder if he has a criminal record in a sanctuary jurisdiction?
Wasn’t an immigrant. Immigrants arrive here after applying to the State Department, paying all fees, undergoing security background check, undergoing medical checkup and vaccination, waiting 3 – 8 years, and then finally showing up at the border with their new visa in hand. Where they go through some more checking and forms before finally being admitted.
Thank you. I have this argument often. There is a big difference between an immigrant and illegal aliens. An immigrant, as you say comes into this country LEGALLY. Illegal aliens break into our country.
Oh, it’s so much worse than when a homegrown American citizen kills someone, like at a Trump rally or Charlie Kirk.
Oh, it’s so much worse than when a homegrown American citizen kills someone, like at a Trump rally or Charlie Kirk.
Those murderers were Biden’s Alphabet Sex Pride Tribe Tranny Furries. At the moment this appears to be somebody Biden, trying to minimize the public disgust at his Afghanistan betrayal and disaster, randomly chose to bring here from Afghanistan without the same vetting a legal immigrant would have to go through.
Other than you’re attempting a non sequitur, it looks like the commonality between all three of them is the slimy dark hand of The Oval Office House Plant.
Trump should get rid of the troops in DC. Having them walking around and doing nothing makes them targets. There is no point in having them there.
“. . . doing nothing . . .”
Since the NG appeared in DC , violent crime is down some 40%. That’s a lot of “nothing.”
More right wing violence in DC. When are we going to face facts that right wing white racist are the biggest threat to our country.
Yesiree there unindenpendent Bob. That right wing independent came all the way to from Afghanistan to attempt a couple of murders to support Trump. Yeseree that wing white racist come to help Trump doncha know you wacky rabbit. Your all in on that the attempt on Trumps life was staged. Sufferin Socatash.
Hey tits, if you know anything about my postings you know I said this tongue in cheek. I was 18 years old when I realized I wasn’t a democrat. I’m 76. I know who I am.
Odd duck. That work bob
Independent Bob,
Hard to tell if one of the anony’s highjacked your comment or not. And, hard to tell if you were being sarcastic or not. Might help to add the /sarc at the end of a comment.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Seriously? The illegal Afghan national certainly was not a “right winger”!
OT
Two Guardsmen murdered near the White House.
The murderer caught.
I wonder what the odds are that the villain has a lengthy criminal record and has been turned loose again and again by mushy brained judges?
As Professor Ilya Shapiro has pointed out, our woke Critical Legal Theory law schools are turning out radical lawyers and judges who are dangerous to civilization.
This is how it has been ending all too often…with innocents stabbed, burned alive or shot.
We need to get savages off the streets and radical judges out of courtrooms.
And many law schools need a course correction to support law rather than legal insurrection.
First reports often wrong. Now we are hearing the Guardsmen are in critical condition but, thankfully, still alive.
Unfortunately they have both succumbed to their wounds. Perp is believed to be of mid eastern descent, not yet verified.
When are the judges that keep letting these scum repeat career criminals off going to be held accountable for their incompetence.
Perp is probably pAntifag but really could be any demographic.
Apparently perp was wounded and captured. Why do they hold back on basic info about him/her/it?
Making identity central to the Leftist platform is actually a glaring weakess, no?
Thanks for consistently delivering content that 🚀 makes a real difference in lives
Self-righteous elite prigs strike again.
First of all, no reason for cancelling Dershowitz was given, so he and Turley assume it is political and scream “censorchip”. Maybe, just maybe, it was his association with Epstein, and the fact that Dershowitz helped negotiate that outrageous sweetheart deal in Florida for Epstein in which he only slept at jail and was free for most of the day. According to “Wikipedia”:
In 2005, police in Palm Beach, Florida, began investigating Epstein after a parent reported that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter. Federal officials identified 36 girls, some as young as 14 years old, whom Epstein had allegedly sexually abused.[8] Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute. He was convicted of only these two crimes as part of a controversial plea deal agreed by the US Department of Justice’s Alex Acosta, and he served almost 13 months in custody but with extensive work release.[9]
Later on, Dershowitz insisted that Epstein was “unfairly maligned” and he described himself as one of Epstein’s “close friends”. These are reason enough to cancel Dershowitz, all of which are irrespective of Dershowitz’s public defending of Trump.
. . . no reason for cancelling Dershowitz was given . . .
That makes it suspicious, though, doesn’t it? Professor Turley acknowledges possible opposition based on Dershowitz’s having represented President Trump (during the first bogus impeachment). That is Professor Turley’s point. You seem to split hairs by saying, no no no, it could be because of some other client that Dershowitz has represented to which the Harvard Club objects. Okay, but the point is the same. Cancelling a lawyer’s book event because you don’t like someone he has represented misunderstands the role of lawyers in our society. Lawyers often represent people they disagree with. (For example a Black lawyer once represented the KKK on principle because the government was trying to get its donor list, and the lawyer reasoned that the government should not be able to do that; next week it could turn around and demand the NAACP’s donor list.)
Oldman– “Cancelling a lawyer’s book event because you don’t like someone he has represented misunderstands the role of lawyers in our society. Lawyers often represent people they disagree with. ”
I hope you teach in some university or law school. Such sound judgment is too often missing in ‘higher’ education; and, apparently, in the Harvard Club–for shame.
Early on an ideal was established when Robert Treat Payne prosecuted the British soldiers in the Boston Massacre and his friend, and future president, John Adams successfully defended them. To both brilliant men the law was higher than mob sentiment. I would equally honor the black lawyer you mentioned who defended the KKK.
Thank you for your observation.
Nothing “suspicious” about a prestigious college refusing to host a speaker who defends a child predator and monster like Epstein. It’s not just that he helped Epstein get away with molesting underage girls, but that his “representation” allowed Epstein to go free so he could hurt even more victims. As if all of this isn’t enough, he then claimed that Epstein was “unfairly maligned”. Records prove that Dershowitz also flew on Epstein’s plane. From “Business Insider”:
“Virginia Giuffre’s 2016 deposition involving allegations against Alan Dershowitz was unsealed Tuesday.
Dershowitz has pushed for the unsealing of all case documents, saying they’ll prove his innocence.
In her deposition, Giuffre claimed she and Dershowitz had sex at least 6 times as she was trafficked by Epstein.
The word “censorship” is strewn about by JT without distinction as to whether legal or illegal.
It is illegal for governments to censor critical voices, with civil lawsuit available the corrective.
It is legal for private institutions, companies, families, and individuals to select what messages they will tolerate.
When they ignore or suppress certain themes judged to be counterproductive to mission or values, that’s called “filtering”. Using the word “censorship” cheapens the word, and totally blurs the privilege private persons and orgs enjoy in supremacy to government.
Cry wolf indiscriminately, and people will no longer understand their own freedoms.
You’re right that he uses the word “censorship” sometimes in two different ways. OTOH, he is careful not to suggest that a private person or entity such as the Harvard Club, which engages in cancel culture, is in any way breaking the law. I don’t see his use of censorship in this broader context (such as in today’s article) as tantamount to crying wolf.
Pbinca- “It is legal for private institutions, companies, families, and individuals to select what messages they will tolerate”
True enough, but in this instance is the Harvard Club acting consistently with its presumed ideals and, if not, is it not appropriate to point out and condemn their hypocrisy and the intellectual rot that that hypocrisy reveals?
I agree that Harvard Club is wallowing in the sewer morally to cancel a scheduled author with no reason given.
It’s a horrible example of intellectual cowardice and retreat from healthy civic life.
*. After witnessing the destruction of the US, I’ve concluded any nation can go under and a person should keep homes and citizenship in at least two countries. There’s a place to flee in that way.
Arivva derci
You make it sound like an easy option. Quitters are losers. A superpower doesn’t need quitters.
You make it sound like an easy option. Quitters are losers. A superpower doesn’t need quitters.
You’re going to have to come up with something better than that to childishly claim that Donald Trump, Dan Bongino, Ben Shapiro, and every other conservative who left the tyranny of New York are quitters. Go ahead: tell them to go back and fight instead of taking the easy option out.
Beyond that, Americans who have maintained dual citizenship for all kinds of reasons has been a fact for longer than before anyone currently alive was born.
OT: For those that only count faux charges against Trump. Here is another one to bite the dust.
Georgia prosecutor who took over 2020 election interference case says he’s dropping charges
The Georgia prosecutor who took over the alleged 2020 election interference case after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was disqualified said Wednesday he’s dropping the criminal charges against President Donald Trump and his co-defendants.
The prosecutor who is ending the case is Pete Skandalakis, according to NBC News.
Cont: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/georgia-prosecutor-who-took-over-2020-election-interference-case-says-hes?utm_source=breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
“For those that only count faux charges against Trump. Here is another one to bite the dust.”
What about faux charges by Trump? The other news today is that the $1m sanction against him has been upheld for his frivolous attempt to sue Clinton et al, wasting the court’s time and filing documents even more confused and long-winded than one of his speeches.
Yawn. Sooooo boring. You must suffer from TDS if you think that is worth a comment to the above article.
What is the betting that the learned Professor Turley (or his intern) will tomorrow churn out a breathless piece about the decision in Georgia, and totally ignore the judgement against Trump’s frivolous lawsuit? I mean, a man does not wish the invitations from Fox to dry up, does he?
You can continue to live in your fantasy world while Trump racks up another win.