District Court Judge Indira Talwani in Boston has been one of the most active judges in the country in seeking to enjoin the orders of President Donald Trump, including her orders to prevent deportations under previously “paroled” immigrants under the Biden Administration. She previously sought to enjoin the denial of federal funds to Planned Parenthood, an order that the United States Court of Appeals lifted for the First Circuit pending appeal. Now, Judge Talwani is back with a new basis for forcing payments to Planned Parenthood despite Congress barring Medicaid funds under the Big Beautiful Bill.
Planned Parenthood is facing a financial meltdown without the federal funding and is closing offices after the passage of the BBB.
Judge Talwani previously halted the cessation of federal funding on the basis that the action was an effort to punish Planned Parenthood for offering abortion services. She wrote the law likely violates the Constitution’s “bill of attainder clause,” which prohibits Congress and state legislatures from imposing punishments on individuals or specific entities without trial. As lead counsel in the Foretich case (one of the few successful modern bill of attainder cases), I was highly skeptical of the chances of Talwani’s earlier opinion being upheld.
However, the law applies to any health care provider providing abortions as of October 1 and receives more than $800,000 in Medicaid payments in a year. The Justice Department argued that “The elected Branches determined that taxpayer funds should not be used to subsidize certain entities that practice abortion – conduct that many Americans find morally abhorrent.”
The opinion, in my view, is flawed and (again) stretches existing precedent to the breaking point. Congress clearly has the power to place this condition on federal funding and was clear on the application of that condition.
Section 71113 was enacted on July 4, 2025, and provides that “[n]o Federal funds that are . . . provided to carry out a State [Medicaid plan] . . . shall be used to make payments to a prohibited entity for items and services furnished during the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act[.]” Pub. L. No. 119-21, § 71113(a), 139 Stat. 72, 300-01 (July 4, 2025).
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) further provided the following notice and guidance:
States must ensure their managed care programs comply with section 71113 and applicable requirements under 42 CFR Part 438. States and their actuaries should evaluate whether implementation of section 71113 necessitates adjustments to Medicaid capitation rate development or constitutes a material adjustment requiring an amended rate certification. Additionally, states should review any [state directed payments (“SDPs”)] to determine whether revisions are required and how such SDPs are accounted for in capitation rate development and rate certifications.States must also ensure that all Medicaid managed care contracts comply with all applicable federal and state laws, including Section 71113 of WFTC legislation.[8] To ensure clarity, states should assess if their managed care contracts should be revised to detail the requirements of section 71113. For example, states may wish to specify in their managed care contracts that payments to prohibited entities are not allowable expenditures of Federal funds under section 71113(a), and that any expenditures to such entities made by [covered organizations] are not eligible for [federal financial participation].
The CMS told the states that if it “has already claimed or has drawn down FFP on or after July 4, 2025 for payments to entities identified as prohibited entities as of October 1, 2025, it should promptly withdraw or correct the claim, or return FFP, as required by applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.”
In my view, the court tries too hard (as it did on the attainder opinion) to protect this funding. We will have to see if the First Circuit and the Supreme Court agree with that assessment.
Here is the opinion: Planned Parenthood decision
I remember a lot of whining and complaining here when the case against Letitia James was dismissed because the judge ruled that Lindsey Halligan was improperly appointed as US Attorney. All you MAGA morons said, “no problem” she can just be re-indicted again with a new grand jury because the statute of limitations has not expired.
So the DOJ did indeed take it to a new grand jury, who today REFUSED TO INDICT.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!!!!!
The clown show continues !!!!!!!
What a joke !!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!!!
These guys need to find a ham sandwich to get their groove back.
That’s an unfair comparison.
Clown shows are much more competent
Lady Justice may be blind, but she still laughs out loud when she hears a good joke!
These bozos couldn’t get Al Capone for tax fraud. Even if he confessed.
Elect a clown, and you get a circus.
Are you MAGA morons tired of winning yet ?????
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!!!!
Nothing sticks when you use Pam
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G7XKV3BWgAA4Rrd?format=jpg&name=small
Pam…you’re in trouble girl!
How many strikeouts is that?
Obviously the next move is to try again and file with Judge Judy.
Take it easy, Karl.
What are you gonna do when the Supreme Court finally finds out you’re all unconstitutional?
Elect a potato and you get a bag of rotten nuts to go with it.
ANON IS A JOKE!
Replying to yourself over and over ANON? That’s a CLOWN!!
CLOWN SHOW ANON!!
ATS so your claim is that getting an indictment proves competence ?
Then you owe Halligan an apology for the insults you threw at her.
Halligan indicted James and Comey 8 days after her appointment
under difficult circumstances.
Judge Currie ruled that Halligan DID NOT OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT.
Are you capable of reading.
So all you are doing is proving that Halligan was a very capable prosecutor – she managed to indict James.
DOJ can try again – and again and again for the next 6 months.
AND at the same time they are appealing Curries decision – and they will win.
Curie misreads the law badly.
There was a similar recent decision removing Habba in New Jersey – but it would be instructive for those of you on the left to compare the orders – specifically related to the different facts and law.
Habba was appointed to a US Attorney position – and has not been confirmed todate – and likely wont be because Senate Democrats have an axe to grind. Habba served the 120 days she was allowed to, and then Bondi appointed her to a different position – which Bondi was entitled to do,
BUT that effectively had the same powers as a US Attorney. The court in the Habba case found that Habba’s time was up.
The correctly read the law. If the Senate ever confirms Habba – she can resume as US attorney.
She could also be appointed by Bondi to an inferior officer position – such as an assistant US Attorney.
But that position must be subordinate to a Officer of the United States.
It is possible that DOJ may appeal the Habba order and possibly even win – but that is not likely.
But they have already appealed the Currie order and they have better than a 50:50 chance of winning at the apeals level Curries decision is so at odds with the case law and the rules of statutory interpretation. But if they lose at tthe appeals level – they will win before SCOTUS.
While the law and the constitution are the primary drivers of appeals decisions, a major factor will be that Comey and James are OBVIOUSLY guilty. The simplest resolution to the case is to reverse Curries decision – the existing indictments are then valid.
John Say the Stupid
Why do you always insist on simply making sh!t up ???
DOJ HAS NOT APPEALED JUDGE CURRIE’S RULING REGARDING HALLIGAN.
THERE IS NO APPEAL !!!!!
THEY KNOW THEY WILL LOSE !!!!!
Just because you want the DOJ to appeal does not make that wish come true.
You are delusional. There will be no appeal.
Haven’t you noticed that all your stupid predictions never come to pass.
Halligan did not manage to indict James. She falsified the indictment and submitted that. There is also the matter that she lied to the grand jury about the case, that Comey’s refusal to testify before the grand jury should be considered a confession of guilt.
A ham-sandwich indictment is based on a skilled and capable legal argument, not that just anyone could wander in and ask the jury to indict on say-so.
They may be “obviously guilty” but so far the DoJ has been unable to produce evidence of that guilt.
You are celebrating that two Criminals might get away with it ?
Really ?
There is zero doubt that James committed mortgage fraud – as well as insurance fraud.
There is zero doubt that if you did what she did and were caught you would be headed for jail.
There are further – and actually worse frauds in NY – but the likelyhood of NY prosecuting her is tiny.
There is zero doubt that Comey lied under oath, that he personally leaked confidential information, that he authorized others in government to do so and that some of what he leaked was classified.
It is irrelevant whether James and Comey are left or right.
They are criminals and should be prosecuted.
Unfortunately your belief that “there is zero doubt” that James committed fraud is not shared by the grand jury who returned a no true bill today after the second attempt to indict.
Obviously there is substantial doubt in the mind of the grand jurors.
You are an idiot.
Your pseudo-intellectual theorizing and utterly absurd legal reasoning does not speak well of your mental health.
You are wrong.
You are always wrong.
You are an idiot.
AI Overview
Special counsel Robert Hur concluded in his report that President Joe Biden’s memory was a key reason for not bringing criminal charges in the classified documents case, assessing that a jury would likely see him as a “sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory”.
Hur’s assessment of Biden’s ability to testify (specifically in a potential future trial, not the actual interview which did take place):
A potential jury would have reasonable doubt about his mental state: The core of Hur’s argument was that because the relevant statute required proving Biden acted “willfully” (with criminal intent), his impaired memory and advanced age would make it difficult to convince a jury of this intent beyond a reasonable doubt.
Memory lapses during the interview: The report cited specific examples from Biden’s five-hour voluntary interview with prosecutors where he struggled to recall dates, including when he left the vice presidency or the specific year his son Beau died.
Assessment was “necessary and accurate and fair”: Hur defended his assessment during congressional testimony, stating it was fundamental to determining if criminal charges were warranted and that he did not “disparage the President unfairly”.
No charges recommended: Ultimately, due to the assessment of his memory and the high bar for proving intent, Hur’s office did not recommend criminal charges against Biden, a decision that drew both praise and criticism.
Hurrs decison was correct.
What is disturbing is that Biden was not removed from office using the 25th amendment after that decision.
There was not even the hint of an effort to do so.
Biden is not going to be prosecuted, – he is not competent to stand trial.
He has not been for the past 8 years.
Concerning trumps MRI…
“An MRI scan may give information about heart size, and heart failure, but you cannot see if arteries are blocked or damaged (it is not an angiogram), you cannot see if he has high cholesterol, diabetes or even high blood pressure. Most importantly, if the question is related to brain function and questions over competency, you have simply scanned the wrong area.”
Maybe they had previously searched for his brain and could not find it. So they broadened the search to look in his huuuuuge chest carvity?
You should seek medical help with that bad case of TDS
J, the clown doesn’t even say who he is quoting.
Absolutely a test for one thing rarely disproves something else.
But it also does not prove that something else.
It is extremely reasonable to determine that Trump’s health – phycial and mental is excellent – because he has an incredibly active life and he has had no problems.
He recovered from Covid – which killed 1/3 of those his age, and he recovered rapidly.
He ran and won a very long and arduous political campaign.
And he is incredibly active as president – succcessfully doing things that pi$$ of left wing nuts every day.
Based on his actual life – he is in better health than I am – and I am 15 years younger and in very good health.
But he is still old and something bad could happen tomorow.
But unlike Biden there is no good reasons to suspect a problem aside from that older people are more likely to have health problems.
he has an incredibly active life”
The guy needed a golf cart to keep up with somewhat elderly EU representatives. His main activity is stuffing junk food into his face and tweeting from his toilet at all hours of the night.
His most strenuous activity is having the Heritage Foundation use him as a sock puppet to deliver what billionaires crave.
If someone manage to shove that fatberg of a body over, it would take 3 strong people to get him back to his feet, not because of the weight, just because of the difficulty in getting a grip on the bag of floppy skin.
The legalization of killing babies is the “Holy Grail” of the democrat party. Sexual/genital surgical-mutilation of children is distant second-place, but of the same disrespect for life itself.
“Sexual/genital surgical-mutilation of children” isn’t something that happens in the USA, except on male babies. Oh, and male children who have enlarged breasts. And breast augmentation of some teen girls. Not really a problem considering the number of surgeries for these sexual reasons.
If you think Democrats are for the legalization of killing babies, talk to a therapist as those voices you hear in your head might be Fox News weekend anchors lying to you again.
Just a thought/question? Who in the hell is running the country anyway? Liberal judges, and the Deep State. That is who runs this train wreck. Someday, it will just die on the vine, I guess.
Rabble:
If a (originally) non-profit, non-governmental organization can only exist on federal funds being funneled in, then they should be the first shut down when there are budget issues (like there are now), and should be the last to be considered for opening.
PP has only ever been about eugenics. They are PETA for humans. They should never have existed in the first place.
Most of the federal funding to Planned Parenthood is via Medicaid. Planned Parenthood is the sole medical provider for sexual health in some areas.
In addition are:
Title X Grants: A federal family planning program that provides grants to cover the cost of preventive services (like contraception, STI testing, and cancer screenings) for uninsured or low-income individuals. Organizations receiving these grants cannot use the funds to provide abortion services.
OT
“What fresh hell can this be?”
– Dorothy Parker
____________________
Five years on, the DOJ brings forth a “patsy” to cover up the “false flag” “pipe bomb” operation that was a decoy to draw Capitol security away and allow the Jan 6 riot perpetrated by the FBI and its 274 onsite “plainclothes” agents.
I tend to be more inclined to believe they had it correct with the first suspect…
“… perpetrated by the FBI and its 274 onsite “plainclothes” agents. ”
Who at the FBI: Conceived the Op, Scheduled the Agent-Operatives to be there, Orchestrated the Live-Ops, Plan the J6 Trails as a Cover-Up Op, … Who got a Pay check for being on duty J6?
There are a lot of dead-end questions to be answered, that won’t be answered.
AI Overview
On January 6, 2021, the top leadership of the FBI included Christopher Wray, Paul Abbate, David Bowdich, Robert Kissane, Steven M. D’Antuono, Brian Driscoll et al.
THANK YOU! 6 (Top Brass) out of 247 is a good start.
Now how about the names of the rest of the Rank Management:
Field Office Managers (for D.C./Baltimore)
Resident Agency Managers (for D.C./Baltimore)
Strategic Information and Operations Center (SIOC) Managers (for D.C./Baltimore)
Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Managers (for D.C./Baltimore)
Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) Managers (for D.C./Baltimore)
Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) (for D.C./Baltimore)
Special Agents (for D.C./Baltimore)
My guess is that there was quite a bit of Overtime pay for the 241 of the Supervisors & Agents>
A Payroll Audit should be enough to turn up the Names.
Ironic – These People got Paid to storm the Capitol and cause the mayhem of J6.
When a judge issues an order that is appealed by the government to the appropriate appeals court and the appeals court finds against the appeal in favor of the district court, the government should have the right to appeal to the Supreme Court an have the district court judge defend his/her decision in open chambers. This might make for more thoughtful and defensible decisions at the district court level. Certainly this will be included in the Constitution for the Red States of America. apbd
I believe they can appeal to the Supreme Court and will.
District Court Judge Indira Talwani possesses no executive power.
President Donald J. Trump enjoys all executive power exclusively.
As unfortunate as it is for power-hungry members of the juristocracy, while the judicial branch enjoys judicial power utterly, the judicial branch enjoys absolutely NO executive power.
The judicial branch may judge; the judicial branch does not possess and may NOT exercise executive power.
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney recounted his related experience in his letter of 1861 below.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Article 1, Section 1
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Article 2, Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Article 3, Section 1
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“The clause in the Constitution which authorizes the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is in the ninth section of the first article. This article is devoted to the Legislative Department of the United States, and has not the slightest reference to the Executive Department.”
“I can see no ground whatever for supposing that the President in any emergency or in any state of things can authorize the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or arrest a citizen except in aid of the judicial power.”
“I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power has been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome.”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, May 28, 1861
Surely, the American Founders and Framers did not intend to establish two executive branches.
Caveat: The word “interpret” does not appear in the Constitution; there is no power of “interpretation,” modification, or amendment related to the judicial branch. The judicial branch exists simply to ensure that actions comport with law.
___________________________________________________________
AI Overview
The U.S. Constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government—the legislative, executive, and judicial—to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful. The legislative branch (Congress) makes laws, the executive branch (the President) enforces laws, and the judicial branch (the courts) interprets laws. This system, known as separation of powers, is supported by a system of checks and balances, where each branch has some authority to limit the powers of the others.
George is running his favorite Kluxxer Confederate SCOTUS Justice, Taney up the Confederate flagpole again. After all, Taney told George’s Kluxxer Confederate predecessors that they could keep their Darkies as slaves because they weren’t human – they were just a different breed of farm animal working on their farms. “I can see no ground that says your Darkies are human beings entitled to freedom” Dred Scott v. Sandford, [a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857),
“I can see no ground whatever for supposing that the President in any emergency or in any state of things can authorize the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or arrest a citizen except in aid of the judicial power.”
“I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power has been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome.”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, May 28, 1861
b>Chief Justice William Rehnquist spent 300 pages explaining and dealing with Confederate Commie GeorgeX’s Marxist wet dreams and revisionist historical and Constitutional analysis of both Lincoln and the Confederate Democrat Civil War (as seen through the eyes of today’s Democrat Kluxxers who have now turned to communism when their Civil War ended in a crushing FAFO).
Given that George has proved his reading comprehension has never gotten beyond what he developed in kindergarten, Justice Rehnquist’s work and explanations may as well be laying on the surface of the moon as far as George is concerned. For everybody else who are normal Americans:
ALL THE LAWS BUT ONE: CIVIL LIBERTIES IN WARTIME
https://www.amazon.com/All-Laws-but-One-Liberties/dp/0679446613
*. In the 1st paragraph of the Judges opinion she said Bill of Attainder clause in the 1st and 5th amendment? It’s contained in Article 1, section 10, prohibiting punishment without due process by congress, trial? Planned Parenthood Federation , 22 States are complaining.
So they want a trial that finds them guilty of providing elective abortions. Kind of circular considering reorganization isn’t it? This “punishment” was part of a budget passed by congress. So do a class action trial because one entity won’t do.
Shouldn’t that settle it? Settle it until it’s all reversed. KBJ said she’s not part of government.
To all parents who love their children beyond measure will not understand. Condolences…
^^^ The problem appears to be because it’s public money, taxes. Prohibiting bill of attainder , article 1, section 10, isn’t about public money.
It’s a fail.
There are 14 States with total abortion bans including medicine abortions. North Dakota has the stiffest. These are poverty women and children living in poverty. Two mouths to feed is more difficult than one outh for survival purposes. It is hoped these 14 States are making increased adoptions possible and orphanages.
Boo hoo, I can’t understand why I keep getting pregnant. Im poor which means I can’t afford a .75 rubber. Instead, I will just let the taxpayer pay to kill my unborn child.
I’m 12 and was in love with a 17 year old guy. I’m pregnant. I’m not fully grown yet and weigh 80 pounds. I didn’t tell anyone until after 6 weeks passed. I’m homeless with my drug addicted mother. I hope they put me in a shelter with food.
Sounds like the state should have removed you from your drug addicted mother and put you into foster care.
I also find it really odd that you seem to think it is OK for 12yr olds to be having sex – and worse still with 17yr olds.
Finally you are fortunate that you live in the US today.
There is the possibility that you will get some assistance with your problem.
For 99.9999% of human existance – you were going to have this baby or possibly die giving birth.
Actual rights are things that you have that others can not take away by force.
They are not things that you want that you aare trying to FORCE others to give you.
The pro-lifers don’t accept foster kids. They only want women to suffer, even if raped by a family member. Once the child is born the pro-lifers would just as soon watch it starve to death. Once it is born, the child is no longer their concern because that would entail them doing something beside heaping scorn on others.
“For 99.9999% of human existance – you were going to have this baby or possibly die giving birth.”
Not really a sound argument, and you are unable to spell existence correctly. Is this a Moscow dictionary being used?
For 99.9999% of human existence plenty of horrific things that people do could happen. Perhaps you would like to face abdominal surgery with no anesthetic or antibiotics or sterilized surgical instruments on the same basis. Or no surgery at all following a ruptured appendix. Fun stuff. Try it some time.
I am sure that you can find a church that will assist you with your problems – but Charity is a gift the rest of us choose to give – and sometimes it has strings.
There is no right to charity, and govenrment has no business funding charity.
Oh, you left out the mentally retarded with an IQ of 60 part and of course she’s blind in one eye and has clubbed feet…
Gosh, you’re so funny. Do you lack the chromosome, genes for kindness and compassion? You may. They are gifts.
Kindness and compassion to kill the unborn? You’re a twisted black hole.
There is no right involved in funding or defunding PP, therefore there is no punishment and the bill of attainder provisions do nott apply.
Birth control without utilizing abortion is a fairly easy process with many options. If thinking adults used these options , then the need for abortions would be extremely rare. Then PP could focus their efforts on truly women’s healthcare. Women do have many other risks to their health than being pregnant or having children.
America has a terminal risk to its health with a fertility rate in a “death spiral.”
More actual Americans die than are born.
Where’s the future for a country with no babies?
Deport the foreigners and make new Americans.
There’s an idea.
whoa is me. not enough white babies are born. too many foriegners. How about this, you move out and let more people in and then you dont have to worry about the birth rate? Also im assuming you have like 50 kids. go away xenophobe
What’s the difference between a patriot and a xenophobe?
Is it unconstitutional to be a xenophobe?
Were the American Founders xenophobes?
Let’s ask the quisling.
_________________________
“The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities. In the composition of society, the harmony of the ingredients is all-important, and whatever tends to a discordant intermixture must have an injurious tendency.”
– Alexander Hamilton
_________________________
Freedom and Self-Reliance.
They will never be Americans who require “free stuff” and “free status” and are, therefore, unassimilable.
Remember the Alamo!
Whoa is right! Better to be silent, and thought a fool, than to peck away on your keyboard and remove all doubt.
The American Founders established a Nation, its Law, and its Population.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1798, 1802
United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” March 26, 1790
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof….
The greatest tragedy of George/X/Anonymous’s life: them Darkies that he believes he has a right to own not only can vote, but they can be citizens as well!
The American Founders are long dead but their Constitution and the mechanism to pass, amend, and repeal legislation continues. The Confederate Kluxxer Democrats attempted to destroy the nation they established. But the Republic survives and through the Constitution the law has grown with the country.
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Pub.L. 82–414, 66 Stat. 163, enacted June 27, 1952), codified under Title 8 of the United States Code (8 U.S.C. ch. 12), governs immigration to and citizenship in the United States.
8 U.S. Code Chapter 12 Subchapter III Part II – Nationality Through Naturalization
8 U.S. Code § 1422 – Eligibility for naturalization
The right of a person to become a naturalized citizen of the United States shall not be denied or abridged because of race or sex or because such person is married.
whoa is me. not enough white babies are born. too many foriegners.
But thank God – Salvation! We Democrats and Planned Parenthood that we fund (and then they fund us in return) are doing a WONDERFUL job of wiping out them Darkies before they’re born!
Margaret Sanger and her Eugenics still LIVES!!!
Gotta put an end to the number of Darkies living outside our Democrat Poverty Plantations now that they’re increasingly voting for Orange Hitler!!! We’ll replace them with MS13 members to pick our lettuce growing in the cracks of the sidewalks and streets of Los Angeles, New York, etc. Biden brought in about 15 million – that’ll cover our shortfall!
More than 60% of those who seek elective abortions are people of color according to the Guttmacher Institute
“whoa is me.”
Do not care about your whoa’s
“not enough white babies are born”
Who said anything about white ?
“too many foriegners.”‘
Correct, the citizens of a nation get to decide who can be part of that nation – that is true everywhere in the world across all time.
“How about this, you move out”
Because citizens have the right to be here.
“and let more people in”
Because the citizens of other nations have the right to be in THEIR country – not this one.
“then you dont have to worry about the birth rate?”
The current US birth rate is a relatively minor problem.
But most off western Europe, Russia, China and Japan are in deep $hit.
Demographic collapse is always accompanied by economic collapse.
“Also im assuming you have like 50 kids.”
You make lots of false assumptions – worse still – with near certinty you know that you do and do not care.
That is called LYING. Lying is as destructive to a nation as declining birth rates.
Exactly how do you think you can make an economy work if people can not trust other people.
What if your employer decided to stop paying you ?
What if the people you bought services from stopped providing them and kept your money ?
“go away xenophobe”
You live in the least xenophobic contry in the world, in the least xenophobic momeny in time and all you can do is insult people.
Authoritarian judges are a threat to democracy. They and their illegal bench legislation should be resisted and ignored.
The Trump administration’s frantic push to hire 10,000 new deportation officers by year’s end has spiraled into what insiders describe as a national embarrassment – with lax vetting and a signing bonus of up to $50,000 luring in a wave of woefully unfit recruits.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has lowered standards so dramatically that the new cohort now includes recent high school graduates and applicants who can ‘barely read or write’ as well as those who lack basic physical fitness and even have pending criminal charges.
Meanwhile, total novices are being fast-tracked into the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Georgia, where instructors have been left astounded at the levels of incompetence.
‘We have people failing open-book tests and we have folks that can barely read or write English,’ one Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official said.
‘We even had a 469-lb man sent to the academy whose own doctor certified him not at all fit for any physical activity.’
Insiders say the vetting process has been so rushed that officials didn’t even wait for drug test results to come back before hiring recruits and flying them off to the training center in Georgia, only to discover afterward that tests came back positive.
In one shocking incident, staff were left shaking their heads when one student asked to be excused from class so he could attend a court date on a gun charge.
Standards have been lowered to the floor. They have a bunch of unqualified misfits and unhinged weirdos they are rushing through an abbreviated academy so they can get them weapons and gear and out onto the streets ASAP.
What could go wrong?
We can see what could go wrong everyday in real time, when these thugs and hoodlums attack and detain perfectly innocent citizens.
Name one.
George Retes: An American combat veteran who was detained for three days in California without access to a lawyer.
Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez: A U.S.-born citizen arrested during a traffic stop in Florida who was held even after a judge was presented with his birth certificate.
Leonardo Garcia Venegas: A citizen detained twice by agents who dismissed his REAL ID as a fake
Just a few. There are many more.
Have you seen his immigration documentation? A congressman from California has no documentation and simply states that he came in with his father, who was working in a “Bracero” program, but the dates prove him wrong, and the program was terminated before he claimed to have entered, additionally, his father claimed to be working in agriculture when he was actually working in mining. He also seems to believe that fraudulent and illegal service in the U.S. Marine Corps as a non-citizen constitutes grounds for legal immigration.
In all likelihood, an extremely large percentage of “immigrants” are actually illegal and without proper documentation.
George Retes was arrested and held for three days for ASSAULT on the officers and blocking them with his car. DHS wrote in a press release: “George Retes—a U.S. citizen—became violent and refused to comply with law enforcement. He challenged agents and blocked their route by refusing to move his vehicle out of the road. CBP arrested Retes for assault.”https://www.newsweek.com/us-citizen-army-veteran-arrested-ice-dhs-debunk-10870108
Juan Lopez-Gomez: “A senior official with the Department of Homeland Security said Monday that Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, a 20-year-old born in Georgia, was detained Wednesday after he told a Florida Highway Patrol trooper that he was in the country illegally. ‘Immediately after learning the individual was a United States citizen, he was released,’ a DHS senior official said in a statement Monday.”https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/04/21/feds-blame-u-s-citizen-for-his-arrest-under-suspended-immigration-law/
Leonardo Garcia Venegas: was held for ONE HOUR the first time, and 20 MINUTES the second time, until information could be verified. “A US citizen construction worker was detained by ICE. Twice. Now he’s suing.” USA TOday
You see, there’s always two sides to every story, especially when it’s media vs. DHS
George Retes: Wasn’t he detained by the Mexicans for crossing their border? Why don’t you get your facts straight?
No he was not detained by Mexico.
I suggest you get your facts straight.
Your excessive characterizations, your over-the-top rhetorical extremum and your perverse endorsement of illegalities have nothing to do with protecting citizens or understanding lawful legislation.
You are protecting an ideological virtue-signal, a counterfeit virtue that celebrates criminality itself (i.e., law-breaking), and it’s a good bet you’ve never lifted one finger to help a single on the those “innocent citizens”—they are simply pawns in your histrionic game of irrational and affective-excitability, and your highly sensationalized penchant for emotional agitation while you criminally deny and nullify laws already on the books.
IFIFY
it’s a good bet you’ve never lifted one finger to help a single on the those “innocent citizens”
it’s a good bet you’ve never lifted one finger to help a single one of those “innocent citizens”
Obama’s influx of Somalian immigrants to Minnesota created a Muslim voting block that Democrats can’t resist. Tim Walz has looked the other way while this bunch of corrupt third world thieves stole $1B tax dollars. Reportedly, a substantial portion of the money went to fund El Shabab, a Islamic terrorist group.
So tell us again how unvetted ICE officers are again.
20 million latinos et al. were illegally imported en masse and à la hâte to “fundamentally transform the United States of America” and to vote (D) for DINERO.
They were invited by the criminals Biden and Mayorkas. Do you expect them to understand American law? The real question is: why are they walking around free? Mayorkas and Biden are Americans.
This is a serious situation which cant be ignored. This must be corrected. It must be corrected because many more officers are needed due to the cynical purely political move of opening our borders.
Do you care to name or point to someone providing such specific information? May as well as said you got a note from your mother and say it’s all true. Heck, any 3rd party notification that has data and not just “anonymous sources” would be good.
Deportation of illegal aliens is a beautiful thing, reducing violent crime and saving American lives.
DEPORTATION NATION!
Those look like the exact same anonymous “insider sources” that convinced Biden’s Bolshevik Birthing Boyz that the FBI had 100% verified the felonious Clinton-Obama “Trump-Russia Dossier”.
Words that are gold for Democrat apparatchiks:
“Insiders”
“Supposedly”
“Allegedly”
Why, just over a year ago, I can remember four straight years of you being in full throated rage when the Biden administration was pushing General “White Rage” Milley to recruit hundreds of thousands of Alphabet Sex Pride Tribe pudgy purple haired bisexuals and lard assed bull dikes as recruits – with special preference given for Tranny Furries that were so skinny they looked like zippers when told to stick their tongue out.
You WERE in the exact same state of disgust during those four years… weren’t you, Bolshevik Birthing Boy?
The Trump administration’s frantic push to hire 10,000 new deportation officers by year’s end has spiraled into what insiders… What could go wrong?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15345295/ICE-campaign-hire-deportation-officers-unfit-violent-illiterate.html
Could it go wrong that you copied and pasted all of that, word for word, from the UK’s Daily Mail?
That tabloid of pure socialist unbiased journalism that assured you for FIVE YEARS that their inside sources were telling them the felonious Clinton-Obama Russia Dossier was 100% verified and proved Trump conspiring with Putin stole the 2016 election?
You can quit screaming in rage about deportations of criminal Illegal Aliens now! Your MS13 and hajji terrorist Illegal Alien friends are now safe!
After all, according to the Daily Mail, these new officers are going to be so incompetent that the million and a half of Biden’s Guest Democrat Voters that have been booted out or run out will be strolling back across the incompetently guarded borders now.
Yesterday one of the topics was Military Order [who, what, when], today it’s Judicial Order or put more simply WHO’S THE BOSS. By boss I mean who has the final say as to how the law is interpreted and what is their supremacy in the chain of command.
The current structure of judicial administration leaves the boss in a peculiar position, a lower court Judge Issues orders that are counter to the Bosses rulings, which then stymies the courts to address the lower court Judges interference.
I have no idea of a solution other than a total restructure of the Courts hierarchy with more definitely. Rogue officious government officials usurping authority are attacking the very foundation of this great Country.
Wrong thread dufus.
What are you in eight the grade?
He didn’t make it to the EIGHTH grade, and you may not have either because, apparently, you may have ate the grade.
Bull crap, he know they were both in the eighth grade for three years! If only they hadn’t copied off one another 🤡
Impeachment is a difficult remedy in cases like this.
Correction may have to come from within the judiciary house. If a mechanism exists the cobwebs need to be brushed away and the power turned on. If it doesn’t exist it must be created.
In other words, Roberts and the Court must act.
Rogue judges can’t be allowed to continue their destruction of the reputation and legitimacy of the federal judiciary. There must be consequences for arbitrary and capricious rulings based on ideology.
Whatever the merits of the Democrat/Socialist “Resistance” to Trump, the judiciary can’t be a part of it and continue to exist as a respected institution of lawful government.
Impeach for what reason?
As Justice Storey wrote, “high crimes and misdemeanours” includes the “usurpation” of authority. That is what this judge is doing.
Daniel,
Anon failed to understand that I was speaking of a lesser alternative to impeachment in the hands of the Court rather than a cumbersome legislative remedy.
His post is a non sequitur.
But you have made a good point. Thank you.
These judges are Obama appointees.
Young says: In other words, Roberts and the Court must act.
“Must”? Give your head a shake and remember this is the same Roberts who did NOTHING to address Boasberg repeatedly allowing the FISA courts he was put in charge of allowing Obama to smugly send his Attorney Generals and FBI Directors to those courts where they perjured themselves every time to obtain fraudulent spy warrants to deprive thousands of Americans of their civil rights by color of law. Boasberg hasn’t dragged a single one of those unindicted felons back into his court to face jail for the felonies they committed to his courtroom and him.
But why would Boasberg do that – they’re his fellow members of the Washington DC Bar Association – as is Roberts.
Roberts is now watching as we learn what Roberts already knows: that Boasberg did practically the same thing to issue warrants for Jack Smith to go hunting Republican congressman and spy on businesses that weren’t even in existence until two years after the year 2000.
Roberts won’t lift a finger about that judicial misconduct, he’s making no effort to identify who leaked the Dobbs decision – he primarily ensures he doesn’t get disinvited from the Washington DC cocktails and canapes party circuit…
And that’s the Chief Justice you think will pay any attention to being told he must act in regards to this Insurrection From The Bench judge?
Ain’t gonna happen.
And the Senate Republicans are very, VERY short of the numbers they would need to impeach Boasberg and/or this judge and swiftly boot their corrupt asses off the bench. Pour encouragez les autres to decide whether or not they wanted to engage in judicial insurrection from the bench with a belief they’re invulnerable.
We don’t need a President to run the Country, we have federal judges for that.
Yes, and every one of them thinks s/he knows better than the President, Congress, and every right thinking person in the country.
What is a right thinking person? What is a wrong thinking person?
Wrong thinking person=ANON!
Answer:
A right-thinking person is a free and self-reliant person who persists under the “manifest tenor” of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, 1789.
A wrong-thinking person is a democrat/communist/liberal/progressive/socialist/moderate/RINO/AINO.
Judges have no executive power; this is a corrupt unconstitutional juristocracy.
Judge, shut up, and go away.
Hold on to your seat.
Remember when Octomom Nadia Suleman gave birth to 8 babies. Nadia has a money beg video looking for $1 million dollars.
Relevance please?
You are irrelevant and obsolete. Wait for a finding of this inquiry.
What inquiry? Has Nadia Suleman committed a crime?
Unconstitutional parasitism; the receipt of unconstitutional welfare payments and public assistance by one who is fundamentally ineligible.
Who let her in?
*. There are those who think humans are merely mammals. In such a case any veterinarian would do ? It’s quite true that any vet can manage a medium sized mammal and can do so at a spay and neuter clinic. Have an ear clipped or notched afterward.
This case makes me think of that. The advent of medicaid should have taken this issue out of discussion. Planned parenthood shouldn’t exist at all.
Medicaid cards are like pre-loaded credit cards. Spend them as you will. Everyone did that.
Everyone else uses a Visa and no one says on what. If a woman feels and thinks she cannot have a baby can she pay cash?
Pre-loaded credit cards for food but not this or that food? Perhaps your Visa shouldn’t buy this or that either.
So tragic, so sorrowful…
“Medicaid cards are like . . .” “Everyone else uses a Visa . . .”
Visa: My money; I decide.
Medicaid: Public dole; the public decides.
Learn the importance of fundamental distinctions.
I’ve read the constitution and nowhere can I find any language from our founders that requires the federal government using our tax dollars to fund the killing of babies. Did I miss something?
They don’t. No funding goes towards abortion. Period. The problem is, conservatives don’t like the fact that an organization that gets government funds for other services that are wholly uncontroversial still seems to erroneously believe that somehow Planned Parenthood is funneling government funds to perform abortions. That’s the conspiracy nut sort of thinking that will never go away because there will always be that one nut coming up with another convoluted reason federal money is used for abortions.
Money is fungible.
Most of all when it comes to PP
Anon didn’t mean a fungicide, fungible, as in economics and law, fungibility is the property of something whose individual units are considered fundamentally interchangeable with each other.
Money is fungible. So fungible that what doesn’t get moved around to fund elective birth control abortions of black babies, get’s moved right back into the pockets of the Democrats who voted for that taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood says it will spend $40 million to bolster Democrat campaigns ahead of November’s election
https://apnews.com/article/planned-parenthood-spending-45-million-2024-election-a6b9252fec64d1e051816ea173dab32f
georgie, your argument is so artificial, but consistent with your intent on this site.
“No funding goes toward abortion.”
So, PP tries to move the money from its other programs to instead pay for its abortions, then refills the bank and replaces the money from those other programs (that it had moved) with the federal funds. Do you get the controversy?
X – To believe that is a textbook example of “willful ignorance.”
They don’t. No funding goes towards abortion. Period.
X/George/Anonymous has a special soft spot in his Confederate Kluxxer heart for Planned Parenthood as they do the work of killing off those Darkies he doesn’t want in America – 60% of their abortions are of those Darkie babies George loathes with the heat of a thousand burning suns.
And the phrase of the day for those who aren’t communist financial illiterates is “MONEY IS FUNGIBLE – INCLUDING THE MONEY DEMOCRATS GIVE TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD”.
Planned Parenthood receives approximately $792.2 million in taxpayer funding each year, which accounts for nearly 40% of its total revenue.
Planned Parenthood knows that and depends on it.
Democrats know it and expect that Planned Parenthood will kick back millions of dollars to their campaign funds as “donations”.
George even knows that – but there he goes again, lyin’ like a Biden. Even though (while it’s hard to believe), The Oval Office House Plant has more credibility after all those years of saying he didn’t know The First Felon Son’s customers and he would never pardon him.
This commie Confederate Nut thinks Americans are as mentally incapacitated as he is with his undeveloped prefrontal cortex.
It’s murder
Half of all pregnancies are miscarriages within the first two weeks. Women don’t know it. .33 percent of women worldwide die in childbirth.
Only God has the right to kill. Yes, life begins at conception. It’s an act of creation.
Whoa, call the looney bin, got one coming in.
*. Can’t take a few facts, presumably.
Congress can’t tax for and fund a bunch of somali parasites in Minnesota or Al-Shabab either, but it does, through Ilhan Omar and her camel driving minions.
This judge does not understand how our Constitutional system works, apparently.
Congress passed a law that she doesn’t like, and so she is going to usurp Congress to impose her preferences.
It seems you don’t fully understand how the judicial system works. Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit, and the judge is obligated to consider both sides—the plaintiffs’ and the defendants’. Her job is to interpret the law and decide whether the plaintiffs have legal standing to sue. She concluded that they do, according to the law. However, conservatives didn’t agree with her interpretation, and they attack her by discrediting her as an activist, a leftist, or anything else to undermine her reasoning instead of on the merits.
She also has the authority to determine whether the law passed by Congress is constitutional or if it conflicts with other statutes Congress has enacted. You can complain and whine all you want, but the process is clear: if you conservatives don’t like her ruling, they can exercise the right to appeal to a higher court—until it possibly reaches the Supreme Court. Until then, any decision made by lower courts remains in effect.
X says It seems you don’t fully understand how the judicial system works.
It seems X’s lack of a developed prefrontal cortex handicaps him to the point he doesn’t realize that he’s considered to be nothing but a crazed psychopathic liar who assumes he has credibility here.
George X: you are the pathetic retard who just a few weeks ago said that the courts weren’t going to allow Trump to deploy the National Guard.
And then the courts affirmed Trump had the right to allow Trump to deploy the National Guard.
Using the word retard on you… well it’s a waste of a perfectly good word.
What is the point of having judicial immunity if you can’t impose your values on others from time to time?