What is the next worst thing to being arrested for DUI just before Christmas with a viral video of you berating an officer? Being confused with that person by irate citizens because you share the same name, Maria Bucci. It is particularly unwelcome when you are a substance abuse counselor.
On December 18, Maria Bucci, a 51-year-old Rhode Island political figure, was pulled over on suspicion of drunk driving by an officer in East Greenwich. The Chairwoman of the Democratic Committee in Cranston is shown on the police bodycam video invoking her special or influential status: “You know who I am right?”
The Cranston Herald reported Bucci is a former Cranston mayoral candidate who previously served on the City Council and made an unsuccessful bid for the Rhode Island House of Representatives last year.
The officer responds by saying, “I don’t know who you are, miss. You can start throwing out names and start doing out what you need to do, it’s not going to work with me, I’m telling you right now, I’m not the guy for that.”
That only seemed to set Bucci off, who then abused the officer. The most ironic statement was the following:
“Call my husband right now, and call the attorney general and everybody else in town, cause this is disgusting, God forbid I was a Black person, I’d be arrested.”
So, after invoking a special privilege or status, Bucci attacked the officer as presumptively racist for not arresting white people for crimes that Black people are arrested for. He then arrested her for a misdemeanor as she declared, “You’re a d**k … Like I am not drinking, you’re a loser.”
If she were drunk, it would seem a case of in vino veritas, or “in wine there is truth.” The immediate response of this politician is to reveal a deep dislike of police officers and her view of officers as inherently racist.
Bucci will have to deal with the consequences, but it should be the right Bucci. While the real Bucci asked “You know who I am, right?” some appear to have done little to answer in the affirmative before going on the attack.
The problem is that East Greenwich has a second Maria Bucci, who is also a substance abuse counselor. She was apparently deluged by trolling and angry citizens.
The “other” Maria Bucci is also from Cranston but works in East Greenwich. She is 61 years old and was surprised to find herself taking the heat for someone else over the holiday.
It was bad enough that East Greenwich News ran a story to ask people to stop harassing the poor woman, noting that the newspaper:
“typically doesn’t use names when people who get arrested unless there is a public service aspect. We did not consider Bucci’s arrest rose to that level but we are writing about it now to clarify that the Maria Bucci who works for the Town of East Greenwich is not the same Maria Bucci arrested by EGPD Dec. 18 (here is that arrest report: 25-251-AR).”
Legally, the “other” Maria Bucci could sue for a publication that falsely claims she was responsible for this viral encounter. (So far, no news organizations have committed that error). However, such litigation is expensive and trolls are notoriously difficult to track down. That leaves Maria Bucci in the unfortunate class of others who share names with notorious figures, as Dr. Jeffrey Epstein recently learned after a bizarre shoutout from ep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX). Indeed, even spelling “Madoff” with one “f” does not help when you are scooped up in the sensation of a crime.
Bucci is clearly not on the same level as an Epstein or a Madoff. This is, after all, a still unproven misdemeanor. However, in the community of Cranston, Rhode Island (pop. 84,934), it is hard to shake a viral story with your name. The greatest penalty likely to befall the real Maria Bucci is the reputational damage, which should not be shared with that “other” Maria Bucci.
“God alone is satisfied with what He is and can proclaim ‘I am what I am.” Unlike God, man strives with all his might to be what he is not. He incessantly proclaims, “I am what I am not.” ‘Eric Hoffer’
some RI animals are more equal than others.
She was probably drunk when she said that. 😏. Just like Kavanaugh had too many eggnogs on December 23, 2025.
I wonder what the success rate is for politicians and other self-imagined mucky-mucks who have an undesired law enforcement encounter and who resort to asking “You know who I am, right?” of the uniformed officer standing in front of them or looking down at them through their driver-side window? Either there is a large number of such people who evade stories like this by asking that question, and so the risk may seem acceptable, or the proliferation of body cams is driving the success rate down and we are seeing stories like this when it involves the dumber ones who haven’t gotten the word yet to act very meek and respectful and hope they don’t recognise you.
“I wonder what the success rate is for politicians and other self-imagined mucky-mucks who have an undesired law enforcement encounter and who resort to asking “You know who I am, right?” ”
There are undoubtedly some politicians and other public figures who could potentially make an LEO miserable after an arrest. However, I’m pretty sure that the number is pretty small, and that cops in the area are probably already pretty well aware of their identities. The idiot who was stopped failed to realize that she didn’t really have any weight to throw around, in spite of her fantasies.
Why did Professor Turley write today about a worthless, drunk, parasitic, overpaid, communist, state, musical chairs apparatchik rather than the Supreme Court, which acted yesterday to reinforce its Black Supremacy—the authority of the Black Robes—and to wield the power of the “Dictatorship of the Juristocracy”?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
HIGH COURT BLOCKS PRESIDENT FROM DEPLOYING NATIONAL GUARD
“Alito rips Supreme Court majority as ‘unwise’ for blocking Trump’s National Guard plan”
Conservative justice warns decision could limit federal government’s ability to protect personnel during unrest
Justice Samuel Alito criticized the Supreme Court’s majority in a sharp dissent Tuesday after the high court decided 6–3 to temporarily block President Donald Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago.
– Fox News
______________
The judicial branch may judge and issue a decision that is devoid of, or compels, the exercise of executive power.
The legislative branch may enact laws that are devoid of, or compel, the exercise of executive power.
That you do not enjoy the verbatim Constitution and disagree does not bear.
Congress may impeach and convict the president if it determines that he has committed crimes of high office.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“I HAVE EXERCISED ALL THE POWER WHICH THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS CONFER ON ME”
“The clause in the Constitution which authorizes the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is in the ninth section of the first article. This article is devoted to the Legislative Department of the United States, and has not the slightest reference to the Executive Department.”
“I can see no ground whatever for supposing that the President in any emergency or in any state of things can authorize the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or arrest a citizen except in aid of the judicial power.”
“I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power has been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome.”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, May 28, 1861
Right.
Finally, a high-functioning logical mind that is able to read English and assimilate the immutable dominion of the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the American Founders, 1789.
It ain’t the vote. It ain’t the “interpretation.” It ain’t the officials. It ain’t the communists. It ain’t the “free stuff.” It ain’t the “free status.” It’s the “free dom!” It’s the “manifest tenor.”
It’s the Constitution.
“I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power has been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome.”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, May 28, 1861
==============
Roger B Taney🙀🙀🙀!!!! ….LOL….Hahahahahahahaha ……Hahaha…..
Would this be the SAME “Roger G Taney” who wrote, what is considered by most SCOTUS legal scholars, the WORST ruling to ever come out of the SCOTUS; using twisted, tortured application of “case law” with insane “interpretations” of the Constitution and “Bill of Rights”, the OPINION in the Dredd Scott case ????🤬 Hahahahaha ….. 🤮 🤮 🤮
Go Home Junior, this is WAY ABOVE your deranged TDS Pay Grade😹😹😹
The failure is yours: the failure to evaluate that case and decision in the legal context of the time. In 1857, slaves were still considered to be the legal property of their owners, and therefore were not considered US citizens. The case outcome, and Taney’s majority (7-2) opinion, hinged principally on legal standing (i. e., citizenship), and on whether the slaveholder had conferred freedom upon and legally released Scott and his wife Harriet by virtue of transporting them to the states of Illinois and Wisconsin (which had outlawed slavery) before returning to Missouri, where slavery continued to be practiced. As reprehensible as we find slavery to be today, in the context of Federal law in 1857, Taney’s opinion was defensible, and, most likely, legally correct.
You know who I am, right? I’m a big name VIP that you should be scared of. What makes me a big name VIP? I once lost an election where I was trying to become a member of the Rhode Island house of representatives. Got that? Had I won, I would have been one of 75 members of one legislative chamber in the smallest state in the nation. But I’m not even that because I lost.
As for right now, well this should scare you to reason: right now I’m the co-chair of a political committee in a town few people have ever heard of. That should frighten you into letting me go so I can endanger the lives and safety of innocent motorists and pedestrians. P.S. Nobody is above the law.
Exactly. If she was a real VIP, she would be above the law. .. see, e.g., the Epstein Transparency Act.
* why Turley seems to dwell on these radical left scum persona non gatas .. . is a mystery to me.
Rhode Island is so small, that’s where the “I know a guy” crap comes from. Anyone in any position is almost always there because they too, ‘knew a guy’ and so feel ‘privileged’, the “in” group. The attitude on this lady is unfortunately Rhode Island culture now, they’re everywhere.
It’s the main way democrats maintain power here; schmooze, go along with the ‘gang’, keep your position. Hilarity ensues. Voters eyes glaze over thinking they at least got the mob out of RI politics…
“Voters eyes glaze over thinking they at least got the mob out of RI politics…”
That history may be part of the RI attitude problem on full display here. The state was once a primary refuge for major organized crime players…
Said the shepherd boy to the mighty king,
“Do you know who He is?
In your palace warm, mighty king,
Do you know who He is?
A Child, a Child shivers in the cold–
Let us bring him silver and gold,
Let us bring him silver and gold,
Said the king to the people everywhere,
“Listen to what I say!
Pray for peace, people, everywhere,
Listen to what I say!
The Child, the Child sleeping in the night
He will bring us goodness and light,
He will bring us goodness and light.”
–from Do You Hear What I Hear
When danger appears without warning, and the police intervene to keep us safe, gratitude comes naturally. Officers routinely put their lives at risk on our behalf. When we are issued a ticket for our own wrongdoing, we should remember that same commitment to public safety and respond with respect, even thanking them, because enforcement exists to protect lives, not to punish arbitrarily.
Then, there were those Capitol Police officers who were battered, beaten, sprayed with bear spray, spat upon and crushed in doors, trying to do their jobs protecting members of Congress from an angry mob who believed the lie that Trump’s “victory” was “stolen by fraud”. They were deluded into believing that they should get to the floor of the House and prevent Biden from becoming President: “if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country any more.” Where is the gratitude for their sacrifice and dedication in the face of danger? One of the first things your hero did was pardon them–even those who pleaded guilty–even those found guilty by juries of their peers So, where’s the appreciation for their sacrifice? I don’t ever want to hear you Trump fans praise law enforcement ever again–it’s hypocrisy if you can just ignore Trump pardoning the J6 defendants.
THEY ALREADY SERVED TIME IN PRISON!!! Trump: Protest peacefully!
No, they didn’t. And, several of them have been re-arrested for other crimes. Many of them had criminal records, which is why some of them were denied bail–they were already out on bail or on probation, which would require their re-arrest. \
But, your reply is not responsive. WHY is it OK with you Trump fans that the J6 defendants and those who hadn’t been arrested yet, to batter, spit on, bear spray and injure the Capitol Police?
I’ll tell you WHY. because you left out all the context, all the true opinions of non-radicals like yourself, and lumped it all together with your dumb wrong conclusion which is driven by TDS causing you to not be able to be objective. Either you’re ignorant or you’re malicious. That’s WHY.
NOT RESPONSIVE. What’s “objective” about the blanket pardon of all of the J6 participants? What is the “context”? Did or didn’t Trump tell the faithful to “fight like hell”, but then threw in the word “peaceful” later on? You can’t “peacefully….fight like hell”. As usual, all you MAGAs can do is name–call and accuse your opponent of lying or of having a “derangement syndrome”. If there is “derangement” involving Trump–it’s those of you who can’t see the malignant narcissist who is hungry for power and attention, who is petty, vindictive, ignorant of economics and world history, and who will tell whatever lie it takes to get what he wants. According to his niece, clinical psychologist Dr. Mary Trump, he is looking for love, but will never find it because he doesn’t deserve it. He can only love himself. As to the J6 participants, we all saw what they did–how they beat up cops, broke down doors, smashed windows, bear-sprayed and spit on police officers, tore up Nancy Pelosi’s office and stole things, trashed the John Lewis Memoria, and how they chanted “Hang Mike Pence”. What did my lying eyes and ears get wrong?
This officer deserves a commendation for his patience with miss somebody.
Meanwhile Tina Peters rots in jail for doing her job but apparently that story isn’t worthy of a blog post.
Tina Peters’ job was NOT to tamper with election equipment, which is the STATE crime with which she was charged, and for which Trump has NO power to issue a pardon. She DESERVES to “rot in jail”. Regardless of politics, someone who tampers with election equipment to try to falsify election results because they are an election denier cannot be allowed to escape prosecution.