“Are you not entertained?” With the country’s economy improving and other issues losing traction with the public, Democrats are increasingly turning to the one thing lacking in Washington: impeachments.
As they work to take back the House in the midterms, Democrats are again promising voters the equivalent of the Roman Games by restarting impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump. For many liberal voters, impeachments are the thrilling cage matches of lawfare.
Facing a challenger on the left in New York, Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., was the latest to dangle impeachment before his constituents. He insisted that Trump can be removed for his capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.
The same people who introduced what I called an abusive “snap impeachment” against Trump are now suggesting that he can be impeached for an act that was previously upheld as lawful in the courts.
According to Goldman, the attack constitutes an undeclared war and is thus impeachable.
The professed shock over the attack is nothing short of comical from leaders who said nothing when Democratic presidents engaged in such attacks.
There were no widespread calls for impeachment when Clinton attacked Bosnia or Obama attacked Libya. In the latter case, I represented a few members to challenge the undeclared war in Libya. Obama (like Trump) dismissed any need to get congressional approval in attacking the capital city of a foreign nation and military sites to force regime change. Figures like then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were lionized for their tough action in Libya.
Democratic members have combined a lack of memory with an equally startling lack of knowledge. Sen. Tim Kaine (D., Va.) declared on national television that “the Constitution does not give the President the right to initiate military action.” It is, of course, entirely untrue.
Presidents cannot declare war under the Constitution, but they can certainly order the use of military forces without such a declaration. Kaine did not appear aggrieved when Democratic presidents repeatedly and routinely attacked foreign targets without prior congressional consultation, let alone approval. That includes President Barack Obama killing an American citizen who was not charged with any crime in a drone attack under his “kill list policy.”
Moreover, House and Senate Democrats have stated that they either support or do not object to the capture.
I have long opposed undeclared wars and such unilateral actions. However, as a legal analyst, I am asked whether a president has the legal authority under governing case law to carry out such operations. Trump has that authority. We lost the Libyan case and other challenges to such unilateral action have also failed.
This includes the litigation surrounding the capture and prosecution of former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega. That also involved an attack on a foreign country. Indeed, it was a larger military operation that took days in the country to capture Noriega, followed by a regime change.
Noriega raised the same international and U.S. authorities being cited today by pundits and lost across the board. In appeals that went all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Noriega lost on his head-of-state immunity and other claims.
If there are grounds for such claims, Maduro is even less credible in making them. Roughly 50 countries refused to recognize him as the head of Venezuela after he lost the last election and seized control of the country. While he proclaimed in court this week that “I am still president of my country,” he has about the same claim to that office as Rep. Goldman.
There are good-faith objections to such military attacks on foreign countries under international law. This is a claim that other nations, such as China or Russia, could use to justify their own actions. However, this is a matter that will be resolved under U.S. law. While Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum declared that the action violated Article 2 of the United Nations Charter, it will be Article II of the United States Constitution that will dictate the outcome of this case.
Now, back to the impeachment games.
Goldman and others are suggesting that they will impeach President Trump for a capture that is virtually identical to the one in Noriega and declared lawful by the courts. Even putting aside the criminal prosecution, they would impeach him for attacks that are legally no different from those carried out by a long list of presidents, including Democratic presidents in the last two decades.
Neither history nor the Constitution matters in the impeachment games.
In the movie Gladiator, Emperor Commodus noted to the game organizer that the recreation of the Battle of Carthage seemed to get the conclusion wrong when the barbarians won: “My history’s a little hazy Cassius, but shouldn’t the Barbarians lose the battle of Carthage?” He then said that it did not matter. After all, these are the games and “I rather enjoy surprises.”
The impulsive use of impeachment is about good entertainment, not good government. For politicians fighting to stay in power like Goldman, a flash impeachment is the same call to the mob. To paraphrase, Senator Gracchus from the movie “I think he knows what Rome is. Rome is the Mob. Conjure magic for them and they’ll be distracted. … The beating heart of Rome is not the marble of the Senate, it’s the sand of the Colosseum. He’ll bring them [impeachments], and they will love him for it.”
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of the forthcoming “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution” on the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution.
N.B.: This column also appeared on Fox.com
Folks, looking below, you’ll see trolls rolling out their morning cringe. Please, don’t feed the trolls.
Your cringe too?
Can the two of us Anonymous be cringe-worthy together tonight?
Diogenes,
It is only because they and the Democrats are ever so desperate. The good professor points out how past presidents, to include Democrats, did the exact same thing, how courts ruled those presidents had the law on their side and as a result, they are crying. Democrats have nothing else to run on other than, “We are not TRUMP!!!!” so they have to pull out the impeachment gig again. What is going to be most embarrassing for them if they try to go down the impeachment route is professor Turley’s analysis will only get more attention and views putting on full display of how wrong Democrats are. Again.
re: Upstate Farmer
Maybe most of us want all leaders (of both parties) to stop the law breaking and oath of office breaking?
Just playing team sports increases law breaking by both parties. The big losers in that game are us the American people.
Upstate, I hope they run on impeaching Trump. Give them enough rope…
The people who support Trump’s action in Venezuela have probably said, on at least one occasion, that America should not be the police of the world.
Here, like always, there is a matter of drawing the line. Yes, I think the US should not seek to mete out justice when the CCP violates the human rights of its citizens and neighbors. Yes, the US should not seek to mete out justice when the mullahs in Iran murder innocents. But when the leaders of a neighboring nation deliberately send poison across our border to kill our youth for profit, and team up with our known enemies in the effort to defeat us, that line is pretty easy to draw.
If mullahs make a practice of murdering innocents abroad, meting out justice in Iran is, well, justice.
The people who support Trump’s action in Venezuela have probably said, on at least one occasion, that America should not be the police of the world.
The people who are opposing it are the very same ones who last summer said Trump should have done nothing to stop Iran completing their first nukes in their nuke weapons system that Obama and Biden helped enable and fund.
After all they point out, Trump doing that was breaking the law and his oath of office.
There’s the poorly hidden elephant in their academic purist room.
Policing the world is far more expansive than dealing with a thug who is poisoning our citizens and infiltrating our country with criminals.
Real news:
On the 5th anniversary of the January 6 coup attempt to steal an election. This week Mike Johnson refuses to display a plaque honoring police officers and federal law enforcement that saved the U.S. Capitol from coup participants.
Republicans refuse to honor police officers.
You know that no police officers died on J6 right? Only an unarmed veteran?
A former veteran that once made a promise to GOD to pledge supreme loyalty to the U.S. Constitution. This is vital point, American officials swear an “indirect” loyalty oath. The Oath of Office does not pledge loyalty to the nation directly, not to the American people directly. Americans – including military and police – swear supreme loyalty to the U.S. Constitution.
After this veteran breaking the locked exterior doors and windows, this oath-sworn veteran then tried to break down interior doors inside the U.S. Capitol to steal an election. Subverting the constitutional oath instead of supporting it.
By contrast, even federal employees that work at the U.S. Capitol every day must pass through security to enter the building. Criminals breaking windows and locked doors sometimes get shot in their law breaking.
A former veteran that once made a promise to GOD to pledge supreme loyalty to the U.S. Constitution.
Others who made similar oaths that they then violated: Obama, Biden, Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer, Comey, Mueller, McCabe, Strzok, Page… want the whole list?
That’s the short list that violated their oaths in the fictional and felonious lawfare insurrection that was their “Trump-Russia Dossier” to take out a newly elected president.
That never happened in the Democrat Borg?
Yes it did – but Democrats by agreement pretend it did not. Just as they pretend the earlier assault on the White House which the FBI and Garland did nothing about did not happen.
Keep trying to appear consistent, you pathetic frauds.
There was nothing done on J6 th violated the constitution.
Nowhere in the constitution does it say that anyone must believe corupt and lawless sec states regarding the outcome of elections.
though there is far more if you care to look the recent revalations in GA make it clear that the MSM and the courts got it wrong in 2020.
Did Trump win GA or other swing states in 2020 ? We do not know.
Nor do we actually know tht Biden did.
What we know is that election officicals violated THEIR oaths and failed to uphold the law.
And the courts allowed them.
That election laws – even state constitutional provisions were violated all over the nation.
J6 protestors excercised their constitutional right to
Free Speech
To assemble
To petition govenrment.
They did so at EXACLTLY the place they should do so – the premeinent forum for free speech in the world – which was illegally locked down. If Congress is not open to the public – it is NOT free to conduct the business of the people.
Regardless, these protestors were their to ask congress to do its duty and refuse to certify a lawless and dubious election.
All of that is 100% constitutional.
The people who violated their oaths are those who sought to deny them the constitutional right to assemble. speak and petition government.
Again if the people can not go to congress and ask their representatives to refuse to certify a lawless and dubious election,
then we have no first amendment and no meaningful adherance to the constitution.
Several went to the hospital with severe injuries. However, the plaque isn’t a memorial for deaths, but for standing to protect America.
Several went to the hospital with severe injuries. However, the plaque isn’t a memorial for deaths, but for standing to protect America.
No plaque to honor these officers? Any jusifiable reason there isn’t?
50 Secret Service agents wounded by rioters assaulting White House as Donald Trump is taken to ‘terror attack’ bunker
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11752998/trump-secure-bunker-friday-george-floyd-protests-white-house/
There is some improvement that some Democrats will now admit that Biden & Co. repeatedly lied and continued to lie that police officers were murdered that night.
However, if the choice today is to honor law enforcement rather than to villify them and call for their murder for arresting criminal Illegal Aliens, here’s an awkward question you won’t answer:
Where is the plaque honoring the 50+ Secret Service and Capitol Police wounded by Democrat street thugs attempting to breach the White House fence in their attempt to murder Trump inside the White House?
No police or other officers died that day.
Except for civilians, as well as those who were beaten by the officers.
Real news:
There was no coup attempt.
Nacy Pelosi denied the use of NG troops as Trump suggested. She even admitted it on video.
Yes – it’s the rape victim’s fault for not fighting back enough.
Trump wanted National Guard there to fire on his supporters so he could declare martial law and suspend the election, keeping the office indefinitely. If he was so concerned about violence he would not have incited it.
“Yes – it’s the rape victim’s fault for not fighting back enough.”
Authority over the capital grounds belongs to congress.
Pelosi was free to reject the DC NG – which she did.
She could have asked for help from DC police – who did provide a SMALL amount of help.
But the wisest things should could have done was to tell the CP NOT to lob CS tear Gas into peaceful crowds.
“Trump wanted National Guard there to fire on his supporters so he could declare martial law and suspend the election, keeping the office indefinitely.”
The TDS is strong in this one.
Ex Parte Milligan – SCOTUS
“Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war.”
” If he was so concerned about violence he would not have incited it.”
He did not.
Brandenburg v. Ohio,
Incitement requires a SPECIFIC concrete call to lawless acts.
It requires that call is for immediate acts.
It require that it is likely those acts will occur.
You do not have any specific calls to lawless acts by Trump (or anyone else).
I would note that SCOTUS has repeatedly said that even a specific call to lawless acts is NOT enough.
“We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Today we will see whether Republicans stand strong for integrity of our elections. ”
No call for violence. No call for lawless action.
Coup? Or demonstration by unarmed citizens whose primary crime was trespassing – and disagreeing with the vote count? Was Al Gore staging a coup when he disputed the vote count in Florida in 2000?
You can not tresspass on the worlds pre-eminit forum for free speech.
Congress can not conduct business while preventing the first amendment rights of the people to protest, assemble and petition government.
Congress can have neutral rules governing exercises of the first amendment, but it can not use rules as a pretext to prevent them.
Congress could have searched people before allowing them into the capital.
It could have imposed reasonable limits on the number allwed into the capital at one time.
It could have removed those who were disruptive.
But Congress can not conduct the business of the people without allowing the people their first amendment rights to speak to what congress is doing.
You can not trasspass on the capital while congress is in session.
Unarmed “coup” protesters had little impact against the armed democrat security personnel. Two innocent American citizens lost their lives.
This is all a great distraction that the DOJ failed to release the Epstein files, they missed the deadline.
Based off the pictures, Bill Clinton sure looked happy at Epstein’s pool, getting a massage, getting all friendly with some very young girls.
Let us not forget the 26 trips Bill Clinton took on Epstein’s Lolita Express, 5 trips without his SS detail.
OK, then Trump and Clinton can go to prison together. Fair enough. Let’s do it.
When you find evidence of illegal activity by Trump.
Trump never traveled on the lolita express, never when to esptain island.
And cur off all dealings with Esptain banning him from Trump properties for his conduct among underage women in 2003.
Every photo you have of Trump and Epstain is from the 90’s.
Trump is mentioned by Epstain in communications after that – mostly because they became enemies and has animus towards each other.
Wow! A fantastic misinterpretation of history…
This is all a great distraction that the DOJ failed to release the Epstein files, they missed the deadline
This is all a great distraction from the DOJ still attempting to find all the Democrats’ Pelosi J6 Committee files that were hidden and left in burn bags after Harris lost the election.
You haven’t even bothered looking at the tens of thousands they’ve released already – you demand that the several million documents that are currently under review must be finished in days.
“The U.S. Department of Justice said Monday it has reviewed and publicly released 125,285 documents tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, while it continues reviewing more than two million additional documents potentially related to him, pushing the government’s document release more than two weeks past a congressionally mandated deadline.
In a letter to U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Manhattan, DOJ officials said more than two million documents remain “in various phases of review” under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
The act set a Dec. 19, 2025, deadline for the government to release all Epstein-related files in its possession, subject to privacy protections and court-ordered limits. The DOJ said it began releasing documents from the decades-long Epstein investigation last month, but acknowledged it did not meet the statutory deadline.”
Jacob Chansley was very entertaining:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Chansley
Jacob Chansley was very entertaining:
Liz Cheney was even more entertaining playing her fraudulent role Nancy Pelosi’s sock puppet Republican. Currently under criminal investigation for both witness tampering and felonies relating to the destruction of federal J6 Committee evidence and files, she might get to a chance to live the Jacob Chansley prison experience if indicted and tried in her home state of Wyoming she was operating from.
Impeachment, that’s all the dims have to offer. If Donald Trump had a cure for cancer, the democrats would fight to protect cancer.
Trump doesn’t have a cure for cancer.
Impeachment is not the worst of his worries. The midterms.
True. If the balance of power shifts, goodbye MAGA. Hello impeachment.
True, if the balance of power shifts, goodbye MAGA – and a big collective warm invitation to another 20 million criminal Illegal Aliens!
Trump contributes to this propaganda.
Trump is Turley’s paymaster.
You mean this propaganda?
Watch: Dems Screeched For Maduro’s Ouster… Until Trump Delivered It
“Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is rushing to block President Trump’s successful operation to arrest Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, labeling it “lawlessness” and a violation of congressional authority—despite Schumer himself and a string of Democrats and their media mouthpieces previously blasting Trump for failing to end the Maduro regime.”
https://modernity.news/2026/01/05/watch-dems-screeched-for-maduros-ouster-until-trump-delivered-it/
When you have no countervailing program or leadership, then impeachment is the fallback position. This time around, there seems much less enthusiasm on the democratic side for impeachment since you are condemning the president for starting the breakup of a threat to this nation and its people. Seems there is more demand for impeachment in the Mainstream Media than in congress.
Invalid impeachments just waste time and it’s an attempt to just feed the colosseum crowd and make them forget about any worthwhile legislation that might instead be dealt with. I agree Professor . It just Bread and Circuses for the Rabid mob.
Break the filibuster and pass some truly reformist legislation and then watch the mob howl. It’s better than trolling the mob with Trump 2028 hats and maybe it get’s something done, for a change.
Thank you, Professor, for guiding us, via your brilliant expertise, through these events!
Ditto
Excuse me, what is his expertise please?
Excuse me, what is his expertise please?
You were far more entertaining before you escaped the Democrat circus where the ringmaster had you perched on a stool clapping your flippers and barking while balancing a beach ball on your nose.
Sealioning:
Sealioning is a form of adolescent trolling where someone persistently demands answers to insincere questions to provoke a response, often pretending to seek a civil debate while actually trying to exhaust or frustrate others with no intention of real discourse. This behavior is characterized by a facade of politeness and a refusal to acknowledge previous answers. Often used as a tactic by whining Democrats in online forums and blogs
It should be presumed that going to war hinges on a declaration of war.
Else why have the declaration clause at all?
“Its war if I say so.” Dan Goldman, NY
It should be presumed that going to war hinges on a declaration of war.
It’s presumed that an intelligent adult (versus a party hack and apparatchik) attempting to make that presumption should explain why SCOTUS has held that limited actions involving the military is not “going to war”.
If SCOTUS and lower US courts were wrong on that – including the cases Professor Turley was involved in – then an intelligent adult would present their argument.
But if you just want to distract…. carry on!
Impeachment isn’t just for presidents. There are a few judges who deserve it, especially FISA judges.
If they have impeachment hearings, they can call Obama as a witness. He was really good at killing people and can explain the process. Every Tuesday there was a menu, and he chose shrimps or tuna salad.
So cynical, as if there is never a legitimate reason for a constitutional legal maneuver.
Editorialization is one thing, but the blatant lies about our laws from media and active representatives is maddening; that they are likely perfectly aware they are lying is more so, and it hasn’t been this bad in my lifetime.
The modern left is simply stomach-churning from top to bottom at this point, and I don’t think they have nearly the level of support in this they imagine. Enough, already.
It’s a feature of “democracy”. We elect 536 crooks to steal $4 TRILLION from us taxpayers every year. Whichever party is in power gets to decide how to divvy up the loot. So there are 4 TRILLION reasons why the opposition party wants to persuade voters to return them to power. To do so, they care not about mundane things like virtue, honor, truth, or principles. It’s Calvinball. No rules. The ONLY thing that matters is gaining power to control the stolen booty. Lying, spinning, shading, intentionally misrepresenting what the party in power does is fair for the opposition provided they think that is the best strategy to trick voters into giving them power.
As a voter, your job is to try to weed through all of the lies and decide for yourself which of the two crooked parties is slightly less repulsive. Put that party in power, and pray every night that they do not bankrupt the country before you die. Your children and grandchildren are on their own.
That’s “our democracy!” You must always cherish it and consider it sacred.
What’s stomach-churning is the amount of people that support them.
Trump has filed his flight plan, and I’m sure he anticipates a fresh new impeachment, should the Dems take back Congress. This is one reason he has jam-packed his first two years with everything he can. But you can, with 100% certainty, know that some activist judge will order Maduro’s (et ux) release in the next month or so. Trump is also ready for that. Maybe historians will refer to this period as the “Trump’s Coliseum Days.”
“. . . some activist judge will order Maduro’s (et ux) release . . .”
I hope so.
Then fly them back over Florida, with a pitstop at Miami International Airport. Have the FL NG arrest them (again). After all, according to the Left, the NG is under the sole authority of a state’s governor. Put them on trial in Miami.
Then let the Venezuelan exiles in Miami serve on the jury. Then take bets — which will come first: Their convictions or their heads on a spike?
I got the feeling you’ve done that before?
Maduro is an illegal alien in US custody and should be returned to his country of origin as soon as possible, the way that ICE deals with all illegal aliens.
Facts don’t matter to those whose hatred exceeds their patriotism. Neither the Constitution nor historical precedent can compete with self-righteous hatred.
There is little to no evidence of any “patriotism” on the left, and it serves as a threat to our Republic.
Speaking of ‘the mob’, I appreciate you commemorating the 5-year anniversary of the mob that Trump sent to attack the Capital – something he’s now tried to erase from history. And lest we forget, of all the J6ers he’s pardoned, 33 have now committed subsequent crimes – and in my state, one of these individuals has killed somebody. How’s that for entertaining?
Your comment is very entertaining. Continuing to parrot the debunked “Trump sent to attack the capitol” talking point. I realize facts don’t matter to you. I guess my only question is how much are you getting paid? I hope you’re at least well compensated to be this oblivious.
Everyone from the Trump rally just went directly home and did not go anywhere near the Capitol. It was an entirely different group that was waving Trump flags and were secretly all Antifa that Trump has pardoned.
You got proof for your statement? Um.. didn’t think so.
You got proof for your statement? Um.. didn’t think so.
You could at least add one short additional sentence to thank Trump for reducing the price of gas and allowing you to ply your trade with lower employment expenses.
Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the intended psychological manipulation by a low-IQ perpetrator of those they hope to victimize through intentionally misleading that person or group. This involves the perpetrator lying, denying events, and other methods used in the hope their intended victims doubt their perceptions of reality, memories, and feel overly emotional or irrational.
The main five methods of gaslighting that may be used alone or in conjunction with others are: trivializing, countering, lying, blame shifting, and withholding.
Anonymous , fits your name because you have no desire to be identified for your stupid comment. The America lovers who walked into the open Capitol building and destroyed nothing and fought nobody saw the only person killed was by a rotten cop . 4 years in prison for vagrancy while filth like Fat , Smelly ( YES , I met the POS ) drunk driving murder champ of Chappaquiddick got away with MURDER… Illegal clown Omar marries her brother to illegally get into America is now a demorat in Congress , Joey Bid-on-me has NEVER had a job outside of government is a multi- millionaire as is crooked Chuckie Doll Schumer ( And I met that clown too ). Rotten would be murderers tried to assassinate President Trump TWICE , demorat ” Protestors ” have destroyed MILLIONS of dollars of government and Private property in their insane protests while Tea Partiers and MAGA demonstrators showed the world what PEACEFUL protesting is. Crawl back into mommy’s basement and keep your ” Anonymous ” comments where they belong ….in your diaper.
I appreciate you commemorating the 5-year anniversary of the mob that Trump sent to attack the Capital – something he’s now tried to erase from history. And lest we forget…
Let we forget Democrat’s mobs sent by Biden to attack Trump in the White House and their glaring tunnel vision hypocrisy…
50 Secret Service agents wounded in White House riots as Donald Trump is taken to ‘terror attack’ bunker
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11752998/trump-secure-bunker-friday-george-floyd-protests-white-house/
So true
It might work for primaries, but I doubt it will “play in Peoria”, as they used to say, the general elections outside of the Blue states
“There were no widespread calls for impeachment when Clinton attacked Bosnia or Obama attacked Libya.”
There are no widespread calls for impeachment of Trump now either, though Turley points to a single Democrat and smears them all with his brush. Democrats generally view impeachment as a losing issue regarding Trump with the current make-up og Congress though it gets spoken of more often for Bondi and Patel as they continue violating the law regarding the Epstein Files release. I’m curious as to how Turley tells us the economy is improving and traction is being lost on other issues. That certainly isn’t reflected it Trump’s polling.
When you do it on national tv, it doesn’t really matter if it’s one or 100. That’s a siren call
So anything a Democrat (or Republican) says on national tv is automatically the view of the entire party? Two MAGA-aligned pastors (Toby Sumpter and Jared Longshore) said on national television that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Is that, then, the view of all Christians, or even their denomination?
That’s not what I said. Also, not comparable as only one of these scenarios has a massive hurdle to clear and that’s what you said you loon.
It matters when the influence is stronger! Two pastors may have some influence but none close to the level of a US congressman! Work on your conflation skills mate.
anthony, excellent response/
What member of a House minority party not in leadership has any real power? Not Dan Goldman. It is what you said that one person on national tv represented the Party.
Well how is his reelection bid going?
A US Congressman, that is one in the House of Representatives, has almost as much influence as a piece of wet paper towel. That’s why it takes so many of them to agree to get anything done. At best you can get help from them with some small problem or getting a flag that has flown over the Capitol building, but they individually represent so small a fraction of the population that they matter less to most people than the Governor of their state or the local mayor.
Mr. Spivey, talking of being on the sand floor of combat, you’re about to be assaulted by 300 masked anonymous commenters. I was told that even my name is fake, a pseudonym, to make me sound more soviet. Never mind that I self identify as an independent conservative.
I think it more likely to be six or so anonymous commenters.
So that’s the subject for today, anons?
Hey Mike no offense if we call you meathead.
“… sound more soviet. “. Its spelt SOVIET. So guess the dumb pole … is valid. So you really are a molovinsky.
michael molovinsky says: Never mind that I self identify as an independent conservative.
You hide your real identity as the blogger behind the link you posted earlier. Where ‘as an independent conservative’ you blogged that Obama had proven his foreign affairs “chops” after he enabled Iran’s nuclear weapons program and gave them hundreds of billions of dollars in unmarked bills reminiscent of what a president doing a drug deal with a Mexican drug cartel would look like. Oh… and abandoned Americans to be murdered by hajji terrorists in Benghazi because an election was coming up.
Now there’s some political affairs “chops” that an American conservative has to admire!
The same blog that about the same time, you not only pronounced yourself as a conservative, but also a Second Amendment supporter. Doing so while blogging that Hillary Clinton’s calls to ban what Democrats call assault weapons was “pragmatic gun control honoring the Second Amendment”.
Your name isn’t a fake – but your claims to be a conservative and supporter of the Second Amendment are even more fraudulent than whoever said your name isn’t real.
Michael Molovinsky: are you now or have you ever been a Code Pink and/or Never-Trump Republican?
I think Michael Molovinsky isn’t the only blogger posting here who goes to great efforts to hide what they post on their failed blogs.
Illinois Democratic Rep. Delia Ramirez also supported calls for Trump to be impeached.
Until this moment, I don’t think I’ve ever heard her name before. By all means, all Democrats support Impeachment.
It couldn’t be that Turley is carrying Trump’s water by running with the claim Trump is making that Democrats will impeach him if they win the midterms.
It could be that Americans threw wasted money when they donated money to the United Knee Grow Fund, as you prove with your comments. Welcome back. Then again, I’m only one voice in a minority so there is that.
Why post such a classless comment?
Democrats generally view impeachment as a losing issue regarding Trump with the current make-up og Congress though it gets spoken of more often for Bondi and Patel as they continue violating the law regarding the Epstein Files release.
Nothing To See Here, Please Believe Enigmainblackcom, Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes™
That never stopped Democrat impeachments also based on falsehoods both times before, when they knew their was zero chance of convicting Trump in an impeachment trial while Republicans were the majority in the Senate. It was all Soviet-style Pelosi show trials.
The poorly hidden elephant in the hypocritical Democrats room is their complete and total indifference to all of the missing and destroyed documents created by the Democrats’ Pelosi hand-picked J6 Committee. They publicly moan and whine about “the Epstein Files” – with no mention of the missing J6 Committee Files.
Democrats had eight years of Obama and then four more years with Obama’s Third Term to frantically go through those files page by page in search of something – anything – that could be used to destroy Trump. Comey had a year to do it for them, so could have Jack Smith. Nothing… crickets… We’re supposed to believe they never thought to look?
Meanwhile, the Republicans and Americans haven’t even had a year to examine the J6 Committee files – that is, if they can find the hidden ones that weren’t among the ones hurriedly destroyed in violation of federal law.
Is there a Democrat apparatchik and Internet Legal Expert who can make the case that Pelosi and her specially hand-picked J6 Committee WEREN’T violating the law as they spent WEEKS destroying all the evidence and documents collected during those hearings?