Former Secretary of State and two-time presidential loser Hillary Clinton has triggered yet another question of defamation in the political arena with an attack on President Donald Trump on the fifth anniversary of the January 6 riot. Clinton claimed that Trump “urged” supporters to “attack Congress.” That is untrue. However, Clinton can rely on tort doctrine to shield her from potential defamation liability.
Jan. 6th was a desecration of our constitutional process and one of the most disgraceful days in our history.
However, it was a riot, not an insurrection.
Clinton posted her comment on X, declaring, “Five years ago today, Donald Trump urged his supporters to attack Congress and the Capitol over a proven lie.”
The comments mirror statements made by the J6 committee and others. The difference is that many of those statements were protected by members of Congress under the Speech and Debate Clause.
I previously wrote about how the J6 Committee in Congress routinely edited out Trump’s call to protest “peacefully” despite objections that it was intentionally omitting a material element to his speech.
Trump was never charged with inciting the riot despite pledges of Democratic D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine to investigate Trump for that crime.
The reason is simple. It was not criminal incitement and Trump’s speech was protected under the First Amendment.
The same, however, may be true with regard to Clinton’s posting. Her claim is clearly false. Trump did not urge his followers to attack Congress. He urged them to go to Congress peacefully to protest the certification of the election.
However, American tort law offers robust protections for free speech, particularly when related to political figures.
In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the actual malice standard, requiring public officials to shoulder the higher burden of proving defamation. Under that standard, an official would have to show either actual knowledge of its falsity or a reckless disregard of the truth. That standard was later extended to public figures.
The court correctly viewed civil liability as creating a chilling effect on the free press, either by draining publications of funds or inducing a type of self-censorship. Imposing a high standard for proof of defamation, Justice William Brennan sought to give the free press “breathing space” to carry out its key function in our system.
The case established a higher standard of proof for defamation than simple negligence for public officials. The court believed that public officials have ample means to rebut false statements, but that it’s essential for democracy for voters and reporters to be able to challenge government officials.
There is also protection for opinion. The issue comes down to the meaning of “urge.” Merriam-Webster defines the word as including “stimulate or provoke” as well as “solicit.”
Clinton would claim that she considers the thrust of his comments as effectively urging the violence even if he did not directly call for violence. Many Democrats obviously share that view.
Many have made unsupported and at times ridiculous claims that are equally protected as opinion. For example, Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe has made a litany of such claims, including his declaration on MSNBC that President Donald Trump could be charged (“without any doubt, beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt”) with the attempted murder of former Vice President Michael Pence.
Ironically, while Clinton has called for crackdowns on people who she deems as spreading disinformation, she has been criticized for such false or misleading statements.
Nevertheless, Clinton’s posting would not make for a strong defamation case, and even if a court did not dismiss the case before trial, it would be challenging to secure a jury verdict on such subjective terms.
I think at the very least Hillary should be lawfar’ed for a while. After she is fleeced for a few million, do it again. It is the American Democrat way!
I wish people would just comment regarding the post instead of dragging in every other issue under the sun– and why comment at all if you refuse to accept any opinion other than your own?
Anyway– I just broke my own request but now let me ask Prof. Turley how he squares “In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the actual malice standard,” with the principles of a tripartite system of government in which the judiciary’s role is to interpret the law “as written” by the legislature or in the Constitution. This “actual malice” standard — which they [SCOTUS] then later extended to other people besides just elected officials does not appear in the First Amendment and is in no other law passed that I can find. One can argue it would be good policy and the court may have, in their opinion– had they ruled differently in NYT v Sulluvan– that the Legislature should seek to remedy what may be seen as a flaw in the 1A and the court MAY HAVE “correctly viewed civil liability as creating a chilling effect on the free press, either by draining publications of funds or inducing a type of self-censorship” but it is not the role of the SCOTUS to enact policy that it prefers. How then Mr. Turley, as a self-professed free-speech absolutist and constitutional scholar can you square your support for SCTOTUS decision that actually limits a person’t 1A rights to speak and be heard in a court of law to defend themselves simply because they are a “public figure” or celebrity? Especially when such lack of 1A right exists solely from a judicially mandated policy that was never enacted by the Legislature?
Turley left out the part at the end of the speech:
“We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore”
just before sending them to the Capitol.
“So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we’re going to the Capitol, and we’re going to try and give.”
In between “peaceful” and “fight like hell” was a lengthy series of false claims that would rile up Trump supporters, about how the election was fraudulent.
Would like Turley’s view on this please.
This morning we have masked federal officials physically standing/trespassing on Minnesota government (closing down Minnesota streets) telling legal protesters to stop trespassing on federal property.
The protesters are standing on Minnesota public property, not federal government property.
This federal agency is also fleecing taxpayer dollars. There is already a perimeter fence around the federal property. Only a minimal amount of federal officials would be required to protect the narrow driveway.
Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar.
Who cares what Hillary says anymore? Try as she might to stay relevant, her “musings” are irrelevant, even in Dem circles.
. Walz said he’s going to deploy the NG to protect Minnesota. 😂. NY, California, Washington etc send your back-up troops. Here’s your true insurrection. Here’s your true treason. They’ve come out of the closet. Marshall your patriots, Walz 😂. Shamone.
Justices? 😂
🌲
That may prove a huge problem for him.
Based on the Recent SCOTUS ruling – while the President can not deploy the NG unilaterally in a state, arguably the moment that the governor calls in the NG the conditions for the President to federalize them are met.
. ^^^ Sincere condolences to the family and the families who’ve tragically lost loved ones.
Stay home if ICE is working. The press is there to cover it. If you must go be on best civilian behavior. ICE has been attacked, NG also. Don’t impede, obstruct and other. Tragic
Yes, great advice Anon. STAY HOME as in your own country.
Declaration of War
“To Donald Trump and Kristi Noem: You’ve done enough.”
“I’ve issued a warning order to prepare the Minnesota National Guard.”
“We have soldiers in training and prepared to be deployed, if necessary.”
– “Tampon Tim” Walz
De Facto Insurrection
De Facto Rebellion
De facto treasonous yeeha!
I guess the President can now federalize the Minnesota guard. DOT Duffy and the interstates…
It does present an interesting dilemma with so many people with allegiance to foreign nations.
Gosh, war there too. Well, army, navy, air force…there’s always conscription. I guess Walz is using conscription for the nation of Minnesota.
Justices?
🌲
😂 ^^^MS13, TREN D ARAGUA, Barrio Boys, Abrego García and his trafficking 😂 are in training.
Shamone!
Weird the way left wing nuts work.
Walz blaming Trump and Noem for the violence and unrest in Mineapolis plays right into Trump’s hands and satisfies the requirements of SCOTUS’s constaint on the president power.
SCOTUS essentially said tht POTUS does not have the unilateral power to decide when civil order has failed sufficiently to call in the NG.
But Walz has conceeded that civil order has failed.
His remarks ceded the prerequistes for the president to federalize the Minesota National Guard.
Walz calling them up makes that even clearer.
Walz is literally walking into the same trap that Southern Governors did 70 years ago – calling up the NG to resist Federal law enforcement, and then facing the president federalizing the NG.
Trump is a pedophile.
I cn not think of a better way for you to discredit yourself.
Naa that would be Billy boy Clinton.
Thanks for playing
Good old Timmy. Who lied about his service record.
Blindfolded donkey dems playing pin the crime on the Trump
Why would anyone ever believe Trump as he is a sexual predator, con man and chronic liar in addition to being a war criminal who should be tried at the Hague?
Why would anyone beleive you ?
No Trump is not a war criminal.
Yes he is a war criminal say almost all legal scholars in addition to being a sexual predator, con man and chronic liar. Ask any of the AIs and they will objectively give you the facts. Unfortunately you are a member of the MAGA cult and will believe any lie he says even when he contradicts him self. Will you at least admit he is a sexual predator, con man and chronic liar?
“Yes he is a war criminal say almost all legal scholars”
Turley is certainly one of the more pre-=eminent constitutional scholars today and he has posted two articles so far noting how this is not even slighly unusual.
Would those legal scholars of yours be the ones who were wrong about – pretty much everything.
Further Schumer and Biden attacked Trump for not doing anything about Maduro in his first term – specifically noting that Maduro is an indicted criminal. Weirdly after Biden did nothing about Maduro for 4 years – except increasing the reward for information leadingt to his capture, Schumer again attacked Trump in 2024 for failing to do anything about Maduro claiming that was because Trump is in Putin’s pocket.
The entirety of western nations does NOT recognize Maduro as a legitimate leader – and that has been true two TWO fraudulent election.
The indictment of Maduro is pretty damning and includes receiving personal kickbacks for flying planeloads of drugs into the US under Diplomatic protection.
Maduro is a criminal.
He was arrested by US Law enforcement, on a US arrest Warrant based on a US indictment by a US Grand Jury in NYC.
What more do you want ?
“in addition to being a sexual predator”
That would be clinton and Biden
“con man”
Please who has been defrauded by Trump ?
” and chronic liar.”
Here is Trump’s platform – it is consistent with things has had been saying since the early 80’s
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform
For liar he sure seems to be keeping his promises.
“Ask any of the AIs and they will objectively give you the facts.”
I have no problem with AI – but you are an idiot if you presume they are anything more than a reflection of the data they have been trained with.
Ask AI in english. cantonese and mandarin about Tienamen Square – you will get 3 radically different answers.
AI can not tell you what is true. It can only tell you what it was taught.
“Unfortunately you are a member of the MAGA cult and will believe any lie he says even when he contradicts him self. Will you at least admit he is a sexual predator, con man and chronic liar?”
Why would anyone “admit” things that are false. ?
It is sad that you are so brainwashed by the MAGA cult. What about Trump University and the charity in New York that he defrauded so that he is not allowed to be involved with any charity? What about the over 26 women who have indicated that he sexually abused them? Are all of them liars? What about his history of bankruptcies? What about his statements that he can grab women inappropriately? What about his civil judgement involving sexual abuse ? What about his lying about having sex with Stormy Daniels and the playmate of the year? What about the thousands of lies the Washington Post has indicated that he has engaged in? Even Jeffrey Epstein indicated Trump was a very evil man. On a daily basis the man lies when he not rambling nonsense which does not make sense.
“What about Trump University”
What about it ?
People paid to get the secret to success – the people Trump hired were far more qualified to tech the secrets to success than any academic.
Regardless, No one was FORCED to go to Trump U.
And they received exactly the education they were promised.
If you wanted to know how to become a ihighly educated failure – go to Harvard.
“the charity in New York that he defrauded”
There was no charity in NY that was defrauded – I suspect ha you are talking about the Trump Family Trust – that is a private Trust – not a charity. The money in it is for the benefit of the Trump family.
“so that he is not allowed to be involved with any charity?”
False, Trump can donate to or serve on the board of any charity or Trust that is not in NY.
“What about the over 26 women who have indicated that he sexually abused them?”
Produce ONE. There are a tiny number of people who have LOTS cases to Trump – because they could not even prove they were in the same town as he was.
If there were women who Trump Abused – they have access to the courts and Trump is a huge Target.
BTW Billionaires get sued for things like this all the time.
They are giant targets.
There is real sexual abuse out there and there are people – men and women who lie.
The latter make things worse for the former.
” Are all of them liars?”
Can you even name their names ?
Regardless, of the cases that have gone to court ALL except EJC have been found to be liars.
And in the court of public opinion EJC was found to be a liar.
There are billionaires who abuse women – Epstain proves that.
But there are far more people who make false claims against billionaires looking for money.
That is just reality.
Is Tara Read a liar ?
Are the SS agents that complained about Biden liars ?
You do not get to have it both ways.
You can not play this nonsense were all claims against republicans are ture but none against democrats are.
” What about his history of bankruptcies?”
What about his history of successess ?
One in 7 Businesses survive 10 years.
Trump has a success rate far above that.
“What about his statements that he can grab women inappropriately?”
That is not what he said. I would further note it was locker room talk that was supposed to be private.
Have you never said anything in private that you would not want the world to know ?
” What about his civil judgement involving sexual abuse ?”
Did you follow the case – it was corrupt. EJC can not tell you what year this occured and can not herself make up her mind what happened to her. Anyone on the Jury that voted for EJC is a moron.
“What about his lying about having sex with Stormy Daniels and the playmate of the year?”
What about it ? First I listend to Daniels testimony – I was inclinded to beleive Trump had sex with her before she testifies.
Not afterwards. She is lying for personal gain as to the other women – no she did not say she had sex with Trump.
She received a small payment for her story.
I no you are a moron – but you do know that wealthy people pay to kill false stories too ?
That was litterally the testimony of several witnesses.
Regardless, lets say Trump had sex with these women – it was consensual and pretty tame according to Daniels and not anyo of your business – unless you are Melania.
Clinton got a blow job in the Oval and lied about it.
“What about the thousands of lies the Washington Post has indicated that he has engaged in? ”
Which is Wwhy WaPo is in the toilet – biased fact checkers that would not know the truth if it bit them.
Regardless please provide ONE so called lie that is actually a lie ?
Don’t tell me that other people says something – SHOW ME.
Trump’s remarks are published all over – he lives almost entirely in public.
You can find video of every single word.
Provide it – unedited.
“Even Jeffrey Epstein indicated Trump was a very evil man.”
Correct – a very evil man who was banned by Trump in 2003 spent years afterwards trying to Get Trump.
That is your ide of evidence ?
“On a daily basis the man lies when he not rambling nonsense which does not make sense.”
Then you should be able to cite an actual lie – easily.
An NO I am not interested in idiocy like Trump did not get Peace in Ukraine on Day one – that is an exageration and the world knew it when he said it.
Regardless lies are not inaccurte claims about the future.
They are not oppinions you disagree with.
MAGA is not decieved – they know exactly what they are getting.
This is what they voted for and this is what is being delivered.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform
Can you name a democrat that kept ONE campaign promise ?
John Say,
Such a pasting of lies and diarrhea, a Gish Gallop of fecal matter.
Just one:
Students in Trump University were told they could not have any certificates until they signed documents praising the program, essentially blackmailing them for good reviews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_University
Trump would never sue because Clinton would perform discover on Trump that would make a colonoscopy seem like a day at the beach.
Anonymous, they don’t care how immoral a person Trump is. They like him because he hates all the same people they do and hate is all they care about. They aren’t flooding schools or training programs, they are moaning over their jobs, the ones that got sent to China by the people who backed Trump.
This blog needs a 100 word limit on comments. It’s like wading through John Say sewage to find anyone else’s opinions or views.
Trump isn’t a convicted war criminal. Wait for 2029.
Hillary is irrelevant. Why is she given any “air time” at all?
That is simple @annon 8:43 – because she and most of the National Socialist German Workers Party of nearly 100 years ago are in the same cult: Stated simply, empower hatred, bigotry, and violence through fear and propaganda and act on it – start the train to Dachau (according to Hillary, of course – why would she EVER disagree with Schumer, Pelosi, Jeffries, Watters, Schiff, Garland, Brennan, Smith, Kouric, . . .)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2023/10/06/hillary-clinton-suggests-formal-deprogramming-for-maga-extremists-who-still-support-trump/?sh=1ae07e5d73b8
Trump did attempt a lawyerly coup to remain President after losing the 2020 election. The plan never entailed mob violence. The Dems misread the nuances of Jan 6th.
Pence had to Trump to “forget it” in their phone exchange before the Ellipse Rally. Remember, Trump accused his VP of being a pu$$y?
Trump’s elaborate plot was collapsing all during the day J6. At the Ellipse, the most likely explanation for what was said in the 3 speeches (Eastman, Giuliani, Trump):
– Go to the Capitol and raise your voices — maybe you can change Mike Pence’s mind
– If you’re successful, I’ll be President another term.
That’s the gist of it. He wasn’t instructing the throngs to riot. But “go peacefully?” That just meant “non-violent”.
He obviously wanted loud chants that would be heard and disrupt the Proceedings indoors the chamber.
Hillary’s shrill accusation suffers from exaggeration. But, that doesn’t begin to defend what Trump was planning the 6 weeks up to J6th. There’s no nobility left in national leadership (except Mike Pence’s allegiance to the Constitution under great partisan political pressure).
Now tell us the reason for this plan. It was developed because of the fraud and interference orchestrated by the Democrats and Deep State to provide for a fair election. Tulsi Gabbard has released and declassified the documents evidencing this.
It’s the same plan the Democrats used in Hawaii.
pbinca, with a return engagement tonight!!!! Trump did attempt a lawyerly coup to remain President after losing the 2020 election…. that doesn’t begin to defend what Trump was planning the 6 weeks up to J6th.
pbinca has sneaked back in the dead of night hoping nobody wants to question her fidelity and what she considers “a lawyerly coup” is more accurately Democrat hypocrisy:
Six months before the election, CIA Director Brennan was warning Obama, Biden, and Comey that Clinton’s plan to work with George Soros’s Open Society to create a “Russia Dossier” to distract from her Espionage Act felonies, was not only fraudulent and criminal, but the Dutch and other foreign intelligence agencies already knew what she was in the middle of beginning to do.
Declassified Documents Prove Hillary Clinton, Obama, OK’d Plan to Work With Soros’s Open Society To Smear Trump With Russia Collusion
https://nypost.com/2025/07/31/us-news/hillary-clinton-approved-plan-hatched-by-campaign-aides-to-smear-trump-with-russia-collusion-declassified-docs/
True or false pbinca – don’t play Lie And Hide. If you’re not sure, I’ll give you the page number in the investigation conducted serveral years later to refresh your memory.
1. How is it different than the “lawyerly coup” attempted by Al Gore after Bush’s election, when they frantically went judge shopping in cherrypicked Florida districts until finally stopped by SCOTUS?
2. Is it a “lawyerly coup” after the 2016 election to offer bribes to Electoral College Voters to change their State’s vote to be for Clinton, instead of for Trump who won the election in their state? Or is bribing a voter a felony?
3. Is it a “lawyerly coup” when Clinton and Obama illegally paid foreign spies to write a fictional and felonious “Russia Dossier” – and then send Obama’s Attorney Generals and FBI Directors repeatedly to FISA courts to commit perjury with that felonious piece of fiction, hoping they could fix the 2016 election for Trump, and when that filed continue using it in hopes of destroying Trump’s presidency. Lawyerly? Or a Democrat political crime syndicate.
pbinca… is it a long series of felonies for Obama and Biden’s Attorney Generals and three of their FBI Directors to repeatedly perjure themselves in FISA courts that Obama’s paid-for Russia Dossier written by a hired Russian spy to attempt to take Trump out of the 2016 election so Clinton could win unopposed?
The Big Red Democrat Lie is pbinca claiming “The 2020 election was the most fair and transparent election ever”.
Trump-appointed judge demands Lindsey Halligan explain why she’s still using US attorney title
District Judge David Novak, appointed by President Donald Trump, issued a three-page order Tuesday giving Halligan seven days to explain herself, given that District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie had found in November that the Department of Justice had violated the Constitution by appointing her as a second successive interim hire.
By: Joe Sommerlad ~ January 7, 2026
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-lindsey-halligan-judge-letter-b2895899.html
Ref.:
District Judge David Novak’s – three-page order (PDF)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.586310/gov.uscourts.vaed.586310.16.0.pdf
Because Curries order is under appeal and DOJ is going to win it.
It is that simple.
Attorney for Rob Reiner’s son resigns but says his client is not guilty of murder under state law
“Circumstances beyond our control and more importantly circumstances beyond Nick’s control have dictated that, sadly, it’s made it impossible to continue our representation of Nick,” lawyer Alan Jackson said as he stood with his team outside a Los Angeles courthouse.
By: Andrew Dalton
https://apnews.com/article/rob-reiner-michele-nick-killing-001241300a3de5ecfa1323b0031fdfcf
NOTE: Food for Thought: if you’re planning to whack dear ole Ma & Pa sometime in the future. There won’t be any inheritance money for a Defense Attorney.
‘Slayer rule’ likely to play a role in Rob Reiner’s family inheritance
All states have some form of a slayer rule that prevents killers from inheriting from their victims. While the rules differ slightly from state to state, they always bar murderers from profiting from their own crimes. Simply put, if you’re found guilty of killing someone or plead guilty to their murder, you can’t inherit anything from your victim’s estate.
By Naomi Cahn, University of Virginia & Reid Kress Weisbord, Rutgers University – Newark
https://www.upi.com/Voices/2025/12/22/slayer-rule-Rob-Reiner-Michele-Singer-Reiner-inheritance/7101766415462/
Nick Reiner Murder Case: Who Is Paying the Legal Bills? And More Questions
A breakdown of issues at play in the case ahead of the Los Angeles arraignment.
By: Winston Cho ~ January 7, 2026
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/questions-surrounding-nick-reiners-murder-case-insanity-defense-legal-bills-and-a-potential-death-sentence-1236466247/
Dear Prof Turley,
If Hillary had a brain fart in the woods, would anyone hear it? What is the sound of one hand clapping? .. how old is the Tao?
Why is Trump’s oil in Venezuela’s ground?
*giddy up .. .
Dg, one hand signifies aloneness, not anyone to share happiness or approval. One person is a lonely number. Others are needed. A koan is what is impossible but it is also symbolism. Is that what you mean?
Rubio is chomping at the bit, Cuba…
Professor Turley wrote (yet again): Jan. 6th was a desecration of our constitutional process and one of the most disgraceful days in our history.
What words, specifically and in detail, would JT use to describe the MONTHS immediately before and after our constitutional process to elect a president in 2016, where he now knows Clinton and Obama first commissioned and illegally paid a Russian and British spy to write the fictional and felonious “Trump-Russia Dossier”?
Criminal acts followed by two of his last Attorney Generals and three of his FBI Directors repeatedly going in person to FISA courts in order to perjure themselves and use that fictional document to obtain spy warrants to first take out Trump in the months before that election. And when that failed, continue trying to take him out after he won that election?
Professor Turley has regularly written columns about those actions in the years ever since. And yet, never once has he called the actions of the multiple Obama/Biden Democrats specifically involved either criminal, or their acts to fix and then overturn an election a “desecration of our election constitutional process.”
JT can’t even bear the thought of admitting either their felonies regarding the creation of that dossier, or felonies after that to fix an election and then attempt to destroy an election, might even be disgraceful.
I believe the reason is that these are his fellow Democrat members of the Washington DC Bar Association, the people he bellies up to the liquor bar beside when that Bar Association meets and makes the high society rounds of the Washington DC cocktails and canapes party circuit.
It’s universal truth: A Democrat can learn to behave civilly. But you can’t take the double standards and the hypocrisy out of the Democrat. The more elitist and academic they are, the more fraudulent they get.
Democrats desecrate our Republic’s constitutional process and regularly do it in a disgraceful manner. Some try to sell their disgraceful acts with congeniality.
How about having a triel of trump with the evidence Jack Smith found.
What’s a TRIEL???
He was sick the day they taught spelling at the learing center.
How about having a triel of trump with the evidence Jack Smith found.
You can be taken as real rather than as a fraudulent Democrat bot when you start out by demanding a trial for Obama and his Attorney Generals and FBI Directors and their minions who repeatedly went to Boasbergs’ FISA courts to (a)perjure themselves about Clinton/Obama’s the fictional and felonious ‘Russia Dossier, and (b) deprived THOUSANDS of Americans of their civil rights by color of law using those lawless warrants obtained by perjury. While at the same time trying Jack Smith and his boss Merrick Garland for doing exactly the same thing.
When you even demand that – never mind actually do that – then we’ll consider whether you can be given the benefit of the doubt on being a real American who cares about the rule of law.
Your move, Tovarisch….
Bring it
Shamone!
What evidence ?
There is none.
Smith was a fizzle
Worse he violated the law.
He didn’t…the Atty. General (Merrick Garland) who appointed him violated the law. Smith’s case was dismissed based on a technicality (improper appointment). The evidence went the same place much of the Epstein evidence went. Not to a Jury. To a black hole DOJ uses for counter-transparency.
“He didn’t…”
Yes he did.
He violated federal law in subpoenaing records of Senators.
There are other illegal acts by smith – Bratt one of Smith’s team attampted to Extort the attorney for Walter NUtta to get him to flip.
The MAL search Warrant was illegal – but I beleive that was before Smith was given the case.
“the Atty. General (Merrick Garland) who appointed him violated the law. ”
Correct – Different law.
“Smith’s case was dismissed based on a technicality (improper appointment). ”
And you agree correct that is an error on Garland’s part.
“The evidence went the same place much of the Epstein evidence went.”
Smith testified to Congress – he was asked for evidence – what he offered did not meet probable cause.
How about a class action lawsuit against her by the American taxpayers for three times the costs of her fraud against a duly elected president? Her little smear campaign cost American tax payers $42 million tax dollars with the Mueller report and God knows how much more for her other crimes as Secretary of State. What a couple of pompous buffoons the Clintons are, they should be held accountable.
Democrats are evil, malicious, lying, traitorous losers who cant win elections fairly and so resort to cowardice like Hillary did.
Now ICE Rioters in Minneapolis are at it again, except this time a female rioter driving an SUV tried to mow down an ICE officer, after rioters surrounded ICE officers with their vehicles. The driver HIT the ICE officer!!!!! The ICE officer shot and killed the driver. The Democrats in Minnesota are already pouring gasoline on the volatile situation, not hesitating to fan the flames. Why? it’s all Democrats have – blame others for their violent rhetoric. US Senator Tina Smith (D, MN), the mayor of Minneapolis Jacob Frey and the Governor or Minnesota, Tim Walz, are screaming obscenities at Trump. The ICE officer is now in the hospital due to injuries from SUV hitting him.
It really is a pity Americans can’t just line up Democrats like Hillary, Jacob Frey, Tim Walz and too many to list and take them out to the woodshed.
======
“To ICE, get the f*** out of Minneapolis. We do not want you here,” Frey said during a fiery press conference after the shooting.
“Your stated reason for being in this city is to create some kind of safety, and you are doing exactly the opposite”
“I’ve seen the video. Don’t believe this propaganda machine,” said Gov. Tim Walz on X. “The state will ensure there is a full, fair, and expeditious investigation to ensure accountability and justice.”
US Sen. Tina Smith (D, MN) said the victim was a legal resident.
“A US citizen has apparently been shot by ICE agents in Minneapolis. I’m gathering information, but the situation on the ground is volatile,” she wrote on X.
“ICE should leave now for everyone’s safety. Please be safe Minneapolis,” Smith added.
https://nypost.com/2026/01/07/us-news/minneapolis-mayor-jacob-frey-tells-ice-to-get-the-fk-out-after-agent-guns-down-woman/
If a cop tells you to stop, stop. And don’t use your car as a weapon.
Minnesota is special because it has the right to ignore federal laws.
This was Minneapolis. Whom were they picking up?
^^^ This is the city of the Learing Center? These guys just told all Americans they’re just fine? WTH, other Americans aren’t just fine you sick sacks of shat. The fine Minnesotans can START by returning our money. Wholesale theft from other Americans but they’re just fine?
Send in the army.