Yesterday, a curious thing happened in a House Committee. Bill and Hillary Clinton were actually held accountable for flouting the law — at least as a preliminary matter. In the House Oversight Committee, Democrats joined Republicans in approving contempt resolutions against the two political figures after they refused to appear to answer questions about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
The House panel voted 34-8 to advance the resolution on Bill Clinton to a floor vote. It voted 28-15 to advance a resolution on Hillary Clinton.
As previously discussed, the Clintons adopted a position that was devoid of any cognizable legal defense. It was simple hubris, telling Congress that they did not want to appear to be saying that congressional subpoenas are discretionary for them.
From the Whitewater case to the Lewinsky matter to the email scandal, the Clintons have always escaped accountability for their actions. Courts can find perjury and prosecutors can find classified material without a criminal charge. Evidence can suddenly surface after investigations, or thousands of emails can be destroyed without any repercussions.
After that history, it is little surprise that the Clintons would believe that they, unlike other Americans, can choose whether to comply with a subpoena. After standing in flagrant contempt, the Clintons only reaffirmed the sense of entitlement by offering to allow an interview in New York without a transcript. There would be no “what the meaning of ‘is’ is” moments.
It is a demonstration of our partisan times that the mere fact that Democrats joined in the motion came as a surprise to many. Nine Democrats voted with their GOP colleagues against the Clintons
What is disgraceful are those Democrats who dispensed with any institutional or ethical obligations in opposing the resolution. Here were the eight Democrats who voted to allow the Clintons to disregard lawfully issued subpoenas from the Committee:
Wesley Bell (D., Mo.)
Shontel Brown (D., Oh)
Robert Garcia (D., Cal.)
Ro Khanna (D., Cal.)
Kweisi Mfume (D., Md.)
Eleanor Holmes Norton (D., D.C.)
Suhas Subramanyam (D., Va.)
James Walkinsaw (D., Va.)
Then there are the two Democrats who voted “present” rather than take responsibility by making an actual decision: Reps. David Min (D., Cal.) and Yassamin Ansari (D., Wash.). That is the “profile of courage” for some members: voting that “I’m here” without taking a position on open contempt for the Committee.
Figures like Ro Khanna have long portrayed themselves as more moderate voices, but appear to be yielding to the far left, including his recent support for the disastrous wealth tax in California. Now he is effectively saying that congressional subpoenas simply do not apply to the Clintons like they would every other American.
The three Democrats who voted to advance the resolution against Hillary Clinton are Lee, Stansbury and Tlaib, according to Politico.
Two Democrats voted “present” for the Bill Clinton contempt resolution: California Rep. David Min and Washington Rep. Yassamin Ansari, while just Min voted “present” on the Hillary Clinton resolution.
This vote was the true test of courage for House members. There has to be something that is not entirely dispensable in the face of political advantage. Even if you disagree with the need for a subpoena, members should be able to support the authority of their colleagues to demand that everyone, even the Clintons, respect such subpoenas.
For a party that runs on fighting the privileged and entitled wealthy class, this vote is comically ironic. They are supporting the claim of the Clintons that they get to decide when they will be subject to legal demands without offering an even remotely plausible legal defenses.
herr william kelly is in prison
If you have questions about the real Bill Clinton, read The Secret Life of Bill Clinton. Evans-Pritchard. You will be knocked on your little behind
FBI under the “Joe Biden” administration was a diseased temple. “This is what corruption looks like when it thinks no one is watching.” Giving itself trophies for corrupt political investigations into political opponents.
-Patel
AND they have a really terrible cheap 3D printer.
That thing is a monstrosity and a monument to stupidity.
Someone should ritually tar and feather it. Release the stl file!
Trump Threatens NYT Over Negative Poll
President Donald Trump threatened legal consequences for The New York Times after a poll released by the outlet found that independent voters have soured on his leadership at the one-year mark of his second term.
Just 34 percent of independent voters told the New York Times/Siena poll that they approve of the president’s job performance. The president took to Truth Social to vent his frustration on Thursday.
“The Times Siena Poll, which is always tremendously negative to me, especially just before the Election of 2024, where I won in a Landslide, will be added to my lawsuit against The Failing New York Times,” Trump wrote on Thursday.
“Fake and Fraudulent Polling should be, virtually, a criminal offense,” Trump wrote in a subsequent post.
From Today’s Politico
Yawn. Zzzzzzz. Wake us up when you have something interesting to say.
Threats don’t have conditional verbs.
Amen. Like 60 Minutes editing Harris’ interview, replacing what she actually said with a fictional version.
So what ?
I do not think there is a credible lawsuit over fake polling.
But Trump is free to sue.
Its not like there are not dozens of bogus left wing nut lawsuits.
As to the specific poll. Trump is correct – a significant number of polls were way off in 2024.
This is actually commonplace. The majority of MSM polls skew – sometimes as much as 10 pts in the last few weeks of an election towards the republican (almost never the other way).
Why ? Because if the poll is close to right on election day it maintains credibility and gets funded the rest of the time.
So they can spend a year before the elections aaying the republican is behind by 10 and then in the last few weeks claim that the race tightened
If you want to know what Polls to trust – follow those that are not merely right on election day, but do not show sudden unexplained changes,.
The US Legal system is rotten to the core.
Wife of judge who refused to sign off on Don Lemon charges is Asst AG to Keith Ellison
The magistrate who refused to sign off on charges brought by the Department of Justice against Don Lemon for storming into a church in St. Paul, Minnesota has been identified as Magistrate Judge Douglas Micko, and his wife reportedly works as the assistant attorney general in Keith Ellison’s office.
Micko’s wife, Caitlin Micko, has also shown support for anti-ICE posts on LinkedIn, according to a report from Human Events Daily host Jack Posobiec.
https://thepostmillennial.com/new-wife-of-judge-who-refused-to-sign-off-on-don-lemon-charges-is-asst-ag-to-keith-ellison-report
Hear, hear!
This is not your Founders’ America.
The judicial branch is fraught with corruption, which begins on the fundamental level of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the members of which must have been impeached and convicted long ago, if not for untoward activity, then for high crimes, misdemeanors, and treason.
It will take longer but they can just get a Grand Jury indictment.
On Thursday, CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale called attention to a post by the White House in which federal agents were seen arresting a protester in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In the photo posted by the Trump White House, the protester was seen crying. But the actual photo shows the protester wearing a stoic expression while being handcuffed.
Hey, who cares about the truth. This is trump we are talking about. The most untruthful president in history.
. . . federal agents were seen arresting a protester in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Thanks for clarifying that. I had thought it was Minneapolis, Oklahoma.
Oh, My protestor might not have been crying.
Impeach now.
BTW why is a WH photo not an “actual photo” ? We all know EVERYONE is videoing everything.
Why do you beleive that CNN photos are the only photos ?
So what? The Ds don’t have the “protect each other at all cost” mentality of the Rs
^ This person has been asleep while D judges have been protecting Ds and thwarting Trump at every turn. The latest example: magistrate judge in Minneapolis, who is married to an attorney who works for AG Keith Ellison, refuses to sign off on a warrant for Don Lemon’s criminal conduct.
Here is a good topic for a free speech blog to tackle: is ICE violating the First Amenment rights of protestors?
No. Simple!
Turley’s focus is free speech., The majority of his stories have a strong intersection with the law and free speech.
The details are all important. Saying “Is ICE violating protesters’ first amendment rights?” devoid of any specifics is a meaningless question.
No, it isn’t. What makes you think it is? People are free to express their ignorant, hateful, and unpatriotic views about ICE, so long as they do it from sufficient distance not to interfere with their operations. Doing it closer than that is obstruction, which is a felony and not protected by the first or any other amendment.
The first amendments is violated by specific ACTS – not as some vauge concept
What exactly is ICE doing that would violate protesters First amendment rights?
I have major problems with ICE protesotrs – ICE is following the law. If you do not like the law – take that up with legislators.
It is stupid to protest LEOs who are enforcing thee law.
But the first amendment does NOT have an exception for stupidity.
But it does not apply to acts of violence or obstruction.
Rant however you wish.
Stay out of ICE’s way or get arrested and go to jail.
The political profiling of blue cities is like racial profiling. It is wrong.
Are you sure that you people love America and the Constitution?
You seem to take pleasure in seeing unconstitutional things done to your political rivals.
No it isn’t wrong. Racial profiling isn’t wrong either, but this isn’t even like that. No cities are being “profiled”; ICE is operating wherever there are known to be wanted illegal aliens. Of course in most places they don’t need many agents, because the local authorities cooperate. Two or three agents are enough to make an arrest, they don’t need dozens. Where the local authorities refuse to assist (which is their constitutional right) ICE obviously needs more people to do the same job.
So there’s nothing to discuss.
. Millhouse, It will all fall away after a law is passed and anyone can come and go at will without passports or visas. The US will be a shopping mall. That’s what Minnesota is doing. Presumably people have left Minnesota if they had the wherewithal to do so.
Perhaps they’ll pass another law and ICE will arrest citizens and exile them. In any event it’s not the United States anymore. I think it’s called America.
Scorpions and frogs but dear heaven the termites and buzzards are. Perhaps the national bird is the Buzzard. 😢
WRONG ONCE AGAIN:
Against this backdrop, for state and local law enforcement officers to “cooperate” with
the Secretary (within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g)(10)(B)) in rendering assistance to DHS
officers, those officers must at all times be in a position to be—and, when requested, must in fact be—responsive to federal enforcement discretion, and their assistance must be rendered within any parameters set by DHS so that DHS can exercise control over enforcement and has the flexibility to respond to changing considerations
It is a full time job to correct the lies spouted by the enemies of the U.S.
Democrats are NOT a protected class.
Democrats target republicans all the time.
What about political liberty?
I would expect someone here to believe in political liberty.
You started with a claim that the Constitution was violated. Others were responding to that. Now you change it to some vague and undefined concept of “political liberty.” What a bozo.
What about political liberty ?
You are free to be an anarchist.
But you are not protected from prosecution when you throw bombs because of your politics.
Nor is government barred from paying attention to anarchists because they frequently throw bombs
“Profiling” is just more left wing nut idiocy.
TSA should not be checking the depends of White Swedish Grandmothers for bombs.
They should focus their efforts on those most likely to violate the law.
When you say LEOs can not “profile” you are saying that Law Enforcement is not allowed to suspect people who are suspicious.
The left profiles all the time.
“Democrats target republicans all the time.”
In what, specific, way?
In the same specific ways as you think Republicans target democrats.
But lets use ONE example relevant to this article.
Eric Holder refused to testify to Congress claiming Executive Priviledge. Congress help Holder in contempt.
There was no prosecution.
Bannon and Navaro refused to testify to confress claiming executive priviledge – they had a far batter claim that holder as the J6 committee wanted their conversations with the president that is exactly with EP is their to protect. Regardless congress held Bannon and Navoro in contempt. DOJ prosecuted they were unlawfully convicted and jailed.
“In what, specific, way?”
Are you here to learn or just stay stupid?
The “profiling of [sanctuary] cities is” smart law enforcement.
That’s where criminals go to be protected by D politicians.
Now your dishonest statement is truthful.
More nonsense – there is nothing wrong with political profiling.
Regardless that is NOT what has happened.
The “surge” in Mineapolis is approcimately the 15th ICE surge since Trump was elected.
There have been protests everywhere.
There are very few places there has been obstruction and violence.
ICE did nto go to Minneapolis First.
Tjhey have been to Lousiana, TX, Nashville, and LA among many others first.
Even in LA were there was rioting, and the NG called in, the LAPD responded to ICE 911 calls, and CA provided ICE with the current addresses of criminal illegal aliens. Only Minnesota has engaged in this massive and desparate obstruction.
Is it wrong for me to enjoy not dying with the lowest murder rate in 100+ years?
Arresting people who break the law MADE this country.
Example: every other country that isn’t a country of enforced, righteous laws chosen by the people.
We are a country of LAWS. They are our protection.
Laws are our choice and our true rulers and we elect just to enforce them.
Since you clearly haven’t thought this through yet, I will pass on your accusations as they are plentiful around here.
“Jane Doe” aka “Katie Johnson” – 1994. Lawsuit filed June 2016, refiled October 2016 as reported by Buzzfeed and others, then dropped in November 2016.
Jane Doe is an unnamed plaintiff, who has also gone by “Katie Johnson” in legal papers. She claims she was repeatedly raped by Trump and Jeffery Epstein at Epstein’s New York City apartment in 1994, when she was 13 years old. A witness, also given a pseudonym — “Tiffany Doe” — said she recruited “Jane Doe” and others. Doe, using the name “Johnson,” gave an interview to the Daily Mail in which she said she did not know who Trump was at the time of the alleged attack but identified him later when she saw him on television. It is not known why she withdrew the lawsuit. She has not spoken publicly or withdrawn her rape allegation since then.
So what? Some random liar tells stories?! What normal person would pay any attention?
The lawsuit was dismissed because the alleged event occurred in a city that Trump was thousands of miles away from at the time.
AS I recall she changed her story 3 separate times – and was unable to come up with a single instance where her stroy was enven possible without a Star Trek Transporter.
Withdrew is not dismissed.
Trump claimed he was thousands of miles away, or about 4 hours by private jet.
Read the news – not only was the lawsuit dismissed – it was DISMISSED multiple times.
Trump was also only 1 hour away by SR71 and 8 minutes away by ICBM – what is relevant is that Trump was not at the places claimed by the plaintiff on the dates and times claimed – or at any time near them.
The EJC case should have been dismissed for very nearly the same reason
If you make a claim of misconduct and you can not provide sufficient details for the person you have accused to defend themselves, then your case MUST be dismissed.
As to your nonsense – what is it you think happened ?
Trump Jetted across country to rape someone who he had no relationship with,
jetted back, and they erased all logs of the flights, all hotel records, and erased the memories of the pilot, the limo driver the hotel clerks,
Even those of us whose lives are nut incredibly public who do not pretty much always have someone else who will be able to specifiy where we were and what we were doing, are entitled when accused to have the accusation include sufficient specifics that we can defend ourselves.
“I was raped at an unknown date, at an unknown time, in an unknown season, maybe 30 years ago give or take 10 years”
Should be dismissed immediately – not against Trump, but against ANYONE.
UNCLASSIFIED r NO team. meta
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Intake
Date: 10/27/2020
Case ID #: SOD-NY-3027571 (U) EPSTEIN, JEFFREY; CHILD SEX
TRAFFICKING
Drafted By:
Date/Time Received: 10/27/2020 03:20 PM EDT
Details:
On 10/27/2020, at 3:20 p.m. Eastern. Time, , date of birth
cellular telephone number called the FBI
National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) Unit, to report potential
information related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
III provided the following information:
III reported around 1997, he made contact with
birth whom he had known from 6 or 7 years prior as they
had a son together. III and ended up dating, as explained
she was having money issues and problems with her daughters. III noted
they were friends from before. During the contact in 1997, asked
III how to spell “Ghislaine” numerous times, as noted she had
taken her daughters up to see one of the “supposed father’s” who lived in
Niagara Falls, NY recently.
date of
reported she had met a lady who invited her daughters
, date of birth-, and , date of birth-
to a fancy hotel and met Donald Trump and some of his friends in 1997.
continued asking III how to spell “Ghislaine” implying
Ghislaine had given her money and would give her additional money if
needed.
On Christmas Eve of 1999, or the day prix:, III was over visiting his
son, who he had with years prior. III began talking to , as
she seemed to be acting strange and III if he needed a ride home.
UNCLASSIFIED
EFTA00020517
UNCLASSIFIED
Re: 50D-NY-3027571, 10/27/2021/4)
asked III about his time driving a limousine for two years in the
Dallas/Ft. Worth area. During time as a driver, he had met Donald
Trump. III noted he picked the President up in 1995 and took him to the
DFW Airport. III reported some of things President Trump had spoken about
during the ride while on his cell phone were very concerning. III
reported he was “a few seconds from pulling the limousine over on the
median and within a few seconds of pulling him out of the car and hurting
him due to some of things he was saying” as caller choose not to. III
noted Trump continuously stated the name “Jeffrey” while on the phone,
and made references to “abusing some girl.” III was unsure who he was
talking to nor who he was referencing. As III talked about his time
meeting Donald Trump, immediately demeanor went “stone
cold” as stated “he raped me.” III said “what” as replied
“Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.” noted
some girl with a funny name “took me into a fancy hotel or building,
that’s how it happened.”
III advised to call the police regarding the incident as
stated “I can’t they will kill me.” On Christmas Day, contacted III
stated she had in fact called the police about what they had talked
about. III told she had “done good.” III did not hear from or
until 01/10/2000.
reached out to III stating was dead and noted she was found
with her head “blown off” in Kiefer, OK. Officers on the scene and
stated there was no way it was a suicide. Corner stated it was a suicide.
later stated •
cocaine from a Mexican
Ghislaine.
The last contact with
Facebook a couple of weeks prior.
put the family in danger. III explained
date of birt
committed suicide because had gotten
drug cartel. III feels the murder is a cover for
was after III posted this information on
called III yelling that he had
had a third daughter named
Note: During report he mentioned John Doe No.2 was actually John
UNCLASSIFIED
EFTA00020518
UNCLASSIFIED
Re: 50D-NY-3027571, 10/27/2020
W Nichols, date of birth who tried to
originally set III up for the bombing in Oklahoma City. Nichols worked
security for Bill and Hillary Clinton as III ate at a place where Nichols
worked security at the door. Hillary walked up to III drunk and begin
yelling as they asked III to leave and fired Nichols, which led Nichols
to attempt to set up III for the bombing.
♦♦
UNCLASSIFIED
3
We all read every word.
Thank you, Einstein!
Every day, people suffering from Trump derangement syndrome congregate here and express their derangement, lunacy, and psychosis.
They laughed at Galileo.
^ Every psychotic idiot is Galileo. Dem logic. ^
No they tried to imprison him.
They are laughing at you.
I believe Galileo had the last laugh.
*they had nothing to do with it.
They also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
(Also, the Church had no problem whatsoever with Copernicus. And had Galileo stuck to science and the evidence, and not got political, it would have had no problem with him. But he not only got into politics, but went way past what the evidence could support. That was what got him in trouble.)
“Also, the Church had . . .”
BS.
You’re rewriting and whitewashing the Church’s historic crime against science.
Copernicus remained relatively unscathed because for decades he kept his discoveries *secret*.
Galileo was put on trial and imprisoned by anti-science, anti-Renaissance fanatics like Cardinal Bellarmine. Why? Because Galileo’s heliocentric *science* was deemed “false and contrary to Holy Scripture.”
You better start making big discoveries like Galileo because now you’re going to look foolish.
You know that I love? I love that Professor Turley reads all the same news as a normal person does – samples from Fox, Washington Post, NY Times, The New York Post, etc etc….and he KNOWS what the truth is – but he consciously cherry picks items, while conveniently overlooking other stories, to specifically enrage his base. But the whole time he’s writing his little anti-Democratic screeds, he knows in his gut that he has chosen the wrong side in this. That he’s decided to be a sycophant to a deeply corrupt party that would back a petulant dictator…that would consistently lie to it’s constituents about an election, that protects pedophiles, etc etc etc. And while Professor Turley would never admit that – it privately eats at him – he’s too intelligent for it to NOT erode away at him in some private little place we can’t see, while he’s writing his pro-Trump essays. And I love thinking about him having to swallow that down like a little kid trying to stomach a mouthful of broccoli day after day after day….
Cry harder Gigi, we can’t hear you.
it really does sound like gigi.
You have the right to start a blog, or a podcast. You’ll end up having to select what item to cover on any given day, call it cherry picking: some call it editing
Might that be because there are so few storied of Republicans behaving badly, and democrats behaving well.
Or many it is because there are so many stories of democrats behaving badly.
Regardless, Turley’s focus is free speech., The majority of his stories have a strong intersection with the law and free speech.
The majority of stories about bad conduct regarding speech – either government engaged in censorship or people engaged is protected but highly offensive speech involve the left.
I mentioned genocide and was banned.
Oh well
. Olly’s comments are stellar and John Say also. Recommend
On Epstein Island, a pair of little girl’s panties were found to have some of Trump’s semen on them.
Clinton’s – Fixed it for you!!
On Epstein Island, a pair of little girl’s panties were found to have some of Trump’s semen on them.
===
I heard they found some in your mouth too…..😹
Again evidence rather than unsourced and unsupported claims.
Do you have the results of a DNA test ?
Why am I asking ?
Everyone KNOWS you don’t.
You make this schiff up.
And you wonder why people do not beleive you.
BAN FOR LIFE!
“As recent as 2018, air traffic controllers and other airport personnel reported seeing Epstein leave his plane with young girls some of whom appeared to be between the age of 11 and 18 years old,” the complaint alleges.
Epstein, prosecutors say, paid for women to show up to his estates on the islands, often providing extra money if the victims brought along additional young women and girls.
Is there someone that does not Know Epstain was scum ?
Regardless, how is this evidence that would allow you to indict or prosecute anyone ?
You have not connected any of what is claimed here to actually articulate crimes involving specific people.
If you have an actual 13 year old Jane Doe willing tgo testify that she felated Bill Clinton that would be evidence.
While we all KNOW what Mr. Bill was doing on Epstain Island,
I have still never heard evidence to connect him to actual sexual activity with a specific woman on Epstain Island whether that person was of age or not.
And if you can not get Mr. Bill you are not getting anyone else.
That does not mean bad things did not happen on Epstain Island.
It just means that the expectation you are going to get proof sufficient to prosecute anyone from the DOJ Epstain files is a faint hope.
I would love to be proven wrong. But if there was anything damning enough to prosecute – those indictments and prosecutions would already have occurred.
This is the end of the road for the most vile president we’ve ever had. He finally met his match in President Trump. He should have left well enough alone. Consenting, however reluctantly, to Hillary’s plan to take out Trump using Steele and others, sealed the fate of both of them. Trump will destroy them, without malice, but destroy nevertheless. About Time. This will have an atmosphere of divine justice woven throughout.
This is little I would like more than to see Bill and Hillary in Orange Jump Suits.
But this is not the way to go about that.
Congress is not a criminal investigative body.
There must be a legislative or govenrment oversite purpose.
I would further note there is a risk associated with forced congressional testimony.
The conviction of Oliver North was tossed because his congressional testimony circumvented his 5th amendment rights.
nd there was atleast a legitimate oversite purpose to North’s testimoney.
As much as I would like to castrate everyone associated with the sexual abuse fostered by Epstain,
it is NOT legitimate for Congress.
Limited government MUST mean LIMITED – not stretching the rules in the judiciary, not in the executive, not in congress.
Yes, but the democrats unleashed the frank-epstein monster to eat trump and terrorize the conservative village but it ended up eating Bill and Hilarity.
His testimony will be a confession and appropriate law enforcement personnel will charge him with crimes. From high school girls to the Dixie Mafia, he will be exposed for the animal he is. I’ve seen through his acting since the first time I saw him speak. Some who observe a person see exactly what others see, but they sense what is underneath, too. Discernment, they say. It sees what others don’t, but it is just as real and accurate. Bill isn’t a very good actor, but if you want to believe in someone, it doesn’t take much to con you. Clinton is a pure con, always has been and learned nothing from the earthquakes he created that almost ruined him. After a lifetime of deceit and abuse, his criminality has caught up with him and Trump ain’t letting go.
When ICE agents can enter your home without a warrant, it is a violation of property rights that could be described as Marxist or communistic.
The requirements for Law Enforcement to enter a home are extremely well developed area of constitutional law.
In 99.9% of instances ICE agents entering homes have warrants – Sworn by ICE agents and signed off on by Immigration judges.
This is the same as ICE has done for atleadt 60 years.
You are free to try to challenge it in court – but you are not going to win.
You are free to go to congress and change the law.
The no knock is before SCOTUS currently. At the very least it’s extraordinarily dangerous to all.
I am not aware of ICE engaging in no knock warrants – do you have some evidence of that ?
Regardless, while I doubt SCOTUS is going to reign in no knock warrants – they absolutely should
There are few if any circumstancs in which they are legitimate.
Where possible LEO’s should serve warrants in the safest possible way.
Radley Balko has an excellent book on the multidecade long militarization of law enforcement.
It extensively covers no knock warrants
Regardless you are NOT making an ICE specific point.
ICE is bound MOSTLY to the same rules as other LEOs.
There are some due process differences – because technically ICE is detaining pending deportation, and that is NOT a criminal matter, and no actual rights are at issue.
With few exceptions you are “free to go” when detained by ICE – just not “free to go back to the US”
If you are detained you can leave at anytime – on an airplane back to your home country.
That is not the same as an arrest and you are not afforded the same criminal due process because you are not facing any infringement or loss of rights.
HOWEVER the constitutions requirements for a Warrant are NOT specific to criminal cases.
With a few limited exceptions you MUST have a warrant to conduct a search of private property – that includes a search for a person.
ICE warrants can be challenged just like any other warrant.
But the likelihood of successfully challenging an ICE warrant is near zero – that is a logical issue, not a legal one.
ICE is “searching” for an illegal alien. If they find one, clearly the warrant was proper.
Usually ICE is after a SPECIFIC illegal alien, if they find that specific illegal alien, the WARRANT is going to be near impossible to challenge – what are you going to claim ? ICE had the wrong address but accidentally find the right person there ?
ALREADY HAVE an administrative warrant to enter home. Quit the lies ANON!! They were given rights to DEPORT!!
Judgements to deport the illegals were already given. LEGAL to enter their homes!! ANON lies too much!!
They are constitutionally incapable of admitting errors. The love to lie. They live to lie. Their hope is, if they throw enough crap out there, some of it will be believed.
Sounds like you ANON- throwing out lies and crap daily!!
There can be no such thing as property rights to be violated under Marx, you —-ing idiot!
Marx intended to abolish private property.
Hmm, dems suddenly very concerned about making the opposing teams’ legally employed LEO citizens ‘show their papers’.
A new lawsuit claims Jeffrey Epstein trafficked girls as young as 12 to his private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands as recently as 2018. President Donald Trump “knew about the girls” and “spent hours” with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims at the financier’s home.
again a source for anything ?
Trump “knew” Ep[stain was up to no good in 2004 when he banned him from MAL.
The investigation that lead to Epstains arrest was started under Trump
Using left wing nut idiot logic Trump “Knew” about Epstain and directed FBI/DOJ to go after him.
They just can’t stop using the suffering of others to advance their agenda. Referring to Trump as a “pedophile” is the most ridiculous of all. Even when the victims were directly asked, and they have been repeatedly, he is the one person that not only has NO ONE accused, they even said they never saw him there. The Left is complete human garbage.
“Supreme Court appears ready to keep Lisa Cook on Federal Reserve board despite Trump efforts to fire her”
– Fox News
______________
Supreme Court Corruption Of Fundamental Law
The Federal Reserve Act Is Unconstitutional
The Constitution establishes a federal government of limited and enumerated powers, reserving all others to the states or the people. Nowhere does it authorize Congress to regulate banking, control credit, manage interest rates, or displace free enterprise in private financial markets. Banking and lending are matters of private contract and state law, not federal sovereignty. The Necessary and Proper Clause permits only laws that carry enumerated powers into execution; it does not create new powers or justify federal takeover of private industries. Congress already exercises its legitimate fiscal authority—taxing, borrowing, spending, and coining money—through the constitutional structure it created, principally the Treasury and the Mint. The Federal Reserve Act does not execute an enumerated power; it creates a new and independent monetary authority over private markets. Because the Constitution grants no such authority, the Federal Reserve Act exceeds Article I and is unconstitutional.
Are you also concerned about violations of the 4th Amendment?
I would be if there were any.
No, because there is more than sufficient probable cause, Einstein!