Some of us in the free speech community have been writing about the hypocrisy of many in the media and academia suddenly championing free speech values after years of silence (or support) over censorship of conservatives, libertarians, and contrarians. A good example can be found in the Chicago area, where a physical education teacher is on administrative leave and faces possible termination after posting two words (“Go ICE”) on Facebook in support of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Local leaders and groups are demanding that he be fired, even though a posting opposing ICE would likely have been heralded rather than condemned.
Social media exploded with commentators calling the teacher a “f****** piece of s***.” A flyer demanded termination because any expression of support for ICE is “inappropriate and unsuitable for an educator.” The flyer insisted that “keeping this teacher will disrupt the emotional welfare and therefore, the education of our students.”
Local Democratic leaders immediately joined the mob. That includes Karina Villa, who posted a message saying she stands in “unwavering solidarity” with those demanding action given the “disturbing comments reportedly made by an educator.”
As is often the case, Villa did the perfunctory nod toward the right to free speech before joining the effort to gut it. She acknowledged the right, but noted that “as educators we have the responsibility to our students and their families to create a safe and welcoming environment for all.”
According to the district’s superintendent, Kristina Davis, the unnamed teacher submitted a resignation on Friday but then withdrew that resignation before the board could approve it. She then suspended the teacher pending an investigation.
That “investigation” concerns the posting of two words in favor of law enforcement outside the school on a personal social media account.
In the meantime, Mayor Daniel Bovey and the city council of West Chicago held a “listening session” on Monday to address the trauma of having a teacher who openly supports ICE. The District also addressed what it called the “disruption for students, families, and staff” and assured families that “our schools are safe spaces.”
Once again, the teacher simply wrote “Go Ice” on a personal social media account.
Notably, the nearby Chicago Teachers’ Union is one of the most radical and politically active in the country. Members have publicly voiced support for the Venezuelan regime and have engaged in violent public declarations against the Administration.
The much bigger crisis:
The top law enforcement official in the USA – Pam Bondi – won’t comply with United States laws and won’t follow her own Oath of Office. She won’t release the Epstein files.
That alone is justification for firing or impeachment.
This is “Team Sports” – nothing else.
Every wants their own favorite team to win, even if they cheat and even if they bribe the referee.
Trump supporters cherry-pick parts of the U.S. Constitution that they agree with and those rights only apply to Trump supporters. Clinton, Obama or Biden would have been impeached or indicted for doing the same thing Trump does.
Many (maybe most) voters have lost faith in our government institutions and even lost faith in judges (many considered politicians in robes).
Obama’s millions of American voters were robbed of about 100 judges and U.S. Supreme Court pick. Unequal treatment than any other modern president. Those MAGA judges (many politicians in robes) are ruling on cases right now.
Maybe Trump supporters should practice what they are preaching? The U.S. Constitution is a package deal that includes constitutional rights for women, African-Americans and other groups. If you support the 2nd Amendment, you must also support the 1st and 4th Amendment rights of Minnesota citizens!
As well as the Tenth Amendment.
Low-resolution analysis, fitting the anonymous choice.
to die for
“. . . a physical education teacher is on administrative leave . . .” (JT)
He should have posted: “Go ANTIFA.”
He’d now be Principal.
If ICE had an illegitimate presence, then all of their actions were illegitimate, too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree
All of the video analysis in the world is irrelevant if they should not have been there in the first place. Being there in the first place was the initial wrong.
They who ?
ICE was their to enforce a democratically passed constitutional law.
Protesters were their to voice their disagreement with that law.
The protestors were stupid – their actions were performative ignorance.
You do not change the law by shouting at law enforcement.
You do so by voicing your oposition to those who make laws, not those who enforce them.
Stupid or not they were free to protest.
What they are not free to do is obstruct.
“They” should not have been engaging in obstruction in the first through nth place.
Thank you for demonstrating the poor quality of left wing nut education and logic.
You start with a false premise. ICE’s presence is OBVIOUSLY legitimate – they were created by congress for a task constitutionally delegated to the federal government and they are enforcing the laws passed by congress that the courts have long ago found to be constitutional.
outside of alternate universes where logic does not exist ICE’s presence is OBVIOUSLY legitimate.
Clearly YOU do not beleive it SHOULD be legitimate – andd that is fine. It is unlikely that any two humans share exactly the same views of what SHOULD be.
That is why we have governments, and why we prefer democratic ones.
If each of use choses to impose our idea of what should be by force on others – we have anarchy.
Governments exist to impose BY FORCE one view of what SHOULD be. Representative Democratic governments leave the choice of what SHOULD be to us collectively rather than individually. Limited governments confine the domain of the use of FORCE to impose a collective view of what SHOULD be to only the most critical areas, leaving us as individually free to choose what SHOULD be for ourselves in our own lives to the greatest extent possible so long as we do not use FORCE to impose out perception of what SHOULD be on others.
The above is the social contract, it is the foundation for legitimate government.
Living together requires that if we can not persuade others to adopt our view of what should be, that we live with what is extablished through Representative governments.
That is what is legally legitimate. If your personal systems of morals rejects that – you are free to work through elected representatives to change the law.
Next – the “fruit of the Poinous Tree is a legal doctrine regarding the admissibility of evidence.
It is not a rule of law or logic.
A logical error does NOT make your conclusions Wrong – it makes them unproven.
Even in Law – the fruit of the poisonous tree prohibition is completely circumvented by establishing an independent evidentiary chain
But even in law one error on the part of law enforcement does not inherently invalidate everything that follows.
If the police get the address on a warrant wrong and attempt to search your house – after they have identified themselves you do NOT get to shoot them in self defense – as you would someone else breaking into your home.
An actual error on the part of law enforcement – as opposed to the made up errors of left wing nuts, does not allow you to pretend that the police are now Criminals.
When a police officer gives you and order – with extremely few exceptions you are OBLIGATED to obey it.
If you do not you are subject to arrest. At the scene and in the moment regardless of your personal views on the legality of the officers order you are OBLIGATED to accept it as legitimate – and if you fail to do so – you will likely be arrested, and if you resist you may be hurt or killed.
And that is all perfectly legitimate even if the original order is later deemed unlawful.
We do not have legal debates with law enforcement in the streets.
We have them later in court.
That is how our system works.
An officer is not answerable to you or anyone else for his actions while in the streets.
You get tohold them accountable after the fact in court – and it is entirely possible that you can win that argument as STILL end up charged, convicted and imprisoned.
Learn some real law and logic – not blindered left wing nut nonsense.
We have spent 900,000 years getting to where we are.
‘What we have may fall short of perfect, but the odds of some left wing nut finding an actually better way are near zero.
They odds of finding something that has not previously been tried and failed are near zero.
It’s a good idea that the Founders failed to consider.
Dem-o-rats are so peaceful. Well maybe not
__________________________
Ohio Democrat Attorney General candidate Elliot Forhan has a video in which he says, “…I am going to kill Donald Trump.”
One more loser
____________________
During an anti-immigration-enforcement protest event Tuesday, Democrat Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner vowed to “hunt down” and prosecute ICE agents, whom he called “Nazis.”
“One more loser” = dustoff
Truth just drive you nutty right Ano.
So you support this kind of stuff… bet you do
“Forhan has a video in which he says”? That your own text dustoff?
You are an inept knucklehead.
Trump raped a 13-year-old girl and YOU support him. That says it all.
Any proof ANO?
Nice going Nurse.
You not only will lose your job and your medical lic.
What a fool!
A nurse working at Virginia Commonwealth University Health has been placed on administrative leave following the emergence of disturbing TikTok videos where she outlined methods to disrupt and harm Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. The content, which quickly spread across social media, prompted an immediate investigation by VCU Police and the health system.
In one video, captioned “#ice #resistance #sabotage,” the nurse suggested: “All the medical providers, grab some syringes with needles on the end… Have them full of saline or succinylcholine, you know, whatever. Whatever. That will probably be a deterrent. Be safe.”
You just know she’s a lib.
Oh look, its dustoff plagiarizing.
Folks, dustoff is so stupid he can’t formulate a sentence over 5 words. And misspells all 5 words.
Oh, he’s got two “collage” degrees.
Did you understand what he wrote ?
Sorry, Wrong test.
Did normal people understand what he wrote ?
If so, who cares about your pedantic nonsense ?
I type fast, sometimes my keyboard can not keep up.
I do not proof, or spell check.
No one is paying me.
in the Real World I have multiple published papers – which I carefully edited multiple times.
The Turley.org comment space is not the real world.
So you support this kind of stuff?
I’m guessing so.
PS you dummy, this info I posted came from the news… Fool!
Supporting the legal law authority is now a crime according to the insane liberals.
So now we learn more about Mr. Pretti. A week before he was shot, he got into a fight with ICE. I wonder now how many times he’s done this? If that wasn’t bad enough, he broke a rib in the fight.
Now him being a nurse, he should have stayed home and let his rib repair.But he didn’t, he went backed for another rodeo with ICE, but this time armed. No wonder his family tired to convince him to say out of it. We all know the rest. He was not a simple nurse just walking down the street taking in the sights.
He wanted to fight. No common sense.
What did we learn dustoff? he wanted to fight. Okay, who did he want to fight?
Law Enforcement trying to arrest and deport criminals.
In what world do you think fighting them is a good idea ?
Have you seen the videos dummy?
What a foolish question.
Jezz Ano.
He already had a broken rib from fighting with ICE a week ago. So he came back for more. Even when his own father asked him not too.
Not a smart move…
yup. So: he los the 1st fight (and did not bring a gun to it as he was still alive after). Wanting revenge, he brought a gun to the 2nd fight. clearly he was itching to shoot and kill BP/ICE. Motive.
Hypocrisy is the indelible hallmark of Marxists and radical Democrats.
And dumb commenters.
Wow. This is so deep.
Anarchist Leftists run away from pointed questions. Their strategy is to drag rational people into arguing with them.
No! They don’t complain about the gunned-down innocents in metros controlled by their cronies. We are not supposed to notice those irreconcilable hypocrisies. They are experts at twisting reasonable people into unending, useless arguments, even as we forget their hypocrisy. We hope to beat them back into some awareness of their futile arguments. They don’t care. Arguing is their raison d’être.
They care for no one. They love to argue and they are practically wizards at directing the focus away from their devilish schemes.
Or, we could forget the whole thing, open our borders as Biden did, and groove on the rubble.
How do you know he wasn’t talking about “internal combustion engines?”
Republican Appointed Judge Summons ‘Acting’ ICE Director
In a brief ruling issued late Monday, the judge, Patrick J. Schiltz, of Federal District Court in Minnesota, said he recognized that ordering ICE’s acting director, Todd Lyons, to personally defend himself in court was “an extraordinary step.” But Judge Schiltz, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said it was necessary because “the extent of ICE’s violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary.”
Judge Schiltz, who once clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia, is an unlikely critic of the White House. But his summons of Mr. Lyons was his second clash with the Trump administration in less than a week.
On Friday, he expressed exasperation about an extraordinary request from the Justice Department to have him reverse another judge’s decision and personally issue arrest warrants for the journalist Don Lemon and four other people in connection with a protest at a church service in St. Paul this month
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/us/politics/ice-director-minnesota-contempt.html
REGARDING ABOVE:
Here we have a Federal judge who clerked for Anton Scalia and was appointed by George W. And he’s completely lost patience with the legal shenanigans ICE keeps pulling.
And notice that Todd Lyons is the ‘acting’ ICE director. No confirmed appointment?
Here’s a revealing paragraph from Lyons Wikipedia bio:
“On May 12, 2025, Acting Director Todd Lyons authored a secret memorandum that was later leaked by a whistleblower. ICE officers were told to follow the memo’s guidance instead of written training materials. It authorized ICE officers to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant”.
ATS – a memo does not authorize people to enter homes without a judicial warant.
two centuries of 4th amendment law does.
There is litterally no difference between an ICE warrant and a criminal warrant – except that an ICE warrant is civil not criminal,
because most immigration law is civil – not criminal and because unless an illegal alien is being arrested and prosecuted for a crime, the entire corpus of criminal law and procedure does not apply.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The word judicial appears NOWHERE in the amendment.
The 4th amendment requires a SWORN Warrant. – it does not even require a judge of anykind to signoff – though in both criminal warrants and civil warrants in the US – a JP – who need not be a lawyer, an Article II Federal Magistrate or an Article II INS judge signs off on the warrant.
NOT an article III judge.
4th amendment law is the most highly developed law in the US. There are litterally thousands of cases on the 4th amendment – specifically search and seizure.
While I personally think that warrants should be required for far more instances than SCOTUS – the FACT is that there are myriads of ways that an LEO can conduct a lawful search or Seizure without a warrant.
ICE Policy does not Determine when a warrant is needed.
A Memo does not decide when a warrant is needed.
Centuries of case law do.
Policies are attempts to provide a simplified overview of the requirements to officers.
Memos that modify those polices are EXACTLY THE SAME.
It is NOT the policy or memo that matters,
it is the constitution, the law, and the caselaw.
The courts do not have jurisdiction over policy or memos.
They have jurisdiction over cases.
If a judge legitimately has a case before him where there is a challenge to the search of seizure,
it is not the Memo or Policy that matter – it is the constitution, law, and caselaw.
If a federal judge wishes to express his own general views on Search and seizure – he can write a law text.
A federal judge has no more authority over an ICE memo than he has over lawrence tribes book on constitutional law.
The Judge can not drag Tribe into a courtroom in Minnesota because he does not like what he wrote.
Please cite a single instance in which Scalia ordered anyone in the executive to appear before him to explain a memo ?
In fact prior to 2025 – provide any example of any federal judge anywhere ordering anyone within the executive before them to explain a memo ?
This is so clearly outside the jurisdiction of the judge.
When there is a SPECIFIC case before him, the judge has the authority to rule regarding whether the specific search and seizure complies with the constitution, the law and the caselaw. Any Memo will not come up.
Memo’s and policy are guideance to Law Enforcement they are NOT legal authority – any more than your lawschool text on search and seizure is anything more than the opinion of the author. Courts do not order the authors of law school texts to explain their books.
This is no different.
The judge has jurisdiction over people in ICE outside of MN if and only if they Directly acted int he case before him.
I do not beleive this judge even has a specific case or controversy before him – the courts do not have jurisdiction over the internal deliberations and communications of the executive branch – only Congress has Oversight of the executive.
Courts gain jurisdiction over a person in the executive only when they have direct involvement in a specific case.
This has been addressed in other stupid lawsuits involving the Trump administration – so far judges have repeatedly failed in their attempts to expand their jurisdiction outside of the case before them.
Judges are not presidents.
There role is to address the constitution and the law regarding cases and controversies that are legitimately before them.
To order ICE director to MN to appear before him – the Judge must have jurisdiction over an issue that is withing his district and that directly involves Lyons.
Are you sufficiently insane to beleive that a judge can order each and every member of ICE to appear before him ?
The judge must has a case of controversey over which he has jurisdiction – and SCOTUS has REPEATEDLY told the federal courts their jurisdiction over deportations is incredibly limited. But even after that the Judge must have personal jurisdiction over the parties he is trying to order arround.
A judge can not simply order any ICE agent he wishes into his court.
More specifically he can not order anyone in ICE who is not already physically present in his district before him without establishing very concretely that they are directly involved in the case or controversey before him.
You have not provided the details – but I am near certain ICE already appealed this order and it was rejected by higher courts.
Different judge and different case but still a clue as to how Schiltz will fare on appeal
I found more information on this.
This strongly resembles the zombie case in front of Boasberg that Boasberg can not let go of – though SCOTUS told him to pound sand.
In this case a specific illegal alien was arrested by ICE and transported to a fascility in TX while awaiting deportation.
SCOTUS has already said jurisdiction for habeus claims by an illegal alien are in the district where they are being detained – in this case TX, not MN.
This judge has no jurisdiction. SCOTUS has already spoken on that.
If by some miracle the illegal was detained in MN – that only happens for hours as ICE does not have enough beds in MN to handle the arrests they are making. All arrestees are transfered to larger detention centers.
Is ICE sending people to TX of FL to avoid idiot judges like this – sure.
But also because only places like TX and FL have allowed large detention fascilities to be built.
But lets pretend for a moment that this illegal is in MN, and the judge has jurisdiction.
The judges jurisdiction is limited to Habeus – the illegal files a habeus case – he is the plantif, DHS is the defendant.
The only legitimate claim is “I am not the person the INC court has ordered deported”
That is it. Federal Article III courts have no other jurisdiction. ICE “arrests” are not actually criminal arrests.
Anyone “detained” by ICE is “free to go” – they can agree at any time to be deported back to their HOME.
The only restriction on them is they can not be released into the US.
A judge ordering that is arguably violating US immigration law themselves.
Regardless the order would be illegal.
This judge has tried to assert jurisdiction over an illegal alien in another district.
SCOTUS has decided he can not do that over 6 months ago.
This judge is trying to assert jurisdiction beyond Habeus.
SCOTUS has decided he can not do that over 6 months ago.
This judge does not have a valid case or controversy before him.
He has no jurisdiction at all.
Again presuming he did – the burden of proof in a habeuas case is on the plantif – the illegal alien.
ICE is not there to present evidence – beyond getting the oportunity to rebut any claim the plantiff makes.
The memo you are ranting about is not an issue.
The judge has no authority to transform a plaintiffs habeus motion – where the plantif has the burden of proof, into a serioes of demands from ICE that are not germain to the case.
But lets presume that somehow the warrant is an issue, and the judge has the authority to release this person because of some defect int he warrant. First that is determined by the Warrant itself, or the testimony of the arresting officer if the arrest was done without a warrant.
The very most the judge could do, was decide the arrest was improper and order the plantiff released.
One ordering the plantiff released – the case is over the judge has no more jurisdiction.
As the plantiff left the courthouse he would be immediately detained by ICE.
No warrant is needed. There is a valid deportation order outstanding for this person and they can be detained based on that order anywhere in public they are found.
This judge has no power to invalidate a Deportation order after the time limit for appeal has expired and ICE waits for that time limit to expire before making an arrest. The illegal had time to file and appeal of the deportation order if they wished to.
They did not, the order is therefore final – not subject to further judicial review.
Sorry forgot another issue Judge Schiltz and his wife donated to a legal defense fund for immigrants
He is free to do so. I have donated to funds for that purpose.
What he can not do, is judge a case involving illegal aliens after doing so.
It is a clear conflict of interests.
Some good advice for “protestors” from Johnny Cash
ICE is completely and utterly out of control.
They are nothing more than thugs acting as Trump’s gestapo secret police.
They tried to force their way into the Ecuadorian Consulate in Minneapolis and threatened to arrest a Consulate official.
Embassies and Consulates are considered to be sovereign territory of the foreign nation, where US law enforcement has absolutely no jurisdiction.
Ecuador’s Minister of Foreign Affairs has filed a protest with the U.S. Embassy after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents tried to enter the Ecuadorian consulate in Minneapolis without permission Tuesday.
A video of the attempt on social media shows a consulate staffer running to the door to turn the ICE agents away, telling them, “This is the Ecuadorian consulate. You’re not allowed to enter.”
One ICE officer can be heard responding by threatening to “grab” the staffer if he touched the agent, before finally agreeing to leave.
International law prohibits law enforcement authorities from entering foreign consulates or embassies without permission.
You clearly dont believe in law and order
“ICE is completely and utterly out of control.”
ROFL
Lets see – Bovino is headed elsewhere – Homan is in Minneapolis,
A few ICE agents have been removed.
the MPD is arresting protestors at the hotel were ICE was purportedly staying.
Protestors have raided Walz’s office calling him a traitor and recent poll shows the majority of people support what ICE is doing.
Sounds like it is the left that is out of control.
Recent video shows Pretti reaching behind his back while trying to stand up while being arrested – that is a threat.
He did not know his gun was not there and was attempting to pull it.
The ICE agents that shot him did not know his gun was not there.
Then we have Pretti with a broken rib from prior fights with ICE.
In addition to establishing that Pretti is an agitator not a protestor, it also means the Officers have reason to KNOW he is dangerous.
And he has been connected to the group that was deliberately engaged in obstructing ICE.
“They are nothing more than thugs acting as Trump’s gestapo secret police.”
ICE has been arround for decades. They are the federal law enforcement officers tasked with arresting and deporting illegal immigrants.
At their peak under Obama they were deporting 480,000 illegal immigrants per year – and no one was protesting.
Homan, BGovino and the two agents involved in the recent shootings joined ICE while Obama was president.
Does not sound like Trumps secret police, or thugs.
“They tried to force their way into the Ecuadorian Consulate in Minneapolis and threatened to arrest a Consulate official.
Embassies and Consulates are considered to be sovereign territory of the foreign nation, where US law enforcement has absolutely no jurisdiction.
Ecuador’s Minister of Foreign Affairs has filed a protest with the U.S. Embassy after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents tried to enter the Ecuadorian consulate in Minneapolis without permission Tuesday.
A video of the attempt on social media shows a consulate staffer running to the door to turn the ICE agents away, telling them, “This is the Ecuadorian consulate. You’re not allowed to enter.”
One ICE officer can be heard responding by threatening to “grab” the staffer if he touched the agent, before finally agreeing to leave.
International law prohibits law enforcement authorities from entering foreign consulates or embassies without permission.”
https://www.visaverge.com/news/no-verified-reports-of-ice-breaking-into-ecuadorean-consulate-in-minneapolis/
“No Verified Reports of ICE Breaking Into Ecuadorean Consulate in Minneapolis”
John Say the Stupid
So you find some completely bogus story on some completely bogus website devoted to assisting with visa applications.
There are literally thousands of reports confirming this incident.
Here is the official statement from the Consulate, with translation below.
https://x.com/CancilleriaEc/status/2016285340244254976
And here is the video:
https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/2016310262387691787
Press Release
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility
January 27, 2026
ON ATTEMPTED INCURSION INTO THE ECUADORIAN CONSULATE IN MINNEAPOLIS BY ICE AGENTS
This morning, the Ecuadorian Consul in Minneapolis reported that, at approximately 11:00 a.m., an agent from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) attempted to enter the Consulate premises.
Consulate officials immediately prevented the ICE officer from entering the consular office, thus guaranteeing the protection of the Ecuadorian citizens who were present at the consulate at that time and activating the emergency protocols issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility.
Therefore, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic immediately submitted a note of protest to the United States Embassy in Ecuador to ensure that acts of this nature are not repeated in any of Ecuador’s consular offices in the United States.
REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR
Forced their way in?????????? he was standing close to the door. At no point did he enter.
Plus what a junk video
It leaves out they are protecting a non-citizen and criminal from prosecution and or deportation.
The equadorian consul is allowed to do that.
What we really have is a case of someone “self deporting”.
The consul is equadorian soil. It isnot part of the US.
ICE can not enter without permission – but the consul can give permission.
But the person who entered can not exit without being arrested.
ATS you really do not understand how low the level of trust and credibility you have is.
While it is entirely possible that an ICE agent attempted to follow an illegal alien into the Ecuadorian consul,
and that if he did, he was denied entrance.
There would be nothing unusual about that.
The possibility does not make the story true.
It might be true.
It might not.
You link a video – did you bother to watch it ?
What does it show ?
Some seeking entrance to a space along a street that has a storefront door.
The person seeking entrance is barely visible – but appears to be wearing camo.
Alex Pretti was wearing similar clothes.
Regardless who ever it is did not enter the space that we have no clue what it was,
And certainly did NOT as you claim use FORCE.
It is Plausible this was an ICE agent,
it is Plausible this was the ecuadorian consul.
But the video does NOT establish either.
Nor does the protest by the consul.
But even if we accept that the person attempting entry was an ICE agent.
That agent DID NOT use force,
He sought entry to a space that in your video is not in anyway identified as an Equadorian consul,
and could easily be a Pizxa parlor.
Maybe there is some sign on the outside – but YOU did not provide it.
As always you have Jumped to conclusions without the evidence to support your claims.
Again – it is plausible the person seeking entry is an ICE agent – but you have not demostrated that.
It is plausible this was an equadoran consul – but you have not demonstrated that.
It is POSSIBLE – that the person seeking entry KNEW it was an equadorian consul – but you have not demonstrated that.
It is possible that force was used – but you have provided absolutely ZERO evidence of that.
Is your claim provably false ? No.
Is it provably true ? Not even close.
Given the weakness of your claim and your established reputation as a liar,
it is perfectly reasonable to conclude you are again lying.
even if a real video, it has been manipulated near the end to make it appear that ICE returned and tried again after the warning. Watch the replay at the end that is duplicative of the beginning. So this video has at a minimum been manipulated. Second, who said it was ICE?
to die for!
🤣 you are cray cray
WHITE LIVES MATTER!!!
ICE WINNING!!!