On Tuesday, my new book for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Rage and the Republic, will be released. It is a book about revolutions, including our own. The book begins with a quote from the French writer Jacques Mallet du Pan, written in 1793: “Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children.” History has proven him right over and over again. Today’s revolutionaries often become tomorrow’s reactionaries as the mob turns on its former leaders.
That inexorable pattern will soon play out as Democratic establishment leaders fuel the rage in the streets of cities like Minneapolis, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia. A glimpse of this reality was seen this week at Sarah Lawrence College. The college has long pandered to the far left and has virtually purged any conservatives or libertarians from its faculty ranks. Without a conservative to cancel, students set upon liberal columnist Ezra Klein, disrupting his talk, as Cristle Judd, president of Sarah Lawrence College, sat obediently in silence next to him.
After disrupting the event, the students left to carry on their protests outside. What was notable was Klein’s surprise, who (to his credit) remained calm and tried to engage the protesters. Klein attempted to object that he was not a “denier” of alleged atrocities in Gaza. The students were not there for a dialogue but a disruption. They ignored Klein’s efforts to tamp down the rhetoric and yelling.
Judd was entirely useless, remaining a mere pedestrian watching the protest. After the students left, she quipped, “Welcome to Sarah Lawrence College.” There was no pledge to suspend or expel the students: just a shrug and a joke.
I have long argued that universities need to focus on conduct, not speech content. This is conduct. If you disrupt classes or events (rather than protesting outside), you deny the very essence of higher education by preventing others from hearing a diversity of viewpoints.
In fairness to Klein, I am not suggesting that he is leading a mob. Rather, he is an example of how the focus on cancelling conservative figures is unlikely to end there. Sarah Lawrence College is a liberal echo chamber with virtually no conservatives or libertarians to attack. In that environment, the left becomes the target of the far left; the spectrum simply adjusts with no relative reactionaries.
After years of viewpoint intolerance, schools like Yale have finally reached the point where there is not a single faculty member left who donates to the Republican party or candidates.
In 2018, a faculty member who called for greater viewpoint diversity at Sarah Lawrence was the subject of threats and vandalism.
Samuel J. Abrams, a professor at Sarah Lawrence College, wrote about the problem almost ten years ago. His research showed that, while the faculty was overwhelmingly liberal, the administrators were even more so. In his survey of 900 college administrators, he found that liberal staff members outnumber conservative staff members by a 12-to-1 ratio: “A fairly liberal student body is being taught by a very liberal professoriate — and socialized by an incredibly liberal group of administrators.”
That was almost a decade ago.
This does not happen overnight or by accident. It is the result of faculty and administrators replicating their own views while effectively purging their ranks of conservatives or moderates.
When this intellectual cleansing is complete, what remains is a new spectrum and an adjusted political litmus test. That is how a liberal columnist like Klein can become the target of a cancel campaign.
As Klein pleaded, “You have me right here. You can talk to me,” he was missing the point. It is not about dialogue or intellectual exchange. These students have been taught that they do not have to tolerate opposing views on their campuses. Klein was simply next in line.
Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of the Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”
As usual, Turley goes on a misleading and exaggeration spree while omitting particularly important facts. Sigh.
This is of course more of promotional chit for his upcoming book than anything in else. Nothing wrong with that in itself. However he used Sarah Lawrence which is a private school. What Turley ‘neglected to point out is Sarah Lawrence was a women’s college. It allowed men to attend as recently as 1968. Furthermore, Sarah Lawrence is a huge LGBTQ college. Which would make it quite liberal. Just like there is a Liberty College, or BYU which are very conservative. Funny how Turley never seems to be concerned about a lack of equally liberal faculty at those colleges.
Sam Abrams is a professor of politics at Sarah Abram, he’s also a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute which is a big supporter of Anti-DEI initiatives including…Professor Sam Abrams. He’s also a big time Jewish Zionist, another thing Turley “forgot” to mention. That should be a big clue as to why many students and staff are opposed to his views. He calls anything critical of Israel anti-Semitic. Which is ironically used to stifle criticism of anything about Israel’s malicious policies against Palestinians. Turley sure loves to focus on liberal faculties, especially when they are from private colleges and universities.
The idea that these colleges are “purging conservatives and libertarians” is frankly pretty stupid. Turns out most of these conservatives and libertarians basically out themselves when they express their views. Which are often at odds with what students beliefs. Not because of libertarian facilities but because of students’ understanding of the distinctions and the associations with those views.
Turley keeps forgetting that students don’t just “attack” conservative faculty because they are conservative or Republican. It’s when they express support for things students know is wrong or reprehensible in their view. That is not intolerance either. It’s…an opposing view. Problem is students who are young and green are going to express their disapproval with loud protests, disruptions, and shouting over those they disagree with. Uncivil conduct in Turley’s view. Because to Turley every disagreement needs to be…civil. Anything less deserves extreme punishment. That is his view and he’s entitled to it. But Students have their own views and they are also entitled to them.
Conservatives love to tell others how they should protest and conduct themselves in order to disagree. At the same time they proclaim others shouldn’t be telling them how to live or act when confronted with their own hypocrisy. Sam Abrams’s problems stem from his expressions of support for Israel and calling anything critical of it as anti-Semitic. A tactic used to silence criticism of Israel something Turley doesn’t seem to address because it is also a way to deny the other side’s point of view.
Hypocrisy abounds, and is the stock and trade of your own comrades and ideology, X. “Sarah Lawrence is a huge LGBTQ college”—well, guess what? The greater majority of colleges LGBTQ, culturally Marxist, insurrectionists, explaining their uncivilized behaviors, which have nothing to do with “learning.”
“Because to Turley every disagreement needs to be…civil.” The fact that higher-education displays everything un-civil from bad-manners to property damages to assaults, is another one of the Marxist sanctions for insurrection and overthrow. You know what, the Majority of people don’t want what you Marxist, socialist-democrats are peddling. Colleges exist precisely to practice the CIVILITY of dialogue.
“Not because of libertarian [liberal] facilities but because of students’ understanding of the distinctions and the associations with those views.”—NO, they don’t understand the distinctions of views. While wet behind the ears and eager to dissent for ANY reason due to hormones and poor primary/secondary educations, they learn nothing but how to force their hissy-fit, one-sided Marxist inculcation, onto everyone else. No wonder they are so very destructive.
“…Professor Sam Abrams. He’s also a big time Jewish Zionist, another thing Turley ‘forgot’ to mention.” Forgot??? You mean like when mainstream-TV-land “forgets” to tell you the ethnic/racial identifiers of those who most commit crimes? You like the “forgetting” when it suits you—again, your hypocrisy abounds.
* Your diatribes are tiresome, X, and you’re just as full of the hypocrisies you point out so virtuously. Ick.
AI: ( What are the 4 types of syllogism? Explain categorical syllogisms )
There are four primary types of syllogisms used in formal logic. While they all follow a deductive structure—using two premises to reach a necessary conclusion—they differ in the nature of the statements they use.
1. The 4 Types of Syllogism:
Categorical Syllogism: The most common form, which relates categories or “classes” of things (e.g., “All humans are mortal”).
Hypothetical (Conditional) Syllogism: Uses “if-then” statements to establish a relationship. If the first condition is met, the second must follow.
Disjunctive Syllogism: Presents a choice between two mutually exclusive options (e.g., “Either A or B is true”).
Compound Syllogism: A more complex form that combines multiple premises or types of logic, such as a “Sorites” (a chain of syllogisms).
2. Categorical Syllogisms Explained:
A categorical syllogism is a deductive argument consisting of exactly three categorical propositions (two premises and one conclusion) and exactly three terms, each appearing twice.
The Three Core Terms:
Major Term (P): The predicate of the conclusion.
Minor Term (S): The subject of the conclusion.
Middle Term (M): The term that appears in both premises but never in the conclusion. It acts as the bridge between the major and minor terms.
The Standard Structure:
To be in “standard form,” a categorical syllogism must follow this order:
Major Premise: Contains the major term (P) and the middle term (M).
Minor Premise: Contains the minor term (S) and the middle term (M).
Conclusion: Contains the minor term (S) and the major term (P).
Example:
Major Premise: All mammals (M) are warm-blooded (P).
Minor Premise: All black dogs (S) are mammals (M).
Conclusion: Therefore, all black dogs (S) are warm-blooded (P).
The 4 Types of Statements (Mood):
Every categorical syllogism is built using four types of statements, often labeled A, E, I, and O:
A (Universal Affirmative): “All S are P” (e.g., All dogs are animals).
E (Universal Negative): “No S are P” (e.g., No people are cars).
I (Particular Affirmative): “Some S are P” (e.g., Some snakes are poisonous).
O (Particular Negative): “Some S are not P” (e.g., Some birds cannot fly).
Diana Bec is only here because of public assistance and affirmative action, while the American fertility rate drops to 1.6, the fertility rate’s “death spiral” is exacerbated, and more actual Americans die than are born—the American population is being replaced by unassimilable illegal alien invaders.
If it is the duty of men to fight their nation’s wars, is it not the duty of women to bear their nation’s children, in numbers sufficient to protect and grow their nation?
X comments on LGBTQ college(s),
X uses an Androgynous moniker (X) to denote the their ambiguity toward sexual denotation,
X advocates criticisms of Turley’s Blog entries,
Therefore X is a member of the LGBTQ community and an Anti-Turlite.
Conclusion: X is a Turley Denier
X, Jonathan writes incomplete-arguments with a slant (that is known as a ‘Syllogism’). To wit his commentaries are no different than the contemporary Contrarian blogs of the; LGBTQ, Leftist, Liberal blogs that employ their slant (Syllogisms). Many LGBTQ, Leftist, Liberal mediums publish ‘Hypothesis’ which are often filled with untrue projections and conjecture that elude conclusion (are false). Jonathan’s pieces are primarily written in syllogism, rarely has there been a hypothesis piece.
X – If you don’t like Jonathan’s style, there’s a whole internet out there waiting for you.
As usual george is pushing his conspiracy nonsense.
Would be nice if he had a point to his rantings.
“forgot to mention” and “omitted the fact that” are new tactics learned by X/George/Svelaz from others on this site. I went back and looked at his posts over the last few years: none. nada.
So glad that Dianna and I and OldMan and Lin and Farmer and Hullbobby and Ollie and others can provide a free education and skill development for GeorgeX
“preventing others from hearing a diversity of viewpoints.”
These viewpoints, undelivered, were my constitutional right. These students violated MY constitutional rights.
A violation of mine and yours constitutional right to live in an open society and speak AND listen.
This is the most UN-AMERICAN action. Everyone of them is a coward, afraid of words. Reprehensible.
Those students are commies and may not even know how murderous they can become.
Between yesterday’s school superintendent being a useless wet rag, and today’s college president being a useless wet rag, WTF is happening where people in leadership positions in education have no backbone? How dis they get into such positions when it’s so abundantly clear they lack even rudimentary leadership skills?
It’s because they have degrees in every kind of victimology: lacking the ethical goals of the scientific method, they have looked under every rock for novel subject-matter and created pseudo-learning, which is nothing more than highly-emotional (primitive brain) response, to the picayune….College students and the newest faculty no longer contend with principles, and without principles there is no backbone. —>
These pseudo-scholars hardly know about “Aristotle’s Moral Virtues,” the excess, MEAN, and deficiency. Judd falls into the “excess” or cowardice (response to fear) AND the deficiency, which is lack of spirit and insensibility.
oldman: They got to their position because they have an innate inability to function in a productive job in society. Now more than ever seems true that “those who can do, those who can’t teach, those who can do neither administrate”.
“Today’s revolutionaries often become tomorrow’s reactionaries as the mob turns on its former leaders.”
It always happens. Case in point, the Cultural Revolution. Read Nien Cheng’s memoir “Life and Death in Shanghai.”
There is a way of looking at history that comes from the earth and life science people- geologists, paleontologists, zoologists, botanists and kindred. “The past is prologue”. A lot of that story has to be dug out of rock and fossils. No luxury of the slim written record we have of history we have laid down in our human time here. And yet it dovetails nicely with the idea that diversity in education-all of what happened, all of what has previously been thought about in history, informs how to think about the now. At least in our nation’s approach to education, downloading a complete body of knowhow into the next generation commends itself. Taking benefit from a prologue past to form an ongoing more perfect union.
Excellent comment Mike. The past is prologue only if it is taught honestly. Civic formation provides the mechanical knowledge of how the system works and how citizens are meant to respond lawfully. Spiritual formation shapes moral character and helps people understand how fear, anger, apathy, and courage influence behavior under pressure. Citizen formation occurs when the two are joined. Teaching the emotional impact of history allows the past to function as a true prologue rather than a list of facts. When the historical record is corrupted or selectively taught, the facts no longer align with the emotional responses that actually occurred. That disconnect prevents recognition, leaving people unable to see repeating patterns until it is too late.
Olly, we’re on an 80 year cycle. 80 years ago we were getting through world war 2 and the great depression. After Roosevelt died, Harry Truman became president. Unlike Roosevelt he did not have big grandiose plans on how he was going to run the country. Truman was a democrat, but more traditional. And after him came Eisenhower, who like Truman, had no grandiose plans on how the country should be run by a central power. I remember 1967 through 1973. Something like now. Crazy times. Riots in the inner cities. Campuses were going nuts with anti Vietnam hysteria. Then in 1980 we elected Ronald Regan. We’ll make it through this mess.
I appreciate the thoughtful comment Bob, and I understand the appeal of the 80-year cycle argument, but it assumes there is a mechanical self-correction built into history. There isn’t. The postwar recovery did not happen because time passed or a cycle completed. It happened because depression and war formed a generation that took civic responsibility seriously, restrained centralized power, and demanded limits. Truman and Eisenhower were not accidental course corrections. They were products of a formed citizenry. Remove that formation and history does not reset, it degrades. Assuming “we’ll make it through” without rebuilding civic formation is not optimism, it is abdication.
I agree totally.. Going back farther there was a great deal of communist activity right after WWI. Our democracy has gone through multiple periods of political violence and nasty rhetoric. I doubt this is worse than any of the others.
Thankfully the echo chamber remains that, if vast, and its values still do not align with sense or reality. The more we can continue to stabilize society again, the more that will be apparent to these folks when they leave the chamber, which for an awful lot of young people will be for the first time in their lives.
Sad how the college experience, which was once associated with expansion of an individual is now thoroughly its opposite, inculcating and cementing a personal, mental prison cell. Matriculate and inculcate!
Many of us have been saying, having watched the trajectory of the dems over the past ten years in specific, that they will either fracture or cease to be. Madness of that level is not sustainable; history shows us time and time again. I hope people snap out of it (really. What will it take for the supposedly ‘sane’ liberals?) and it’s the former and we are not just left with an American party and a rabid communist one when all traces of a true liberal have been erased, and they willingly tossed matches and gasoline on themselves.
James, I agree the madness isn’t sustainable, but waiting for collapse isn’t a strategy. Echo chambers don’t break themselves; they’re broken when citizens are formed who can live outside them. Without civic formation, fracture just produces the next dysfunction.
@OLLY
Oh, I refer strictly to the collapse of the party, not society writ large, if I’m understanding you correctly. The moderate dems, if there are any, are the ones sitting on the sidelines in full-blinders on mode.
Oddly, it’s the likes of Bill Maher, a self-proclaimed ‘libertine’, talking sense at times. The rest need to find their spines if there’s anything worth saving there. But, TDS is a real thing, and sense seems to have jumped out the window.
James, you’re right that you’re talking about party collapse, not societal collapse, but that distinction doesn’t solve the problem. A fractured party doesn’t produce healthier citizens or institutions. Moderates sitting on the sidelines aren’t a corrective force, they’re part of the vacuum. Civic formation doesn’t happen automatically or in a vacuum either. It has to be done deliberately now, or it will happen later under pressure and loss. History shows people either learn the responsibilities of self-government by choice, or they learn them reactively after discovering their rights are no longer secure.
@OLLY
Truly, nothing happens automatically. That is largely the problem with the logic of the modern left, particularly the younger contingent. And if something better can be built on the ashes of the DNC, then IMO it does solve a problem; to state otherwise would be like saying the fall of the Iron Curtain, or Al Qaeda, or even the temporary respite from the Taliban was in error, whatever has resulted – the despotism had to go, altogether. The world would be a better place if Hamas (which is different from Palestine, for the easily triggered, not you OLLY) was erased in toto. I no longer consider these comparisons to modern dems or the globalist left outlandish, and there was a time that I did.
The question for me is whether or not that is even a possibility anymore with the modern left, and I don’t know that at present that question is anything but rhetorical.
In JFK’s day there were some sane liberals. Today there are none left.
Oldman, when Kennedy was president the steel workers went on strike. He told management and labor that either they sit down and work out a deal or he’ll do out for them. He didn’t take sides.
JFK’s day? What a stupid comment. You pathetic clown.
Up to 350 Colleges are expected to close in the next decade, many more if demographic and financial problems persist. It couldn’t happen to a nicer group of ideologues.
Tim, I think you’re one of the few people who sees this coming. I have a relative who works for Harvard University. They tell me that Harvard is looking into a future with more international students. All these colleges and universities can make it. This world we live in is changing, and faster than most people realize.
That’s can’t make it. Sorry.
Harvard isn’t looking to foreign students for the money. Their endowment is so large that they wouldn’t even need to collect tuition if they didn’t want to. The entire educational system in this county is built on a rotten foundation. And that carries on into college. Public education has been so watered down that very few graduating students are even competent in basic studies. If your school is performing badly, just change the metrics. If students can’t pass standardized tests, get rid of them or dumb them down. If schools in low income and/or high minority areas can’t achieve decent test scores, just exclude the data from the report. Easy peasy.
Unfortunately, this is not limited to colleges professors, staff or students. I have many friends who are seniors who simply refuse to discuss anything positive about Trump. I asked one of them if he thought Trump bombing the Iranian nuclear sites was a good idea. Instead of agreeing or disagreeing he diverted to something else he didn’t like about Trump because he just could not possibly accept that Trump could do anything positive.
Are you sure this is a blog about defending freedom, and not a blog about rationalizing tyranny and oppression?
Yes.
You are correct. The so-called commenters here are a particularly deranged group. No different than the deranged leftists.
And yet you willingly come here every day. Moron.
Any where in that comment that states anon is a leftist or rightist? Or anon’s visiting habits.
See folks, this comment is the essence of stupidity.
Why? did you come here looking for tyranny and oppression?
Is tyranny and oppression in the room with you right now?
Freedom isn’t for sale here, …it’s free!
This inability to exchange ideas, beliefs etc. will result in a population sector incapable of original thought and bereft of creativity. Already, the k-12 system is broken and children are and will continue to be the victims. The left blames Republicans for ending democracy, but requiring subscription to a single and universal doctrine is the true end of freedom!
@mrtenez
That is already happening, many in the covid cohort can’t do much of anything; they are victims of larger trends as well, and it isn’t just them. The question for me is: can we right the ship before it’s too big to address?
We’re not lost yet, but we’re getting close. We have to hold on in the face of historical ugliness, but hold on we must.
Hoping to calm nerves after his government arrested reporters Don Lemon and Georgia Fort, on Friday Donald J. Trump reassured the staff at Fox News Channel that he does not consider them journalists.
“It’s true that I’m engaging in a systematic attack on the First Amendment rights of journalists,” he told the Fox employees. “But obviously none of that applies to you.”
Offering further comfort, Trump added, “I would never have hired Pete Hegseth if I thought he was a journalist.”
In a sentiment widely echoed by his colleagues, “Fox & Friends” co-host Steve Doocy responded, “Mr. President, we weren’t really worried.”
At the White House, press secretary Karoline Leavitt revealed that Trump had sent a similar message of reassurance to CBS News chief Bari Weiss.
It’s early in the day, stick to the topic.
Left trys to gatekeep “journalists” like it’s some kind of profession.
“My neighbor’s cat smells like cigarettes”. there. now I’m a journalist.
Freedom of the press applies to every american. We are all free to publish whatever.
I could tell you it’s sunny out, but I don’t want them to gatekeep weathermen.
Actually this is kinda fun to watch them devour themselves. Now you not only have to be against something, you have to put your loyalty to the cause on full display in even more and more over the top performance! That mob in Minneapolis who mistaken some IT guys having lunch for ICE LEOs, the mob demanded the ITs say “F— ICE!” When they did not, one woman declared, “If you are not with us, you are against us!”
Leftists, the far-leftists are coming for you! Better get you hair dyed blue or they will declare you to be a pro-ICE, Trump, fascist!! 😉
Stupid comment. Come back when you can write coherently.
💯 👍
“virtually no conservatives or libertarians to attack. In that environment, the left becomes the target of the far left; ”
French Revolution
You’re quoting. Who? French revolution? No such quote ever existence. Fraud.
Try reading the article before commenting. If you did you’d know he’s quoting the article and saying the quote also applies to the French Revolution. But you were too lazy even to do that. You just reacted without even thinking, so you are the fraud in this situation. Frauds like you usually post anonymously.
“Frauds like you?” And you’re not anonymous? Then I say, you are a particularly stupid creature. As you always prove.
No, I am not anonymous. I use a screen name. Hint: look up the word “anonymous” in a dictionary.
Oldman, I hire a lot of people, so I am used to those with low-level thinking who act like trolls. They do the menial work at a minimum wage level.
Hire huh? Then the adage is valid: it takes a low-thinker to know a low-thinker.
You are such an idiot. The quote is a reference and was written by Turley above. Thank you for telling us you cannot and don’t read. You are a troll.
Um… guess you didn’t notice you sourced “French Revolution”.
When you become so dumb, your point becomes unrecognizeable.
S. Meyer
When your only response is an infantile insult, you become irrelevant
Then why didn’t you name Turely as the source? And you’re not a troll? Then I say, you are a particularly stupid creature. As you always prove..
Because it was obvious to anyone who read the article. You reacted in the most lazy way possible without even bothering to read the article. You’ve been caught with your pants around your ankles and now you’re trying to cover for it. It won’t work. Your embarrassment is exposed for all to see.
Pants around your ankles? Now that signifies just one thing. You a former grade school teacher?
You really never heard that metaphor before?
I’m 85 and I’ve never heard nor read it before.
Only in reference to your moniker. Old man huh? Still using candy as a lure?
Troll, if you read the article, you would recognize who I was quoting. Stop making excuses and at least attempt to look normal. Alternatively, continue with the same and earn the laughter of others towards your behavior.
Reference? Then why didn’t you credit Turley? You like most people here lack a basic English grammar education. Strunk & White, The Elements of Style, is a start.
There’s a principle in writing that if something is obvious, the writer doesn’t have to explain it. To anyone who had actually read the article, it was obvious he was quoting the article.
Let’s see, going through Strunk & White… Nope, nothing about “not explaining if its… And, it was not obvious he was quoting, he wrote that the quote is from “French Revolution”. Now that was obvious. Right? But you didn’t pick-up that up.
NotSoOld: And we know there’s also legal principle known as “judicial notice” that advances the same framework.
-Perhaps we need to create a new ‘on notice’ principle that applies to these trolls who condescendingly consider themselves above other “morons.” What would you suggest?
S.Meyer. They’ve become cannibals,
S. Meyer: I understood you perfectly, from your quoted premise, to your own premise of expanded application/analogy.
I do hope the first act of cannibalism will be the mayor of NYC. I stab at, not only, socialism/communism-lite, but also at islamists who think that they are on their way to creating the American Caliphate. I doubt if the “true believers” in islam or those suffering TDS will recognize the change but perhaps all the squishy middle that waffles around will recognize the signs of impossible-to-fulfil promises and the rage that accompanies such failure to deliver to angry mobs with nothing to lose.
Someone is full of hate this morning. Liberal-derangement-syndrome?
Not really, just on constant guard against the brain-killing cancer of liberalism. Glad to see the stage of cannibalism has begun. It won’t stop any more than the French could stop it after their revolution, and every other revolution begun by starry eyed idealists with absolutely no grasp of actual reality but with a dream of perfection…If human perfection were possible, we would have never needed religions, governments, creeds of morality… but we do need them and will continue to deal with the VERY IMPERFECT nature of man.
It was the CLIMATE that had this same crowd blocking streets, screeching at everyone and throwing paint on works of art, then it grew in intensity because Trump was back in office and the Jews were involved and so it was Israel’s “genocide” that was the end of the world and so they needed to block streets, chant, whistle and attack places where Jews might congregate.
In between the CLIMATE and my points to follow we had the riots for race in 2020 when they “allowed” folks to go out in mobs while forcing you to abandon sick parents and grandparents while keeping your kids out of schools. Of course this worked twofold for the left, it hurt Trump and it harmed the nation.
Of course as the fighting part of the Israel-Hamas war’s actions stopped and Israel actually forced Hamas to a ceasefire (thanks to Trump not forcing them to stop as Biden always did) the same crowd had to find a new target. Enter Tesla and Elon Musk and the crowd destroyed dealerships and attacked the cars of fellow liberals just because they were Tesla’s.
Well Elon new what to do and he left the public sphere and the same crowd needed a new target for their Two Minutes of Hate and enter ICE. Now it is blocking streets, blowing whistles and making their newest demands. Note how the demands always, and I mean always, do harm to America and/or the west. They never protest China. They haven’t said a peep about Iran killing 30,000 of their own citizens and they never tweet, comment or protest when an illegal kills an American woman.
Follow the money and it will lead back to anti-American operatives and eventually even China. This is how we had the anti-nuke nuts in the 80s when it was the Soviets that backed these loons. It is always our enemy in conjunction with our very own self hating Americans, like professors, the media and leftist Hollywood types, that cause these eruptions that harm our nation.
. Funny how that lock-down created a need for mail in ballots. Funny how things just work out like that.
What a heap of nonsensical BS.
Please rebut what you think I got wrong with facts and or counterpoints. Otherwise you are just another anonymous waste of everyone’s time.
Rebut a heap of unsourced nonsensical BS?
I wanted to call you a moron, but I think Clown is more accurate.
hullbooby thinks he’s an intellectual.
In other words, you’re unable to engage with substance. Got it.
Hi hullbobby. Going anon again eh?
With substance? There’s no substance in that gobbledygook to respond to.
“This is what Fascism looks like!” There is no less tolerant group than leftwing Fascists.
A judge ordered Don Lemon released on his own recognizance after he was indicted for interfering with a religious service during an ICE protest in Minnesota.
The judge also denied the government’s request for a $100,000 bond and refused to restrict his travel.
Just like all the other high profile indictments brought by Bottle Blonde Bondi, this case is going nowhere !!!!!
Let’s see how the trial goes
Traumatized children will be among the witnesses who present the evidence.
The more satisfying trials will be the civil ones!
Donny goes on welfare!
hey Don Lemon! come over here and violate my civil rights you klansman.
Sarah Lawrence is a private institution. If they wish to submit to cultural Marxism I support their right to do so. However, why do the rest of us have to fund them, though tax exemptions, scholarships, and grants? The original idea was that private institutions of higher learning, such as Harvard, Princeton, Yale, and, yes, Sarah Lawrence, were providing a public good, a liberal education. Does anyone still believe that?
Let George Soros and his ilk fund them. They can’t get any worse.
. Qatar
Klien was presenting himself as a more moderate leftest after his book “Abundance.” Of late he as been agreeing with extreme leftests on his podcast. Almost like he was getting messages he was no longer allowed in the tent.
Yet another example of what happens when adults abdicating their responsibilities to teach!
The true adults are not welcome to teach. Those within the current academic faculty ARE teaching just what they believe in. These current faculties are full of angry outliers and the generation coached on the fumes of old hippy utopianism/communism and racial justice ideology. They are quite happy believing that they are completing the mission of the likes of Howard Zinn and Saul Alinsky and G-d only knows how many more crackpots that I have resisted reading. The abdication came with the voters who elected enough far left types since post WWII to saturate our media/education industry with this egregious ideology. Women voters tend to vote with their emotions, rather than logic, and this explains how America has wandered away from its original vision and into the softer, illogical era of hope utopianism/bleeding heart radicalism.
Pray tell, what is a “true adult”? Anything like the delusional geriatrics populating this place?
If you have to ask, then you are not one…