The decline of American mainstream media has long been obvious, with public trust and revenues plunging. Some companies are responding with the novel idea of restoring objectivity and neutrality to coverage. For years, news organizations have essentially written off half of the country. However, as news organizations struggle to avoid even greater layoffs, staffers are fighting efforts to bring balance to their networks. That was evident last week in meetings at CNN and CBS where staffers continue to fight to retain their bias rather than their jobs.
CNN has long aired controversial hosts and guests who engaged in controversial statements on race and politics from the left. However, a meeting last week focused on the airing of one of the few conservatives who regularly appear on the network. As one staff member reportedly raised, there was outrage that Jennings is “allowed to exist” on the network. Even as CNN continues to languish in ratings, staffers want to fire one of the few remaining conservative voices on the network.
One of the key issues raised in the meeting was Jennings referring to “illegal aliens.” While CNN bars the term, it is used in federal law and federal cases, including by the United States Supreme Court.
In one exchange on Jan. 19, Jennings trades barbs with fellow panelist Cameron Kasky, a survivor of the 2018 Parkland school shooting. Kasky criticized Jennings for saying that ICE should be allowed to “chase down illegals” in Minnesota.
Jennings pushed back: “Who are you to tell me what I can and can’t say? I’ve never met you, brother. I can say whatever I want. They’re illegal aliens. And that’s what the law calls them. Illegal aliens. That’s what I’m going to call them.”
Staff members reportedly denounced him as a “MAGA mouthpiece” and a “firebrand Trump loyalist” who “frequently gets into verbal spats with other CNN guests.” It is a curious objection since these panels are supposed to be lively contrasts between guests.
The meeting is reminiscent of the effort at the Washington Post to get staffers to recognize the company’s declining position.
Robert Lewis, a British media executive who joined the Post earlier this year, reportedly got into a “heated exchange” with a staffer. Lewis explained that, while reporters were protesting measures to expand readership, the very survival of the paper was now at stake:
“We are going to turn this thing around, but let’s not sugarcoat it. It needs turning around. We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff. Right. I can’t sugarcoat it anymore.”
The response from staffers was to call for the new editors to be fired. One staffer complained, “We now have four White men running three newsrooms.” The Post has been buying out staff to avoid mass layoffs, but reporters were up in arms over the effort to turn the newspaper around.
The same dynamic is playing out at CBS, where Bari Weiss was brought in to turn around the network.
Weiss has been the subject of anonymous attacks since the company brought her in to reverse the decline in ratings. Like Lewis, Weiss tried to explain that the staff is “not producing a product that enough people want” and that something has to change.
According to reports, Weiss was direct and candid with the staff. She stated:
“I need to start by acknowledging that there’s been a lot of noise around me taking this job. … I get it. I also get why, in the face of all this tumult, you might feel uncertain or skeptical about me or what I’m aiming to do here. I’m not going to stand up here today and ask you for your trust. I’m going to earn it, just like we have to do with our viewers.”
However, she was also clear that returning to past practices is not one of the options:
“So, here it is as plain as I can say it: I am here to make CBS News fit for purpose in the 21st century. Our industry has changed more in the last decade than in the last 150 years and the transformation isn’t over yet. Far from it. It’s almost impossible to conceive of how fast things will move from here…Back then, 30 million people watched Walter Cronkite every night. Some were on the left, some were on the right. But they trusted him. Through Cronkite, they inhabited a shared world with shared facts and a shared sense of reality. We can’t reverse time’s arrow. He had two competitors. We have two billion, give or take.”
She then made the same point as Lewis with a brutally honest and brilliantly blunt assessment: “What we can do is what journalists do best: look at the world as it actually is. We have to start by looking honestly at ourselves. We are not producing a product that enough people want.”
Weiss concluded with this powerful line:
“I realize that none of these ideas are revolutionary on their own. What’s different now is that the stakes are so very high. And the hour is late. And we are in a position, with the support of all of the leadership of this company, to really make the change we need.”
Any rational person would hear these words and understand that Weiss is struggling to protect these staffers from themselves; struggling to keep their jobs. Instead, the response has been glacial from journalists, who believe they should be able to continue covering stories for one another and for an ever-shrinking audience on the left.
The fact is that we need CNN and CBS. The Framers understood the importance of an independent press. These companies helped revolutionize media and could be restored if the staff stopped obstructing reform efforts.
Instead, staff members continue to furiously saw at the branch upon which they sit.
We never needed the Communist News Network. They were NEVER unbiased with their leftist propaganda.
Cnn headline news was real news
It is all about making money through presentation of the news fairly and balanced. Tough to do yet look at Megyn Kelly. She’s killin. Killin. Fox.
Megyn Kelly is not killin Fox. They aren’t even competitors because of the way they deliver their content.
Kelly gets 1.16 million views per month. Fox gets 375 million views per month.
Kelly’s audience is growing more quickly than Fox, but that’s because she has a lot of room to grow. Fox already has the majority of the cable news market. So, doesn’t have as much room to grow.
A 2 time moron.
She achieved
1. 116.8 million views in July 2024 alone. Beat it you horse’s patoot. 2. The point was that she and FOX r killin the left wing, radical, violent, stupid, ignorant fools comprising the idiots on the left. Beat it punk.
She is 1% news 99% opinion.
U r 123 percent clueless, 78 percent moron, 212 percent concrete, 331 percent fool.
The response of the woke liberal reporters tells you everything you need to know. They are partisans who are pissed of that they can’t keep spewing their propaganda. They are reporters and editors with TDS who can’t believe that the majority of Americans don’t agree with them. All you can do is fire them and tell them to piss off.
” They are reporters and editors with TDS.” Therefore they are not journalist. They are not reporters. Additionally they are revealing themselves a juveniles’. This is correct – “They are partisans who are pissed of that they can’t keep spewing their propaganda.”
They gotta make money or they go bye-bye.
Why go back to MSM? There are numerous more reliable sources of misinformation. They (the MSM) can blame anything or anyone they want, but when you lose your credibility (real or imagined). It’s very difficult to get it back.
A return to serious journalism (from activist performative role playing) begins with news selection.
“What deserves to be covered?”
“Of what practical value will the information we bring be to the audience?”
“A month from now, will it still be relevant?”
“Is it important enough to follow up?”
“Are we choosing this story just for sensationalism?….emotionalism?”
The serious news org will begin to document news selection as a process, write down news selection standards, and make continuous improvements in news selection.
The amateurs will still give a few executives and producers opaque, subjective decisionmaking over what to cover — cheap-to-produce conflict theatrics with zero interest in conflict resolution.
What is the job of the news media? Report the news. It is that easy. Regardless of what source is used, you would hope you are getting the facts and ostensibly the truth. The idea of getting it right has now passed and it is all about pushing the pile in the direction the journalist prefer.
The problem is that half of your potential audience has left the building. Economic realities are setting in and the news media is bleeding and if not properly triaged, will die. So how do you fix it? By attempting to bring back balance to the news. The reason is that we need to draw back lost audience and balance is the way to go.
Bias is like a cancer that eats away at the body for a long time before pain becomes apparent. It can kill the body if left untreated. What is now happening is the start of the cure. What those opposed to the changes do not seem to understand is that the viewing public has lost faith with the media and now went somewhere else. I get these reporters think they know better, but they have not grown their audience, thus they have convinced nobody already not convinced. That tells me their thinking is wrong about bias. The average audience member just stopped listening.
They want to be mad, feel free and stomp your feet and scream into the night. However, your views still need to live in reality and produce income. You are not right now. Maybe it is time to put the reporters against non-bias reporting out and let them fend for themselves. Some may do well and most probably not.
My suggestion? Get with the program or get fired. That is the choice normal people must make everyday.
“What is the job of the news media?” as a typical citizen, I want Who What, When and some Why from both or several sides. I don’t give a rats crap what the “reporter or presenter” thinks. While we are at it let’s drop the “without evidence” B.S. that is a judgement call that a reporter cannot know. Most of them think if they don’t know about something… it never happened or is not important. I believed that too when I was sixteen!
Epstein victims’ lawyers ask court to order DOJ to take down Epstein files website
The lawyers represent more than 200 alleged Epstein victims (Attorneys Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards).
Attorneys for alleged victims of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — citing an “unfolding emergency” — are urging two federal judges in New York to order the immediate takedown of the Justice Department’s Epstein files website.
By: James Hill – ABC News ~ February 1, 2026
https://abcnews.go.com/US/epstein-victims-lawyers-court-order-doj-epstein-files/story?id=129766059
Epstein Victims’ Lawyers Ask Court to Pull Docs
Lawyers representing victims of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are urging a federal court to order the Justice Department to take down a massive online release of Epstein-related records, according to multiple reports.
In a letter dated Sunday and sent to two federal judges in New York, the attorneys are warning that failure to properly redact victims’ identities has created what they call an “unfolding emergency.”
By: Mark Swanson – Newsfront ~ Monday, 02 February 2026
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/epsteinvictims-court-website/2026/02/02/id/1244529/
This is on purpose, so the DoJ can say to Congress they are being forced to hold back on releasing the Epstein files until they can go over them properly, a task they will never do and therefore never complete. The side effect is to paint targets on everyone that is a victim mentioned in the files for every pro-Trump nut job with a hammer to go after them, the way that people went after the Sandy Hook shooting victims and their parents over exposure by Alex Jones.
“This is on purpose” agreed but for whom the purpose serves is the question. Defiantly the Clinton’s now that they agreed to do something with the Oversight Committee, but also Epstein’s foreign/international dealings.
It’s understand able the the Women ‘girls at the time’ need the take-down, But it is questionable as to what they were doing there in the first place.
Were the underage women (Epstein victims) brought to Epstein’s Homes by force/kidnapping?
Or did they ‘want the job’ -payday- ? It doesn’t appear that they were tricked into working with Epstein’s operation.
A normal thinking Girl should have been at the Shopping Mall, not some Old Man’s Island – just say’in
I don’t believe the Court(s) can overrule/overturn a Congressional Bill H.R. 4405 Signed into Law.
Congressional Bill H.R. 4405 Signed into Law
On Wednesday, November 19, 2025, the President signed into law:
H.R. 4405, the “Epstein Files Transparency Act,” which requires the Attorney General to release all documents and records in possession of the Department of Justice relating to Jeffrey Epstein, and for other purposes.
The White House ~ November 19, 2025
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/11/congressional-bill-h-r-4405-signed-into-law/
On November 19, 2025, President Trump signed the
Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) into law, requiring the Department of Justice to publicly release documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The legislation, passed with near-unanimous Congressional support, mandated a 30-day timeline for the release of, in some cases, millions of pages of records.
(Be careful what you wish for)
“So, … …Back then, 30 million people watched Walter Cronkite every night. Some were on the left, some were on the right. But they trusted him.” ,,,
Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein sits on couches with journalist Walter Cronkite (right) and another guest.
https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2025/12/Screenshot-2025-12-19-at-5.24.54%E2%80%AFPM-1024×787.png
The primary currency that Epstein traded in was influence and introductions.
His sexual abuse of children was from a carefully curated few. Epstein would crave a contact like Walter Cronkite to legitimize his business.
If there is some claim against Cronkite in the files then it will be time to re-evaluate. Until then this is nothing like the accounts of forcible rape by Trump of minor children.
You spelled Clinton wrong.
Their function is propaganda, not news. Either knowingly or useful ideological idiots, they are propagandist.
When there was the catastrophic collision between a helicopter and a passenger jet, then all the coverage was propaganda – the collision didn’t occur, all made up, no one died? When the broadcasters all reported that Trump had won the 2024 election, also propaganda?
You must be a source of endless amusement for your mental health professional.
Clintons Capitulate: A very last minute slight-of-hand today as the House Oversight Committee was finalizing the Floor Vote to advance the Clinton’s Contempt of Congress resolutions.
Clintons reverse course, agree to testify in House Epstein inquiry
“They negotiated in good faith. You did not. They told you under oath what they know, but you don’t care,” Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña wrote on X in response to a post from Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.). “But the former President and former Secretary of State will be there. They look forward to setting a precedent that applies to everyone.”
Comer appeared to learn the news in real time during the Rules Committee meeting on Monday.
By: Regina Zilbermints – 02/02/26
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5719536-bill-hillary-clinton-testify-house-oversight-epstein/
Again will see what comes of it (The 5th Amendment is going to get a workout).
Tickler Re: Ghislaine Maxwell depo Monday February 9, 2026
The House Oversight Committee is scheduled to depose Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s former associate, on February 9, 2026
Trump took the 5th about 5,000 times over what his name and birth date were when he was deposed.
But this is what they were taught at the IVY league journalism programs. Journalism is not to be objective. The current definition of journalism as taught is to be an advocate for your partisan concerns. It happens on Fox also.
Fox for what it is worth is nowhere near as blatantly biased and full of horse pucky as CNN/CBS has been for decades. I dont watch any TV period – I get my news from various websites and long ago learned to read between the lines and detect partisan left or right bull pucky. As CNN & CBS are learning on the one way partisan staff level nobody is buying their unfair and biased POV anymore. It’s just too much leftist bent opinionated slants instead of the tell it like it is journalism like it was decades ago. That they resist truth and neutrality kinda tells us they need to sack alot of these impediments.
You don’t watch the broadcasts, but you know they are biased? Can’t be personal research.
CNN and CBS are now both owned by conservative billionaires who are staunch Trump supporters.
Yes, may sources. Not MSM. The instant I see buzz words like “without evidence” I tune out and move on.
Amen.
The mistake we make, and when I say “we” I’m talking about the average person who views this from the outside looking in, is when we think they know, or they have to know, that they’re liberal. The liberals I know, know no such thing. They view themselves as objective, and they view their conclusions as a largely apolitical truth. “I can’t believe you can see it any other way,” they’ll say with accusation. If we counter their arguments with strong conservative positions, they’ll complain that we’re too political. If, in an attempt to avoid offending them, we take a position that is so conservative-lite that it could mistaken for independent, they will still view it as political. Most of them are in so deep that the only position that is not political is the liberal one.
“Most of them are in so deep that the only position that is not political is the liberal one?” perfectly stated.
Love the last line! Priceless!
Didn’t read today’s slop because it’s a waste of time. Turley is part of the paid MAGA media circus that tries to sell MAGA media and the lies it peddles as some kind of “counterbalance” to the reporting of mainstream media. MAGA media ignores Trump and his obvious mental decline, the outrageous things he says and does, the unprecedented incompetence of his administration, their flaunting of court orders, using public office for personal gain, insults to the judiciary and ignoring court orders….the list goes on and on. Here’s just one little example of the sort of thing Turley does–he claimed that Democrats and mainstream media LIED about Liam’s father running away and abandoning him and falsely accused Trump’s ICE army of using little Liam as bait—mainstream media DID report that Liam was used as bait to try to lure other family members out of the house so they could take them, too, and denied that his father abandoned him, based on the eyewitness report of the Superintendent of Liam’s school, who reported these things. She offered to take Liam, but ICE refused. Turley takes up the MAGA media point, which always attacks the victim of Trump’s Nazi squad over anyone else–but WHY would a Superintendent of school lie about such things?
Publishing the lies of the most-unfit and corrupt administration in US history is not a “counterbalance” to mainstream news. MAGA cannot survive without lies, so they pay people like Turley to spin their version of reality, but it’s NOT working. Trump has set yet another record for low approval ratings–mid-30’s.
This comment actually illustrates the problem being discussed. Notice how disagreement is framed not around facts, evidence, or corrections, but around identity and moral alignment.
Journalism, as an information system, is supposed to present verifiable facts, clearly distinguish what is known from what is alleged, and allow readers to form their own judgments. What replaces that here is narrative certainty. Anyone who challenges the narrative is labeled, motives are assumed, and contrary evidence is dismissed without engagement.
That is not information. That is formation.
A system committed to objective journalism would ask simple process questions. What facts are established? What sources are cited? What is disputed? What is uncertain? How are corrections handled if new information emerges?
When those questions are replaced by accusations of bad faith and moral sorting, the system has already abandoned journalism’s informing role and taken on the task of shaping belief. That shift, more than any individual story, is what has eroded trust.
Nice reply Olly.
I love the last paragraph. . . about the left “task of shaping belief. That shift, more than any individual story, is what has eroded trust.”
u got it. leftists all repeat the company line. we are supposed to accept their accusations hook, line and sinker. But, we don’t. we can think and draw different conclusions. it is they who are stunted, stuck in believing conservatives can’t think. stuck believing they are right no matter what. if they repeat their positions loud enough and often enough, we are supposed to fall in line. not any more. open your eyes emperor. u are naked
Olly,
Feel free to supply any contrary evidence you have that can be independently verified.
Did Trump correct himself and tell people that injecting bleach would kill them?
. Considering the hysterical females running for the acetaminophen bottles, he was hoping.
They did.
. Looking at the emotionalism used by democrats it’s likely they use emotions to persuade the formation of consumer. Women are emotional and that leads to a 50% population consumer formation. Half the battle is won. Show women a picture of a cute 5 year old and the female brain shuts down. Then the persuasive effect of the nag comes into play. Husbands will say anything at that point.
Part of the problem is estrogen poisoning.
/s
Disclaimer- 🎄 could be true.
Show a man a picture of a pile of dirt with a sign on it that says “FREE” and their brains want to know if the pile is still there.
Olly,
Why do you suppose that “A system committed to objective journalism would ask simple process questions.” is not currently the winning strategy and, if it is not the winning strategy now, why do you think it would be the winning strategy ever?
Conservatives accepted as part of their news the guy who slandered women as “feminazis” for decades. Conservatives made him wealthy, a confessed drug addict who pushed for draconian punishment of drug addicts; a drug addict who coerced his housekeeper to buy drugs for him in a literal conspiracy.
Conservatives roll in the journalistic muck; the slather themselves in it. They spend time thinking of demeaning and dehumanizing terminology about others rather than just being smug about how successful their own strategy is. Maybe they aren’t successful and their strategy is a failure and they are looking to blame others. Gays, for example. Transsexuals. Women in the office. Black people. Hispanic people. All of them are to blame for the lack of conservative success, by conservatives.
Do you want to read Gigi’s lies ?^^^^^
This is what Gigi spouts as factual truth;
“…Liam was used as bait to try to lure other family members out of the house so they could take them, too, and denied that his father abandoned him, based on the eyewitness report of the Superintendent of Liam’s school, who reported these things. She offered to take Liam, but ICE refused”
The Sup’t of Schools? Dear, dear, gigi.
Here’s what NYT said:
“Ms. Stenvik, the district superintendent, said in a statement that another adult who lived in the family’s home had ‘begged’ to care for Liam, but the federal agents refused to allow it. Mary Granlund, the school board chair, who was there when the boy and his father were detained, said at the news conference on Thursday that she had heard an adult in the home say, ‘I will take the child, I will take the child.’ She said she also offered to take Liam as a representative of the school.”
And GIGI says she is a nurse AND a lawyer?
She apparently does not know that a child is just not handed over to someone who says she will take him. What a clown, that gigi. The NYT article also stated that the father was screaming to those in the house to not open the door.
Why do you call people with whom you disagree “Gigi” or any other name and constantly accuse others of lying? From the “AP”:
“School officials say ICE used the boy as ‘bait’
Columbia Heights Public Schools Superintendent Zena Stenvik told reporters that the officers instructed the boy to knock on the door to his home to see if other people were inside, “essentially using a 5-year-old as bait,” she said.
The father told the child’s mother, who was inside, not to open the door, Stenvik said.
School officials said the agents wouldn’t leave Liam with other adults.
A photo of the boy wearing a beanie and a Spiderman backpack has circulated widely on social media, sparking strong reactions.
“Why detain a 5-year-old?” the superintendent asked. “You cannot tell me that this child is going to be classified as a violent criminal.”
Other adults at the scene wanted to care for the boy
School officials said other adults at the scene offered to care for the boy but were ignored by agents, including a neighbor who said they had papers authorizing her to take care of Liam on behalf of the parents.
Mary Granlund, school board chair for Columbia Heights, said she told agents that she also could take care of him.”
NOW, if Liam’s father had run away and abandoned him, like MAGA media says he did, how could he tell the child’s mother not to open the door when Liam was told to knock on the door?
TURLEY reported that Democrats and mainstream media published a lie about Liam being used as bait–that comment came from the Columbia Heights Public Schools Superintendent–not Democrats or mainstream media putting their spin on the facts. The point is that Turley is carrying the MAGA media message–attack Democrats and mainstream media as liars.
Bruh , it was on video that illegal running and leaving his kid. His mother is illegal too and would not answer the door. They literally abandoned their child like deadbeat parents – real trash to abandon their child like that !!!.
. No one knows the reason the alleged mother wouldn’t open the door.
Link to the video. Bring enough for the entire class.
@Anonymous
As though you actually read and comprehend on any other day? Go collect your paycheck, we really don’t care. Glad at least that you are now likely being paid by blue states such as VA instead of me.
Maga , durp durp , maga , durp. Trump , durp durp , maga ….durpy derp durp. You have any self awareness ?.
You, anon, are FOS!
I literally do not know anyone but for a handful that even still watch the MSM, and that includes Fox. Ditto for reading the papers of record. I actually agree that it is an important facet of our society, but they have broken trust beyond repair over the past decade, and I doubt they will recover no matter what they do. I’d be more concerned about the dross on the likes of Tik-Tok, frankly. Just wait until we are in the era of AI paired with smart glasses and this is all literally being beamed into people’s eyeballs.
We are headed for interesting times, alright, and many are focusing on entirely the wrong targets. Forget the cable networks – they are already done. As capricious as someone like Elon Musk is, and he is, he sees the writing on the wall.
The under 30 already do not read, do not watch the news, do not have anything resembling a counterbalance in their lives, and believe whatever an algorithm or a professor serves up to them. The products of this are what we will be dealing with in 10-15 years.
James, I largely agree with the diagnosis, but I would push back on one point. If we do not anchor this discussion in systems thinking and objective output standards, then no technological shift will matter. Changing distribution without fixing the process is just changing the wrapper.
Cable networks may indeed be in terminal decline, but that does not solve the underlying problem. The same failure mode simply migrates to new platforms. TikTok, algorithms, AI, smart glasses, or whatever comes next will still be information systems producing outputs. Without defined standards, they will optimize for engagement, not truth.
From a systems perspective, the concern about younger generations is not that they use different media, but that there is no agreed-upon standard for what constitutes quality information. When standards disappear, the system rewards persuasion, reinforcement, and virality by default.
That is why focusing on “who controls the platform” or “which medium survives” misses the deeper issue. The question is whether we are willing to define and defend objective standards for informing citizens, regardless of format.
If we fail to do that, then every innovation simply accelerates the same problem. If we succeed, the medium becomes secondary. Trust follows performance, not nostalgia.
@OLLY
Yup. And the Tik-Tok generation (and sadly, many of their parents) have absolutely, quite explicitly, zero grasp of this. It IS going to be a problem. A big one. One that will be very difficult to resolve.
James, I thoroughly understand your point. A basic systems question helps here. We have many journalism and information problems with many contributing causes, but is there a single root cause? And when a solution is proposed, does fixing that one thing cause most of the other problems to diminish as well?
If the answer is no, then it is not a root-cause solution. Technology, platforms, and generations change, but without objective standards, the same failures simply migrate and accelerate. Standards are the only lever that acts on the system itself rather than its symptoms.
“We have many journalism and information problems with many contributing causes, but is there a single root cause?”
To get a head start on how we got here. . .go ask the parents who are (were) largely responsible for rearing their children.
Does filling a gas tank cause the oil to get changed? Then filling the gas tank is not a root cause for why the car doesn’t go after running out of gas, because filling the tank didn’t fix other problems.
Do you see the results of how you think when it is applied to real-world problems? It’s not good. Many times there is one cause for one problem.
There are many standards that are in place to cope with symptoms. What a poor education you have had.
One more thing James. That logic extends upstream to education as well. If objective journalism standards were clearly defined, journalism degree programs would have clear guidance on what they are preparing students to do.
Teach to those standards and graduates qualify for credentialed access. Teach something else, advocacy, narrative construction, or ideological framing, and graduates are free to practice that, but without claiming the privileges reserved for an independent press.
That is not censorship. It is alignment. Standards clarify purpose, processes follow purpose, and credentials simply reflect whether the training matches the role.
. Same story, Olly, who will guard the guards. I agree with you to some degree. Freedom of the press is any press, any reading and writing and apparently burning.
The consumer needs education. Basic emotion v. Reason. Advertising starving animals, children, people, sells and buys.
Is there more than money? Ask a starving man or Bill Gates.
. Politico wrote an article about Stanford students registering as disabled because disability has perks such as great single dorm rooms.
. The normative now is honest people are at a disadvantage. Gaming the systems is advantage.
Strunk & Whit: Use fewer words.
If you don’t describe the system there cannot be a “systems perspective.” It’s word salad.
“Strunk & Whit [sic]: Use fewer words.”
And more letters.
It’s “White,” not “Whit.”
You don’t know anyone who watches mainstream media because you MAGAs flock together for mutual support because you HAVE to–the creature you worship is damaged goods, outrageously unfit to serve as President. BUT, the majority of Americans are NOT MAGA. WE, the majority, know that Trump is unfit for office, that he is a criminal, a chronic, habitual liar, a racist, misogynist, and an unpatriotic attention hog whose craven soul requires attention and adulation. Those “cabinet meetings” are a laughingstock. He has the most-unqualified cabinet in US history, has done permanent damage to our country, our credibility as a world power, the relationships forged over decades which have helped prevent another world war, and WE don’t want to hear the MAGA media lies and excuses for the horrendous things done for the sake of this sick, narcissist, chronic, habitual liar. So, PLEASE, stop referring to “WE”–you MAGAs are not “WE”–the majority of the American people.
It is a MAGA media talking point that mainstream media are not credible or trustworthy–why? Because MAGA media, set up by billionaires who don’t want to pay their fair share of taxes and who want consumer and environmental protections rolled back so they can get even richer, keeps harping that THEY are trustworthy and those not in Trump’s pocket are not–so, they constantly attack Democrats, educational institutions and mostly mainstream media calling THEM liars. It’s true that all television media have lower numbers of people watching, but this is due to the internet, where a lot of people receive their news.
lol
There you go again MAGA , derp derp derpy durp durp !. No wonder CNN/CBS are drowning in the cesspool of their partisan bias.
With all of the psychotropic pharmaceuticals available today, why are you so completely delusional?
You have a severe case of TDS. Like most liberals you can’t accept the fact that Trump won by a landslide in the last election, despite a biased mainstream media. Our European allies are bloodsuckers who expect us to be their defense force on our dime. Trump has stopped the illegal immigration at the border which has resulted in a low crime rate and rents going down. The GDP is up. Trump has stopped about 8 wars and right now there is peace in the ME which no other President has accomplished. Trump is putting Americans and America first. Why would you not like that?
It is all about making money through presentation of the news fairly and balanced. Tough to do yet look at Megyn Kelly. She’s killin. Killin.