“Our Employees and Guests were Uncomfortable.”: Arkansas Gov. Sanders Told to Leave Restaurant

Republican Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders was kicked out of another restaurant this week. Years ago, I wrote about how Sanders, then the Trump White House spokesperson, was told to leave the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia. Now, the Croissanterie Restaurant in Little Rock, Arkansas, has told the governor to leave because employees said they felt uncomfortable having her in the restaurant. One person yelled at her and flipped her off as she left with her friends and security.

Sanders went to the restaurant with three other moms for a quick meal. She recounted how she and the other moms were then told to leave: “Last week I was having lunch with two other moms at a restaurant when the owner approached a member of the State Police Executive Protection Detail and said my presence made their employees feel threatened and told us to leave.”

She added: “Arkansans are known for their warm hospitality, and while that restaurant certainly doesn’t meet that standard, my administration will continue to focus on lifting Arkansans up, not tearing others down with discrimination and hate.”

Sanders had already started to eat when the restaurant’s owner approached a member of the security detail and requested that the governor leave.

The Croissanterie released a lengthy statement and admitted that they told the governor and her party to leave. While offering a hand-ringing explanation about being “surprised and uncertain how best to respond,” it admitted that it “ultimately made the decision” to “support our employees and guests who expressed they were uncomfortable.”

It added, “We regret being placed in this position and having to make a difficult decision. However, we stand by our choice to support our employees and guests.”

The restaurant is founded and owned by Jill McDonald, executive chef, and Wendy Schay, pastry chef.

We have seen various restaurants refusing to serve Trump supporters,  conservatives, and even those deemed allies. Democratic members of Congress have defended such actions and even encouraged liberals to disrupt meals of conservatives.

Liberals went to social media to celebrate the move by the restaurant. One posting from an employee declared:

“Good Morning! Sarah Huckabee Sanders no amount of evil you send our way can ever take our smiles away!!! I’m proud af to work here! I’m proud af to be gay and I’m proud af to be an Arkansan. My voice matters. Try again.”

There have been virtually no condemnations from leading Democrats, who either fear or support such mob actions.

In my book, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage, and my new book, Rage and the Republic, I discuss what I called this “age of rage.”

Rage is a curious emotion. It is the ultimate release. It allows you to do things and say things that you would not otherwise do or say. That is why it is addictive and contagious. What people will not admit is that they like it. It allows them to hate completely; to dispense with notions of decency or civility.

This restaurant yielded to hate and intolerance to appease not only its employees but the radical left.

This action occurs the same week as a poll showing that a majority of Americans now view those with opposing views as “morally bad.”

The rage addiction is obvious in these postings, as shown most recently by James Carville.

Democratic leaders believe that they can fuel this rage addiction and lead the mob to victory in the midterm elections. The cost is also to fuel the product of rage, including political violence.

The most recent targeting of Sanders presents a moral choice for the left. If you rationalize this action or continue to patronize restaurants like the Croissanterie Restaurant, you have made a choice. You have embraced the intolerance and hatred sweeping over this nation.

For all of their superficial expressions of reluctance, Jill McDonald and Wendy Schay chose hate over tolerance. While claiming to be “uncertain how best to respond,” the answer was obvious for anyone with a sense of decency: you serve everyone regardless of your political differences. Food, like music, allows people to come together; share common experiences and environments.

I truly believe that this age of rage will end as prior such ages ended. Eventually, the rage burns off and people recognize that their hatred had twisted them into grotesque figures. To reach that point, however, we must learn to speak to each other again and tolerate those who disagree with us. To put it simply, we have to break bread with one another and consider what we have in common.

Jill McDonald and Wendy Schay appear to want to cater to the rage and make their food exclusively available to those with whom they and their employees agree politically. We will have to see if that is a winning business strategy, but most of us have little appetite for their type of culinary-based hate.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”

282 thoughts on ““Our Employees and Guests were Uncomfortable.”: Arkansas Gov. Sanders Told to Leave Restaurant”

  1. In Stoic terms, this is also a failure of self‑government. The problem is not that the Governor walked in, it is the judgments and emotions the staff chose to indulge. As Epictetus put it, It is not things that trouble us, but our judgements about things, and Marcus Aurelius reminded us, You have power over your mind, not outside events. The owner chose to reward ungoverned reactions instead of asking adults to govern themselves.

    1. OLLY,
      Well said.
      I think that is the part that I cannot understand. If I am a business owner, I hire a employee, I have expectations of them behaving in a professional manner as their words and actions reflect me and my business. Unless a guest is verbally or physically assaulting my employees, I expect them to be professionals even if they did not vote for that person as governor. If someone’s “presence” makes a employee feel threatened, I would tell them to either grow up and be a professional or they are fired. If a guest says someone’s “presence” makes them feel threatened, I would point out that me and my establishment do not discriminate by political party.
      Asking adults to govern themselves, seems to be too much to ask of some these days.

      1. How about this Upstate: A Possible Yelp Review: I chose not to visit after learning the owner asked a table of women, including the governor, to leave because staff “felt threatened” by their presence. I cannot relate to that supposed fear; a small group having lunch with a professional security detail signals safety to me, not danger. If employees are dictating which peaceful customers they are willing to serve, that raises basic questions about the owner’s hiring and leadership. If you cannot trust your staff to handle a polite table of political opponents, it is hard to be confident in what is happening in the kitchen or anywhere else in the operation.

        1. What is a principle, a universal principle behind this event?

          Let’s see if the governor responds. As to yelp reviews etc, that may be coercive. I can’t twist arms.

      2. Upstate “I think that is the part that I cannot understand. If I am a business owner, I hire a employee, I have expectations of them behaving in a professional manner as their words and actions reflect me and my business.”

        That was my thought too. I should think anyone who has run a business would know that.

        But now, as a customer, I wonder whether I prefer being told to leave or being given a fake smile while being served food with snot in it.

        The implicit trust between business and patron has been compromised. Also the trust between employer and employee. I would fire all of them and get by on my own or close until I hire employees who understand they represent the business rather than their personal grievances. We dealt with a similar situation one time.

        1. Young,
          “But now, as a customer, I wonder whether I prefer being told to leave or being given a fake smile while being served food with snot in it.”
          That is a good point.

          1. UpstateFarmer,

            Thanks,

            I think they just made more than half the state get the creeps simply thinking about eating food served by these rage addicts.

            I feel bad for the owners after I followed Turley’s link to the two women who started this business from scratch. The edifice built by hard work and love of their craft is maybe destroyed and is certainly harmed to some degree because of employees that they didn’t have the courage to manage quickly in an unexpected and difficult situation.

            Sad.

            They were poorly advised or misguided in their public statement as well. I have read your posts enough to know you already know what the correct statement should have been and could whip it out in about thirty seconds.

  2. We all believe no one should be barred from public establishments due to race, but Democrats are quite adamant that conservatives should be hounded out with ax handles if necessary. They are what Lester Maddox would look like if he were a communist.

    Democrats will encode this behavior into law if they ever get the power they want. It would be normalized. It would be worse than England.

    Professor Turley writes, “I truly believe that this age of rage will end as prior such ages ended.”

    I hope the Professor will be proven right, but I doubt it. Globalist-leftism, which even infects softer heads in Arkansas, has an economic underpinning that makes it violently stubborn, like the antebellum economy of the South. They are loyal to their third-world suppliers of cheap labor–for both foreign and domestic use–and have built an Antifa ecosystem to encourage and reinforce it.

    1. The question isn’t, I think, whether this age of rage will eventually end; rather, it is whether it will end without the widespread indiscriminate bloodshed that have characterized such ages of rage as the French Revolution, the Revolutions of 1848, the American Civil War, the Paris Commune, the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, the Cambodian Revolution….ad infinitum….

      1. exactly. We must remember that these previous events were not so fueled by social media and our media/education industry. Until we end that source of rage we will endure endless rage either until we are subsumed or we end their ideology entirely. There is no middle ground with fanatic jihadis of any sort.

        1. “We must remember that these previous events were not so fueled by social media and our media/education industry.”

          An interesting theory I heard last night is that every time a major technological change happened in media, it led to a wave of fanaticism and hysteria. The Gutenberg press might have contributed to the Salem witch trials because of the mass printing of a book about witchcraft. Radio fed the rise of Hitler. TV might have been a factor in the Red Scare. Now social media are leading to the rise of leftwing mania.

          There are other theories that also support your comment. I don’t think it’s just theoretical anymore.

    2. Exactly, se can no more rationally cohabit with fanatic progressives than we could cohabit with sharia islamists or virulent communists. They are all of the same ilk, desperate cultists who would do anything to protect the putrid bubble of ideology in which they reside.

      1. My theory, whimsicalmama, is that it’s not necessarily the doctrine of communism or jihadism that’s the underlying problem. It’s the kind of mentalities that are attracted to these ideas. On paper, communism sounds promising, but in practice, it’s always a disaster. These ideas fail because they ignore one simple fact: human nature is too fallible to be trusted with that much power.

        1. Diogenes,
          I think not only is human nature too fallible to be trusted with that much power (and those who seek that much power over others), but to a degree a certain part of the nation is either unable to make their own decisions or want someone else to make decision for them. This loosely is associated with OLLY’s citizen or those capable of self-governance. I have meet a few people who, unless picking out what clothing to wear that day, any other decision would lead to decision paralysis.

          1. Just imagine these employees outside of civil society for a moment. When the ‘scary’ people refuse to leave, who exactly are they going to call. At some point adults have to learn to govern themselves instead of expecting the world to clear out whenever their feelings get spooked.

        2. I think it is more the fact that endless indoctrination through our media/education industry will not give space for contemplative comparisons because the progs know that if a fair and logical alternative to their socialist utopia were presented, they would lose.

          1. I appreciate your optimism, whimsicalmama. I’m more cynical than you. I think 80% of the human race is congenitally sheople or thugs, and it’s getting close to 50% in the U.S. I hope you’re right for all our sakes.

            1. Without a framework of morality and ethics, we should expect the problem to worsen. We have laws and punishment. Many people do not steal because they don’t want to go to jail. That is positive, but it would be far better if people didn’t steal because stealing is immoral.

              1. You all are circling the same beast from different sides.

                – Whimsicalmama is pointing at the indoctrination machine that never lets people see a real side‑by‑side of competing ideas.

                – Diogenes is pointing at the raw material it’s working on: a lot of folks are either sleepwalking or looking for someone to roll.

                – S. Meyer is pointing at the missing piece that used to hold that in check: an inner sense of right and wrong that doesn’t depend on whether there’s a cop around.

                Put together, that looks like the real root cause: a system that abandons moral and civic formation while monopolizing the narrative will steadily produce citizens who are unfit for self‑government, and then use their unfitness as the excuse for even more control.

                1. OLLY
                  It never ceases to amaze me how you can have such a limited one track mind that somehow manages to always formulate a comment that circles back to some aspect of self-government no matter what the topic at hand. Your comments are remarkably tedious, and often so convoluted in reasoning in an attempt to get to some vague point about government, as to become incomprehensible and absurd.
                  You are the very definition of a one trick pony.

                  Apparently you know nothing else, and are incapable of thinking outside the little box that you have created for yourself.
                  Apparently every topic of discussion here looks like a nail to you, so you simply whack it with your hammer, the only tool you possess and know how to use.

                  Your thinking is extraordinarily narrow, and lacks any significant degree of intellectual depth. Not only that, you also demonstrate a surprising disinterest in actual facts related to current events as demonstrated by your recent lack of knowledge about taxation in California, supposedly your home state.

              2. Meyer
                Once again you prove to be nothing more than an “imitator” and a “follower”.
                You are “imitating” the analogy I used yesterday about morality, wherein I said that immoral people do not rob banks because they are afraid of going to prison, while moral people do not rob banks because they have an inherent sense of morality.

                It is worth repeating Oscar Wilde’s quote that I used previously about you:
                “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness”

                I am indeed flattered that someone as mediocre as you sees fit to “imitate” and “follow” me yet again, and thus recognize my greatness.

                1. “imitating” the analogy I used yesterday about morality, wherein I said that immoral people?

                  I don’t want to be insensitive to your feelings, but few people, myself included, pay attention to what you say. However, if my post had similarities to yours, it would be your first post that wasn’t cr-p.

                  Final Grade: Hopeless, Self-Confessed Liar.

                  1. Meyer, Meyer, Meyer

                    You are being remarkably coy today.
                    You are trying to imply that it is purely coincidental that your comment “imitates” my comment of yesterday, as if you didn’t actually notice my comment. You are trying to say you don’t pay attention to me.
                    You are being too cute by half !!!

                    You responded to my comment yesterday, so I know perfectly well that you not only noticed the comment, but you must have read it, since you did your usual trick of copy/pasting parts of my comment into yours.

                    Once an “imitator” and “follower”, always an “imitator” and “follower”.
                    You really can’t help yourself can you??
                    And you continue to “imitate” my grading concept after I used it only once before abandoning it. If it wasn’t for me, I doubt that you would ever have an original thought.
                    The more you imitate me the more you recognize my greatness as Oscar so succinctly put it.
                    What a pathetic loser.

                    1. “You are trying to say you don’t pay attention to me.”

                      Why would anyone want to pay attention to a hopeless self-confessed liar?

                      ” my greatness as Oscar so succinctly put it.” “What a pathetic loser.”

                      Final Grade: Hopeless, Self-Confessed Liar & Pathetic Loser

                    2. You pose a fascinating question about why anyone would want to pay attention to me.
                      Why indeed ????
                      A truly wonderful question. It makes me wonder how someone of such a low intellect could even formulate such a marvelous question.

                      I think the answer would be someone who obsessively responds to EVERY SINGLE ONE of my comments without fail.
                      It would be someone who relentlessly PAYS ATTENTION to me and always responds to me.

                      That person of course, would be none other than yourself.
                      In fact of all the other losers on this pitiful blog, you are the one who pays the most attention to me. Others frequently pay attention to me and respond, but you are by far the one who pays the most attention to me.

                      So, I am glad to have answered your remarkably well posed question for you.
                      Obviously you are too stupid to answer its for yourself, thus further demonstrating your remarkably low intellectual capacity once again.

                    3. “I think the answer would be someone who obsessively responds to EVERY SINGLE ONE of my comments without fail.”

                      Sigmund the Fraud, I aim to please even a hopeless, self-confessed, and grandiloquent liar. I have difficulty not responding when, like a tapeworm, you hook into my comments and the comments of others that have nothing to do with you, hoping to infuse their intelligence into an otherwise boring ego ready to explode. Your obsession with my attention is the only substance you possess.

                      Final Grade: Self-confessed, Grandiloquent Tapeworm.

            2. You are correct in the 80%, but before the welfare state, most of the 80% were not willing or capable to oppose the 20% capitalists that were better fed, better educated, just generally better able to comprehend the world. With welfare we have allowed the 80% to have the leisure to be educated/indoctrinated to think a certain way and now we face a considerable throng of people programmed to feel victimized and empowered by that victimhood to take matters in to their own hands even if they are ignorant of what they are calling for (I cite examples of mamdani in NYC and every lgbt+++ moron that is thinking that islam is better than Trump). If you can adhere to the notion that democrats are destroying the nation, you would trace that initial step towards that goal with the Great Society legislation of the dems in 1964. How to undo that coupled with the concurrent threat of islamitization, we need to understand that we have a long row to hoe.

      1. nn
        My gay Asian friend Am was trans, we called him TransAm. His Dad called him Sport so sometimes he called him TranSport…he love you long time, two dollar.

  3. absolute dog shit reporting – you fail to proofread your second paragraph (three moms/two moms) and the Governor was finished eating and had closed out. lazy clickbait like the rest of ya’z

    1. You obviously don’t read nor comprehend very well, but at least your writing is fourth-grade level.

  4. OT—- A bit f anti-semitism

    A Jewish Synagogue and School in the Netherlands, One Day Apart

    On March 14, two suspects bombed the Cheider Orthodox Jewish school in Amsterdam with police releasing surveillance footage of the pair this week. The attack came just one day after four teenagers torched a synagogue in Rotterdam, whom prosecutors have since formally charged with terrorism, saying the attacks were designed to “instill serious fear” in the Jewish community.

    Soldiers Deployed to Guard Jewish Sites in Belgium and Italy

    Belgium announced military deployment to protect synagogues, schools, and community centers in Brussels, Antwerp, and other cities; in Rome, the president of the Union of Italian Jewish Communities told CBS News that Italy has seen a 400 percent increase in antisemitic attacks and that she now thinks twice before wearing a Star of David in public.

    Iran Was Spying on London’s Jews

    A dual Iranian British citizen and an Iranian national were charged under Britain’s National Security Act with conducting “hostile surveillance” of London’s Jewish institutions on behalf of Iranian intelligence, including Bevis Marks Synagogue—the oldest in continuous use in Britain. Both men appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Thursday.

    NYC College to Face Antisemitism Lawsuit

    On March 13, federal Judge Vernon Broderick denied the City University of New York’s motion to dismiss a hostile work environment suit brought by Leah Garrett, director of Hebrew and Jewish studies, who describes protesters blocking elevators with signs showing “Jewish symbols dripping with blood” while she and colleagues removed their names from office doors out of fear.

    Police Stop ‘Deadly’ ISIS Attack in France

    Last Sunday, French police announced that two Moroccan Italian brothers, 20 and 22, were arrested in northern France March 10 after police found a loaded semi-automatic firearm, hydrochloric acid, and an ISIS flag in their car. France’s counterterrorism prosecutor charged them with planning a “deadly and antisemitic” attack.

    House Education Committee Releases ‘How Campuses Became Hotbeds’

    The March 17 report found campuses with Faculty & Staff for Justice in Palestine chapters were seven times more likely to experience violence against Jews, and that American university satellite campuses in the Middle East are “failing in critical ways to fulfill their stated goal of promoting American values.”

    Antisemitic Graffiti Spread Across New York

    The phrase “Kill a Jew, go to heaven” was spray-painted in Riverside Park on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, one of New York City’s most prominent Jewish neighborhoods.

    1 in 5 British College Students Say They Wouldn’t Share a Dorm with Jews

    The March 16 report found one in four students had witnessed antisemitic behavior on campus, 49 percent had heard slogans glorifying the terror groups Hamas or Hezbollah, and 47 percent had witnessed justification of Hamas’s October 7 attacks on Israel—rising to 77 percent among those who regularly encounter Israel-Palestine protests.

    UN Human Rights Commissioner Calls for Investigation into Attacks on Jewish Life

    On March 18, United Nations Human Rights Commissioner Volker Türk called on Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada, and the U.S. to “promptly and fully investigate” the recent wave of attacks on Jewish institutions.

    Protest Outside The Guardian After Article Downplays Antisemitism

    Dozens of Jewish activists rallied outside The Guardian’s London headquarters Wednesday after the paper published a column describing the repeated vandalism of a Gail’s bakery branch in north London—windows smashed and anti-Zionist slogans on the wall—as “small acts of petty symbolism” growing out of Palestinian frustration. Gail’s was founded by an Israeli baker; the Metropolitan Police are investigating the attacks as hate crimes. The Guardian quietly edited the column after publication, removing the line calling the bakery’s mere presence near a Palestinian-owned café “an act of heavy-handed high-street aggression.”

    State Lawmakers Advance Synagogue Buffer Zone Bill

    Following the Michigan synagogue attack, New York State lawmakers said a bill creating 25-foot buffer zones around houses of worship would gain traction. It was originally introduced after pro-Palestinian protests were held outside NYC synagogues.

    Nearly 200 Biennale Artists Sign Letter Demanding Israel’s Expulsion

    The activist group Art Not Genocide Alliance published an open letter this week signed by nearly 200 artists, curators, and arts workers participating in the 2026 Venice Biennale, demanding Israel be barred from the exhibition on the grounds that it is “a genocidal state.” The Biennale has refused, stating it rejects “any form of exclusion or censorship of culture and art.”

  5. Thank you JT for the distraction.
    Meanwhile…

    “Trump’s Plan A was to hit Iran hard, watch the theocrats flee, and then hand power to a government of his own choosing,” Nichols explained. “Should such things not come to pass, Plan B was … well, apparently, there was no Plan B.”

    MAGA = Idiots.

      1. Who invaded Afghanistan?
        Who invaded Iraq/
        Who invaded Venezuela?
        Who invaded Panama?
        Who invaded Grenada?
        Who invaded Iran?

    1. No, you’re wrong. It’s all going to plan.
      trump promised lower prices.
      trump promised no more foreign intervention.
      trump promised inflation was going away.

      What did we get?
      Higher prices due to trump imposed tariffs.
      A fight over Greenland, Venezuela, Iran (Cuba next?).
      Higher inflation.

      Yes, we got exactly what trump promised.

      1. Closed the border, got men out of women’s sports and bathrooms, brought inflation down from the nightmare Biden years, reinvigorated energy production, deprived Putin of multiple allies, Cuba is about to be free, Iran is about to be free and stop sponsoring worldwide terror, significantly damaged Iran’s nuke program, and now perhaps Iran will never have a nuke. But all of that is bad news to you, since you hate America and want America to be nuked, moron.

    2. “hit Iran hard”

      Done — no navy, no air force . . .

      “watch the theocrats flee”

      Which they are. Or better yet, dead.

      “hand power to a government”

      Actually, of the freedom-loving *Iranians* choosing — which is in progress.

      This is a righteous use of the U.S. military (finally). It’s a masterful plan, perfectly executed. And for the first time in decades — not throttled by squishy appeasers.

  6. If a Christian can refuse a gay, a gay can refuse a Christian. Or anyone. It’s our right as business owners to sell to who we want. You sound like a liberal. Pitiful pitiful man.

      1. It was a good call for her and her entourage to leave. Otherwise with the kind of hate in there her and friends might have an upset stomach and diarrhea the next morning.

    1. The Jack Phillips case is about compelled speech. Serving food is not a first amendment activity. Your comment contains the typical liberal ignorance of the issues involved.

    2. You are likely too uneducated to realize (or just don’t care) that you are (unsuccessfully) changing the subject from “Should they?” to “May they?”
      Yes, they may.
      No, they shouldn’t.
      Thankfully, that restaurant will now get to experience the wrath of the people of AR who elected Sanders, and rightfully so, because they brought it on themselves. 😉

    3. Democrats have created generations of whiny ass babies. their keywords are I feel uncomfortable, or I’m gay or I’m transgender. The reason they have such a hard times because they’re not comfortable with themselves. It has nothing to do with anyone else.

      They’re just like the Douche bag on the playground who’s taking his ball home because I can’t get my way.

      Democrats have turned into the party of Whiners. We were much better off 20 years ago than we are today. We didn’t have a nanny State or a bunch of freaks running around crying about being uncomfortable.

      Hopefully all of these bad attributes of Democrats we’ll seal their fate and they will never control our government again.

    4. Did Sanders demand that the place make her a croissant with a cross on it? Wow, your level of analysis is or should be embarrassing.

    1. What if they put up a sign that reads—> we do not serve Republicans, MAGA, nor anyone identifying as either or both. Can that be done?

  7. Typical of the PC snowflake microaggression-sensitive NeoMarxist left, saturated in Marcusian ‘repressive intolerance’ censorship of ‘disfavored viewpoints’.
    They need to be schooled on your book on freedom of speech, ‘The Indispensable Right’.

  8. (I truly believe that this age of rage will end as prior such ages ended. Eventually, the rage burns off and people recognize that their hatred had twisted them into grotesque figures. )

    Is that how the hatred and rage ended with the hatred of the South for the Yankee. We slaughtered how many on the fields of battle during our civil war and even then the rage was not slaked and lives on still in parts of the south. You can only deal with this type of psychological hatred by eliminating the source of its genesis. We all know that this current state of rage has been fueled by our media/education industry since the 60s. I doubt that as long as that industry persists there will be a change of direction from the prog/left. Those adhering to that fanaticism will continue to rage as long as the media/education industry persists. Just analyze the content of those who rage, listen to their illogical rants, witness the gross alternative visages that they present, and for what purpose other than to shed any adherence to western culture.

    This is not rage, it is psychological impairment brought on by the same sort of propagandizing that we witnessed so many times in the past where horrible acts were committed by a frenzied populace (hitler’s germany, mao’s china, france’s jacobins, islam’s iran, islam’s nigeria, islam’s janissaries) just as examples. We will not wait out, nor will we rationally discuss the current situation in America, we will stop it or we will succumb to this. Add in the concurrent onslaught of islamist determined to conquer this land and we should not we waiting to see how this ends.

    1. What a load … the intro is a parenthetical? Never seen that before. So, what’s the issue today… Nigeria you say. Okay, what about it? Go ahead tell the Dr. Daddy issues huh? Ah ha, thought so. Well, here’s what I suggest, go have a croissant, there’s a nice little place in Little Rock. Friendly staff, lesbian bakers. Tip big or else you’ll get a beef with the customers.

  9. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth imposed a total ban on microphones at the Pentagon on Friday, complaining that press briefings were making him sound “like a giant idiot.”

    “I’ve been watching so-called news coverage of me and every word out of my mouth sounds stupider than the last,” he said. “I blame microphones.”

    After expelling all sound-capturing equipment from the Pentagon media room, Hegseth proceeded to conduct an hourlong briefing entirely in mime.

    According to a new poll, Americans strongly support Hegseth’s new policy since it saves them the trouble of muting him.

    1. Really? OMG! The sky is falling! Women and children first! Buttholes, just stay where you are.

    2. Pss’t. The article is about the governor of Arkansas and about her being asked to leave a restaurant. It’s not about the SOW.

      Reading is fundamental. Pay attention and try to keep up. You may need to take notes as it seems as if your attention span is limited.

  10. One thing that I took away from this posting by Turley is that comey cannot be a truly great thinker since he is very famiilar with the beyonce songbook. Nuff said.

  11. I cannot believe this is still their go-to to bring politics into a business strategy and insult half their patrons. It didn’t end well for the Red Hen, as they closed so I predict the same for this place.

  12. This looks like Maxine Waters 2018 redux: “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere!”
    If rage were a garment, it would be Lily Tomlin’s leisure suit. She wondered what the people who brought the leisure suit would do with our leisure time.

  13. It appears the governor, despite not being allowed to finish her meal, paid for and then abide by the owners request, respectfully.
    That is a display of class, professionalism and character.

    “Jill McDonald and Wendy Schay appear to want to cater to the rage and make their food exclusively available to those with whom they and their employees agree politically.”
    That on the other hand is NOT professionalism and speaks volumes of their character in feeding into the hate and rage, and discrimination.

    Checked out their web site. A lot of “Image coming soon!” How hard is it to take a pic of a soup and salad and post it? As a former WP sysadmin, it is not!

    1. So she finished and paid, then were escorted out? 90 minute table limit, they stayed longer just to piss everyone off there.
      Now what do you know about “class, professionalism and character”? Did you work there, anywhere, beside McD’s. heck, reading your comment, you come across as a fruit cake soy boy.

      1. So she finished and paid

        No, moron, she had just started her meal when she was told to leave. That’s not the same as finishing one’s meal. Read the article again, this time for comprehesion.

      2. 90 minute table limit? You just proved you are lying. There is no such thing. I have worked in food and bev off and on to include fine dinning and unless the restaurant was closing, there was no such thing as a time table limit.
        As I have worked in food and bev off and on, from fast food in high school where I learned the value of a good work ethic, customer service, money flow, economics, to front of the house and back of the house is where I learned things like “class, professionalism” which would then develop “character,” along with being a US Marine.
        The US Marines dont take fruit cake soy boys and fruit cake soy boys dont become volunteer firefighters.

    2. If I read the post correctly or I read it somewhere else, she also left a tip. I doubt that the staff will return it.

  14. Ah the great manners of the Blue Haired Nose Ring Leftist Filth! Their Momma (if they even knew who she was) never taught them a thing. They learned everything from their street urchin friends and now can pass on that lack of knowledge to their illegitimate spawn as they populate the planet. Who knew that Idiocracy (the movie) was our modern day Nostradamus with lines like – Only Stupid People are Reproducing! Viva the low IQ Communist Advocate Morons!

  15. We should all go AR and burn that place down, slaughter the employees and owners, and then burn down Little Rock, rape and pillage it all. The good ole American response.
    Some call Trump and have him nuke the state.

Leave a Reply to edwardmahlCancel reply