Below is my column in the Hill on the education cartel and how it is destroying our K-12 school system. After decades of bloated budgets and failing scores, our school system is now less popular than Cuba and communism. It is a particularly telling comparison in Chicago where union members went to Venezuela to praise the worker’s paradise of the Maduro regime while the school system dumped U.S. bonds in opposition to the American “regime.” Generations of inner-city children are being left without a future due to the failure of our school system, which prioritizes its own survival over its students.
Here is the column:
“In the first place, God made idiots,” Mark Twain once wrote in an 1879 travel book. “That was for practice. Then he made school boards.”
It appears that most Americans now agree with him. New polling shows that K-12 education has now reached a record low in the number of people who are even “somewhat satisfied” with the state of education in the U.S.
What is most troubling is that the near-total contempt for our school system does not make a bit of difference. Families and students have become largely irrelevant to an education cartel, a self-sustaining, self-perpetuating political alliance of unions and politicians.
According to Gallup, only 32 percent of American adults say they are “completely” or “somewhat” satisfied with the quality of K-12 education. That is the lowest figure in Gallup’s 27 years of asking the question. Public satisfaction with the school system has dropped almost 20 points since just 2024.
The collapse comes at a time when universities are reporting that college students are entering higher education without basic math and other skills.
We have also seen the dismal decline in standards at elite universities like Harvard, where faculty have been compelled to teach high school-level math classes to students.
In May, faculty in the University of California system (which eliminated standardized testing to achieve greater equity in admissions) reported an alarming lack of math knowledge among new students.
Most recently, a University of California, San Diego, faculty report found a nearly 30-fold increase since 2020 in incoming students whose math skills fell below a high-school level.
For many of us, neither the drop in skills nor public support is surprising. For generations, the public school system has failed students in major cities. Despite massive budget increases, actual test scores continue to fall or remain at subpar levels.
In a prior column, I was particularly moved by the frustration of a mother in Baltimore who complained that her son was in the top half of his class despite failing all but three of his classes. Her story led to my changing my view of school vouchers. Despite my long support for public schools, I believe vouchers may be the only way to wrest control away from the education cartel by introducing real competition based on academic performance.
Faced with low proficiency scores, teachers’ unions and school administrators have continued to lower proficiency requirements. They are simply pushing students out the door without basic skills, robbing these kids of any chance to break out of cycles of poverty and unemployment. When confronted with their poor performance, school board members have declared meritocracy to be a form of “white supremacy.” Gifted and talented programs are being eliminated in the name of so-called “equity.”
In any other field, such generational failure would be unthinkable. No business or enterprise could sustain itself. However, that is the point. There is little competition in this system. Blue states have largely blocked voucher systems while protecting teachers from performance-based standards.
Actual students have become irrelevant to budgets. In Chicago, there are schools that remain open despite 80 percent vacancy rates. One school, Frederick Douglass Academy High School has only 27 students, or 2 percent of its building’s capacity. The school system spends $55,000 for each student at Frederick Douglass Academy.
Overall, 35 percent of Chicago schools are half full or less. But that did not stop the schools from spending a couple million on transcendental meditation sessions or giving teachers and students days off to join May Day protests (with city-subsidized buses).
According to a recent study, in 2025, Chicago Teachers Union spent a record $4.2 million on politics and lobbying but less than 18 percent on representing teachers. This included massive contributions used to elect former teacher and union organizer Mayor Brandon Johnson, a former organizer for the union. Johnson, in turn, has effectively turned over his office to the far-left union.
In economics, there are few scourges older and more damaging than the cartel, which uses its power over an area to create “higher prices, lower quality, and stifled innovation.” There is a natural tendency for people to form such groups to stifle competition and feather their own nests. Adam Smith warned that “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public.”
The Education Cartel is becoming one of the greatest and most insidious forms of such anti-competitive conduct. Teacher unions have used hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions to acquire unchallenged power in blue states where they can dictate ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and budgets. One estimate found that, since 2015, the nation’s two largest teachers unions — the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers — spent $669 million on federal campaigns and another $336 million on state and local campaigns.
Figures such as Randi Weingarten with the American Federation of Teachers effectively made their unions piggy banks for the Democratic Party and appear at far-left rallies to support Democratic causes. In return, Democratic leaders give this cartel most everything that it demands, including barring competition in the form of public vouchers or tying budgets to improving the education of actual students.
It is a closed circuit. Democratic leaders increase school budgets and salaries and the unions then send back hundreds of millions to fund Democratic campaigns.
If you want to understand the priorities of the unions, just watch one of National Education Association head Becky Pringle’s unhinged speeches.
Her declarations that the union will “win all of the things” clearly did not include educational improvements for students.
A recent study found that blue states with strong teachers’ unions overwhelmingly have worse student literacy scores than red states. At least eight of the ten states with the worst literacy scores were liberal districts with politically powerful teachers’ unions, according to the Progressive Policy Institute.
For example, in New York, more than half of third- to fifth-grade students failed their reading proficiency exams this year. And it isn’t about money: The state spends almost $37,000 per student to fund this bloated, poor-performing bureaucracy. But the unions also pump political contributions into the campaigns of Democratic leaders in every election, and nothing changes.
In the meantime, historically poor states like Mississippi and Arkansas, with relatively new voucher and performance-based systems, are showing major improvements in scores among their students. Yet when these same policies are proposed in blue states, they are routinely blocked by the powerful teachers’ unions.
Many liberals instinctively support unions and schools despite their costs. Recently, former New York Times journalist (and now Howard University Journalism Professor) Nikole Hannah-Jones drew criticism over an exchange with her daughter when she discussed her disappointment that her daughter would not stay at a majority-black, inner-city school despite its poor conditions and resources. Her daughter finally insisted on going to a private school out of concern for her own future as opposed to what Jones called supporting “her life’s work.”
Most families do not have the resources of Jones to make that choice. They are captives to a system that appears entirely detached and unresponsive to their same concerns as Jones’s daughter.
The mark of a cartel is that it controls competition while inflating profits or costs. However, the education cartel makes you long for the old oil or even drug cartels. The difference is that the education cartel actually charges cartel prices while producing diminishing products. It is like OPEC watering down the gas at the pump while pumping up the price. Everyone is getting windfall profits, from the unions to the politicians. Only the kids are being shortchanged by America’s school system.
Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the New York Times best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”
You can’t have education without discipline. Today’s Educators are of the mindset that corporal punishment is abusive and ineffective. I disagree, having been on the receiving end of the Coaches and Dean’s paddle I found it quite the deterrent to my mischief in early years.
That along with ranked classification for those with higher IQ abilities definitely work.
If you look at actual student performance on standard measures like the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading scores, the bottom ten states are historically a mix of red, blue, and purple states, many of which are right-to-work states with weak or non-existent teachers’ unions. Turley incorrectly swapped out a metric tracking legislative policy adoption rates and presented it to his readers as a metric tracking actual children’s literacy scores.
Turley uses real numbers—32% satisfaction from Gallup and an “8 out of 10” metric from the PPI report. However, he changes the meaning behind the data: he ignores the pandemic context behind Gallup’s figures and falsely claims the PPI study measured student literacy scores when it actually measured state policy adoption.
The key to solving this travesty is to interrupt the kickback/money laundering operation (take your pick) between the Dem party and the unions. The best solution would be to decertification of all public sector unions. They certainly deserve it. Unionization of government employees breeds corruption of our government and raises the cost of it while lessening the quality received by the public. In collective bargaining, the government (aka Dem party) sits on the same side of the table as the unions with no one representing the interests of the taxpayers who are fleeced by the system. As an alternative bar public sector unions from engaging in the political process by prohibiting political donations, forming or contributing money or other forms of support to PACs or other 3rd party entities. In short break the flow of money between the public sector unions and their allies in the Dem party. It is a matter of national security.
When it comes to pubic school and Teacher’s unions, professor Turley is quite dishonest with the facts. As usual, he relies on the ignorance of his conservative and MAGA readers and lazy acceptance of what he says as true. It only takes a little research and a health dose of skepticism to point out Turley is dishonest with the facts. For example,
Turley states; “Recently, former New York Times journalist (and now Howard University Journalism Professor) Nikole Hannah-Jones drew criticism over an exchange with her daughter when she discussed her disappointment that her daughter would not stay at a majority-black, inner-city school despite its poor conditions and resources. Her daughter finally insisted on going to a private school out of concern for her own future as opposed to what Jones called supporting “her life’s work.”
Most families do not have the resources of Jones to make that choice. They are captives to a system that appears entirely detached and unresponsive to their same concerns as Jones’s daughter.”
He leads readers to believe Hanna-Jones chose a private school to better her daughter’s education by only saying her daughter insisted on going to a private school. What Turley did not tell you is she didn’t send her daughter to private school. She sent her to another public school. A better one. Her daughter, Najya, transitioned to high school, she moved from her local, underfunded neighborhood school to a selective, elite public high school within the New York City public school system.
Hanna-Jones can afford a private school, but she still chose to send her daughter to a public school. Turley “neglected” to point that out.
Then…Turley asserts that “At least eight of the ten states with the worst literacy scores were liberal districts with politically powerful teachers’ unions, according to the Progressive Policy Institute.” He’s being deliberately dishonest with the facts.
The actual study by the Progressive Policy Institute did not rank states by actual student reading scores or testing performance. Instead, it assessed how many early-literacy policy principles (such as K-3 screenings and mandatory phonics instruction) state governments had legally adopted.
When you’re being as blatantly dishonest about the facts like Turley is in this column you cannot take his credibility seriously.
When it comes to pubic school and Teacher’s unions, George X is quite dishonest with the facts and resorts to outright lies.
When you’re being as blatantly dishonest about the facts like George X is in this comment you realize he has no credibility.
Former NEA General Counsel Bob Chanin explains government teachers must pay the union hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year to increase its power.
As FDR correctly noted, government unions are a conspiracy against the taxpayer. Both sides at the negotiating table – labor and management – are paid by taxpayers.
All so very true, but I am more cynical. Their and the democratic party’s intentions, I believe, are to tear the Constitutional fabric down in order to remold the system into a one party state with an eye towards creating a one world order. What better way than to dumb down our public K-12 educational system. Then those who enter college, even though a number are unqualified, are essentially entering into an indoctrination camps as indicated by the number of far left leading professors. This has been transpiring for decades and is akin to the “boiling frog” metaphor. This coming election is a pivotal point for the democratic party as they belief this is their best opportunity to forge ahead with their intentions.
Yes, parents should pull their kids out of government schools. As enrollment declines, schools should get less $. Parents should educate kids on their own dime. It is not that hard or expensive. If private and home schools take government $, they will be regulated into mediocrity just like the existing government schools.
Okay, a plan, but the fact is the unions control the money flow and the POLITICIANS. Gonna be near impossible to break that connection.
I’d like to offer a true story. My children attended public school in an upscale suburban town in New Jersey. The Superintendent Of Schools (having a doctorate degree from Columbia’s Teachers College) proudly announced that our school system had been designated as one of a handful of “Lighthouse Districts” in New Jersey. But my children’s experience in the school system left me wondering how that could possibly be true. One day I decided to get a copy of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the School Board and the Teachers’ Union. One section of the Agreement was titled “Teachers’ Rights And Responsibilities”. It described a robust number of “Rights” in exquisite detail. It did not mention a single “Responsibility”. Who would expect anything different in our inner cities? Before placing blame on school boards and teacher unions, let’s ask this question: What blame belongs to parents who elect school boards? And before placing blame on university indoctrination mills, let’s ask this question: What blame belongs to parents who send their children to be indoctrinated?
All well and good Steve. Considering that the audience here is a hoard of drunk and childless geriatrics, your warning falls on deaf and useless ears – they do not have the motivation and time and to do what you allege to have done.
Now, final note, after all that, what did you do about the situation? I’m guessing …. nothing. So, gotta anything upbeat this morning?
Estovir, since when do you live in New Jersey??
Moved over last night.
Nicely done.
How, Mr. Turley, and yes, I’m dissing you as a constitutional expert and scholar, can a State that is required to be a republic be a “Red State” or a “Blue State”, when that is fundamentally an impossibility?
If we review Federalist 10 where Madison defines a Democracy; “ From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction.”, and from Federalist 52 defines a Republic; “The scheme of representation, as a substitute for a meeting of the citizens in person, being at most but very imperfectly known to ancient polity, it is in more modern times only that we are to expect instructive examples”, and the protection of civil rights through exact representation of the full demographic diversity of the population in Federalist 51;
[In a free government the security for civil rights must be the same as that for religious rights. It consists in the one case in the multiplicity of interests, and in the other in the multiplicity of sects. The degree of security in both cases will depend on the number of interests and sects; and this may be presumed to depend on the extent of country and number of people comprehended under the same government. This view of the subject must particularly recommend a proper federal system to all the sincere and considerate friends of republican government, since it shows that in exact proportion as the territory of the Union may be formed into more circumscribed Confederacies, or States oppressive combinations of a majority will be facilitated: the best security, under the republican forms, for the rights of every class of citizens, will be diminished: and consequently the stability and independence of some member of the government, the only other security, must be proportionately increased.]
I know it’s hard to follow 18th century prose, for some of us, but Madison is telling us that the basic principles of Republican Government prevent the divisive combinations of factions and relegates the influence of factions to their true proportion in the population, and as each State is it’s own republic, its impossible to spread the influence of factions outside their proportion within each individual faction.
In the United States the States are Republics, independent unitary sovereigns, but the United States is a Democracy, a confederation of republics. This was not by accident, the requirement of uniformity in a unitary sovereign prevented consolidation of the States into a national republic. This was especially a point of Antifederalist, and others with respect to the question of slavery, what exists anywhere within a republic must exist everywhere, which would have required either the total abolishment of slavery, or the reinstitution of slavery where it had already been abolished. This made the formation of a national republic unacceptable to all, Federalist and Antifederalist alike.
Not understanding the fundamental principles of democracy, and all democratic and republican forms of government, make it impossible to understand why the States were required to form their union as a confederated republic excluding the possibility of a national republic.
What a heap of cra-p.
So, in your view, the Federalist Papers, Antifederalist Papers, and all our founding documents are “crap”?
And how does anything you wrote have to do with Turley’s article?
States cannot be Red States or Blue States, that destroys his basic premise!
Premise? Over-thinking? And you spent a thousand words on that? Your comment was one of the strangest ever seen here.
Not that states decided to designate themselves any particular color. It’s simply a media trope, a descriptive term.
The ‘battle royale’ is on! Who wins, the host or the parasites? Look at the faces of our kids then make your choice.
Our public schools prepare the kids for communism by teaching liberalism so they are ignorant idiots because no thinking person would ever accept communism.
Talk about ignorant idiots … Reads like you took the grade school level garbage about communism hook-line-and-sinker. You got any facts?
Awww…get real, Dadl! Guys like you don’t need facts. All you need is another night in the basement raging and trying to figure out how to get another government check/beni.
Please take a shower, get dressed and look for a real job.
“. . . college students are entering higher education without basic math and other skills.” (JT)
There is another (perhaps deeper) problem here:
With rare exceptions (usually seen in those home schooled), students enter college without basic knowledge of history, literature, science, economics. Now suppose you are a college professor trying to teach fundamental *theories*, e.g., of political systems, economic systems, philosophic ideas.
It is nearly impossible to teach those theories because you cannot take for granted that the students know any *examples* from history, literature, science, economics. And so, you spend a ridiculous amount of time each semester providing a remedial education, just so that you can do your job: Educate college students about important *ideas*.
Sam is a glaring example of a an illiterate big mouth. Never made it past high school, yet pontificates as a know-it-all.
Let us all thank this particular Anonymous for proving Turley’s point regarding the education level of today’s youth. I just hope beyond being dumb that many of the kids aren’t as nasty as this piece of work.
Here’s another glaring example of the American educational system failure…. hullbobby aka Robert Howard of Hull, MA. The local drunk, lives in his car at the local TotalWine outlet.
He claims to be a lawyer. Everyone here claims to be a lawyer. But nothing here makes any legal sense. Just ranters.
Dad, please stop! If it gets out that your are a teacher’s union steward then your credibility (such as it is) will be lost.
“Usally seen in those home schooled”, “Sure Wilbur.”
Teachers union power up. Quality of education down. It’s an inverse relationship, because the leftwing unions do not care about education or students, they care about power, and power is derived from protecting all teachers from consequences or standards.
The good professor persists in labeling the cartel as one involving — even remotely — “education.” Instead, the creature, led by intellectual slugs like Randi Weingarten, has devolved into a malevolent blue tool of indoctrination. It has abandoned teaching students HOW to think critically, rationally and morally, and instead now focuses basically on indoctrination in WHAT to think. As such, the beast now presents an equal if not greater threat to the survival of the Republic than does the Sinaloa drug cartel peddling fentanyl. Full stop.
Lots of adverbs … reads like delusion..
The “Blue State School Scam” is Turley ginning up rage against Blue States when schools don’t operate on a statewide basis. Schools run on Districts, usually county wide and Turley arbitrarily switches out districts and states to create a pattern that doesn’t exist. I pulled up the bottom ten ranked states, I’m sure there are other rankings that slightly differ, that don’t show the problem with blue states Turley states. He’s lying to you.
1. New Mexico
Appears dead last in all three rankings.
Lowest NAEP math & reading scores nationally.
Graduation rate ~76.6%, lowest in the country.
Severe poverty, chronic absenteeism, teacher shortages.
2. West Virginia
Among the lowest NAEP math scores.
Graduation rate under 80%.
Appears bottom‑five in multiple indices.
3. Louisiana
Bottom five in reading & math proficiency.
Fourth‑grade reading proficiency ~29%.
Persistent structural inequities.
4. Alaska
High spending but very poor outcomes.
Geographic isolation → severe teacher recruitment issues.
WalletHub ranks it #50 overall.
5. Oklahoma
Bottom-tier reading scores and ACT scores.
Teacher pay and retention problems.
6. Oregon
WalletHub places it among the bottom five.
Low test scores and graduation challenges.
7. Arizona
Severe teacher shortages; many classrooms led by uncertified teachers.
Student–teacher ratios exceeding 30:1.
8. Nevada
Appears in WalletHub’s bottom ten.
Low proficiency rates and high student mobility.
9. Alabama
Bottom ten in WalletHub’s ranking.
Struggles with literacy and college readiness metrics.
10. Hawaii
Appears in WalletHub’s bottom ten.
Challenges with cost of living, teacher retention, and rural access.
🧭 Why these states cluster at the bottom
Across sources, the same structural factors recur:
Low NAEP proficiency (especially 4th‑grade reading and 8th‑grade math)
Underfunded or inefficiently funded districts
High poverty and absenteeism
Teacher shortages and retention problems
Rural isolation (Alaska, New Mexico, West Virginia)
Large class sizes (Arizona, Nevada)
NAEP is the National Assessment of Educational Progress — the nation’s largest, congressionally mandated, and continuously administered measure of what U.S. students know and can do. It’s often called “The Nation’s Report Card.”
📘 What NAEP Is
A national yardstick of student achievement, run by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) and overseen by the National Assessment Governing Board. It has measured U.S. educational performance since 1969.
You dumped heaps of irrelevant info to impress us, so you gotta point?
His point… is Turley is being dishonest with the facts and Enigma brought receipts.
“Turley arbitrarily switches out districts and states to create a pattern that doesn’t exist.” Right, of course you’re smarter than Turley. We get that. Or maybe you’re dumber than you realize.
Double spacing? Learn that in grade school?
33 years as a classroom teacher in a major suburban school system showed me how structurally bad or school systems are. It is true that unions do have a negative impact on educational results. However, there are issues that are much more impactful..
School years are still.organized around an agrarian economy. School years begin in late August or Sept and end in May or June. Students then are out of school for 2 months. This has a huge impact on learning especially in Elementary school where basi. skills must be mastered. Teachers end up spending 2 months or more reteaching previous years material. Students fall farther and farther behind so that by HS they are not nearly ready for that level work. Political,racial and socioeconomic factors multiply these issues. The impact of union politics increases the damage exponentially.
The impact of union politics increases the damage exponentially. Does sound like you saw it first-hand. Well said.
“. . . when schools don’t operate on a statewide basis.” He’s “lying to you.”