Bio

JONATHAN TURLEY
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

unnamed-1Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.

After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients. He is also one of the few attorneys to successfully challenge both a federal and a state law — leading to courts striking down the federal Elizabeth Morgan law as well as the state criminalization of cohabitation.

In 2010, Professor Turley represented Judge G. Thomas Porteous in his impeachment trial. After a trial before the Senate, Professor Turley (on December 7, 2010) argued both the motions and gave the final argument to all 100 U.S. Senators from the well of the Senate floor — only the 14th time in history of the country that such a trial of a judge has reached the Senate floor. Judge Porteous was convicted of four articles of impeachments, including the acceptance of $2000 from an attorney and using a false name on a bankruptcy filing.

In 2011, Professor Turley filed a challenge to the Libyan War on behalf of ten members of Congress, including Representatives Roscoe Bartlett (R., Md); Dan Burton (R., Ind.); Mike Capuano (D., Mass.); Howard Coble (R., N.C.); John Conyers (D., Mich.); John J. Duncan (R., Tenn.); Tim Johnson (R., Ill.); Walter Jones (R., N.C.); Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio); and Ron Paul (R., Tx). The lawsuit was before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Turley-600x287In November 2014, Turley agreed to serve as lead counsel to the United States House of Representatives in its constitutional challenge to changes ordered by President Obama to the Affordable Care Act. The litigation was approved by the House of Representatives to seek judicial review of the claims under the separation of powers. On May 12, 2016, the federal court handed down a historic victory for the House and ruled that the Obama Administration violated the separation of powers in ordering billions to be paid to insurance companies without an appropriation of Congress.

Other cases include his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. In the Foretich case, Turley succeeded recently in reversing a trial court and striking down a federal statute through a rare “bill of attainder” challenge. Professor Turley has also served as counsel in a variety of national security cases, including espionage cases like that of Jim Nicholson, the highest ranking CIA officer ever accused of espionage. Turley also served as lead defense counsel in the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia. Turley also served as defense counsel in the case of Dr. Tom Butler, who is faced criminal charges dealing with the importation and handling of thirty vials of plague in Texas. He also served as counsel to Larry Hanauer, the House Intelligence Committee staffer accused of leaking a classified Presidential National Intelligence Estimate to the New York Times. (Hanauer was cleared of all allegations).

05282015_6695Among his current cases, Professor Turley represents Dr. Ali Al-Timimi, who was convicted in Virginia in 2005 of violent speech against the United States. In 2020, the federal court found that there merit in the challenges raised by Professor Turley and his co-counsel Tom Huff. Accordingly, the judge ordered his release to protect him from Covit-19 while the Court prepared a decision on the challenges. Pursuant to a court order, Dr. Al-Timimi was released from the Supermax in Colorado and the two drove across the country so that he could be placed into home confinement.  He also represented Dr. Sami Al-Arian, who was accused of being the American leader of a terrorist organization while he was a university professor in Florida. Turley represented Dr. Al-Arian for eight years, much of which was in a determined defense against an indictment for criminal contempt. The case centered on the alleged violation of a plea bargain by the Justice Department after Dr. Al-Arian was largely exonerated of terrorism charges in Tampa, Florida. On June 27, 2014, all charges were dropped against Dr. Al-Arian. He also represented pilots approaching or over the age of 60 in their challenge to the mandatory retirement age of the FAA. He also represented David Murphee Faulk, the whistleblower who disclosed abuses in the surveillance operations at NSA’s Fort Gordon facility in Georgia.

Professor Turley also agreed to serve as lead counsel representing the Brown family from the TLC “Sister Wives, a reality show on plural marriage or polygamy. On December 13, 2013, the federal court in Utah struck down the criminalization of polygamy — the first such decision in history — on free exercise and due process grounds. On September 26, 2014, the court also ruled in favor of the Browns under Section 1983 — giving them a clean sweep on all of the statutory and constitutional claims.  In April 2015, a panel reversed the decision on standing grounds and that decision is now on appeal.

Professor Turley was also lead counsel in the World Bank protest case stemming from the mass arrest of people in 2002 by the federal and district governments during demonstrations of the IMF and World Bank.  Turley and his co-lead counsel Dan Schwartz (and the law firm of Bryan Cave) were the first to file and represented student journalists arrested without probable cause.  In April 2015, after 13 years of intense litigation, the case was settled for $2.8 million, including $115,000 for each arrestee — a record damage award in a case of this kind and over twice the amount of prior damages for individual protesters.  The case also exposed government destruction and withholding of evidence as well as the admitted mass arrest of hundreds of people without probable cause.

Professor Turley also served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British of Columbia (Canada) Supreme Court. In the latter case, he argued for the decriminalization of plural union and conjugal unions. In 2012, Turley also represented the makers of “Five Wives Vodka” (Ogden’s Own Distillery) in challenging an effective ban on the product in Idaho after officials declared the product to be offensive to Mormons. After opposing to the ban on free speech and other grounds, the state of Idaho issued a letter apologizing for public statements made by officials and lifting the ban on sale for “Five Wives Vodka.”

Turley has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, including the Florida House of Representatives. He also served as the consultant to the Puerto Rico House of Representatives on the impeachment of Gov. Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.

05282015_6655Professor Turley is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. That testimony includes the confirmation hearings of Attorney General nominees Loretta Lynch and William Barr as well as Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.  Professor Turley is also a nationally recognized legal commentator. Professor Turley was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited “public intellectuals” in the recent study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was also found to be the second most cited law professor in the country. He has been repeatedly ranked in the nation’s top 500 lawyers in annual surveys (including in the latest rankings by LawDragon) – one of only a handful of academics. In prior years, he was ranked as one of the nation’s top ten lawyers in military law cases as well as one of the top 40 lawyers under 40. He was also selected in the last five years as one of the 100 top Irish lawyers in the world.  In 2016, he was ranked as one of the 100 most famous (past and present) law professors.

694940094001_6113691487001_6113685625001-vsProfessor Turley is one of only two academics to testify at both the Clinton and Trump impeachment hearings. In December 2019, Professor Turley was called as the one Republican witness in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings.  He appeared with three Democratic witnesses.  Professor Turley disagreed with this fellow witnesses in opposing the proposed articles of impeachments on bribery, extortion, campaign finance violations or obstruction of justice. He argued that these alleged impeachable acts were at odds with controlling definitions of those crimes and that Congress has historically looked to the criminal code and cases for guidance on such allegations.  The committee ultimately rejected those articles and adopted the only two articles that Professor Turley said could be legitimately advanced: abuse of power, obstruction of Congress. Chairman Jerrold Nadler even ended the hearing by quoting his position on abuse of power. However, Turley  opposed impeachment on this record as incomplete and insufficient for submission to the Senate. He argued for the House to wait and complete the record by seeking to compel key witnesses like former National Security Adviser John Bolton.  His testimony was later relied upon in the impeachment floor debate by various House members and he was cited by both the White House and House managers in their arguments before the United States Senate in the Trump impeachment trial, including videotaped remarks played at the trial.

download-2Professor Turley’s articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications with hundreds of articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is a columnist for USA Today and writes regularly for the Washington Post. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC News, CBS News, BBC and Fox News.  Professor Turley has been a repeated guest on Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday. Professor Turley has taught courses on constitutional law, constitutional criminal law, environmental law, litigation, and torts. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS). His work with older prisoners has been honored in various states, including his selection as the 2011 recipient of the Dr. Mary Ann Quaranta Elder Justice Award at Fordham University.

His award-winning blog is routinely ranked as one of the most popular legal blogs by AVVO. His blog was selected as the top News/Analysis site in 2013, the top Legal Opinion Blog in 2011 as well as prior selections as the top Law Professor Blog and Legal Theory Blog. It was also ranked in the top 20 constitutional law blog in 2018.  It has been regularly ranked by the ABA Journal in the top 100 blogs in the world. In 2012, Turley has selected as one of the top 20 legal experts on Twitter by Business Insider. In 2013, the ABA Journal inducted the Turley Blog into its Hall of Fame.

Professor Turley received his B.A. at the University of Chicago and his J.D. at Northwestern. In 2008, he was given an honorary Doctorate of Law from John Marshall Law School for his contributions to civil liberties and the public interest.

For further information: Mr. Seth Tate – 202-994-0537

Icon made by DinosoftLabs from Flaticon

1,553 thoughts on “Bio”

  1. Dear Prof. Turley,

    I’ve seen your discussions with Keith Olbermann of COUNTDOWN many times, and have always enjoyed your discussions.

    Your blog and various articles are excellent, and I always learn a great deal about the law and the criminal justice system by reading them. I’m sorry to impose, but I just would like to know where on your website the article “CRIMINALIZING INNOCENT BEHAVIOR AT AN ALARMING RATE” is posted. I would like to post this link at a forum I post on to point out how the criminal justice system is being used as a weapon against innocent people in a grossly abusive fashion by members of the law enforcement community.

    If you could give me a “road map” in the form of a link to that article, it would be very helpful. I’ve looked through several of your pages, but I always seem to miss the correct page. Needless to say, I have put your site on my Favorite Places list for regular reference.

    Thank you in advance.

    Susan

  2. Prof. Turley,

    First off, let me just chime in with my appreciation of the work you do in the media along with your other duties. Taking complex, emotional (as well as more than a few DUH!) issues and breaking them down to their basic “is it legal or not?” facts is a huge benefit and a bright spot in a generally biased media. You help to show what the media can do, inform a busy populace of the facts of the matter. A basic service that is sadly all to lacking these days.

    I hate to bug you, but i do have one question, I have recently gotten into a debate with a friend about the constitutionality of universal health care. His argument is that if a power is not specifically granted by the Constitution, then it is not within the scope of the Federal Government, and then falls upon the states. And that just because powers have been granted to the Fed in the past that weren’t within the intended scope, that doesnt mean that the practice should continue.
    To quote him (because he makes his case far better than I)

    “The reality is that the Constitution defines what the federal government CAN do. If it isn’t explicitly stated, the federal government has no jurisdiction.

    For citizens, it works the other way. If there is nothing prohibiting something to the people, the people can do it unless the states have rules against it. The Bill of Rights may outline some of the rights we have, but one should not take it as an all-inclusive list.

    The second mistake is that she’s attributing the statement of purpose (to provide for the common welfare) with an actual power. A good way to explain this is to break a similar statement down. Ex: “To provide for the national defense, the government may maintain a militia, navy, etc.” Should we then take that statement in the same fashion, claiming that the government’s purpose of providing for defense grants it unlimited power to do so by any means necessary? That’s what we’re stating when we use the welfare bit in that way, after all.

    So, short version:

    The Constitution limits federal government to those powers explicitly granted. If it is not in the Constitution, federal government should not be doing it.

    The welfare “clause” is a statement of purpose. It tells us WHY the government is granted the powers listed in the Constitution… it does not grant additional powers.”

    I was just wondering if he was correct, or if he was missing something?

    The only legal case I can see that makes me question his assertion is mcCulloch V Maryland, however even that ruling states that the end result must be within the scope of the Constitution.
    Of course, I’m no lawyer, so naturally, i have zero clue!

    thanks so much, for giving us this forum, and for giving so much of your time to educating and shedding light on the laws that make our freedoms possible.

    Aaron

  3. Fireontop:

    You are very kind. However, I cannot take the credit for the optimism. We have survived worse than the Bush Administration. The Constitution was designed by the Framers to be idiot proof and through the years we have certainly tested that concept.

    Best,

    Jonathan

  4. Mr. Turley, I enjoy you on Countdown and The Randi Rhodes Show and i’m amazed at how positive you are about our ability to restore the constitution. Just when it seems there’s no turning back from the power grabs by the Bush administration you reassure us that there are legal solutions. With great respect, thank you for serving our country.

  5. Rick:

    Thank you for the kind note. Feel free to periodically post such notes on a regular basis! Happy Holiday.

  6. Always Curious:

    It is not difficult to be a columnist, litigator, and law professor. My secret is that I discovered that you could do a huge number of things if you focus on keeping the quality of your work as low as possible. If you are not insistent on good quality work, you would be surprised how many things you can do!

  7. I thoroughly enjoy your appearances when I see you on CNN. You bring light to areas I am unfamiliar with, such as constitutional law and its interpretation. I enjoy hearing your opinion and consider you one of the best commentators I have seen on TV.

    Keep up the good work.

    Rick

  8. Dear Professor Turley,
    You wouldn’t believe what a great honor it is to be able to address you directly this way. Thank you very much for the welcoming words. You really make me want to be your student. 🙂 But as much as I want to be your virtual student here, I don’t want to be graded either. 🙂 I have been enjoying out of school years for quite some time now.

    Today while driving I caught your voice in some segment in NPR (I think it was “Talk of the Nation”, the subject being Castle Doctrine: In Defense of Self-Defense). Sadly I was able to catch the last few minutes of your commentary on the subject. 🙁 But it certainly was a pleasant surprise. I hope to see/hear you on TV or radio often.
    But I am curious where you find all this time to do so many things, teaching/grading students, appearing on TV or Radio and blogging…  I think I need to learn some time management skills from you. 🙂

    Sincerely,

    – Always Curious

  9. You are very kind and you are welcome to our small circle. I like the idea of a virtual classroom as long as I do not have to hand out virtual grades. I am buried right now in grading my torts class, which is a labor of love but a labor none the less.

  10. Dear Professor Turley,

    It is such a honor to run into your blog like this.
    I used to watch CNN all the time(used to be a news junkie, not anymore though, news depresses me too much these days…) and very much enjoyed your commentaries. I am not going to pretend that I understand law but as a person who strongly believes that “knowledge is power” and more than anything who is always curious with the world and things around me, I feel so lucky to discover your blog today. I made a link to your blog and I know I will be a frequent visitor here and be your virtual student. 🙂

    – Always Curious

  11. I read of your site on the dailykos and since I truly enjoy hearing you speak when you’re on Keith Olberman, I had to try to contact you.

    The article that referenced your site, mentioned that there is a way to go forward with impeachment of the criminals in the white house without congress, since they are hell bent on not doing their job! What can we, as citizens, do when congress and the senate refuse to provide oversight or investigate the many illegal actions of the bush administration?

    I truly fear for the future of this country when all branches of the government are complicit in such gross illegalities. When is torture not torture? When bush and his boys say so… We need help. Where do we go? Thank you in advance.

    (I left this question on another blog – but this seems the better place to ask, so sorry for the repeat.)

  12. What I find remarkable is Professor Turley’s willingness to find the time, despite an overwhelmingly busy schedule I imagine, to reply to contributors to the discussions. Unfailingly kind, he reminds me of Emerson’s maxim:

    The greater man, the greater courtesy.

  13. Thank you. While it is still new and evolving, it has been a fun distraction.

  14. I am indeed aware that there were Turleys in Virginia at the founding. I gave a speech at George Mason’s home a couple years ago and was struck by the fact that one of his neighbors was a Turley. I was told that Turleys first came over before the Revolution and began in New York/New Jersey. My grandfather’s name was Edmund Turley and lived in New Jersey. We were raised in Chicago, however.

  15. Dear Professor Turley,

    While I am always interested in your thoughts on constitutional law and appreciate the wisdom you bring to TV viewers, this is on a personal note. I was wondering if your ancestor was John Turley Gunnell, who was born in 1796 near Alexandria, VA. His wife was Elizabeth Redd Major. He died in Danvers, Il (McClean County) in 1867. If you are interested, I have some old documents in hand that I would be glad to share.

    Regards,

    Pat Gunnell Dean
    San Anselmo, CA

  16. Dear Prof. Turley,
    Welcome to the tubes! I came across your blog after it was mentioned on Daily Kos. I’m a big fan even though I only ever see you in you interviews wit Keith Olbermann. I don’t think he could have picked a better man to help educate the American public about their constitution and the very real risks they face (I’m not American btw).

    Thank you for your clear voice, and for using it.

    Yours,
    Clive,
    Taiwan

  17. Trevor:

    Your message was a wonderful surprise this morning and a great way to start the day. I am glad that you liked the speech and that you guys have continued to talk about it. Enjoy your time in Washington. I look forward to seeing you in a courtroom in the future!

    Best,

    Jonathan

  18. Dear Mr. Turley,

    I, too, am attending the NYLF on Law program. Currently I’m sitting in one of the many hotel rooms on this floor enamored by the speech you gave to us during your brief visit here. You left many of us stunned and became the talk of the night. You truly put things into perspective about what it means to set yourself on an introspective journey. Indeed, it’s more important to be able to look at yourself in a mirror and know who you are, than to be the man who has a thousand riches and has lost himself. Thank you again for taking the time to come. It was definitely enlightening.

    My regards,
    Trevor

Comments are closed.